Murder in Yellowstone: grizzly family is sacrificed for fear of litigation

Doug’s Blog

Rants from a renegade naturalist

Murder in Yellowstone: grizzly family is sacrificed for fear of litigation

News from Yellowstone: please see Terry Tempest William’s post on my Home page, “Don’t kill this grizzly bear.”

The news is that Yellowstone Park officials will kill this mother bear, as they said they would from the beginning. Despite all your pleas for logic, fairness and humane treatment of this grizzly family, a mother and two cubs of the year, they will be killed.

A friend of mine, along with other insiders who work in Yellowstone park, actively lobbied and talked to Kerry Gunther and other YNP officials. To their credit, these public servants at least listened to alternatives to the destruction of this bear family and, although they were inflexible about euthanizing the mother grizzly, they considered placing the two cubs in a zoo-like setting, In particular the Yellowstone Discovery Center in West Yellowstone. This private educational center did it’s best towards accommodating the entire bear family. This discussion included taking in the two cubs and at least considering raising fund to acquire a larger area to suite the older female grizzly who has lived a wild bear life for 20 years. I think this kind of discussion commendable on all sides. And it wouldn’t have taken place without all your letters, calls and pleas to spare the grizzy family’s lives.

The effort failed for two reasons:

First, Yellowstone National Park decided, privately for unstated and unexplained matters of “public safety,” to kill this, and presumably any bear, who is implicated in a human fatality. This is wrong, based on no science and against the NPS Organic Act mission, which is celebrating it’s 100th anniversary in 2016. This incident was a purely defensive, natural response of a mother bear protecting her cubs. This particular female grizzly had a long and tolerant history towards human visitors, however rude and clumsy. My friend:

“It looks like the bear involved was a very familiar, older bear nicknamed, Blaze who had two COY this year. She has been viewed, photographed and filmed by thousands of people over the years with never a shred of aggression even while people chased her and her cubs to get a better shot. Apparently traps have been set and the decision to kill her has already been made.”

The mauling was a human-induced event. The hiker, however experienced, did everything wrong: he got too close to a sleeping mother grizzly, then he ran and tried to fight back. Doing these three things–stumbling in too close to an unaware mother bear, running and fighting back–are about the only way you can get get killed by a mother grizzly.

The park service of old use to treat these defensive attacks, fatal or not, as the natural responses they indeed are. No more. Since the fatal mauling of a Michigan man in 2010, they have hardened their response and changed their policy–if they have a policy other than what’s seems safest to preclude litigation at the time it’s happening. And they never discussed with or even disclosed to the public–concerned taxpayer how they arrived at this policy. Fear of litigation is what made them condemn the natural, defensive-acting mother bear to death. That cash, the litigation slush funds, doesn’t come out of their pockets; it’s our dough. YNP could at least discuss that issue with us.

The second reason is a single bureaucrat has decided to kill the cubs. This proclamation was made after YNP officials, apparently in all good faith, considered sending them to a zoo-like facility. That decency by YNP was overruled: the cubs must be killed. My friend:

“So we got all the way to the alter on adopting these cubs and Chris Servheen said no. If these cubs are euthanized after we offered to take them and privately raise the money…”

Chris Servheen is known as the “Grizzly Czar” and is the boss of the FWS Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee; his chief and perhaps single agenda is to formally “Delist” the Yellowstone, which means to strip the grizzly of all its protections under the ESA and turn “management” over to the states of WY, MT and ID who have promised to immediately issue “Trophy Grizzly Bear Hunt” permits. This removal of ESA protections, as I have argued in my own “Don’t Delist” articles, will irretrievably push the Yellowstone grizzly down the road to regional extinction within years. The boiled-down logic is when mortality (deaths) greatly exceed grizzly births, extinction is usually unavoidable in a species like the griz with exceedingly low reproductive capacities.

So that, my friends, is pretty much the story: the undeserved killing of the mother grizzly and her blood is on the hands of Yellowstone National Park officials. The slaughter of the innocent cubs lies on those of the Griz Czar Chris Sevheen. These people owe you an open explanation for their decisions. They also need to share the data and forensics they used to make their unethical and illogical calls on our innocent bears. Please demand they do.

For the wild, Doug Peacock

http://www.dougpeacock.net/blog/categories/listings/murder-in-yellowstone-grizzly-family-is-sacrificed-for-fear-of-litigation.html

 Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson,  All Rights Reserved

Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson, All Rights Reserved

13 thoughts on “Murder in Yellowstone: grizzly family is sacrificed for fear of litigation

  1. I won’t be visiting again. I don’t like the direction the management of this place is going, and stupid people with cell phones running wild would drive me batshit. I need a place with more solitude. It’s sad, because this park was once beautiful. The cubs have been sentenced to life in prison too – why can’t they put them in a sanctuary where they could be released once they are old enough? The declining population needs all the members it can get.

    It they think they are getting a delisting, they’ve got another think coming.

  2. Human bureau(crazy) “management” trumps wildlife again. You can feel the delisting fever. Instead, should it be asked: Are there too many people in the Park?

  3. I’m really sad about the fate of Blaze, as well as her cubs if they are to die too. I’m glad they had so many advocates trying to save them, and I hope we can find a way to keep those advocates engaged and demanding answers.

    There didn’t seem to be any hesitation in the decision to kill the bears from day one. Is this decision catering to some dark human urge for vengeance against a creature incapable of malicious intent? Is it giving into fear that if people aren’t assured the bears are no longer on this earth they might avoid the park and cost it revenues.

    Litigation? Please! Yellowstone is a huge park with a lot of potential for injury/death, from stupid human behavior to just plain accidents of being at the wrong place at the wrong time. Would the park officials have us believe the state of Montana isn’t prepared for potential law suits? Why would this law suit worry them so much?

    Then the issue of the little ones and considering placing them at the Yellowstone Discovery Center but Chris Servheen said “no.” Why does he have the authority to decide the bears’ fate? I, for one, would like to know that. And were any other facilities considered if getting them out of the park was the goal. Did they try Keepers of the Wild in Arizona? That facility accepted Bam Bam, a grizzly destined for euthanasia. Did they try PAWS or Wildlife Waystation in California? Did they try the Wild Animal Sanctuary in Colorado? Did they talk to Montana Grizzly Encounter in Bozeman? If not, why not? I imagine money would have come in fast on Go Fund Me, among other sources.

    I would like answers, and I suspect that park officials are not used to being questioned and pushed to this extent. I hope we can find ways to keep up the pressure and not let our concern die with the bears, anymore than we let the attention on trophy hunting die with Cecil. If the Yellowstone Park officials don’t “get” the public’s response, then I hope we can help them along.

    • It’s just so bizarre and antiquated, especially for a National Park where decisions are supposedly made with science. They’ve said Blaze was not acting normally, but the Park’s history shows this happens time and time again, and it looks like the ball was dropped in 2011 where nothing was done about the last incident, Wapiti, which reads almost verbatim to this one. But it’s oh so much easier to kill an animal, I suppose. Frighten the public. I am thoroughly disgusted.

Leave a reply to transforminglifenow Cancel reply