Opinion: Wolves need federal protection to survive

“Wolf recovery in the West — the biggest success in wildlife management history — took decades to achieve.”

Yellowstone National Park employees guide a mule-driven sled carrying eight gray wolves to a release site in Yellowstone National Park, Wyo., in Jan., 1995.  (POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Yellowstone National Park employees guide a mule-driven sled carrying eight gray wolves to a release site in Yellowstone National Park, Wyo., in Jan., 1995. (POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

By Ted Williams | Writers on the Range

PUBLISHED: March 26, 2025 at 6:00 AM MDT

On Jan. 31, the 30th anniversary of wolves getting reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park, congressional representatives Lauren Boebert, R.Colo., and Tom Tiffany, R.Wis., introduced their “Pet and Livestock Protection Act.”

It would abolish Endangered Species Act (ESA) protections for wolves in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Washington, Oregon, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Colorado and Michigan, among other states.

“Protective listings,” wrote Boebert, are the work of “leftists (who) cower to radical environmentalists.”

As Boebert notes, populations of wolves have rebounded. But the constant slaughter of the animals in the Northern Rockies makes it likely that at some point, federal recovery actions will once more be necessary. That can’t happen if Boebert’s bill succeeds because it contains a provision that blocks courts from again ordering protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Wolf recovery in the West — the biggest success in wildlife management history — took decades to achieve. I served on the advisory board of the Wolf Fund, which pushed for wolves coming back to Yellowstone, helped get grants for wolf recovery and urged recovery in national publications. As a lifelong hunter, I confronted wolf-haters publicly.

But what does recovery look like?

00:00

02:00

Read More

In Montana, wolf quotas are increasingly liberal. In 2023 alone, a quarter of the state’s wolves were killed. The population is declining by about 100 animals per year, but that’s not fast enough for wolf-haters. Montana’s legislature is considering a bill for non-stop hunting until a 600-wolf quota is reached.

The sponsor, 19-year-old Rep. Lukas Schubert, Republican from Kalispell, says it’s needed “to drive the wolf population down faster.”

In Idaho and Wyoming, one may collect bounties by choking wolves to death with neck snares, gunning them down from helicopters, shooting them at night, attacking them with dogs, burning pups and nursing mothers in their dens, and trapping. In Wyoming, it is still legal to chase wolves from snowmobiles — a sport known as “wolf whacking.”

Wayne Pacelle, president and founder of Animal Wellness Action and Center for a Humane Economy, said, “It’s astonishing to me that, last year, House Republican leaders brought up a bill to remove all federal protections for wolves on the heels of the gut-wrenching revelations about cruelty to wolves in Wyoming. In that state, a man ran down a wolf with a snowmobile and crushed the animal… Then he paraded her around a bar before finally killing her.”

That is why states can’t be trusted when they allow such practices and when they jeopardize wolf recovery.

Wolves also get unfairly blamed for fewer animals to hunt. Elk are being depleted by wolves, proclaim the Sportsmen’s Alliance, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, all of which sued to block ESA protections.

But in most of their range, elk are dangerously above population objectives. The real issue for these litigants is that with wolves back in the ecosystem, elk are acting like wild animals again, becoming more wary and harder for hunters to kill.

Wolves do occasionally kill livestock, especially livestock unprotected by fences and guard dogs. Much of that loss is compensated, and sometimes wolves need to be moved out of an area.

But wolves can be useful on the land, killing deer and elk that have contracted chronic wasting disease (CWD). Dan Ashe, former U.S. Fish and Wildlife director, said wolves and other predators cleanse CWD from the environment by removing infected ungulates.

In a column for Writers on the Range, Ashe noted that the CWD pathogen is a self-replicating protein called a “prion” that is not alive. Humans can’t kill it by inoculating animals or even by cooking infected flesh. Wolves, however, are immune to the prions, deactivating them through digestion.

Here’s the irony: Princeton University biologist Andrew Dobson and University of Calgary biologist Valerius Geist theorized in a 2003 Denver Post news story that “killing off the wolf allowed CWD to take hold in the first place.”

Because CWD may infect humans, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns people not to handle or eat infected game. In 2022, two hunters died who ate venison from a CWD-ravaged deer herd. CWD seems the likely culprit in their deaths.

“We are quite unprepared,” warns Michael Osterholm, Center for Infectious Disease director at the University of Minnesota. “If we saw a spillover (to humans) right now, we would be in free fall.” In the words of Dan Ashe about wolves, “Emerging science tells us that these apex predators aren’t the enemy, they’re allies.”

Ted Williams is a contributor to Writers on the Range, writersontherange.org, an independent nonprofit dedicated to spurring lively conversation about the West. He is a longtime environmental writer and author.

Bills would extend wolf hunting season and allow for thermal imagery

Clayton Murphy, University of Montana School of Journalism | Last updated Mar 27, 2025 10:5am0

ShareXPinterestShare

Adobe Stock image

A Senate Fish and Game Committee meeting last week was dedicated entirely to three hours of fiery debate on two controversial gray wolf management bills from Rep. Paul Fielder, R-Thompson Falls.

House Bill 258 would extend the seven-month wolf hunting season by another three months and House Bill 259 would legalize infrared and thermal imagery for wolf management.

Fish, Wildlife and Parks Chief of Conservation Policy Quentin Kujala, speaking for the department director, opposed the season’s extension into Spring.

“A spring hunting season during denning periods could result in undocumented and indirect mortalities of pups if the lactating female is killed, as well as direct hunting mortality of pups,” Kujala said. “Indirect mortality of pups could also result from increased harvests of other pack wolves at and near den locations.”

Kujala was among more than 40 opponents to the bill, compared with eight proponents. Proponents cited wolf-related livestock, elk and deer deaths as reasons to support the bill, saying the FWP needs more tools to maintain wildlife populations.

The House amended the season extension bill last month to set a 15-mile boundary around national parks, a motion that passed near-unanimously. But Fielder is working to remove that amendment, a decision that will ultimately be left up to the Senate committee.

House Bill 259 attracted many of the same proponents and opponents to testify. Kris Killorn with Safari Club International supported the thermal optics bill, saying he sees it as a simple cleanup of prior legislation.

“I remember when it was first passed, night vision was understood as being anything that could see at night. So they thought thermals and all that was in there,” Killorn said. “ We need to add these tools because as our wolves get smarter, they are more nocturnal, just like a lot of animals are.”

But opponents continued to protest what they see as an extended privilege given to wolf hunters, which one conservation lobbyist called a “weapon in the crusade to eradicate wolves from Montana.”

Another effort from Rep. Shannon Maness, R-Dillon, for an unlimited wolf hunting quota when the population is above 550, is also being heard in the Senate. Rep. Jamie Islay, D-Bozeman, carried a bill to classify wolves as furbearers in an attempt to provide more legal sideboards to their harvest, but the bill missed a key deadline and has died.

You might be interested in:

Dog mistaken for wolf shot dead in Sierra County; sheriff’s office investigating

By Cecilio Padilla

Updated on: March 19, 2025 / 1:25 PM PDT / CBS Sacramento

SIERRA COUNTY – An investigation is underway in the Northern California high country after a dog apparently mistaken for a wolf was shot and killed.

The Sierra County Sheriff’s Office posted earlier this week that a dog owner was looking for their lost pet, named Benson, who had run off from the Sierra Brooks neighborhood. Benson was less than a year old and friendly, the owners reported.

Deputies say, Tuesday morning, they also got reports of a possible wolf sighting in the Sierra Brooks area. Further investigation revealed that the sighting was actually that of a dog that had escaped its yard.

https://www.facebook.com/v4.0/plugins/post.php?app_id=&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Dfbe466b88a7e61c2a%26domain%3Dwww.cbsnews.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.cbsnews.com%252Ffa1ea5cf75c44c2b0%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=980&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fsierracosheriff%2Fposts%2Fpfbid0L5wP9o8asLkxcapDiLJW934J5Wnu4ktxxNeyHjy3oKrLyU7h8d3EBCxwYvWCeER8l&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&width=552

Notably, deputies say the dog mistaken for a wolf had an orange collar – unlike the kind of GPS collars some of the gray wolves have that are being tracked in eastern Sierra County.

Later on Tuesday, the sheriff’s office revealed that the dog that had been mistaken for a wolf was found dead. It had apparently been shot, deputies say.

The sheriff’s office says they are continuing to investigate the dog’s death and are interviewing people. The person who originally posted about the dog is cooperating with the investigation, deputies say, and isn’t considered a suspect. 

00:21

02:00

See More

Sierra Brooks is a Sierra County community about 40 miles north of Truckee. 

Gray wolves are listed as an endangered species in California, meaning taking an animal is prohibited anywhere in the state.