More Coyote Killing

Coyote hunt begins Wednesday

Published: Monday, January 19, 2015 12:49 PM MST

Central Montana’s Coyote Hunt is slated to begin on Jan. 21.  The contest was initiated, when hunters saw more coyotes in the field than deer and antelope during hunting season.  The hunt has been successful in the eyes of many ranchers who have commented on previous years’ hunts. For hunters in the field this year, many noticed the coyotes seemed to be running in packs even sooner, and for many in the field it seemed as if a dent had not even been made in  the population of predators.

The cost of being on the poster and helping to fund the contest is $100. All money raised goes to the hunters who bring in their entries. The contest will be run the same as last year with the drop offs at Don’s Store and the Sport Center in Lewistown.

During last year’s contest there were hunters entering coyotes from all over Central Montana’s trade area including Harlowton, Ryegate, Jordan, Winnett, Grass Range, Big Sandy, Winifred, Geraldine, Denton, Stanford, Geyser, Hobson, Moccasin, Utica, Moore, Judith Gap and Lewistown.

No hunter or trapper is able to enter more than 50 in the contest. Each entry is given a ticket and at the end of the hunt on April 1 tickets are drawn for the prize money. Holding the drawing in this manner lets the hunter who enters once have as good a chance at the prize money as the rest of the hunters, except a hunter who shoots more coyotes gets more entries into the contest.

Sponsors this year are PJG Motorsports, Custom Cut Meats, Fleet Supply, Judith MTN Meats, Utica Rod and Gun Club, Lewistown Plumbing and Repair, Doc’s OK Corral, Yogo Inn, Lewistown Taxidermy, Big Dry Saddlery, Ace Hardware, Hilger Meats, Advanced Electric, Lewistown Propane, Lewistown Honda-Polaris-Kawasaki, Sport Center and Don’s Store. To be listed or be anonymous as a sponsor contact Dale or Charlie Pfau at Don’s Store 538-9408 or John Tognetti  at the Sport Center 535-9308.
Slaughter the Earth...

A Response to Pro-Wolf Article by Chris Albert

by Rosemary Lowe
Veterinarian, Chris Albert, has written a thoughtful article. While people “can” live with wild non-humans like wolves, etc., thus far, our species’ history does not support the likelihood of our ever changing our Humanist perceptions about wild animals, because this species is, for the most part, afraid of Nature, and wild animals; and perhaps even jealous of them, and their “wildness.” We like to “domesticate” things, and we already have turned much of the Earth into a Domesticated Feed Lot.
Yes, some of us love, admire & try to protect  wild animals.  But, would most even consider what “living with” or “near them” would mean to our convenient- for- humans lifestyle? For instance, most humans will not tolerate, anywhere, a so-called “nuisance wild animal” for long, and we see evidence of that everywhere, with ranching, trapping & hunting.

—Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson

—Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson

We live outside Santa Fe, on a former over-grazed ranch.The rancher trapped/poisoned coyotes, bobcat, prairie dogs, etc. Now, houses of about an acre and a half are here, and the wildlife here probably do better than before. Many of us in this community of about 5,000  are pleased  having the wildlife around: I have seen coyote in the day time, and there are some bobcat, quail, and an occasional pronghorn around. However, our AHA newsletter often has to remind residents that our covenants reflect an “appreciation”  of wildlife here, because invariably, there are those here who poison coyote, blaming them for every lost cat and dog, and they do not want wild animals near their kids.
People like to think that wildlife are “out there, somewhere,” but in reality, they would not tolerate any perceived inconvenience (or alleged harm) they might cause.
Human society was designed for humans, not nature, so nature must be pushed back, and that means wildlife & wild places.
Most of us on this blog think this is wrong. But, our human activities here and around the word prove that humans will not “co-exist” with wild animals, because we never really did. It was always an adversarial relationship, and it is not getting better, especially now with human population exploding: going on 7+ billion, to 8, 9 or more billion. What will be left for wildlife? Where will they live? Most wild animal populations are in severe decline around the world.
 Will caring humans (not the majority, I’m afraid) make the hard sacrifices necessary to make more room for surviving wildlife, especially in a world now affected by increasing climate change? Is our species capable of shedding our environmentally-destructive Humanist Ideologies in order to save what is left of Nature?
Rosemary Lowe
image
EARTH for Animals

Environmentalists Against Ranching, Trapping and Hunting

Local coyote hunt draws some controversy

10616612_10152350306096218_4761797786719948975_n

Petition to stop this: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/925/824/605/stop-the-nv-coyote-killing-tournament/?taf_id=13277304&cid=fb_na

Article:

Local hunters have organized a coyote hunt, which has raised hackles of animal protection groups.

The Saturday event, called a coyote calling contest, is similar to hunts in other parts of Nevada and Western states. Coyotes are an unprotected species in Nevada; a license or permit is not required to hunt them, according to the Nevada Department of Wildlife.

“This was set up for local people to get together,” said Jason Schroeder, one of the organizers. “It’s a very small gathering of probably 20 to 40 people.”

The hunting will take place on BLM land around the state, Schroeder said. A post-hunt party and game feed is planned at a Lemmon Valley bar.

The controversy kicked up when copies of a flier announcing the event landed in the email boxes of Nevadans for Responsible Wildlife Management and Nevada Votes For Animals.

“This is really just killing for entertainment,” said Gina Griesen, president of Nevada Votes for Animals. “This is an organized hunt where prizes are awarded, and that is unethical.”

California banned similar contests earlier this month, the first state to do so.

More: http://www.rgj.com/story/news/2014/12/26/local-coyote-hunt-draws-controversy/20918965/

The Poll is now tied-Please Vote!

Someone from the other side (the anti-animal, anti-nature side) must be encouraging their friends to vote for hunting predators. This morning the poll was tied at 47 to 47.
Please go here and vote for a ban on predator hunting: http://www.capecodtimes.com/news  (half way down the page, on the right hand column)
A group of wildlife conservationists asked Cape Cod National Seashore officials to ban hunting for meat-eating predators such as coyotes and foxes on the 44,000-acre park.
Do you support the ban or the hunters?
  • Total Votes: 3118
  • Ban hunting for coyotes, foxes and other predators
    47%
  • Let hunting for predators continue
    47%
  • No opinion
    6%
    photo by Jim Robertson

    photo by Jim Robertson

Vote in Poll for Coyotes and Foxes

“A group of wildlife conservationists asked Cape Cod National Seashore officials to ban hunting for meat-eating predators such as coyotes and foxes on the 44,000-acre park. Do you support the ban or the hunters?”
Vote in Poll on lower right column here:

Can’t decide whether to cast your vote on the side of the wildlife or the hunters? Here’s an example of a typical coyote hunter’s hateful mentality, sent today as a comment to this blog (and promptly deleted).

It is posted here verbatim sic (“thus was it written”)  for full authenticity:

 “we will shoot them even if there isn’t a contest they kill are livestock witch is are livelihood. we also sell the pelts there is nothing wrong with this. this also helps with other animals such as Deere and elk.”

Jim Robertson-wolf-copyright

Hung and Christmas-decorated coyote stirs outrage

Hung and Christmas-decorated coyote stirs outrage

Posted by Ted McDermott on Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM

Earlier this week, Christine Svoboda was driving from her home in Thompson Falls to Plains when she caught sight of something strange and disturbing on the side of River Road, near the Sanders County Fairgrounds: a coyote, hanging by its ankle from a tree, with a red Christmas bow. She initially thought it was a wolf.

CHRISTINE SVOBODA

  • Christine Svoboda

“I was mortified by it,” Svoboda says. “I like wildlife. I moved to Montana, because I love living among nature, and then you see sad things. It’s cruelty to animals, is what it is. It’s very disrespectful to animals.”

Sanders County Commissioner Carol Brooker, who represents the Plains area, says she doesn’t know a lot about the offending coyote, but she does know Svoboda isn’t the only one alarmed by bizarre decoration. According to Brooker, River Road is the second busiest thoroughfare in the county. Its traffic, she says, regularly includes school buses.

“It’s really unnerved a lot of people,” Brooker says.

While Brooker says there is an old ranching tradition of hanging dead coyotes to ward off other coyotes from vulnerable livestock, she doesn’t believe this to be the intention in this case.

“This particular place that this is hanging, I don’t think they have any livestock,” Brooker says, adding that the animal is in a yard, not on a ranch.

According to Brooker, the Sander County Sheriff’s Department is aware of the coyote but is unable to do anything about it, since it’s on private property. As for Svoboda, she says she took photos of the hung animal in an attempt to raise awareness.

“I thought maybe I would try to just let them know that somebody knows, that somebody saw it, and maybe it’s not okay to do that,”

http://m.bigskypress.com/IndyBlog/archives/2014/12/11/hung-and-christmas-decorated-coyote-stirs-outrage

Seashore asked to ban predator hunting

Vote in Poll on lower right column here:
“A group of wildlife conservationists asked Cape Cod National Seashore officials to ban hunting for meat-eating predators such as coyotes and foxes on the 44,000-acre park. Do you support the ban or the hunters?”
                                                           …

Conservationists call on park leaders to prohibit coyote and fox hunting

By Mary Ann Bragg
mbragg@capecodonline.com
Posted Dec. 12, 2014

SOUTH WELLFLEET – A request from wildlife conservationists to ban coyote and fox hunting in the Cape Cod National Seashore will be considered by the agency’s managers in the next few weeks.

Predator Defense, a conservation group in Oregon, joined with backers, including about 30 people on Cape Cod, to ask Seashore officials in a letter Tuesday to ban the hunting of meat-eating predators within the Seashore’s 44,000 acres. The Seashore boundaries include public and private lands across the Cape’s six easternmost towns.

Meat-eating predators found in the Seashore would include Eastern coyote, red fox, river otter and fisher, and in the future, could include gray fox, bobcat and black bear, according to the Predator Defense letter.

The Seashore follows state hunting regulations except for banning all hunting from March 1 through Aug. 31 and allowing a spring turkey hunt, according to Seashore Chief of Natural Resource Management Jason Taylor. The Seashore also operates under a 2007 final environmental impact statement hunting program that manages traditional hunting practices with National Environmental Policy Act standards, such as minimizing the effect on wildlife populations and ecosystems.

“The EIS was fully vetted over multiple years, so I’m not sure why we’re talking about this now,” Taylor said Thursday. Taylor said he and Seashore Superintendent George Price would likely meet to discuss the letter within the next few weeks and craft a response. He said he supported the idea in the letter that predator species are important to maintain a balance within the ecosystem, but that the Seashore is experiencing an imbalance with too many animals because of humans feeding them or leaving trash behind.

In response, Brooks Fahy of Predator Defense and wildlife conservationist Louise Kane, of Eastham, said Thursday that the Seashore had no data to back up a claim of imbalance with coyotes.

“We’d like to meet with them,” Kane said.

For 2014, state regulations allowed coyote hunting Jan. 1 through March 8, and then from Oct. 18 through the end of the year. In 2014, red and gray fox hunting was allowed Jan. 1 through Feb. 28, and then from Nov. 1 through the end of the year. There are no daily or season hunting limits for coyotes or foxes, state records show.

The state’s trapping season in 2014 for coyote and fox was Nov. 1 through Nov. 30, and the trapping season for river otter is Nov. 1 through Dec. 15. The trapping season for fisher was Nov. 1 through Nov. 22.

Statewide, there are an estimated 10,000 coyotes, and they and fox are considered abundant throughout the state including on Cape Cod, according to state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Chief of Information and Education Marion Larson. There is not a state estimate on the number of foxes, Larson said.

On Cape Cod, there are an estimated 200 to 250 coyotes at the end of the winter, before new pups are born, according to coyote researcher Jonathan Way of Barnstable. The coyotes in Massachusetts, called Eastern coyotes, are a hybrid of a coyote and a wolf, according to Way, and he refers to them as “coywolves.” Way was one of the backers of the Predator Defense letter.

The Seashore does not maintain population studies or harvest records on coyotes or other animals hunted under state regulations, Taylor said. “What we see is basically what we observe as we do the other work on the park,” he said.

State records show 24 coyotes and two red foxes were killed in the 2013-2014 season in Barnstable County. Larson said all hunters and trappers are required to report their harvests.

Way, though, said about 100 coyotes are killed each year on Cape Cod.

Coyotes have a natural ability to regulate their population size, and typically would have a pack of three or four adult animals and a territory of about 6 to 10 square miles, Way said. Killing through hunting disrupts the packs and territories and can lead to problems such as more pups being born and more predation of domestic animals, Way said.

“The national park is the ultimate place to have a setting where you can actually study them,” he said. “The population gets stable and they can actually act like a coyote.”

The concerns noted in the Predator Defense letter include that killing “top” predators such as coyotes can cause an overabundance of smaller predators. Hunting does not reduce predation, and killing coyotes for sport rather than to eat is unethical, according to the letter. Heavily hunted animals also show signs of higher stress, the letter stated.

— Follow Mary Ann Bragg on Twitter:@maryannbraggCCT. 

—Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson

—Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson

Giving Tuesday –A message from Queen’s Brian May‏

PC_logo_vector_3_line_tagline2
Donate-button 2 Email button You Tube button Twitter button Facebook button
    Brian-May-Video-Title
Dear Friend of Wildlife,

I’m probably best known to many of you as a founding member and guitarist of the rock group Queen.

Today, on Giving Tuesday I am reaching out to you as the founder of the Save Me campaign to protect British wildlife. We work year-round with concerned citizens to save badgers and foxes from being killed for sport and from being slaughtered as part of ill-advised wildlife ‘control’.

When I learned what Project Coyote was doing, I asked Camilla Fox how I could help. I’m now proud to announce that I have been appointed a Project Coyote Ambassador.

Will you join me in making a year-end donation to Project Coyote? Every dollar that you give will make a difference to the wild animals with whom we share this planet. With your support, we can make a better world for our grandchildren to inherit.

Please watch my video message and make a gift to Project Coyote today. Together we can move from killing toward coexistence.

Kids Killing Coyotes

From Anti-Hunting in America:
This is another sadistic page that promotes the killing of wildlife, and then setting up the dead animals for ridiculous pictures as they stand over smirking with guns in their hands.

They use the term “raising them right” a lot as another reason to try and justify their obsession with killing and letting their kids do it. They genuinely believe that if kids are not out hunting then they will be somewhere else causing trouble. So basically if you are not giving your kids guns and letting them kill helpless animals, you are raising them wrong.

Photo Credit – Facebook.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rack-Em-Up/810718095613660?sk=timeline See More

Photo: This is another sadistic page that promotes the killing of wildlife, and then setting up the dead animals for ridiculous pictures as they stand over smirking with guns in their hands.

They use the term "raising them right" a lot as another reason to try and justify their obsession with killing and letting their kids do it. They genuinely believe that if kids are not out hunting then they will be somewhere else causing trouble. So basically if you are not giving your kids guns and letting them kill helpless animals, you are raising them wrong.

Photo Credit - Facebook.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rack-Em-Up/810718095613660?sk=timeline