Two new wolf packs confirmed on Colville Indian Reservation

Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/aug/08/two-new-wolf-packs-confirmed-on-colville-indian-re/

Wed., Aug. 8, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Two new wolf packs were confirmed on the Colville Indian Reservation this week.

Colville Confederated Tribes Fish and Wildlife found that the alpha male from the Strawberry Pack dispersed and started a new pack that they’re calling the Nason Pack. Another pack, the Frosty Pack, was also confirmed when biologist successfully collared an adult male, according to a Colville news release.

With the confirmation of these two packs there are now five wolf packs on the Colville Reservation.

At the end of 2017, the state had at least 122 wolves, 22 packs and 14 successful breeding pairs, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife said in a March report. That compares with a minimum of 115 wolves, 20 packs and 10 breeding pairs reported at the end of 2016.

Unlike in the rest of the state the Colville Tribe has an annual…

View original post 13 more words

12 thoughts on “Two new wolf packs confirmed on Colville Indian Reservation

  1. I know, I’ve never understood this, and why the Collville are collaborators with the ranchers. There are other tribes who do not hunt them, and usually, like with the grizzly, want to protect and respect our disappearing wildlife.

    I suppose now they’ve met their state delisting quota? Or are the tribal lands not counted in the quota?

  2. The author of this article had to misrepresent again, with the ‘environmentalists think the wolves are sacred’ bullshit, so you know where he’s coming from. Here’s some recent mortality info that shows the population hasn’t increased that much from last year, and that the ranchers can’t wait to kill them. Isn’t it about time for the Diamond M to start making a stink too?:

    https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2018/wolf-03-16-2018.php

  3. To try to find a sliver lining, we can only hope that the Colville will be more conservative in ‘managing’ the wolves on their lands than those outside the tribal lands have been.

  4. I had read that it is by far not a unanimous decision by the Colville; five packs, I’m not sure that taking more than three is wise? I don’t like it, but perhaps it will protect the wolves in a way from outsiders of the old mindset that just want to eradicate wolves entirely. I think that wolves on tribal lands are not open to hunting quotas of the USF&W, at least it appears that way with some tribes. Thank God, is all I can say. Keep out!

Leave a reply to Diane Darvey Cancel reply