Friend,

View this email in your browser

Wolves Lose at MT Commission Hearing

Apologies for not updating you sooner about the August 19, 2026, Montana Fish & Wildlife Commission meeting. After another exhausting day in Helena, I needed time to process everything. These meetings have been particularly tough over the past six years, especially as proposals and amendments often change for the worse, and commenters only get a minute or two. That limited time makes it more challenging to cover all the wolf and furbearer proposals, including bobcats, otters, beavers, trap setback removals, wolves, and several amendments—leaving me with only seconds for each.

Despite the pressure, I tried to address the main proposals since they’re all important to Trap Free Montana. If time had permitted, I would have refined my remarks on wolves to focus more directly on the central issue. Meanwhile, several participants, both in-person and joining via Zoom, presented compelling and well-articulated comments regarding the wolf proposals.

Yet, rather than exercising caution, the commission chose to increase the department’s proposed wolf quota by an additional 50 wolves. Despite Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) openly admitting uncertainty about the current wolf population—and even acknowledging that their estimates may have been inflated by as much as 34% over the years—the commission disregarded these warnings and opted against a more conservative approach.

For years, FWP has said we have ~ 1,100 wolves, “a stable population”, but that was based on a critically flawed population model, IPOM. Recently, with a mere tweak of the software, forming IPOM2.0, they claim Montana may only have 618 – 836 wolves left. The point is, no one knows, but we have suspected for years that there are far less wolves.

FWP’s response was a proposed reduction to a 250-quota for the 2026/2027 Montana wolf season, after a 458-quota last season which claimed the lives of a reported 247 wolves. The general public saw this quota change as a win for wolves, but it is nothing close to that.

During the public meeting, Region 1 Commissioner Wargo’s amendment was discussed that had arrived just days before. He proposed regional quotas bringing the total quota to 317 wolves.  Commissioners opposed and new numbers for regions were quickly inserted, i.e. Region 1 with a high wolf quota of 131, whereas last year 98 wolves were reported killed by hunters and trappers, and a 92 quota for Region 2, likewise well over previous years kills. Region 3 Commissioner Brooke managed to get a reduced quota of 33 wolves in her region where it is easier to shoot wolves and her amendment passed that reduces individual hunting quotas to 5 wolves in Region 3. Elsewhere, individuals can kill 10 wolves by hunting and 10 by trapping/snaring.

Region 4 was assigned a quota of 28 wolves, almost double their average reported kills. Region 5 now has a quota of 6 and Region 6 and 7 each have quotas of 4 wolves. It is seriously doubtful the Commissioners took a look at past kill reports. Honestly, it was if they pulled them out of a hat to come up and quickly with what seemed a goal of a 300-wolf quota. 

Together, we achieved two genuine victories: both units 313 and 316, bordering Yellowstone, were restored to a quota of just one wolf each thanks to Region 4 Vice Chair Walsh’s amendment. Additionally, the commission rejected Commissioner Wargo’s proposal to extend the wolf hunting season by three months—until June 15—which would have resulted in a nine-month season and permitted the killing of newborn and dependent wolf pups in the Bob Marshall Wilderness.

As a result, the total wolf quota for the 2026/2027 season stands at 300. 

After 2 hours of public commenting in person and over zoom, with wolf advocates dominating, Commissioner Wargo, said nothing that was said that was going to change anything. 

What went largely unaddressed during the nearly five-hour public meeting on wolves was the broader context of wolf mortality in Montana. According to FWP, beyond the reported wolves killed by hunters and trappers, an average of 55-additional wolves are documented who die each year due to poaching, vehicle and train collisions, incidental deaths, natural causes, unknown factors, landowner actions, and for livestock. FWP is certain that even more wolves perish annually, underscoring the broader impact that isn’t fully captured by official quotas alone. Yet, therein has lied the focus… quotas. Furthermore, the commission approved 15 wolves total for landowners under SB200, and who can collect $1,000 – $1,500 bounties per wolf, plus no limit, and no commission monitoring of wolves killed by federal officials, i.e. Wildlife Services, FWP, etc.

Therefore, if a mid-point from an uncertain, not peer-reviewed, population model, IPOM2.0, guestimates only 725 wolves are left in Montana and a quota of 300 is hit plus the average 55, that would be a 49% reduction and leave ~ 370 wolves left, falling below the arbitrary 450-wolf population floor, some believe is the ceiling, for Montana’s wolf management goal.

Even if the average known mortalities combined over the last 5-years of 272 wolves shot/trapped and 55 killed from other causes, that results in 327 wolves dead from the population, which is 45% of the ~ 725.

Ultimately, the number of wolves remaining in Montana is unknown, yet fewer wolves are being reported killed even as relentless efforts, with multiple means of unfair chase, to reduce their numbers persist. Unfortunately, the choices made by the commission have only exacerbated the challenges facing the species. Notably, scientific consensus warns that reducing the wolf population by more than 29% jeopardizes their long-term viability, underscoring the urgent need for more responsible management practices.

MEDIA Links:

‘Split the difference’: Fish & Wildlife Commission sets Montana wolf harvest quota. 

Despite overwhelming public oppostion, Montana FWC approves killing 300 wolves.

Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission approve lower wolf quota.

 

By and large bobcats also lost:

Region 1 bobcat quota: instead of being reduced to 175, Wargo’s amendment passed keeping the quota at 200 and despite the biologists saying even last year that the quota needed to be reduced to 175 because of the continuing declining bobcat population in NW Montana after years of trapper overkill.

Region 5 bobcats: FWP proposed an increase quota from 50 to 75. The Commission decided it is better to try and kill 100 bobcats, likely because their fur value has greatly increased again.

Region 7 bobcats: proposal to reduce the 600 quota to 300 passed. They have rarely ever hit 300 and that was from years ago.

Otter Region 5: quota increased from 4 to 8, even though they went over quota last year. This is a common response to simply allow more killing.

Removal of Trap Setbacks Passed in Lincoln and more in Sanders counties. Thereby, increasing the public safety threat.

Halting beaver and otter trapping temporarily in beaver translocation areas: Passed. However, they did not include muskrat, despite our request.

Again, friends, this is why we have felt litigation has become our best option.

There are some court cases Trap Free Montana are involved with and some are progressing.
Stay Tuned.
 

Lastly, a well-done enlightening film on the history of wolves is showing in Bozeman on August 29th!
We were privy to seeing the film before it aired, publicly, and it is well-worth it!
 

Thank you’s will be going out this coming week for the wonderful donations and please know we truly value our monthly contributors, too!

It was great seeing some diehard wolf advocates, especially those who made the journey!

  Thank you!

KC York, president, founder and on behalf of the board of directors.

DONATIONS are tax-deductible to Trap Free Montana and are greatly appreciated.

Trap Free Montana was established in 2016 as a 501(c)3.
Our mission is: Connecting hearts and minds through the best available science, truths in trapping, and compassion for the plight of wildlife, and promoting biodiversity, respectful coexistence, responsible stewardship, and trap free Montana public lands.
81-3736597

Portugal Turns to Hunting to Control Wild Boar

Portugal is pursuing a strategy to reduce wild boar numbers through hunting and extraordinary density adjustments, but the widely reported figure of almost 300,000 animals does not come from a current count: it is an estimate based on data collected in 2021 and subject to a wide margin of variation.

Most read

A drone to get wild boar out of the woods [+]

Thirsty and dehydrated roe deer: one enters a car [+]

Alarm Over Roe Deer Fawn Deaths in Bavaria [+]

Beretta 694 Black DLC: What the New [+]

Wolf Following Dog Walkers Tests Germany’s [+]

CdC

|

August 22, 2026

|

News,Wild Boar

Areport published by Le Chasseur Français has once again drawn attention to the spread of wild boar in Portugal and the use of hunting to reduce its impact. The French publication cites around 300,000 animals in mainland Portugal, as well as agricultural damage, accidents and incursions into urban and tourist areas.

The official documents reviewed confirm the approximate scale of the figure, although they also require it to be qualified. A health declaration by Portugal’s Directorate-General for Food and Veterinary Affairs gives a central estimate of 277,385 wild boar, with a range of 163,157 to 391,612. The data used were collected between January and December 2021 by the University of Aveiro as part of the Wild Boar Strategic and Action Plan promoted by the ICNF.

An Estimate, Not a 2026 Census

The Portuguese documentation itself warns that the figures represent an estimate of abundance by hunting area, not a density calculated per unit of land. The range was obtained by applying an average coefficient of variation of 0.41 to the local estimates. Presenting the 300,000 animals as an exact and current snapshot of the population may therefore be misleading.

The Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests explains that the plan was developed by the University of Aveiro’s CESAM between September 2020 and December 2022. Its objectives included determining the size of the population, assessing the animals’ condition and analysing the habitat and factors associated with damage. The agency considers that this information should be used to design sustainable management and mitigate damage to agriculture and forestry, as well as health risks.

Official sources do describe a population whose development requires intervention. The technical recommendations include concentrating hunting effort at the start of the season, favouring collective methods over individual ones when a greater population-level effect is sought, and directing part of the cull towards females and subadult animals. These are proposals contained in the plan, not new obligations approved in August 2026.

Extraordinary Density Adjustments and Health Surveillance

The most specific measure identified for 2026 is Notice No. 1/2026, signed on 19 February. The decision allowed hunting-area owners and managers to use the RUBUS system to request extraordinary density adjustments through driven hunts between 1 and 15 March. Each application had to be assessed individually and could be authorised only if it did not compromise the site’s conservation values.

The ICNF justified these measures on the grounds of preventing African swine fever, damage to agricultural crops and forests, and road accidents. It also noted that weather conditions had prevented many scheduled driven hunts from taking place. The document therefore confirms a temporary increase in control efforts, but does not in itself demonstrate that new national regulations were adopted this August.

Health surveillance completes the strategy. The DGAV states that the last outbreak of African swine fever recorded in Portugal occurred on 15 November 1999. The disease does not affect people, but it can cause high mortality among swine and serious economic consequences. Portugal requires suspected cases to be reported and allows wild boar found dead to be reported through the ANIMAS application.