
Electronic decoys for hunting waterfowl and doves was approved at Tuesday’s board meeting.
Hunting devices for other game, including electronically heated scent or lure dispensers and those that distribute ozone gas for scent-control purposes, also were approved.
The four devices will be legal in six to eight weeks.
“Next year they will be written into the digest and publicized even more so than they are now,” Wildlife Conservation Officer Supervisor Bert Einodshofer said.
More: Semi-auto rifles approved for some Pa. hunting
More: Gun silencers: Safety device or marketing ploy?
More: How many deer were harvested in Pa.?
The Game Commission began considering the use of these devices when sportsmen’s interest grew. Many hunters use the them legally in other states, including Maryland.
Springfield Township Farmers’ and Sportsmen’s Association board member Nate Ehrhart says he has used the electronic decoys while hunting waterfowl in Maryland.
He describes the decoys as efficient and a better version of wind-driven or pull-string decoys.
“They worked well,” he said. “They help decoy the geese and the ducks.”
Einodshofer said these devices have not had a negative impact in other states. He doesn’t see any negative impact to wildlife or for “fair ethical chase” in Pennsylvania.
—
The board also gave preliminary approval for several changes to state game land access for individuals with mobility challenges.
The proposal includes a free Disabled Person Access Permit that would allow individuals to use ATVs, golf carts and other devices on certain state game land routes.
If given final approval, hunters who use wheelchairs can travel anywhere on the game lands where individuals are able to travel on foot. Those hunters can also locate and flush game, and may carry loaded sporting arms, while on or in wheelchairs.
The board will vote on the proposal at the Jan. 28-30 quarterly meeting.
Reblogged this on The Extinction Chronicles.
Ugh. Fake accessories for fake hunters.
Oh how I wish someone would invent some magical type of decoy that hunters could pursue and “shoot”. Even I would contribute to a “fund” where they’d be modestly rewarded for their “kills”. The caveat would be they could not participate in traditional hunting activities.
Call me “dreamer”.
If I ever see a hunter in front of me, I would spit into his ugly killer’s face!
You’re lucky you don’t ever see them. God did give us enough spit for some places…
“Fair”and “ethical” should never be used with “hunting.”
Except maybe in irony or as a bad joke…
I wish we could buy robots that could be programed to shoot back.
anything else hunters can use to make killing wildlife so much easier for their fat camouflaged asses?