Hunting Conviction Upheld In ‘Landmark’ Court Decision

Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

A former fox hunter appealed his conviction for illegally chasing and killing a fox, trying to use a loophole in the law – but the judge upheld the ruling

Fox hunters
Campaigners have accused hunters of exploiting loopholes in the Hunting Act (Photo: Adobe. Do not use without permission)

fox hunting conviction has been upheld in what campaigners have described as a ‘landmark ruling’.

George Adams, a former huntsman with the Fitzwilliam Hunt, appealed his conviction for illegally chasing and killing a fox, using what is known as the ‘falconry exemption’.

Loophole in the law

This loophole comes from a clause in the Hunting Act 2004, which was designed to ensure falconers did not get prosecuted if their birds killed a mammal that had been flushed out of cover by dogs.

According to welfare group The League Against Cruel Sports (LACS), some hunts ‘exploit…

View original post 393 more words

2 thoughts on “Hunting Conviction Upheld In ‘Landmark’ Court Decision


  1. ..at least I can medium/speed “happy dance” on this one..
    ☺☺
    but not a fast “happy dance”
    because
    after all
    there IS an innocent dead fox involved
    and a human serial killer..

  2. Good! This is another activity that has no place in our modern world – satisfying bloodlust is not something people should continue with.

Leave a comment