The Gargantuan Lie That is Collapsing The World’s Climate

Thinking we have time left to address climate change, or that “Net Zero by 2050” will save us, is driving us toward full social collapse in ways that become more obvious with every new broken temperature record.

filed in Climate Change

Lies are a lot like gourds. They come in hundreds of different varieties, sizes, and bulbous, twisty shapes. Some are off-puttingly spiked and prickly, while others remind us of fall childhood memories.Some lies, if prepared correctly like squash or pumpkin, can appear delicious and irresistible, concealing a dark reality: “I can’t believe you’re not a model! For five thousand dollars I can photograph you so you have a portfolio.” The central aim of most lies is to avoid consequences. When an untruth is especially desperate and self-serving, it can be unintentionally hilarious: “Yes I tried marijuana… but I did not inhale.” 

Embezzling money or murdering someone for the insurance pay-out are part of a phylum of lies that cross into serious criminality. These deceptions’ sphere of influence often stays fairly localized. But sometimes covering up the initial lie can spawn lots of other lies that spread and spread, like with Watergate or Bernie Madoff. What started as a little decorative Thanksgiving-gourd-sized lie suddenly becomes larger and quite ugly. This family of lies strives to not only avoid consequences, but to gain status and resources, another common end game of many deceptions. And then there are the large society-wide lies: hulking distortions and misrepresentations watered and tended to by leaders, mass media, culture, and industry.

This particular sub-genus of grifts, half-truths and strategic omissions have led throughout modern history to wars, mass death, societal collapse, and the theft of humanity’s great treasures. “Manifest Destiny.” “Aryan superiority.” “The divine right of kings.” “The domino theory.” “Israel has a right to defend itself.” “Oxycontin isn’t addictive because it’s time-released.” These county-fair, blue ribbon-winning prevarications tend to be driven by a myriad of short-term incentives, irrational manipulated fears, unexamined assumptions, convenient blind spots, and of course… the desire to avoid consequences and expand status and resources.

“People always pay their mortgages” became the half-true rallying cry used by Wall Street, news media, and politicians to collapse the world economy in 2007. Turns out when you change lending rules to feed an unregulated derivatives market by giving mortgages to people who can’t pay them… they don’t. “Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction” (along with the subvariations on the central lie—“We want to bring democracy,” “If you don’t support the troops, you support the terrorists,” “Saddam orchestrated 9/11,” etc) killed a million people, devastated the entire nation of Iraq, and in many ways also gutted the United States, all while enriching oil companies, weapons manufacturers, big banks, juicing TV ratings, and expanding the power of the Bush/Cheney presidency.

However, there is one type of rare, gargantuan, towering lie that makes all the other mass lies throughout human history seem like frightened, scurrying, little adorable fibs.

It is a lie told worldwide by hundreds of thousands of institutions, elected officials, many universities, legacy news, some large non-profits and eventually—as the deception entered mainstream culture—even by ourselves, to ourselves, every single moment of every day. It is a constantly growing gourd that even as a baby back in the 1970s was the size of three aircraft carriers. These days it is so massive it is almost easier to refer to what isn’t part of it (Disneyland, a BLT, that green croc by the side of the highway) than what is.

This massive lie can best be summed up as “when it comes to climate change… we have more time.”

To be clear, we are not talking about the kind of total climate denial one would find on the extremist, lunatic fringe inhabited by the likes of Alex Jones or the current U.S. President. And we’re not referring to cartoonish hucksters and “climate skeptics” like Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson.

Polling shows only 14.8 percent of Americans deny the basic sixth grade science behind global warming. To put that in perspective, as much as 10 percent of the population still believes the Earth is flat.

No, the monstrous, misshapen garden colossus lie we’re referring to is subscribed to by most of the U.S., has stopped and slowed climate action far more than outright denial, and keeps growing and growing. Every day this deception whispers seductively in the ears of mankind: “global warming is real but not urgent… Keep doing what you’re doing.”

Less embarrassing than “climate change is a Chinese hoax,” but every bit as unscientific and ridiculous, it is the preferred lie of the ruling class, mainstream news media, and corporations.

Sir David King—former science advisor to the United Kingdom, professor at Oxford and then Cambridge, winner of too many awards to list and as establishment as they come—was quoted as saying that what we do over the next three to four years will determine the fate of humankind.

He said this… in 2021.

Like all grand lies, “we have more time” takes many different forms, often focus-grouped. There are the lofty-sounding promises to reach “Net-zero emissions by 2050,” as if 24 years from now was soon enough. There are the queries of “What’s your carbon footprint?,” as if individual people with plastic bags or straws were the problem and not gigantic multinational corporations. There’s the accusation that anyone who expresses urgency is a “doomer.” There are those who treat climate as an abstraction to win political campaigns, first arguing that the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act was a victory despite doing nowhere near enough to address the scale of climate collapse, and more recently that Democrats should just stop talking about climate and focus on more “winnable” issues. Most damaging and common of all, there are those who simply don’t mention it.

All of these distortions have robbed us of the most critical element people need to understand a threat and adjust their actions accordingly: context.

And make no mistake, when it comes to how much time we have, the data and the geological record are crystal clear.

For some badly-needed context, the last three years, likely for the first time in over 100,000 years, have averaged above the Paris Accords’ “do not cross” 1.5 degrees celsius planetary warming. Only ten years ago, that was considered catastrophic, but now mainstream news tells us it’s just a number.

And with a bump coming next year from a growing, historic El Niño up to 1.7 degrees celsius average warming, likely to cause agricultural failure and food shortages, we are staring right at the vaunted 2C number.

Why is 2C so vaunted?

Let’s do the context thing again: 2C will mean we have completely left the stable climate period known as the Holocene. This is the 11,000-year-old era that has given us large-scale crop and livestock agriculture, which gave us cities, written language, modern science and medicine, and warm beds and showers.

Before that, for hundreds of thousands of years in the Pleistocene era, humans (and our hominid ancestors) spent most of their time running from drought, fires, floods, extreme cold and heat, predators, and each other.

The population was likely no more than a few million people spread across the whole planet. At one point we may have almost gone extinct, with just 10,000 Homo sapiens clinging to life. But after the advent of the Holocene and its remarkably stable climate, in only 100 centuries the world population has risen to 8 billion.

That is what we stand to lose. In fact, if our institutions, news and elected officials continue to feed and water the oil company-conceived mega-falsehood that climate breakdown is something just “our great-grandkids need to worry about,”  human civilization as we know it will collapse and billions could die. And we’re not talking about the far distant future. We are talking about collapse within years, not centuries. For real.

This is right around the corner. A joint study by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries and the University of Exeter suggests that a 2C temperature increase by 2050—which we are hurtling towards, with no plans of slowing down—could result in two billion deaths. And that is virtually the best-case scenario, as temperature rise predictions have worsened and put 1.5C of warming out of reach. According to the United Nations, in order to limit warming to 2C, we would need “emissions to drop around 35 per cent by 2035.” Even if “current national commitments” were fully implemented they “would cut emissions only 12 to 15 per cent by that date.”

The other scenario, which scientists now say “recent data aligns more closely with,” is 3C of warming. At that level, the Exeter authors warn of up to 4 billion deaths. Four billion. That is half the planet. In 26 years or less. Even for those lucky enough to survive the worst weather events, life as we know it would cease to exist due to war, involuntary mass migration, and “catastrophic mortality events from disease, malnutrition, thirst and conflict.” According to the lead author of the report, there is no realistic plan in place to avoid this scenario.

How effective and finely tuned is this civilization-killing lie? Recently, out of curiosity, I asked the people at my nonprofit media studio, Yellow Dot, to create a graph with two data points: mentions of climate on U.S. broadcast news and recent spiking global warming numbers. And this is what they sent me:

One look at the near perfect correlatory X at the center of this graph, and it is clear something about humankind and western civilization is profoundly and deeply broken. The revelation hit me as almost biological in its clarity: as a species, we are behaving like a pod of dolphins beaching themselves because some kind of brain parasite disrupted their echolocation. Our ability to share knowledge and understand the situation we’re in has become utterly compromised, and deadly.

If so many people weren’t dying and going to die, it would almost be impressive. The lie and the financial markets, corporations, and billionaires that suckle on it have created a vast, highly sensitive information system over the decades, consisting of careerists, company men, and people who fear for their jobs. That system has so internalized big capital’s desires that it nearly instantly responds to any threat to big capital’s hegemony. And remember, by “threats” we are referring to the reality of billions of deaths.

Lately, as extreme weather goes into uncharted territory, broadcast and much of online and print news has increasingly been framing each freakish weather disaster as a one-off event disconnected from one of the fastest and most deadly shifts in Earth’s history.

For example, take this clip from an NBC news report two weeks ago, about tornadoes striking New York City. It’s remarkable for how it paints a picture of the scale of the crisis we’re facing, without ever mentioning what the crisis is. And there are thousands of news pieces just like it:

Pieces like this put millions of people in active danger by robbing them of the key information they need to adjust their personal risk assessment. Namely, that because oil companies are flooding the planet with heat trapping gases, our environment is getting more and more dangerous every day.

The most recent study of the earth energy imbalance or EEI—the difference between the heat the Earth absorbs from the Sun, and the amount it sends back out into space—shows 12 Hiroshima bombs of heat being trapped by greenhouse gases every single second of every day. As recently as 2020, it was only 5 or 6 atomic bombs’ worth. That’s how fast the crisis is accelerating, but you’d never know it by watching the TV news.

It’s one thing to warn your teen daughter who is going into the city for the weekend not to take a ride from a stranger, and entirely another to fail to mention that the city she’s going to is hosting a serial killer convention.

At this exact moment, oceans are hotter than they’ve ever been since record-keeping began, and air temperatures on average are warmer than they’ve been in around 100,000 years. We refer to humans of the Pleistocene as Hunter Gatherers and not farmers, fishermen, influencers or IT consultants for a reason. Good luck taking corn to market in 135 degree Fahrenheit heat while dodging dry lightning with a saber-toothed tiger stalking you.

Back in 2015, the number chosen for preserving the Holocene and avoiding at least a billion people starving, dying in extreme heat, or in storms or fires was set at 1.5 degrees Celsius, through a mixture of science and political considerations, formalized in the Paris Climate Accord.

We are, once again for the people in the back, averaging over that number for the past three years. And never mind that several renowned scientists, like Michael Mann, think even 1.2C of warming should have been a do-not-cross line.

Still have doubts? If you do, I don’t blame you. We live in a consumer culture hammering us daily with triggering political proclamations, sales pitches, and clickbait designed to spike engagement responses in the brain. “Immigrants are coming for your way of life!” “This new SUV is the best ever!” “Great White Shark Eats Porn Star!” Most of it is misleading, in one way or another, so there’s a natural tendency to assume that “Planet about to boil!” might be too.

But Big Oil and its PR agencies know this, and they’ve weaponized the healthy skepticism we’ve developed as a survival mechanism against those voices speaking the truth about the urgent state of the climate.

After all, who are you going to believe? The New York Times, an outlet famous for downplaying climate urgency, or some weird scientist saying crazy things? Even when a profession famous for dead-eyed, bottom-line risk assessment like insurance actuaries releases a statement about how serious the situation is, corporate news media turns it into what people used to call a “below the fold story,” framing it as just another minor environmental item—not headline news.

In service of the Great Lie, the government of the United Kingdom even tried to bury a climate report from its own intelligence agency before it was leaked. To my knowledge there aren’t many spies being called tree huggers, unless they’re undercover of course. But the MI5 and MI6 are clear-eyed about the danger that’s coming. The report warned that “global ecosystem degradation and collapse threaten UK national security and prosperity.”

No one wants to eat a raw pumpkin. It looks like a Dr. Seuss character’s brain, is full of seeds, and has no real taste. But like with any good lie, when the right sugar, spices, a buttery crust, and time in the oven is added, pumpkin pie becomes a cherished classic.

The same thing happens with the climate lie. The financial markets, massive oil companies, the banks that finance them, the travel industry, car companies, your career and job security, the people you’re having dinner with who don’t want to be bummed out, all of these incentives and forces don’t want you to know you are eating a big, weird gourd.

And as long as we go with their mendacious flow, hundreds of millions, and then billions will die well before “Net Zero by 2050” or “our great grandkids’ future” arrive. Because we are out of time. And we need to get to work immediately. There are a million things to do.

League City Animal Care seeking public’s help for information on cat appeared to be painted red

ByBryan Sarabia KTRK logo

Friday, August 7, 2026 6:04PM

24/7 Coverage of Breaking News and Live Events

24/7 Coverage of Breaking News and Live Events

Live

Watch Eyewitness News and ABC13 originals around the clock

LEAGUE CITY, Texas (KTRK) — League City Animal Care is asking for the public’s help in gathering information on a cat that appears to be painted or dyed red.

A cat seen around the community has generated buzz on social media, and League City Animal Care is working to safely trap the fur baby and get it the proper care it needs.

Images shared by League City Animal Care show a cat that appears to be painted or dyed red.
Images shared by League City Animal Care show a cat that appears to be painted or dyed red.League City Animal Care

Images appear to show the cat was painted or dyed in some way; the cat’s gray fur can be seen peeking through bright red splotches.

Officials are not asking the public to trap the cat, but they are asking those who have seen the cat recently to send them a direct message through social media with the exact time and location of the cat’s last sighting.

Officials in League City are urging residents who spot a cat that appears to be painted or dyed red not to trap it, but to contact them.
Officials in League City are urging residents who spot a cat that appears to be painted or dyed red not to trap it, but to contact them.League City Animal Care

Officials are also asking the public not to feed the cat or approach it, as it may make trapping efforts by city workers more difficult.

Law enforcement has not announced an active investigation or any potential charges of animal cruelty at the moment.

A cat that appears to be painted or dyed red is creating buzz around League City. Officials are seeking the public's help with information.
A cat that appears to be painted or dyed red is creating buzz around League City. Officials are seeking the public’s help with information.League City Animal Care

Bird flu outbreak sparks wildlife vaccination debate

August 7, 2026 03:30 | News

Bird flu outbreak sparks wildlife vaccination debate – Michael West

A worsening bird flu outbreak has sparked debate over whether vaccination is the key to protect Australian wildlife from the deadly strain.

While the Australian government is conducting pilot studies in non-poultry birds, New Zealand has already begun vaccinating some of its rarest birds after completing a world-first research trial last year.

About 300 breeding birds were targeted from five species: kakapo, takahe, black stilt, orange-fronted parakeet and shore plover.

But questions have been raised over whether a similar approach would be viable with Australian birds and other animals as the deadly strain’s national toll soars past 100.

Black swans
Experts say two doses of any avian flu vaccine would need to be administered to birds. (Christopher Hopkins/AAP PHOTOS)

New Zealand used a different vaccine to the one that features in Australian trials.

Safety and efficacy data is still being gathered, and there are concerns about the logistics and practical application of such a program.

Two doses of any vaccine would need to be administered, with a period of time separating them, experts say.

The task of vaccinating wild animals would be especially challenging, University of Adelaide immunologist Mohammed Alsharifi told AAP.

“If we’re talking about vaccinating wild birds, I think that’s a big task,” Associate Professor Alsharifi said.

“As the virus mutates and changes the nature of the surface structure, any existing vaccines may not be effective – it’s a similar situation to human vaccination.”

Vaccination
Some researchers say vaccinating wild animals would be very challenging. (James Ross/AAP PHOTOS)

But Associate Professor Wayne Boardman, also from the University of Adelaide, said all options should remain on the table.

He said smaller colonies of Australian sea lions could be targeted for vaccination using innovative techniques including dart rifles or syringes mounted on long poles.

“Necessity is sometimes the mother of invention,” he said.

There are fears for Australia’s seals after a pup with bird flu symptoms died in Victoria.

It is potentially the first seal to be infected with the deadly H5 virus on the Australian mainland.

But in relation to Australian birds, Assoc Prof Boardman said the situation was much more difficult.

He pointed out that New Zealand birds like the kakapo and takahe were flightless “which helps”.

He said New Zealand birds were all heavily managed, with many or the majority of their tiny populations monitored by tracking devices.

“In the Australian context, you’d be needing to think about which are the most important bird species that we need to consider vaccinating,” he said.

The federal government has just released a susceptibility index, which scales the risk of H5 across native birds and mammals.

“If we don’t do it, and they disappear because we didn’t try, that would be an absolute tragedy,” Assoc Prof Boardman said.

“We’ve got to think really hard about how we’re going to do this.

“If we can vaccinate a proportion of the population, that’s going to be better than nothing.”

Australian King-Parrots
The Australian government is conducting pilot studies of an avian flu vaccine in non-poultry birds. (Jay Kogler/AAP PHOTOS)

David Paton, an ecologist and ornithologist, said it was not a practical solution and called for other proactive approaches in an attempt to contain the virus.

He said birds should have been covered and removed as soon as they began appearing dead and sick along Australia’s coastline.

“We should have had a much greater response base in terms of trying to minimise these contact points.”

There have been 123 confirmed or presumed positive detections of H5 bird flu in Australia.

Lawsuit Challenges Unsustainable Mountain Lion Sport Hunts in Arizona

Data Shows Kittens, Juveniles Most Killed

Lawsuit Challenges Unsustainable Mountain Lion Sport Hunts in Arizona – Center for Biological Diversity

PHOENIX— The Center for Biological Diversity sued the Arizona Game and Fish Department and Commission today, challenging their mountain lion sport hunting quotas as unsustainable and asking the court to suspend issuing mountain lion sport hunting permits until the state’s population has recovered and is sustainable. The mountain lion hunting season begins Aug. 21.

The department’s data shows that 1,937 mountain lions were killed by sport hunters from 2018 to 2024, an average of 277 per year. Of these, 54% were kittens younger than 1 year old (518) or pre-reproductive juveniles younger than 2 years old (519). In addition, females made up 41% of mountain lions killed during that period. Research shows that killing more than 20% of adult females in a hunting population can sharply reduce mountain lion numbers.

“Arizona’s state-sanctioned killing of kittens and juvenile mountain lions is barbaric, unsustainable and illegal,” said Robin Silver, Center co-founder and board member. “State law requires the Game and Fish Commission and Department to put science and public trust first rather than the whims of the mountain lion sport hunters and ranchers. It’s time to end this slaughter and ensure that mountain lions will continue to roam the wilds of Arizona into the future.”

Today’s lawsuit includes three independent modeling analyses of seven years of department hunting data by wildlife demographic experts. All three analyses concluded that without reducing hunting quotas, Arizona’s mountain lions will face steep, unsustainable population declines. The quota for the upcoming season is 340 mountain lions.

The lawsuit says the Arizona Game and Fish Department and Commission’s unsustainable management practices violate their own acknowledgment that they are legally required to hold the state’s wildlife in the public trust.

The Center is represented by the law firm Hofmeyr Wang.

Female mountain lion
Female mountain lion in Arizona. Photo credit: Robin Silver, Center for Biological Diversity. Image is available for media use.

The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 1.8 million members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.

I feel deep sadness about bird flu and environmental loss. Is this normal?

Share article

I feel deep sadness about bird flu and environmental loss. Is this normal?

Print article

Australia’s beloved animals are again under threat as the H5N1 strain of bird flu spreads, with more mass deaths expected. Scientists are bracing for another wave of ecological loss and are particularly concerned about rare and threatened species.

It’s normal to find this news overwhelming, especially in the wake of a growing list of environmental disasters: from algal blooms to coral bleaching, and floods and fires that devastate wildlife and ecosystems.

We research ecological grief – the deep sadness people feel about the loss of nature – and climate emotions – human feelings in response to the climate crisis. We have listened to hundreds of people talk about their feelings about our environment, and their fears and hopes for its future. Some describe sadness, anger or concern. Others try to avoid bad news.

These responses are rarely simple. They are often rooted in particular places and species we love, and in the memories, identities and relationships attached to them. Because of this, grief can co-exist with feelings like awe, pride, belonging and care.

Here, we share some ways to make space for your feelings and find connection and support.

An Australian sea lion swimming underwater.
It’s normal to finding news about environmental loss, such as bird flu, overwhelming. Stephen Frink/Getty

What is ecological grief?

Grief is an understandable response to witnessing harm to places and species that matter to us. We might experience environmental loss directly, particularly when we live or work in threatened places. At other times, we encounter it through news and social media, or against the wider backdrop of future threats such as climate change. Because ecological loss is ongoing, cumulative, and sometimes ambiguous, we need to practise support, connection and care in ways that we can sustain over time.

Don’t let yourself be misled. Understand issues with help from experts

https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/anchor?ar=1&k=6Lf3Oc0UAAAAAIbME3Lv7iS7EVeuQzpru1Jbij5N&co=aHR0cHM6Ly90aGVjb252ZXJzYXRpb24uY29tOjQ0Mw..&hl=en-US&type=image&v=XOqlk8PL_yVx6IdpLbpXdiLy&theme=light&size=invisible&badge=bottomright&anchor-ms=20000&execute-ms=30000&cb=cs8l7bpub4vaSubscribe

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Yet our feelings in response to loss are often hard to talk about, especially when they are minimised or dismissed by others. Our society is not very good at “doing grief”. Death is difficult to understand, and can feel like something to be avoided at all costs.

In addition, many of us have lost the rituals and gathering places that enable us to process loss together, such as those offered through spiritual or cultural practices. This can lead to disenfranchised grief, when loss is not acknowledged or validated, leaving people feeling isolated.

Becoming more “grief literate” means developing the knowledge, values and practical skills to understand grief, and support ourselves and others. For environmental loss, this might involve talking with people who are feeling a similar way, spending time in restorative places, or making art, either alone or in groups.

A giant cuttlefish stares at the camera.
Many South Australians have been distressed by the effects of the deadly algal bloom on marine life, such as this giant cuttlefish. wildest animal/Getty

A growing awareness of loss

The good news is communities and professionals are coming together to support people as they grapple with ecological loss. In Australia, organisations like Psychology for a Safe Climate host a network of mental health practitioners who are aware of the realities of climate change and can provide professional support.

Psychology for a Safe Climate also offers regular “climate cafes”, where people can connect with others who share concerns about beloved species and ecosystems.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have learnt to live amid the drastic changes to Country wrought by centuries of colonisation. Their knowledge and practices offer a vital source of wisdom for all, but must be treated with respect and reciprocity if they are offered beyond their own communities. We Al-li shares Indigenous cultural traditions and trauma informed practices through online courses and other training.

Across the world, new groups are forming to support people grappling with ecological grief. US-based not-for-profit Good Grief Network runs peer-to-peer programs delivered by over 180 facilitators globally. Another organisation, Radical Joy, invites people to “make beauty in a wounded place”, either together or alone.

Paying attention to feelings

As we work with people experiencing ecological loss, we are slowly learning to notice and respond to how we are feeling in ourselves. This might include noticing we need to rest, or take a break from news about ecological “doom”.

It might be as simple as going outside and feeling the grass under our feet, or the wind on our face.

For people in environmental professions, Claudia’s team at the University of Queensland have created an ecological grief resource to guide workplaces to provide better support. It encourages compassionate listening with a colleague, which involves listening without judging or offering solutions. It also suggests undertaking a project – like holding a remembrance event or creating something using art – to honour a loss.

With colleagues at Black Dog Institute and the University of Sydney, Chloe developed an activity booklet for young people, families and all those interested in creative tools for exploring climate and environmental feelings. It provides joyful, open-ended prompts for drawing, photography, and writing that can help people of all ages understand their relationship to the natural world.

An image of an Australian rainforest with towering tree ferns.
Making space for feelings of grief over effects of ecological change can sustain you for the long haul. Posnov/Getty

Making space for grief

Perhaps most importantly, we have learned that paying attention to feelings like ecological grief is not a distraction from responding to pressing environmental challenges.

By making space for grief, you also create opportunities for care, connection and action. This can sustain us all for the long haul, helping us focus on small, achievable changes without losing sight of the bigger picture.

If you are experiencing overwhelming grief or emotional distress, free and confidential support is available anytime in Australia. Call Lifeline at 13 11 14, Griefline at 1300 845 745, or Beyond Blue at 1300 22 4636.