Committee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog
Say it should be last resort, not fallback plan
CORVALLIS, Ore. – Researchers at Oregon State University are challenging the premise that trophy hunting is an acceptable and effective tool for wildlife conservation and community development.
They argue that charging hunters to kill animals and claim body parts should be a last resort rather than a fallback plan.
In a paper published Monday in Conservation Letters, the researchers label the practice as morally inappropriate and say alternative strategies such as ecotourism should be fully explored and ruled out before trophy hunting is broadly endorsed.
“Trophies are body parts,” said lead author Chelsea Batavia, a Ph.D. student in OSU’s College of Forestry. “But when I read the literature, I don’t see researchers talking about them like that. Nobody’s even flinching. And at this point, it seems to have become so…
View original post 556 more words
Trophy hunters are ” conservationists” as much as pedophiles ” love” children. Please. Oxymorons prevail in this “alternate” facts world of ours.