Unknown's avatar

About Exposing the Big Game

Jim Robertson

Four reasons to be concerned (but not freak out) about the bird flu

U.S. government officials said Wednesday they are closely monitoring the bird flu virus in food, livestock and people. Experts say more should be done, but people shouldn’t worry … yet.

Karen Weintraub

USA TODAY

0:30

1:09

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.639.0_en.html#goog_1358338367

Even as several federal agencies scheduled a Wednesday news conference to explain steps being taken to monitor and contain bird flu in the U.S., public health officials this week said even more vigilance is needed.

Now is the time to get ahead of bird flu, a handful of experts said, so we don’t end up with another nightmare scenario.

“Every moment we’re not preparing for it, is a failure on our part,” said Dr. Nahid Bhadelia, an infectious disease specialist and founding director of Boston University’s Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases. “It is always later than we think it is in an outbreak.”

Bird flu is the nonscientific name for avian influenza, a type of flu virus that commonly infects waterfowl, turkeys and other birds. If it stays in birds, the main danger is to poultry. Flocks of chickens have had to be killed and eggs destroyed.

Bird flu is the nonscientific name for avian influenza, a type of flu virus that commonly infects waterfowl, turkeys and other birds.

The larger concern is that it might evolve to become easily transmitted person-to-person. Bird flu is considered more dangerous than the annual flu because it’s a strain humans have never encountered and it’s likely to be highly contagious.

This probably hasn’t happened yet, experts say.

“There’s no current evidence of sustained human-to-human transmission,” said Dr. Raj Panjabi, a part-time faculty member at Harvard Medical School and the former White House senior director for global health security and biodefense on the United States National Security Council.

“It’s the moment to get ready to step up investments in public health, especially around prevention, protection and preparedness,” Panjabi said.

https://cm.usatoday.com/article-body/inline-desktop_032624_USATBAU24

Federal officials Wednesday said the latest round of testing proves the commercial milk supply is safe, as are products like cottage cheese and sour cream that are made from milk. They continue to test people who work on farms and only one person is known to have caught the virus in recent months. Vaccines and antivirals should be available if bird flu becomes transmissible from person to person.

But public health officials say they suspect more people have caught the virus from animals than we’re aware of, and the chance of a bird flu pandemic cannot be ruled out.

Bhadelia said the absence of more human infections so far may reflect a lack of testing rather than a lack of actual infections.

“If I were a betting person, I would say there have probably been more human infections than what we’ve detected already in this country,” she said. “I would bet part of my retirement on that.”

In interviews this week, she and other leading epidemiologists, infectious disease, public policy and dairy industry experts, outlined four major concerns about bird flu, and one area where they feel mostly reassured:

It’s called ‘bird flu’ but it’s now in cows and other animals

What makes the outbreak so concerning is that the bird flu virus already has jumped from birds to other animals, including cows.

This form of avian influenza, a strain called H5N1, has been around since at least 1997, but it mutated a few years ago to become adaptable to more kinds of bird species as well as to mammals. Since then, it’s been found in a range of animals, including a bottlenose dolphin off the coast of Florida in March 2022 and 29 house cats in Poland in June 2023.

But finding it on American cattle farms in early February was still a surprise, said Gerry Parker, associate dean for Global One Health at the College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences at Texas A&M University. Cows are not considered especially vulnerable to flu.

A virus that can thrive in a range of mammals might thrive in humans.

“The probability is going up that we might get a genetic reassortment that could turn this into a human virus,” Parker said. “We don’t know that, but as this continues to circulate into more mammalian species, the likelihood just increases. It may never happen but if it did, it could easily become a potential pandemic threat.”

Do we really know where it’s spread?

Bird flu initially struck a single dairy farm in the Texas panhandle and spread to other dairy farms from there, Dr. Rosemary Sifford, chief veterinary officer with the Department of Agriculture, told reporters Wednesday.

But it’s still not clear exactly where the flu virus has spread or what it’s capable of, said several experts, including Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor of epidemiology and director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health.

What makes the outbreak so concerning is that the bird flu virus already has jumped from birds to other animals, including cows.

“Our surveillance is inadequate to know where this virus is and where it isn’t, which is critical for protecting farmworkers and people involved in the dairy industry ‒ but also important for staying ahead of this virus to prevent a future pandemic,” Nuzzo said.

About 100 people working on dairy and cattle farms have been tested for active infections. Nuzzo and others said testing should be more widespread and should also include tests to see whether some had already recovered from infections.

“If there are a lot more people infected who aren’t sick enough to go to the hospital, that would be important to know,” Nuzzo said. “We have to have a much stronger conversation about how to improve our surveillance.”

It’s also unclear exactly how this virus is being transmitted among animals, which is crucial information for slowing or stopping the spread and protecting people working on farms.

Although flu is typically a respiratory virus passed through the air and by touching contaminated surfaces, it has behaved differently among cows; at least some of the transmission appears to be through unpasteurized milk. Farm cats have contracted the virus, potentially by drinking this milk.

“We think milk is the primary vector for movement (of the virus),” Sifford told reporters.

Milking equipment is cleaned but not sterilized between cows, Parker said, so the virus may be transmitted when one cow with the virus in her milk leaves some of it on the machine to be picked up by the next cow’s udder.

The cows also passed it back to birds. Eight poultry flocks located near infected dairy herds contracted the virus after the cows did, though how they got it remains unclear.

No one knows how sick a person might get if they catch H5N1.

Researchers collect samples of wildlife where the H5N1 bird flu virus was detected, at Chilean Antarctic Territory, Antarctica, in this undated handout photo obtained by Reuters on March 13.

Birds often die; most cows, so far, have recovered from their infections, said Jamie Jonker, chief science officer of the National Milk Producers Federation.

The one farmworker in Texas who caught bird flu only suffered from an eye infection and apparently recovered fully. Bhadelia speculated he might have caught it by touching his eye after touching contaminated milking equipment, which is why the infection was focused on his eye.

Since 1997, about half the people hospitalized globally with bird flu have died. But Bhadelia said many more might have caught the virus from direct interactions with infected birds and never showed symptoms or were so mildly ill that they never required treatment ‒ so the actual death rate is unknown. Plus, if the virus did adapt to become transmissible in people, it might become milder, though we can’t count on that, she said.

In any kind of emerging crisis, there’s never enough data, Parker said. “I call it the fog of war,” he said.

Workers may not be adequately protected

Although the average American is not at risk right from bird flu, farmworkers, especially those working around poultry and cattle, probably are.

“We’ve been so fixated on, ‘Is this going to become a pandemic?’ and not enough on ‘There’s a threat on our farms today,'” Nuzzo said. “We should not wait for a severe illness in order to protect farmworkers.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently recommended dairy workers and people who come onto dairy farms use eye protection, wash their hands frequently and wear things like disposable coveralls if they travel from farm to farm, so as not to carry the virus with them, Jonker noted.

In addition to the basic worries about worker health, the more workers become infected, the greater the risk one of them won’t be able to clear the virus quickly. Viruses evolve as they pass from person to person but also within a single person, especially if they don’t shake it off quickly, Bhadelia said.

“The more people it infects, and the longer it adapts to the human body,” she said, the more likely the virus will become contagious ‒ and dangerous ‒ to other people.

Yes, there are vaccines and antivirals, but…

Unfortunately, even people who’ve gotten annual flu shots or caught the flu recently won’t have any protection against the H5N1 strain, said Lawrence Gostin, a leader in global health at Georgetown University, where he is faculty director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law.

The federal government has flu vaccine and antiviral stockpiles that theoretically could be useful if H5N1 becomes easily transmissible among people.

Sample ready for testing. On April 19, 2022, New York, USA, NYC high school students who work in a virology lab at Mount Sinai collected bird droppings in Central Park. They were looking for pathogens like bird flu and avian paramyxovirus 1, a virus that only affects poultry.

But public health experts say the reality is much more complicated.

There won’t be enough for everyone and the vaccine that’s been stockpiled hasn’t been tested to prove it can effectively prevent infection or severe disease.

“I don’t know that anyone has a vaccine that’s been tested thoroughly that anyone would be really confident about its effectiveness,” said Dr. Jeremy Luban, a professor at the UMass Chan Medical School and member of the executive committee of the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness. “Part of the problem is we don’t actually know what that virus is until it appears.”

Two companies are testing a candidate vaccine in early trials, David Boucher, a top official within the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, said at the news conference.

If the virus moves from animals into people, it will continue to mutate, so existing vaccines might not be effective and it’s challenging to develop and test a vaccine against a virus that does not yet exist, Luban said.

Such testing would take time and the flu virus, which mutates much faster than the virus that causes COVID-19, would continue to transform.

Antivirals, like Tamiflu, are likely to be effective against bird flu, federal officials say.

But they need to be taken within the first day or two after infection starts, at a time when most people aren’t even sure whether they are sick and well before they have time to make a doctor’s appointment and get and fulfill a prescription for an antiviral.

More: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2024/05/01/bird-flu-worry-government-preparedness-update/73519443007/

Also see: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/bird-flu-outbreak-dairy-cows-fails-deter-us-raw-milk-sellers-2024-05-02/

No one wants to think about pandemics. But bird flu doesn’t care.

A pandemic response that amounts to hoping and praying isn’t nearly enough.

By Kelsey Piper  May 3, 2024, 8:00am EDT

Share this story

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2024/5/3/24147217/bird-flu-h5n1-chickens-covid-pandemic-cattle-milk-virus-coronavirus

Two black-feathered chickens with red crests are in close-up, one in the foreground with its head turned and one eye looking at the viewer, the other slightly blurry in the background sitting down.
Rescued chickens gather in an aviary at Farm Sanctuary’s Southern California Sanctuary on October 5, 2022, in Acton, California.

Kelsey Piper is a senior writer at Future Perfect, Vox’s effective altruism-inspired section on the world’s biggest challenges. She explores wide-ranging topics like climate change, artificial intelligence, vaccine development, and factory farms, and also writes the Future Perfect newsletter.

This story is part of a group of stories called

Finding the best ways to do good.

The so-called “bird flu” H5N1 virus only rarely infects humans. Over the course of several decades during which it has circulated and resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of birds, about 880 cases in humans have been reported, generally in humans who work very closely with livestock.

But when it does make the leap to human hosts, H5N1 is often lethal — out of 26 cases reported since 2022, seven people died. That’s why it’s troubling that H5N1 has been recently discovered to have quietly spread across the country’s dairy farms, with testing finding genetic material of the virus present in 1 in 5 milk samples across the country. (Pasteurization kills the virus, so milk remains safe to drink.)

That prevalence suggests that H5N1 is now spreading in mammals — and since cows on dairy farms are in frequent contact with farm workers, it seems likely the virus will have many chances to evolve to spread more easily among humans. If it does that, we may have another pandemic on our hands.

None of that is great news, but the thing that has struck me most about the bird flu outbreak is that among the general public, it’s been greeted with a weariness that borders on indifference. The dominant attitude I’ve encountered when I ask people their concerns about bird flu amounts to “Well, I hope that doesn’t happen; I don’t have it in me to go through a pandemic again.”

The Covid-19 pandemic was awful for people — not just for the millions who died and the many more who it hospitalized and lastingly affected, but also for the billions whose daily life it damaged, from lockdowns and school closures to dramatic new restrictions on movement and travel. You might expect that precisely because Covid-19 was so awful, the general public would be raring to make sure it can never happen again, by insisting our leaders do whatever it takes to be prepared for the next pandemic.

But that doesn’t seem to have happened. Instead, with trust in our public health institutions badly damaged and many people suffering from pandemic fatigue, we now lack the attention span for the kind of serious policy response that could feasibly prevent the next pandemic.

Repeated efforts to get a serious pandemic prevention program through Congress have fizzled. Despite the desperation of Americans to not go through this again — or possibly because of the desperation of Americans to not go through this again — we’ve basically decided to handle pandemic preparedness by hoping really sincerely it doesn’t happen again.

But it will. If not with this virus, another one.

Crossing our fingers isn’t a policy response

H5N1 has never, as far as we know, had sustained human-to-human transmission. It may never mutate to be capable of that — many viruses don’t.

The CDC says “the current public health risk is low,” and while that gives me flashbacks to Covid, it’s accurate at this moment; unless you spend a lot of time with cows or poultry, or drink raw milk, you’re unlikely to be exposed unless the virus evolves new capabilities. H5N1 has been dancing along the line of human spillover for more than 25 years without making the full leap. Hoping really hard that it goes away might work out fine.

But if we are truly desperate to prevent the next pandemic — if we feel very viscerally that we can’t do this again, that our normalcy and our unmasked gatherings are among the most precious things we have these days — then that’s reason to prioritize preparedness more highly, not less so.

We need an actual, serious policy response aimed at looking closely at the possible origins of pandemics, at how to reduce human-wildlife interfaces. We should be closely monitoring research with pandemic potential, and work to improve our infrastructure for spotting pandemics early, developing vaccines and countermeasures.

If we want to stop pandemics, then stop pandemics

It’s very understandable that the general public doesn’t want to have to become an expert in the different varieties of pandemic-potential virus out there. They don’t want to check the CDC website for case numbers, don’t want to see another round of school closures, don’t want to let pandemics consume their life again.

But if there’s limited public pressure to prevent the next pandemic — the issue doesn’t rank among the most important ones for the 2024 elections — policymakers will evidently just not do it. So I think we have to, somehow, process the wreckage wrought by Covid, and turn our sense that we can’t live through this again into a determination to do better so we never have to.

Pandemics aren’t like earthquakes. They happen for predictable reasons, and we know how to stop them. It would be an enormous tragedy if we fail to get that work done because Covid-19 was so painful and so exhausting that we can’t even think clearly about the possibility it might happen again.

A version of this story originally appeared in the Future Perfect newsletter. Sign up here!

Kristi Noem’s VP chances appear as dead as the dog she killed. There are other reasons too.

Noem had long ago been all but cast aside as a likely running mate, according to six people close to Donald Trump.

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem gestures to the crowd.

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem gestures to the crowd prior to remarks from Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump at a campaign rally on March 16, 2024, in Vandalia, Ohio. | Jeff Dean/AP

By NATALIE ALLISON, ADAM WREN and ALEX ISENSTADT

05/02/2024 06:26 PM EDT

Kristi Noem’s damage-control tour is in full swing. It appears destined for the same fate as her late dog Cricket: dead in a gravel pit somewhere near Pierre.

But at Mar-a-Lago, even before the revelation about her dog, Noem had long ago been cast aside as a likely running mate, according to six people close to former President Donald Trump who, while not discounting Noem entirely, have for many weeks said she has almost no chance of being on the ticket. The Cricket saga was just the latest in one of the most spectacularly botched vice presidential contender rollouts in modern political history.

On Wednesday, days ahead of the release of her political memoir originally designed to boost her veepstakes campaign, Noem took to Sean Hannity to try to reset the disastrous political narrative surrounding her: that penning the anecdote about shooting her dog as an example of her ability to make difficult decisions had destroyed her vice presidential ambitions.

Noem will return to Trump’s turf in Palm Beach, Florida this weekend, addressing top-dollar donors with other prospective running mates at a luxury hotel. Two advisers to Noem, granted anonymity to speak freely, said they expect a Sunday show appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation” and additional excerpts from the book to also make news.

White House on Kristi Noem shooting her dog: ‘It’s very sad’Share

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.639.0_en.html#goog_1618095923Play Video

But it almost certainly won’t be enough to turn the tide of public opinion or, more importantly for Noem, the view of her inside Mar-a-Lago.

“She is of no use,” said Scott Jennings, a former President George W. Bush political adviser, comparing Noem to other running mate contenders, including North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Sens. Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) who would “have utility” on the Trump ticket.

“What does she bring?” Jennings said of Noem. “The possibility of weirdo drama. That’s it. She appeals to no constituency Trump doesn’t already have.”

For several years, Noem had appeared ascendant in Republican politics. She became one of the most vocal governors against Covid regulations, was a regular on the conservative television and conference circuit, hosted Trump for a 2020 Independence Day celebration and then gave him a miniature bust of Mount Rushmore with his face included.

But then came reports in conservative media of allegations that Noem was having an extramarital affair with former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski. Noem denied it, saying at the time that “these rumors are total garbage and a disgusting lie.” Yet despite Noem being invited to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago as recently as February, and campaigning for him in Iowa earlier this year, inside Trump’s orbit, the rumors stuck.

Not only have Trump aides been concerned about the reports, Trump himself expressed qualms about them, too. While entertaining visitors at Mar-a-Lago earlier this year, Trump made a joke about Noem’s “baggage,” according to a person with knowledge of the remarks and granted anonymity to speak freely.

In recent weeks — and in rapid succession — everything else came to knock down the negligible chances Noem had of getting tapped as running mate.

She was widely mocked after filming a bizarre infomercial-style video advertising for a Texas cosmetic dentistry that she said had given her a new “smile,” a promotion that raised ethics questions and led to a lawsuit against her.

Noem released new television advertisements featuring herself, spending millions of state dollars to dress up as a construction worker and state trooper — after filming previous spots pretending to be a plumber, dentist, electrician and welder — in an apparent bid to draw new residents to South Dakota.

Last weekend, Noem appeared on CNN, coming under fire after refusing to say whether abortion exceptions for rape and incest should be permitted, instead replying that she doesn’t “believe a tragedy should perpetuate another tragedy.” In South Dakota, all abortions are outlawed except to save a woman’s life.

 MOST READ

election-2024-trump-22641.jpg
  1. Kristi Noem’s VP chances appear as dead as the dog she killed. There are other reasons too.
  2. Gaetz under fire for defending antisemitism vote with antisemitic trope
  3. Why the Senate GOP is downplaying the chances of a red wave
  4. ‘Seize all cannabis’: Inside the surprising federal crackdown on New Mexico weed farmers
  5. Trump suggests he won’t accept 2024 election results in Wisconsin

“Are suburban women going to come and flock to Donald Trump? Probably not,” said David Urban, a former senior Trump campaign adviser. “Does Kristi Noem help that fact? Western governor, kind of a tough cowgirl, tough image. Not sure she’s the one that brings suburban women to the ballot box.”

Noem prioritizes ‘will of the people’ over personal views on abortionShare

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.639.0_en.html#goog_892201308Play Video

After the anecdote about 14-month-old Cricket came out, Noem’s advisers confessed they were taken aback that it garnered such intense backlash.

“I didn’t think that was going to be the headline,” a person close to Noem who had read the book told POLITICO. The person was granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on her behalf.

But news of Noem’s execution and disposal of her dog has continued to play out for more than a week, with Noem making multiple comments defending her decision, including saying on Wednesday that the dog was “not a puppy,” but a threat to her family.

“I think Gov. Noem’s efforts have been sophomoric,” said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump ally. “Running ads may have seemed clever, but to someone as sophisticated as Trump, her strategies have been a bit too obvious.”

“Killing the dog and then writing about it,” Gingrich added, “ended any possibility of her being picked as VP.”

https://a08606f5c114d439bf4a901fbf62c686.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Noem is set to appear at the Trump and Republican National Committee donor retreat taking place this weekend in Palm Beach, where Trump will also give remarks, joined by more than a dozen other “special guests.”

Noem is scheduled to speak on Saturday morning in a “breakfast conversation” with Burgum that will be moderated by RNC Chair Michael Whatley, according to a copy of the agenda.

A number of other Republicans seen as Trump running mate contenders, including Rubio, Vance and Scott, are also expected to appear. The event is expected to draw around 400 major donors, according to a person familiar with the planning.

But damage already done may prove irreversible.

Conservative commentator Erick Erickson, who on his show this week railed about Noem being a “psychopath,” told POLITICO that sharing the dog anecdote showed “poor judgment on her part.”

“If she did that to impress Trump, she forgot he’s hurting himself in the suburbs where they tend not to murder dogs,” Erickson said.

But even before the Cricket fiasco, Noem “had too much baggage,” Erickson said — though he speculated that, if picked for the ticket, it would have been “shrugged off” by conservatives.

Sen. Kevin Cramer, a Republican from the nearby state of North Dakota, described the likelihood of Noem getting on the ticket like this: “It’s hard to imagine a universe where bragging about shooting your 14-month-old puppy increases your brand value.”

The MAGA movement, said Steve Bannon, a former top Trump adviser, “is looking for a perfect compliment to President Trump,” which includes “someone who can help him win and help him govern.”

“But shooting an innocent puppy,” he said, “may be a tad too ‘based’ for many.”

World ‘on brink of hybrid World War 3’ which could lead to ‘radioactive Europe’

Story by Ewan Gleadow & Rudi Kinsella

 • 1h • 2 min read

World 'on brink of hybrid World War 3' which will lead to 'radioactive Europe'

World ‘on brink of hybrid World War 3’ which will lead to ‘radioactive Europe’© (Photo by Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

The world could be teetering on the edge of a “hybrid World War 3” if Russia’s terrifying invasion of Ukraine proves successful, experts have warned.

Russian president Vladimir Putin has advanced troops further into Donetsk, and if his war campaign is victorious, it could result in a radioactive Europe and full-scale conflict with NATO nations.Military strategy game criticized for being 'too realistic'

History Strategy GameMilitary strategy game criticized for being ‘too realistic’

Ad

Experts are warning that parts of Europe could face an “ecological catastrophe” if Putin’s forces defeat the Ukrainian defenders, potentially sparking similar wars worldwide.Chilling map shows which 75% of US population would be ‘killed’ in nuclear warVladimir Putin says ‘just three things’ stop Ukraine war ending as he’s ‘ready for peace’

Globsec, an international think tank, has cautioned that a sudden decrease in Western support and aid to Ukraine could tip the scales in favour of a Russian victory.

This would leave a real nuclear threat in Russia’s hands following their withdrawal from nuclear deterrence treaties.

The potential for nuclear threats could increase as the ripple effects of Ukraine’s defeat spread across Europe. Polish President Andrzej Duda has already declared he will launch nuclear missiles if necessary, leading to possible radioactive “contamination”.Winthrop: These Unsold Storage Units Are Being Given Away

Storage Unit DealsWinthrop: These Unsold Storage Units Are Being Given Away

Ad

The report stated: “Continuing risks of nuclear contamination in Europe, caused by artificially provoked technogenic catastrophes (like on Zaporizhzhya NPP) with consequent after-effects of humanitarian and ecological catastrophe on the entire continent.”

As Russia’s influence widens into wider Europe, experts are fearing a possible full-scale conflict with NATO, one that could potentially involve “nuclear components”. The stage of conflict might also extend worldwide, with Russia and North Korea strengthening ties.

The group raised the alarm stating, “Russia might feel ready at some point to attack other states like Georgia, Kazakhstan and Moldova,” and feared escalation of a “conventional war of NATO countries with Russia”.

Predictions for a peace agreement being orchestrated by Ukraines President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the coming year seem unlikely according to Globesco group. They cite upcoming elections in various nations as barriers to Zelenskyy’s establishment of his Peace Formulae.

Experts noted: “Peace talks with Russia will have no real perspective and will not be supported by almost the entire population of Ukraine.”

For the latest local news and features on Irish America, visit our homepage here.