Unknown's avatar

About Exposing the Big Game

Jim Robertson

If Bird Flu Spills Over To Humans, This Is What Would Happen In A Very Short Period

Things could spiral out of control very quickly.

Rosie McCall

https://www.iflscience.com/if-bird-flu-spills-over-to-humans-this-is-what-would-happen-in-a-very-short-period-81998


Freelance Writer

Rosie is a freelance writer living in London. She has covered everything from ancient Egyptian temples to exciting medical breakthroughs, but she particularly enjoys writing about wildlife, anthropology and the wonders of the human mind.View full profile

EditedbyJohannes Van Zijl


DOWNLOAD PDF

SHARE

facebook-icon
twitter-icon
reddit-icon
flipboard-icon
bluesky-icon

Bird flu spill over to humans.
Bird flu and other zoonotic diseases are prime contenders for a future “Disease X.”Image Credit: TLF/Shutterstock.com

As we all learned in 2020, it does not take long for a disease outbreak to turn into a full-blown pandemic. Zoonotic diseases – such as COVID-19 or bird flu – are prime contenders for a future “Disease X” that could spark a global epidemic. 

In a new paper, published in Springer Nature Link, researchers simulated what could happen if highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), better known as “bird flu,” were to spill over into humans. There is more than one strain floating around at the moment, but it is the H5N1 subtype that is the most well-known and that formed the basis of the research. 

For the study, the researchers used an agent-based simulation to model a two-step scenario, where the disease is first transmitted from bird to human and then, by human to human. The model was based on a fictional village of 9,667 people in the district of Namakkal in Tamil Nadu, India – a region home to over 1,600 poultry farms and more than 70 million chickens. 

The simulation predicted what would happen after the disease was planted at one of two outbreak sites – a poultry farm and a wet market – where primary contacts came into contact with infected birds. These synthetic “agents” would then continue to go about their day, engaging with other agents that existed within a larger network of secondary contacts (such as friends, family and colleagues) and tertiary contacts. Interventions, from culling birds to distributing vaccines to implementing quarantines, could be tested to determine their impact on disease spread.

For a pandemic to ensue, the virus has to first overcome two “bottlenecks” (events that cause the original population to reduce dramatically) – the capacity to infect human hosts and the ability to pass from human to human. Once achieved, the researchers found that infections could quickly be curtailed if cases remained isolated and households were quarantined, but things could quickly spiral out of control as soon as tertiary contacts are infected. 

“It is in the very early stages of an outbreak that control measures make the most difference,” the researchers write. “Once community transmission takes over, cruder public-health measures such as lockdowns, compulsory masking, and large-scale vaccination drives are the only options left.”

vault icon

Explore more from The Vault

The Eye-Watering Question Of What Happens If A Bee Stings You In The Eyeball

AI Aliens: What If Extraterrestrial Life Is Artificially Intelligent?There Will Soon Be A Doomsday Vault For Human Poop

So far, cases of bird flu have been reported in various animals, including sheepcowscatselephant seals and humans. As per the last count, the CDC reports there have been 71 infections – and two deaths – in the U.S. since 2024.

While there is no indication yet that the disease can jump from human to human, scientists have warned we could just be one or two mutations away from this type of scenario. 

If we ever do find ourselves in the midst of a potential outbreak, the researchers say their simulations can be run in real-time “responding to initial reports of cases. They can be tuned further as more information is collected.”

The study is published in the journal Springer Nature Link.

Montana adjusts hunting regulations to address key concerns

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks logo
Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks logoMontana Fish, Wildlife and Parks

HELENA, Mont. – On December 4, the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission set new hunting regulations for 2026 and 2027, addressing nonresident hunting pressure and mule deer population concerns.

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Director Christy Clark emphasized the significance of these regulations and the public input that shaped them.

Top Videos

javascript:false

“The commission’s action were a culmination of a lengthy process that started this past summer with public meetings around the state,” said Clark. “Both the commission and FWP heard a lot of input from hunters, landowners and the public. This input was critical in the final regulations that were approved.”

The changes aim to protect resources rather than focus on revenue.

“It’s true, some of these changes will reduce revenue coming to FWP from license sales, but when it comes down to it, this is about protecting the resource, not revenue,” Clark said.

Nonresident hunting pressure, particularly in eastern Montana, has been a growing concern. The commission approved an amendment to cap nonresident deer licenses, reducing them by about 2,500.

Commission Chair Lesley Robinson highlighted the need for this measure, saying, “The reason that I brought this forward was to start discussion. And something has to be done. We have a lot of overcrowding.”

Mule deer declines have prompted specific changes. In 2026 and 2027, most mule deer B licenses will be valid only on private land, and residents will see a reduction in the number of deer licenses they can hold from eight to three.

Additionally, the number of deer B licenses sold in 2024 was the lowest since 2016, reflecting the declining mule deer numbers.

Other changes include adjustments in archery regulations, bighorn sheep quotas, black bear hunting, and mountain lion season dates.