“I was shocked.”

by Nicole WesthoffOctober 21, 2025

• Facebook
• Twitter
• https://www.thecooldown.com/outdoors/penguin-nesting-colony-rancher-bulldozed-argentina/

Photo Credit: iStock

A local rancher bulldozed through a penguin nesting colony at Punta Tombo, Argentina, destroying over 175 nests and killing more than 100 penguins and their chicks, as reported by Esri.

When Dr. Pablo García Borboroglu, founder of the Global Penguin Society (GPS), first saw the destruction, it didn’t seem real. Hundreds of Magellanic penguins lay crushed beneath a bulldozed road, their nesting grounds in ruins.

“I was shocked,” said Borboroglu. “This place was special.”

For Borboroglu and conservation director Laura M. Reyes, the site was gut-wrenching — and it lit a fire. The two immediately began documenting the scene, gathering measurements, photographs, and videos to present to officials. They knew the evidence had to speak louder than outrage.

Their persistence paid off. The rancher was tried and convicted, a first-of-its-kind ruling in Argentina. The case set a precedent for stronger protections for wildlife and accountability for environmental harm.

The conviction wasn’t just about one rancher; it showed that destroying wildlife has real consequences. For years, conservationists had watched similar cases go unpunished. This time, though, justice was on the penguin’s side, and it set a powerful example for others.

FROM OUR PARTNERSave $10,000 on solar panels without even sharing your phone numberWant to go solar but not sure who to trust? EnergySage has your back with free and transparent quotes from fully vetted providers that can help you save as much as $10k on installation.To get started, just answer a few questions about your home — no phone number required. Within a day or two, EnergySage will email you the best local options for your needs, and their expert advisers can help you compare quotes and pick a winner.Get Started

Watch now: How bad is a gas stove for your home’s indoor air quality?

Borboroglu has dedicated decades to protecting penguins and their ecosystems, working alongside communities, scientists, and governments to create marine reserves and advocate for stronger conservation laws. His work shows that change doesn’t just come from institutions; it comes from people refusing to look away.

The Punta Tombo case became a symbol of what’s possible when people take action to defend what they love. It also highlighted the growing power of environmental justice movements across Latin America, where citizens and scientists are working hand in hand to protect their land and wildlife.

Today, GPS monitors penguin colonies, especially in Patagonia and Argentina, leveraging mapping tools, satellite imagery, and community outreach to inform and guide habitat protection.

Over his career, Borboroglu has helped secure protection for 13 million hectares (roughly 32 million acres) of penguin habitat, benefiting 1.6 million penguins.

Legislators, sportsmen’s group seek diminished wolf population, while conservation groups decry increased harvest limits

By:Micah Drew-October 20, 20253:26 pm

 A gray wolf in snow. (Eric Cole/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and the department’s Fish and Wildlife Commission are named defendants in two lawsuits arguing, from opposite sides, that the latest wolf hunting regulations violate the state constitution. 

First, a pair of Republican lawmakers and the Outdoor Heritage Coalition filed a lawsuit in Sanders County District Court alleging that the Fish and Wildlife Commission, which sets department policies and regulations, had not complied with state laws intended to reduce the state’s population of gray wolves when it adopted regulations for the upcoming hunting and trapping season. 

Then, four conservation organizations filed a lawsuit against the department and commission also in hopes of overturning the latest wolf management regulations, but with an opposing argument — that the decision to increase the quota of wolves that can be killed this year threatens the species and flies in the face of the constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment. 

The opposing lawsuits, filed Sept. 30 and Oct. 16, are continuing a series of arguments that played out during the 2025 legislative session, which pitted legislators and advocates for reducing the state’s population of roughly 1,100 wolves against those seeking to preserve and protect the species. 

At the heart of the suits are the 2025 wolf hunting and trapping regulations, in which the Commission set a statewide harvest quota of 452 wolves, two additional three-wolf quotas for hunting areas outside Yellowstone National Park, plus an additional 100 wolves approved for removal by the department for cases of conflict with livestock or humans. 

Hunters and trappers killed 297 wolves last season, while the most killed in a season was 326 during 2020. The quota for wolf harvest has not been met by hunters and trappers in recent years. 

According to FWP’s latest population survey, there are an estimated 1,091 wolves in Montana, 12 fewer than the 2023 population estimate and slightly lower than the 10-year average of 1,138 wolves. 

But that marginal decline has not been enough for Republican lawmakers who believe the animal has outgrown a stated recovery goal of 15 breeding pairs for the state and in 2021, passed a bill requiring FWP to reduce the number of wolves to a “sustainable level,” with a stated goal of preventing a decline in the state’s deer and elk populations and minimizing livestock predation.

During the 2025 Legislature, lawmakers considered a slew of bills aimed at more dramatically reducing the wolf population, including one by Rep. Shannon Manness, a plaintiff in one lawsuit, by as much as half, aiming towards a population of 450 animals, cited in federal delisting documents as a stable minimum population.

While Manness’ bill did not become law, Rep. Paul Fielder, a Republican from Thompson Falls, did carry one wolf hunting bill that became law, expanding the use of night scopes on private land. 

The two lawmakers in their complaint allege that the Commission has continually adopted more stringent hunting regulations than they could have, and, over the years, have not reduced the wolf population “in a meaningful way.”

“These actions by the Commission demonstrate that it is not establishing rules with the intent to reduce the statewide population,” the complaint states. “… By maintaining wolf populations at higher than mandated levels through inadequate harvest quotas, the Commission has allowed wolves to deplete ungulate populations, thereby diminishing hunting opportunities.”

Rep. Fielder, who at the meeting where the Commission adopted the new regulations said “it is a step in the right direction,” did not respond to an email asking to speak about the lawsuit.

Both the inability to hunt wolves, and lower numbers of game animals due to wolves’ own hunting, allegedly violates a constitutionally guaranteed right to harvest wild fish and wild game, according to the suit.

But the other lawsuit claims overhunting wolves violates a different provision of the Montana Constitution, which preserves the right to a clean and healthful environment.

“Killing of more than half of Montana’s gray wolf population in a single year … will substantially degrade a natural resource and the Montana environment and threatens total population collapse,” the lawsuit brought by WildEarth Guardians, Project Coyote, Footloose Montana and the Gallatin Wildlife Association states. 

The conservation groups argue the harvest level set by the Fish and Wildlife Commission is higher than the department recommends for keeping the population stable, and in fact could lead to the statewide wolf population dropping below the number needed to prevent the species from ending up on the Endangered Species List again. 

Citing the 2024 FWP Wolf Report, the groups say data “shows that a hunting and trapping quota of 458 together with 100 removals greatly exceeds the mortality rates associated with stable populations and is likely to cause a severe decline in overall populations.”

According to FWP’s report, an average harvest of from 308 to 334 wolves has “potential for the population to drop too low to support 15 breeding pairs (450) wolves within a three-year period,” but adds that it is likely the population will remain above that threshold. However, at more than 350 wolves killed annually, “the population will most likely fall below 450 wolves within five years.”

There is also an argument that the state’s method for estimating wolf populations, known as IPOM (Integrated Patch Occupancy Model), is not as accurate as presented, and might overestimate the number of animals in the state. 

That same argument was key in a recent judge’s order to overturn a decision by the federal government to deny endangered species protections for wolves. The judge cited criticisms of IPOM as a reason it should not be considered the “best available science” in setting wolf management policy. 

The conservation groups are seeking a temporary restraining order against the new harvest quota and ultimately are asking the courts to invalidate the new regulations and preserve the status quo. 

“While this may inconvenience some individuals and outfitters, the preservation of a healthy and genetically connected wolf population ensures that the long-term interest in wolf hunting and trapping will be preserved,” the court documents state. “… To knowingly risk erasing wolves now would not only waste this massive investment, but rob Montana citizens and future generations of their rightful natural heritage.”

The lawsuit from the state lawmakers is seeking a court order requiring the Commission to use “all available management tools” to reduce wolf numbers and follow “legislative intent.”

Update Oct. 21: Four conservation groups on Tuesday filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit brought by Reps. Fielder and Maness. The groups “dispute that Montana law requires even more wolf killing and instead seek to defend the statutory discretion of the Fish and Wildlife Commission and FWP,” according to a press release. 

Trap Free Montana, Alliance for the Wild Rockies, the Western Watersheds Project and Wolf and Wildlife Advocates all signed on to intervene. 

“After failing to win over their fellow legislators, the Fish and Wildlife Commission, and the citizens of Montana, anti-wolf politicians have now resorted to filing a legally baseless lawsuit in order to force the state to kill even more wolves,” Patrick Kelly, Montana & Washington Director for Western Watersheds Project, said in a statement. “This is yet another example of the anti-wolf hysteria still gripping some members of Montana’s legislature. Not satisfied with the recently approved 458-wolf kill quota, these politicians are making a last ditch effort to make sure that even more wolves are shot and trapped across Montana.”

Wolfgang Depner, The Canadian Press42 minutes ago36 minutes ago

• https://www.elorafergustoday.com/national-news/how-bc-man-rescued-himself-from-jaws-of-grizzly-that-ripped-off-his-lips-and-scalp-11379173

VICTORIA — Joe Pendry used his experience as a boxer to fight for his life when a mother grizzly attacked him, grabbed him by the head and inflicted horrific injuries while he was hunting elk in British Columbia’s East Kootenay region this month.

His wife, Janice Pendry, has described how her 63-year-old husband survived the attack that took place near Fort Steele on Oct. 2 when he was hunting elk and encountered the bear, which had two cubs.

Pendry says her husband shot the charging bear in the leg but it kept coming.

She says he punched and even bit the animal’s ear as he fought for his life, suffering gruesome injuries that include his lips and part of his scalp being torn off, losing a finger and suffering many broken bones.

Pendry says her husband repeatedly punched the bear in the nose, drawing on his boxing skills, but the animal intensified its assault.

He was eventually able to fend the animal off and call 911 and his son for help, and he was flown to Kelowna General Hospital, where he’s undergone multiple surgeries to his face and other parts of the body.

The BC Conservation Officer Service says a dead grizzly found in the area days later was responsible for the attack, and Janice Pendry says she was told it died of sepsis.

Pendry says her husband’s experiences, both as a boxer and outdoor hunting guide allowed him to beat the odds, but he faces a long recovery and he’s experiencing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.

She says her husband “still dreams about the bear,” and may never be able to return to work as a foreman with a highway maintenance company.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 21, 2025.