Vulture culture: Why these often-reviled birds are really needed by nature

Phaedra Trethan

USA TODAY

0:48

/

0:55

It’s not exactly a compliment to be called a vulture.

They circle overhead when disaster or death is imminent. They scavenge and scrounge, feeding on things killed by nature or man, feasting on the leftovers of other animals.

With their long necks and sparse feathering on their heads, vultures can be downright scary looking, lacking the majesty of the bald eagle, the sleek style of ravens, or the beauty of hawks.

Vultures are a Halloween and horror movie staple, symbolizing death and decay. Even when they’re portrayed sympathetically − like the Liverpool-accented foursome Buzzie, Flaps, Ziggy and Dizzy in Disney’s “The Jungle Book” − they’re bumbling, unloved, hapless creatures.

When they gather as a committee when resting, a kettle when flying, or somewhat disturbingly, a wake when feeding on a carcass, vultures can be a bit unnerving.

Just ask residents in one small Northeast Pennsylvania town. Denise Ackerman told the Honesdale town council at a recent meeting: “These vultures are turning our sweet little town into a horror movie!”

Ackerman said she wasn’t anti-vulture; she understands that living in a rural area, they’re basically her neighbors along with other wildlife. But “when I wake up in the morning there are 20-30 vultures in a tree… or descended into the grass,” Ackerman said, according to the Tri-County Independent.

Honesdale’s Mayor Derek Williams acknowledged that vultures are a protected species and suggested vulture effigies to scare the real ones off. He even compared black vultures to humans, saying he learned they are “very social, mate for life, and hold strong family bonds.

Get the Daily Briefing newsletter in your inbox.

The day’s top stories, from sports to movies to politics to world events.

Delivery: DailyYour Email

“My guess is they want a similar quality of life as we do and that we could all figure something out,” Williams said.

So why should we be glad when vultures do show up on our rooftops and light poles? Lots of reasons, according to wildlife experts.

A vulture and other birds fly over the piles of garbage at Middle Point Landfill in Murfreesboro, Tenn., Aug. 13, 2024.

Like a Kardashian with wings: ‘Nature’s influencers’

Vultures are “nature’s influencers, curating cleaner ecosystems, building their networks and teaching us how to improve conservation practices,” according to an October 2024 story on the World Wildlife Fund website.

The conservation nonprofit calls vultures “nature’s dedicated waste management specialists.” The world’s 23 vulture species, including turkey vultures, black vultures and California condors (which are endangered) here in the U.S., have sharp vision to help them spot carrion from high above.

Turkey vultures gather in Visalia, Calif., trees along Court Street at Green Oaks Drive on Nov. 13, 2012.

Vultures not only consume dead animals that might otherwise remain out in the elements to decompose, according to the Wildlife Center of Virginia, but they also help stop the spread of disease by consuming the bacteria and other germs the carcass might give off. Vultures’ stomachs have enzymes in them to kill off toxins and microorganisms they ingest when they feed on carrion.

Unlike raptors such as eagles and hawks, vultures don’t have the kind of strong talons needed for hunting. Instead, their long toes and blunt talons are better suited for walking or standing while they feed.

Long, hooked bills help vultures tear at muscle and other tissue; the lack of feathers on their heads helps them stay clean as they eat somewhat, uh, messy meals.

America’s vultures, and some good news about condors

In the U.S., there are three species of vultures: turkey vultures, black vultures and California condors. According to Audubon.org, turkey vultures are the most common, found throughout the continental U.S., while black vultures are found mostly in the nation’s Southeast regions.

Black vultures, as their name indicates, have black coloring on their heads, while turkey vultures’ heads are bright red (like wild turkeys). Their wings differ as well, with turkey vultures’ longer, narrower wings black and gray and black vultures having black wings with silver tips. Wingtips, if you will, for added style.

Black vultures roost on a tree overlooking Deep Hole at Myakka River State Park Wilderness Preserve in Sarasota, Fla.

The California condor, like the sprawling state it’s named for, is huge, weighing as much as 25 pounds and with 10-foot wingspans.

Though endangered, they are now found in parts of California, Utah, Arizona and Mexico. The California Condor Recovery Program, led by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and working with zoos, the National Park Service, state and tribal governments, the Bureau of Land Management and other agencies, has helped bring condor populations back from the brink of extinction, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Williams, the Honesdale, Pennsylvania, mayor, offered another idea for coexistence: “Maybe someday a bunch of us can all get together for an outdoor movie night to watch ‘The Birds,’ ” he said, referring to the classic 1963 Hitchcock thriller about birds taking over a village, “and afterward take a walk over to a committee of vultures to say thanks for not attacking us and for being good neighbors.”

There’s nothing scary about that.

Do you want to share a slice of Americana with USA TODAY? Contact Phaedra Tretthan by email at ptrethan@usatoday.com, on X (formerly Twitter) @wordsbyphaedra, on BlueSky @byphaedra, or on Threads @by_phaedra

Vultures look out at the piles of garbage at Middle Point Landfill in Murfreesboro, Tenn., Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2024.

Ninth Circuit: Forest Service lawfully approved cattle grazing lands, despite risks to endangered wolves

Over environmental advocates’ objections, a panel of judges ruled the U.S. Forest Service didn’t violate federal law by failing to consider the effects of livestock on the endangered Mexican gray wolf population.

Matt Simons / February 11, 2025

A Mexican Gray Wolf roams about its enclosure in the San Francisco Zoo on July 15, 2018. (Photo by Michael Fraley, CC BY 2.0, via Flickr)

(CN) — The U.S. Forest Service acted lawfully when it authorized a cattle grazing project in New Mexico and Arizona, despite activists’ claims that it could impact the endangered Mexican gray wolf population in the area, the Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday, upholding a lower court decision.

The three-judge panel rejected claims by the Western Watershed Project that the Forest Service didn’t look hard enough at the effects of the livestock grazing on the Mexican gray wolf, whose wild population is just over 250 in the United States.

Rather, the panel said in its unsigned opinion, the federal agency thoroughly considered those issues and “reasonably concluded” that the proposed grazing was “not likely to adversely affect the subspecies.”

For one, the judges said, the proposed grazing area did not have documented Mexican gray wolf packs, dens, rendezvous sites or territories, and nearly all the grazing allotments had no reported wolf sightings or instances of wolf-livestock conflict.

Additionally, the Mexican gray wolf population within the area nearly doubled between 2016 and 2020, despite higher levels of grazing than those authorized by the Stateline Project — a fact the Forest Service’s attorneys leaned on during oral arguments a week before the decision.

“Given these facts, plaintiffs have not shown that Forest Service’s conclusions were ‘unreasonable,’” the panel wrote.

Cindy Tuell, the Arizona and New Mexico director for Western Watersheds Project, called the court’s decision disappointing.

“Mexican gray wolves are one of the most endangered species that we have in southern Arizona and New Mexico. They desperately need more protections, and one of the biggest threats to the wolf is livestock grazing,” Tuell told Courthouse News.

The nonprofit environmental conservation group is concerned that increased grazing in the area could threaten the recovery of the endangered Mexican gray wolf by disrupting the populations of its prey, which depend on the same grass for food. The group sued the Forest Service in 2021 over the grazing plan, known as the Stateline Project, which was approved in 2019 and began in 2020. After losing summary judgment in late 2023, it appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

Western Watersheds, Tuell said, was suing over the Forest Service’s lack of action just as much as it was grazing land’s approval.

The conservationists say the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to produce an environmental impact statement that fully analyzed the effects grazing might have on the fledgling wolf population in the Greater Gila Bioregion — an area spanning the central portion of the Arizona-New Mexico border that is home to at least 26 sensitive species.

“It’s the Forest Service’s job to tell the public and the judges what the threat is. It’s not the public’s job to do that science,” Tuell said.

Because the current population is descended from just seven wolves, the group says any potential removals or killings due to conflict with grazing livestock would be devastating to the species’ genetic diversity, which is already dangerously low.

Though Western Watersheds lost its appeal, Tuell found a silver lining. “You know, the Forest Service started doing a much better job at this right after we filed our first lawsuit on this case,” she said.

The U.S. Forest Service declined to comment on the lawsuit.

The panel of judges behind the decision included U.S. Circuit Judge Bridget Bade, a Donald Trump appointee, as well as U.S. Circuit Judges Richard Clifton and Jay Bybee, both George W. Bush appointees.

Should Wyoming still permit ‘whacking’ after man paraded wounded wolf through local bar?

Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY

February 20, 2025 at 2:25 PM

A year after a Wyoming man shocked the world by carrying a wounded wolf into a rural bar and letting buddies snap selfies with it, state lawmakers are considering whether to toughen animal cruelty laws.

The incident in Daniel, Wyoming, last year drew international condemnation and sparked death threats after the man ran the female wolf over with a snowmobile, duct-taped its muzzle shut and dragged it into the Green River Bar in a shock collar at the end of a leash. He later killed it.

Wyoming state officials fined the man $250 ‒ not for torturing the animal but instead for possessing live wildlife ‒ because state law permits people to use snowmobiles or ATVs to chase and then run down wolves, coyotes and other predator animals in a process known as “whacking.”

“It’s a practice that needs to stop,” state Rep. Mike Schmid, a Republican who grew up near the bar, told USA TODAY Thursday. “It’s painting all hunters in a bad light.”

Covered in its winter coat, a coyote walks along a creek in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming in this 2017 file photo.
Covered in its winter coat, a coyote walks along a creek in Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming in this 2017 file photo.

Wolves and coyotes are widely disliked in Wyoming, largely because they kill livestock, or game animals like elk and deer that hunters would prefer to shoot themselves. Under existing state law, it’s legal to run down predators under almost any circumstances in large portions of the state.

While Schmid is trying to ban the practice of “whacking” entirely, lawmakers are also considering a separate measure requiring anyone who runs over a predator on public land to kill it cleanly, rather than letting it suffer and die.

Schmid said as a kid, he chased his fair share of coyotes on snowmobiles, but was always taught to dispatch them with a bullet. He said the practice is less common than it once was, but still happens mostly in the western part of Wyoming where deep snows fall on federal lands. His proposal includes an exemption for ranchers targeting predators on private property.

Polls conducted on behalf of both wildlife advocates and hunting groups indicted broad support for banning “whacking,” and animal-rights groups are frustrated lawmakers haven’t yet acted. While a legislative committee approved the “clean kill” measure on Thursday morning, Schmid’s more comprehensive bill appears to have died.

“It should have been a slam-dunk issue,” said Kristin Combs, executive director of Wyoming Wildlife Advocates. “I can appreciate the fact that people need to protect their livestock. But they don’t need to be committing torture.”

Please attend the Canada Goose webinar

Protect Our Geese, Protect Our Communities 

Free Webinar: Hosted by In Defense of Animals’ National Goose Protection Coalition

Important: The Michigan DNR and USDA have decided to gas all Canada geese removed from area lakes and businesses in 2025. This barbaric practice must be stopped. We need your help to promote humane alternatives.

What: Expert Virtual Panel on Non-lethal Goose Mitigation

When: Thursday, March 6, 7 p.m. ET

Register: Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: Protect Our Geese, Protect Our Communities: Expert Panel on Humane Goose Mitigation Solutions. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar.

Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: Protect Our Geese, Protect O…In Defense of Animals’ National Goose Protection Coalition is honored to host a free webinar featuring humane go…

Discover:

·  Humane Goose Deterrent Products: Companies showcase products designed to deter geese without harming them.

·  Guest Speakers:

o   Experts in water quality discuss the impact of geese on local environments.

o   Leaders from goose advocacy groups across the country share effective goose mitigation strategies.

Why Attend?

·  Gain insight into humane solutions to prevent conflicts with geese.

·  Support ethical practices to coexist with wild animals.

·  Connect with others who care about protecting both our wildlife and our communities.

Who’s Invited?

·  Michiganders who care about wild animals and our environment.

·  Property owners, business owners, and residents interacting with geese.

·  Anyone interested in learning about non-lethal wildlife mitigation.

Together, we can make a difference. Let’s create a compassionate and sustainable future for wild animals in Michigan!