Exposing the Big Game

Forget Hunters' Feeble Rationalizations and Trust Your Gut Feelings: Making Sport of Killing Is Not Healthy Human Behavior

Exposing the Big Game

Details emerge in alleged self-defense wolf killing

http://www.bendbulletin.com/localstate/5724826-151/details-emerge-in-alleged-self-defense-wolf-killing

BY ANDREW THEEN

THE OREGONIAN

Brian Scott screamed, pointed his .30-06 rifle, saw hair through the scope, and pulled the trigger once.

Scott shot and killed a gray wolf while elk hunting in rural Union County on Oct. 27. The experienced hunter notified state police of the incident and told the responding trooper, Marcus McDowell, a harrowing tale of self-defense.

Authorities agreed and declined to prosecute the wolf killing, the first reported instance of a protected wolf being shot and killed by a hunter who feared for their life.

Scott could not be reached for comment on this story.

The 38-year-old Clackamas resident told McDowell those details on Oct. 27, hours after the shooting. More details emerged Friday one week after the incident.

McDowell determined the bullet entered the animal’s front right side and exited through the left.

In a Thursday press release, the agency said “based upon the available evidence” the hunter acted in self-defense.

According to the three-page police report obtained through a public record request, Scott was hunting last week in the Starkey hunting unit of Union County near La Grande off of a forest service road where he was camping with several other hunters. At about 7:15 a.m., he left to hunt, and a little after leaving camp he saw animals moving around him.

“I could not identify what was moving around me,” he told McDowell. “There are a lot of coyotes out here.”

Scott hiked into a nearby timber stand and sat for 20 or 30 minutes. After leaving the trees and heading into a meadow, he saw to his left what he assumed was a coyote.

“He was running at me, which is very odd,” Scott told the trooper.

A second animal was behind the first.

A third animal “was running directly at me,” Scott said.

“I definitely felt like she had targeted me,” he said, “and was running at me to make contact.”

He told the trooper he feared for his life. “It was unnerving.”

Scott shot the third animal from roughly 27 yards away and watched the other two run into the timber near a forest road.

The other wolves howled, according to the police account.

An Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife official, Leonard Erickson, later arrived to the scene and helped recover the animal. One of four additional hunters at the camp transported the wolf, an 83-pound female connected to OR-30.

The pictures and police report paint a different picture, according to wolf advocacy group Oregon Wild.

The animal’s death also comes on the heels of five recent approved wolf shootings in eastern Oregon. It is illegal to kill a wolf unless it’s caught red-handed killing livestock — a rare occurrence that has happened just once in 2016 — or in the event of self-defense. Legally, animals can be killed if they are confirmed to have repeatedly attacked livestock.

Steve Pedery, the nonprofit’s conservation director, said in an email that he’d like to see further investigation of the hunting incident. He’s not convinced the animal was running at the hunter, and questioned why the wounds are on the animal’s side.

“How can a wolf that is moving away from someone be a threat?” Pedery asked, “and why would ODFW sign off on a report that is directly contradicted by the evidence?”

9 thoughts on “Details emerge in alleged self-defense wolf killing

  1. Why would ODFW sign off even though the path of the bullet seems to contradict the hunter’s story? Because the people who work for ODFW are hunters and trappers and are sympathetic to hunters and trappers.

  2. What a lying sack of shit, as they all are. It does not sound like wolf behavior at all. He probably intentionally baited the wolves to deliberately kill them. Connected to the ranchers and ranching industry or hired by them, or simply wanted to kill wolves for fun. See? Anyone can come up with an outrageous story. I love (not) the ‘faux frightened’ story by these thugs. They should not be killing coyotes or using the coyote excuse anymore either.

    Oregon still has no wolf ‘management plan’ either – unless this is it! What a sorry dept. the ODFW is.

  3. Bizarre. I didn’t realize he had shot three wolves? Or did he only kill one of them? How could he have managed that, unless he baited them with a carcass of some sort? I mean, with hands trembling in fear and all that. It’s too bad someone could not sue him.

  4. You know, the fact that the state of Oregon is two years overdue with a ‘wolf management’ plan seems like a lawsuit opportunity just waiting to be filed? Somebody please sue them!

  5. I’m confused. Apparently there have been three wolves found dead under mysterious circumstances in OR, in addition to the ones killed ‘above board’ by ORF&W? I really do hope that one of the wildlife groups makes a stink about this – because the average citizen is clueless it appears.

  6. A hunter was “targeted” by a wolf! Damn well about time. Of course, the wolf is dead and the hunter gets by with the killing.

Leave a comment