The case for spraying (just enough) chemicals into the sky to fight climate change

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

A new study says geoengineering could cut global warming in half — with no bad side effects.

A motorcyclist wears a mask after a volcanic eruption in Indonesia. Geoengineering takes its inspiration from volcanoes, which spray sulfur particles into the sky.
NurPhoto via Getty Images

If you think pumping the sky full of chemicals sounds like a weird way to fight climate change, you’re not alone. Solar geoengineering — the idea of injecting aerosols into the high atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space and make for a cooler planet — is very controversial. And not just because it seems so offbeat.

Although geoengineering is not yet being deployed in the real world, past computer modeling studies have suggested it could produce unintended effects like droughts. Some have worried that it might create new climate inequities, worsening the weather in some…

View original post 1,274 more words

2 thoughts on “The case for spraying (just enough) chemicals into the sky to fight climate change

  1. Yes David Keith is recorded on video in a lecture saying they haven’t researched the health effects to humans & it’s kind of free riding on our grandkids (apart from the fact they’ve been spraying us for decades anyway & calling anybody who questions it tinfoil hatters).

Leave a comment