There Really, Really Isn’t a Silver Bullet for Climate Change

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

A nuclear cooling tower is framed between two trees, at the edge of a long, green field.
The cooling tower at the Golfech Nuclear Power Plant sits at the edge of the Garonne river near Toulouse, France.REGIS DUVIGNAU / REUTERS

When the fate of the planet is at stake, a single precedent starts to seem like a blueprint.

Most Americans, as far as pollsters can tell, want the United States to honor its commitment under the Paris Agreement on climate change. According to that pact, the United States must, by 2025, cut its carbon emissions 26 percent below their all-time peak. That will be hard. To make the Paris goal, the U.S. would have to cut carbon by 2.6 percent every year for the next seven years. And it has simply never cut its emissions that fast in such a sustained way before.

View original post 1,163 more words

2 thoughts on “There Really, Really Isn’t a Silver Bullet for Climate Change

  1. Nuclear power just should stop. It is much too dangerous, and the waste storage is a huge problem. Very bad for the environment.

Leave a comment