Bird populations are shrinking faster in agriculture hotspots — including the Midwest, study finds

New research out of Ohio State University found the rate of bird decline was quicker in areas with more intense agricultural practices

By Abigail Bottar | Harvest Public Media 

April 23, 2026

A small brown and gray bird perches on a tree branch next to hanging green catkins, with a blurred background.
A chipping sparrow sits on a branch in suburban Kansas City, Missouri. A new study links accelerating bird population declines with intensive agriculture. Carlos Moreno/KCUR

Subscribe to the new Harvest newsletter, for our latest reporting on agriculture and the environment, behind-the-scenes exclusives and more.

A new study finds bird populations are declining at a faster pace in areas with a lot of agriculture, especially in the Midwest.

The loss of bird populations has been documented since the 1970s. A landmark study from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology published in 2019 found the North American bird population is down by 2.9 billion breeding adults across geographical regions since then.

Understanding Wisconsin, Together.

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.Email

The recent study at Ohio State University found that across North America, more than 120 bird species are experiencing decline, and of those, more than half are experiencing accelerated decline.

Researchers focused on geographic areas where they saw faster declines in bird populations, including in the Midwest, California and Mid-Atlantic states. They then focused on potential causes and found a strong link between accelerated bird decline and areas with a lot of agriculture.

“The data we had access to were the amount of pesticides used, the amount of fertilizer used and the amount of croplands,” said François Leroy, the lead author and a post-doctoral student at Ohio State University.

An American robin with an orange breast stands on the ground among tall green grass and dried brown reeds.
An American robin forages in a stream in Lee’s Summit, Missouri, for material to build a nest. Bird populations are declining more rapidly in areas with intensive agriculture, according to a study at Ohio State University. Carlos Moreno/KCUR

Prior studies have found habitat loss, declines in insect populations and the climate crisis to be key contributors to bird decline. The new research found that agricultural practices are speeding up the already occurring decline, Leroy said.

“You could have a decline and just the decline per se was related to the temperature, where the acceleration of the decline was related to agricultural practices,” he said.

The study was published in Science in February.

Mike Ward is a professor studying bird behavior and ecology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and read the study. He said these findings — although new — were not surprising.

“Some changes in agricultural practices have led to reductions in habitat and likely food availability,” he said.

Increased fertilizer use and a lack of native plants around fields may be behind the faster decline of bird populations, he said.

“The pressure’s on farmers to get as much yield as possible,” he said, “and that easily results in getting rid of hedgerows, getting rid of other pieces of habitats and then using various chemicals or fertilizers and such to try to maximize yields.”

Creating more land that’s habitable for birds would help populations, Ward said. He points to a program from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that pays farmers to convert highly erodible and environmentally sensitive acreage to vegetative cover.

A small bird with a red head and chest stands on the edge of a bird feeder filled with seeds.
A house finch settles on a feeder in Lee’s Summit, Missouri. Researchers in an Ohio State University study found bird populations are declining more quickly in agricultural hotspots. Carlos Moreno/KCUR

Bird decline has grave consequences for broader environmental health. Birds regulate insect populations, spread plant seeds and are an important element on the food chain that other animals rely on.

Ward said he knows farmers are concerned about the environment, including bird loss.

“They really want to do things, and then we’ve got to think strategically about these small things they can do,” he said.

Andrew Stillman, an applied quantitative ecologist with the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, said the study’s findings are very important. Now, more research needs to be done to find solutions, he said.

“It’s time to understand the mechanisms behind these changes using more localized studies that go above and beyond the correlations shown in this study to show which aspects of agricultural intensity are impacting birds the most and what can we do about it,” he said.

Stillman thinks it is still possible to stop the decline before irreparable damage is done.

“I also think that there’s good news here, because we’ve seen that it’s possible to reverse those declines,” he said. “Think about birds like bald eagles or peregrine falcons or even some waterfowl species. There are a lot of success stories that we’ve seen over the last 50 years, and that tells us that recovery of bird populations is possible.”

A silhouette of a bird perched on a tree branch against a clear blue sky, with some leaves and twigs visible.
The familiar silhouette of a mourning dove. More than 120 bird species are experiencing decline, and of those, more than half are experiencing accelerated decline a study from Ohio State University found. Carlos Moreno/KCUR

But if nothing is done, bird populations will continue to decline at increasingly faster rates, Levoy said.

“If we continue to use intensive agriculture, this acceleration should continue,” he said.

He hopes the study will start conversations, especially in the agricultural community.

“The most important (thing) here is to start a dialogue with the farmers, because we need to keep in mind that farmers are the real field experts,” Levoy said. “They are the ones who are walking everyday in the fields. I think they’d have a lot to say about what we’ve observed in the data.”

Leave a comment