Russia may be changing its strategy in Ukraine

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

CBSNews-2h agoFollow

React|356

There are new signs that Russia may be changing its strategy in Ukraine, which continues to mount to a fierce resistance on the battlefield.

Pause

Current Time2:54

/

Duration3:14

Loaded:100.00%LOCaptionsFullscreenUnmute

Russia may be changing its strategy in Ukraine

A senior U.S. defense official says after weeks of failing to capture Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, and suffering heavy losses, Russian forces are shifting their ground offensive to the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, one of its strongholds.

Just outside Kyiv, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s military miscalculations are laid bare. Russian tanks are now burnt out wrecks of twisted metal — as Ukrainian forces continue to fight back, Imtiaz Tyab reports for “CBS Saturday Morning.”

©Provided by CBS NewsA destroyed Russian T-72 battle tank is seen at the outskirts of Kyiv Oblast. / Credit: Alex Chan Tsz Yuk/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

In Moscow, a new…

View original post 404 more words

He was hunting in Villa La Angostura and a friend shot him by accident: he died on the spot

Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

March 25, 2022

inWorld

SHARES

VIEWS

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

a hunter ofBarilochewas shot in the chest on the shores of theLake Nahuel Huapiand died.it would have been by accidentAlthough the cause of death is still being investigated.

It happened in theThursday morningwhile the victim was with a relative and a friend.

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-6447215797690480&output=html&h=280&adk=3027616936&adf=604276250&pi=t.aa~a.1588291387~i.3~rp.4&w=768&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1648236435&num_ads=1&rafmt=1&armr=3&sem=mc&pwprc=5123833634&psa=0&ad_type=text_image&format=768×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zyri.net%2F2022%2F03%2F25%2Fhe-was-hunting-in-villa-la-angostura-and-a-friend-shot-him-by-accident-he-died-on-the-spot%2F&host=ca-host-pub-2644536267352236&fwr=0&pra=3&rh=192&rw=768&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&fa=27&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTQuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiOTkuMC4xMTUwLjQ2IixbXSxudWxsLG51bGwsIjY0IixbWyIgTm90IEE7QnJhbmQiLCI5OS4wLjAuMCJdLFsiQ2hyb21pdW0iLCI5OS4wLjExNTAuNDYiXSxbIk1pY3Jvc29mdCBFZGdlIiwiOTkuMC4xMTUwLjQ2Il1dLGZhbHNlXQ..&dt=1648236435835&bpp=2&bdt=3498&idt=-M&shv=r20220323&mjsv=m202203210101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3D4edac0d39d0c0899-22fc6fbf59d10026%3AT%3D1648236433%3ART%3D1648236433%3AS%3DALNI_MZGMBjTLaob3unDdRFc3NaI8UE9zQ&prev_fmts=0x0%2C728x90&nras=2&correlator=6495233515615&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=657328844.1648236434&ga_sid=1648236435&ga_hid=2028234313&ga_fc=1&u_tz=-420&u_his=1&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=816&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_sd=1.25&dmc=8&adx=376&ady=1083&biw=1519&bih=746&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=44759876%2C44759927%2C44759837%2C21066429%2C31065370%2C31065551&oid=2&pvsid=2979504581592415&pem=506&tmod=123488094&wsm=1&uas=0&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.google.com%2F&eae=0&fc=1408&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C1536%2C816%2C1536%2C746&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7Cs%7C&abl=NS&fu=128&bc=31&ifi=3&uci=a!3&btvi=1&fsb=1&xpc=9IsXRz82sB&p=https%3A//www.zyri.net&dtd=19

I also read:An Italian tourist swam on the island of San Andrés and was attacked by a shark: he bled to death

Tragedy in Bariloche: a hunter was shot by accident and died

it all happenedwhile the victim, a relative and a friend hunted in the vicinity of a private room, located on the armHuemul of Lake Nahuel Huapiterritory that is withinVilla La Angostura.

At the moment not many details are known, but, as indicated by the Neuquén Police, one of the…

View original post 230 more words

Utah biologists seek to reduce deer hunting permits again as populations struggle

Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

ByCarter Williams, KSL.com| Posted – March 24, 2022 at 7:39 a.m.

A deer buck spotted in Utah's wild on Nov. 12, 2020. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is seeking another reduction in general season deer buck hunting hunting permits for 2022.

A deer buck spotted in Utah’s wild on Nov. 12, 2020. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources is seeking another reduction in general season deer buck hunting hunting permits for 2022. (Utah Division of Wildlife Resources)


94


Estimated read time: 3-4 minutes

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah wildlife biologists are again seeking to reduce the number of deer hunting permits in Utah as thestatewide droughtcontinues to impact the species’ populations.

The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources estimates the statewide deer population is now 305,700, based on its assessments in December. That figure is not as bad asofficials had feared earlier this yearbut also about 9,150 fewer deer than last year’s count — and nearly 100,000 short of the division’s deer population goal.

As a result, the division is…

View original post 664 more words

Gene editing could upend the future of factory farming — for better or worse

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

The fight over gene-edited meat, explained.

ByKenny Torrella@KennyTorrellaMar 25, 2022, 8:00am EDT

Share this story

https://www.vox.com/22994946/gene-editing-farm-animals-livestock-crispr-genetic-engineering

Several bullocks in browns, blacks, and tans, with ears forward at the camera.

Earlier this month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that beef from two gene-edited cattle and their offspring issafe to eatand said gene-edited beef could be on the market in as little as two years. The cattle were designed using the gene-editing tool CRISPR to grow shorter hair to better tolerate heat, which makes them more efficient for meat producers in hotter climates. An FDA spokespersonsaidthe agency expects the announcement will encourage more companies to bring forward gene-edited farm animals for marketplace approval in the near future.

Products from such animals aren’t going to appear on grocery shelves or restaurant menus overnight; the FDA hasgenerally moved slowly

View original post 3,278 more words

Chomsky: Let’s Focus on Preventing Nuclear War, Rather Than Debating “Just War”

Meet Five Women Who Are Working To Protect Wild Bears

‘It’s amazing to feel that connection with the bears we work with.’

Trina MoylesUpdated March 24, 2022

Bears have shaped the story of what it means to be human in North America, inspiring the stories we tell, the names of constellations, and the earliest forms of visual art, which have been preserved for thousands of years on cave walls. Many Indigenous groups in Canada regard Bear as a medicine keeper and close relative, referring to them with reverence as “Grandmother” or “Sister.” Today, there are three species of wild bears who roam the mountains, forests, coasts and Arctic tundras in North America, including grizzly bears, polar bears and American black bears. But since the early 20th century, the fields of bear research, guiding, filmmaking and conservation have been mainly occupied by men.

“Generally speaking, the world of carnivore research is a male-dominated space,” says Courtney Hughes, a conservation scientist who studies grizzly bears in Grande Cache, Alta. “But we’re seeing increasing leadership by women, including women of colour.”

Today, Hughes and other women in North America are changing the narrative on what it means to study the movements and behaviours of bears, to view and film them in their wild habitats and ecosystems, to learn their language of body movements and vocalizations, and to advocate for their protection from habitat loss and trophy hunting. Indigenous bear guides, including Sherry Moon and Krista Duncan, are reconnecting with bears, culture and history on their traditional territories. “Every year, I’m seeing more and more women getting into bear guiding,” says Moon.

What motivates these women to spend long hours in the field with bears, following their tracks and learning their language? For Karine Genest, a Yukon-based filmmaker and polar bear guide, the lessons of working with our Ursus kin are many. “The bears ground me,” she says. “Being with bears, you don’t have a choice. You have to focus on the present moment.”

Here, Moon, Duncan, Genest and other women share what it’s like to work to protect wild bear populations in North America.

Sherry Moon, wearing a cap in front of a forest backdrop

(Photo: Taylor Burk)

Sherry Moon

Grizzly bear guide
Musgamakw Dzawada’enuxw First Nation
Port McNeill, B.C.

Sherry Moon knows many of the grizzly bears by name in the Kwakwaka’wakw territory. Since 2016, she’s been working as a guide with Sea Wolf Adventures, facilitating safe ways for visitors to view bears, and travelling by boat and on foot to the favoured places where they come to fish for salmon, flip rocks in search of crabs or dig for roots.

There are the brother bears, Andy and Roy—Andy, a superior fisher, has been known to help his younger brother catch fish—and Caroline, an old matriarch who occasionally forages in close proximity to a black bear (a rare thing for grizzlies to do). Moon recalls a day when she bumped into Numas, an old male grizzly whose name means “Wise One” in the Kwak’wala language, sleeping behind a tree. Numas calmly lifted his head and looked at Moon, and then lowered his huge skull and went back to sleep.

A close-up of a sleeping brown bear

Numas, whose name means “Wise One” in Kwak’wala, dozes in the sun. (Photo: Mike Willey)

“It’s like he knew I wasn’t a threat to him and he wasn’t a threat to me,” she says. “It’s amazing to feel that connection with the bears we work with.”

Although Moon grew up with grizzlies in her backyard, she never imagined she’d become a bear guide. But when her uncle, Mike Willie, started Sea Wolf Adventures, offering Indigenous-led wildlife and cultural tours in their home territory, she knew she wanted to be involved. She joined the team as a boat driver in 2015. “I love being on the water and being with wildlife,” she says. The following year, she was leading her own tours.

It’s not only her love for grizzlies that draws Moon to guiding. It’s about being back in her territory. “When I started walking these rivers that haven’t been walked in a long time, due to colonization, it brought me a lot of pride and empowerment,” she says. “Reconnecting with my traditional territory has given me a bigger sense of my own identity, of who I am and where I come from.”

A woman in a green jacket and navy vest crouches with a camera on the snow

Genest captures footage of fresh polar bear tracks in Churchill, Man. (Photo: Trina Moyles)

Karine Genest

Polar bear guide and wildlife filmmaker
Whitehorse, Yukon

It’s an unusually warm day in early November, and Karine Genest focuses her lens on a large male polar bear, who’s sauntering along the open waters of Hudson Bay. Every year for the past decade, Genest, a wildlife cinematographer and polar bear guide, has travelled to Churchill, Man.—the polar bear capital of the world—to document the annual migration of these giants from land to sea ice on Hudson Bay.

The bear approaches a GoPro camera positioned on the rocky shoreline and opens his jaws wide as if to swallow the camera whole. “Eh, eh, eh!” Genest calmly calls out from 30 feet away as if scolding a dog. Incredulously, he lifts his head and ambles off along the bay. “Thank you!” she sings out.

Over the years, Genest has become intimately attuned to the language of bears, working closely with bear guide and filmmaker Kelsey Eliasson, who runs the Churchill, Man.-based guiding company Polar Bear Alley.

“It’s all about controlling your body language and emotions,” explains Genest. “If you want the bear to be fearful, you can make them afraid. But they aren’t naturally fearful; they’re curious, like us.”

A white polar bear stands on her hind legs, with another bear on her right

A young mother of cubs, whom Genest affectionately calls “Peanut,” stands up to gain a better scent of an approaching male bear. Polar bear cubs stay with their moms for up to three years before navigating the sea ice on their own. (Photo: Trina Moyles)

She’s become familiar with many of the individual polar bears who migrate back to the same places in Churchill, including a young female whom she fondly calls Peanut. Genest first met Peanut when she was an orphaned yearling cub. Despite the high odds against her, the young bear survived in the wild. Several years ago, Genest was overcome with joy to see Peanut, whom she recognized from her calm and tolerant demeanour, return to her favourite resting spot along Hudson Bay, older, wiser and with two young cubs in tow. “She’s really a great mom,” says Genest.

Genest’s feature-length documentary, L’esprit des ours (The Spirit of the Bears), focuses on Indigenous storytelling and science to celebrate the deep bonds that have existed between people and bears for millennia. Genest is striving to change the way bears are often perceived as “nuisances” in North America by advocating for peaceful coexistence between people and bears.

“It’s not that I want to be that voice [for bears], but if they need one, I want to be it,” she says. “We are sharing the land with them—and they’re a part of us.”

A close-up of Krista Duncan in front of a body of water

(Photo: Krista Duncan)

Krista Duncan

Spirit bear guide, skipper and field technician
Kitasoo/Xai’xais First Nation
Klemtu, B.C.

Krista Duncan was born in the village of Klemtu, B.C., a member of the Kitasoo/Xai’xais First Nation. Growing up in the Great Bear Rainforest, a massive protected area that stretches along coastal B.C., she’d listen to the stories of her great-grandmother, Violet Neasloss, the last fluent speaker of Sgüüx̱s, a dialect of Southern Tsimshian. “They were about treating [bears] the way you’d want to be treated—with respect.”

In 2012, Duncan started her first season working as a guide with Spirit Bear Lodge. She found herself spending long hours alone in the forest, making her scent and her behaviours familiar to the mooksgm ol (spirit bears), ksamxsm ol (black bears) and medi’ik (grizzly bears) that gathered along the streams to fish. (Spirit bears, whose Latin name is Ursus americanus kermodei, are a rare subspecies of black bear whose white fur is caused by a recessive gene.) Later that summer, she earned the trust of a black bear, who began leaving her cubs with Duncan while she went fishing. “She basically had us babysit,” she recalls. “It made me fall in love with guiding.”

A black bear among mossy rocks beside a stream

An American black bear fishes for salmon along a stream on the northern coast of Vancouver Island. (Photo: Zac Mills)

The same year, Duncan began working as a research technician with the Spirit Bear Research Foundation, setting up a network of snag sites to collect hair samples for DNA analysis. (Snag sites are typically trees or power lines wrapped with a strand of barbed wire; bears—lured by the scent of a bait mixture—will rub their backs up against the wire, thus snagging some of their long, coarse hairs.) The project was a collaboration between the University of Victoria and five Indigenous nations; its goal was to monitor the movements and salmon consumption of black and grizzly bears.

In 2017, Duncan and her colleagues successfully lobbied to end the trophy hunt on grizzly bears in the Great Bear Rainforest. But while hunting white spirit bears is illegal, hunting black bears— who carry the recessive white fur gene—is not. “We’re fighting for something that we want to keep for thousands of years to come,” says Duncan.

Over the past decade, she’s watched generations of bears grow up in her territory, including a young spirit bear, Cedar, whom she met as an orphaned cub. “He didn’t know how to fish because his mother hadn’t taught him,” she says. But Cedar adapted, feeding on scraps left behind by other bears. “Today, he’s the dominant white bear along the creek,” she says. “Bears have taught me about patience and strength. They are the heart of the Great Bear Rainforest.”

A woman in a blue jacket lies on the floor on her stomach, looking at a laptop

Alysa McCall analyzes data from her research on the movements of female polar bears. (Photo: Bradley Hampson/Polar Bears International)

Alysa McCall

Polar bear scientist
Churchill, Man.

Alysa McCall will never forget the first time she visited Churchill, Man., in 2010, flying over the frozen Hudson Bay to follow the movements of female polar bears. McCall, then a master’s student, worked with a team of scientists to measure tranquilized bears to gain a better understanding of their age and relative health. “Seeing the bears up close— feeling their bodies—was really impactful.”

McCall’s own research as a master’s student tracked the patterns of female polar bears on the sea ice. She analyzed decisions made by females with cubs and without them, discovering when and where they travelled, what type of sea ice they preferred, and when and where they would come ashore. These are critical questions when it comes to the conservation of polar bears, who depend on sea ice to survive.

“Polar bears should really be called ‘ice bears,’” explains McCall. “They navigate the Arctic sea ice in search of seal blubber, the most calorically dense food on the planet—it’s what sustains them.”

A white polar bear in front of the sky, looking to his left

A male polar bear keeps vigil beside the open waters of the Hudson Bay, waiting for the bay to freeze so he can head north. (Photo: Trina Moyles)

Since that first flight over the frozen bay, McCall has dedicated her career to working for polar bear conservation. Her academic research dovetailed into a collaboration with Polar Bears International (PBI), a non-profit focused on protecting the bears and their habitat. In 2011, McCall helped the group launch its online Polar Bear Tracker, which offers users a “secret peek into the world of polar bears” as they journey onto the ice. (She officially joined the PBI team in 2014.)

Climate change is resulting in the rising, record-breaking temperatures of ocean waters, which affects ice formation on Hudson Bay. “The previous three years, we had great freeze-up—right on time,” explains McCall. But in 2021, above-average temperatures in Churchill postponed freeze-up for nearly two weeks, which then delayed the bears’ migration onto the ice. “We know that polar bears will be spending more time on land [and fewer days hunting seals] as the ice continues to decline,” says McCall. “We’re already seeing that happen in southern Hudson Bay in Ontario.”

Unfortunately, there are no short-term fixes. “We really do need to convince this global community of leaders to work on [reducing] carbon emissions.”

A woman holding a clipping tool, looking at a tree with wire wrapped around it

Courtney Hughes collecting grizzly bear hair samples in northwestern Alberta. (Photo credit: KJ Dakin)

Courtney Hughes

Conservation scientist
Grande Cache, Alta.

“I’ve always had an affinity for—and connection with—carnivore species,” says Courtney Hughes, reflecting on her early childhood in northern Ontario. There, she often followed her father, a trapper and hunter, on game trails that wove through black bear territory.

Flash forward 30 years and Hughes is following in the footsteps of Ursus arctos, or grizzly bears, in northwestern Alberta, trudging through boreal swamplands and along the edges of farmland, retrieving hairs from a network of snag sites. Hughes and her team have collected thousands of hair samples for DNA analysis to determine the first-ever population baseline for grizzly bears in this remote region.

The study is part of a province-wide effort to recover the grizzly bear population in Alberta. In 2010, grizzlies were designated a threatened species, with fewer than 700 bears roaming the landscape. Every year, grizzlies are killed by poachers, in head-on collisions on highways and railways, or as a result of coming into close contact with humans. While many people fear grizzlies, the chances of being injured by one are approximately 1 in 2.7 million, according to the U.S. National Park Service. Despite this, people still experience negative interactions with bears that place both parties at risk. For this reason, Hughes decided to dedicate her PhD research at the University of Alberta to better understanding how humans and grizzly bears can coexist, with the goal of reducing instances of human-bear conflict.

A mom bear with three cubs, one of which is rubbing against a tree with wire wrapped around it

A grizzly bear mom and her cub rub up against a snag site. (Photo: courtesy of the Government of Alberta)

“There’s ongoing contention surrounding grizzly bear recovery in Alberta. While there’s a lot of great biological science on grizzly bears, there’s been a gap on understanding the human dimensions of grizzly bear management,” explains Hughes. “I was curious: What do people who live with grizzlies really think, or want with regard to recovery policy?”

Hughes interviewed more than 60 people who live or work in grizzly bear ranges across Alberta, including ranchers, oil and gas workers, and landowners. The results surprised her.

“Only one individual said they didn’t like grizzly bears,” says Hughes. Her data shows that people’s relationships with bears—and their fear of them—is highly complex and often situational. “It’s a matter of working with people to understand what they know [about grizzly bears] and want to know, and what they’re willing to do to mitigate risks for conflict, as well as the types of support they need to do so,” says Hughes.

Today, in the name of conflict mitigation, Hughes is encouraging foresters and oil and gas workers to carry bear spray as a deterrent, asking ranchers to dispose of dead livestock in bearproof containers and suggesting that farmers set up electric fences around their grain bins to deter break-ins. In 2016, Hughes launched a citizen-science app called GrizzTracker, which collects data on people’s sightings of grizzly bears in northwestern Alberta.

“I absolutely think people want bears on the landscape,” says Hughes. “It’s less about human-bear conflict and more about human-human conflict. It’s about working with people to achieve grizzly bear recovery in Alberta.”

WOULD RUSSIA USE A TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON IN UKRAINE?

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

Al Mauroni | 03.16.22

Would Russia Use a Tactical Nuclear Weapon in Ukraine?

Recent nuclear saber rattling by Russian President Vladimir Putin is forcing the West to confront a question that even many national security professionals have been able to ignore for decades: Would Putin actually use tactical nuclear weapons? More specifically, would he order a tactical nuclear strike on Ukrainian military forces out of frustration that his military forces have failed to achieve their objectives? Assessing that possibility requires a reevaluation of certain assumptions that is long overdue.

Russian Nuclear Weapons, in Context

In the current context, Putin could view nuclear weapons use as necessary to ensure Russian national security interests are not derailed by overt Western military support to Ukrainian efforts—which would be in line withstated Russian doctrine. One course of action could be a so-called demonstration strike with a single low-yield nuclear detonation in Ukraine or over the Black Sea to serve as…

View original post 2,011 more words

Why Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

Sanjiv Sathiah – Yesterday 1:08 PMFollow

View Profile

React254 Comments|226

Why Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

Sanjiv Sathiah – Yesterday 1:08 PMFollow

View Profile

React254 Comments|226

Before we consider going to Mars, it’s worth remembering just how dangerous spaceflight can be. To date, 14 astronauts and four cosmonauts have been killed during spaceflight. An additional 13 (astronauts or cosmonauts) have been killed during training or testing for spaceflight. Technically speaking, only three of these deaths occurred outside Earth’s atmosphere, beyond the Kármán line, in what’s generally accepted as “in space.” 

© Provided by SlashGearWhy Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

$19.99 Triumph Flowers – 20% Off Sitewide Discount

Ad

Adhttp://www.fromyouflowers.com

As the Daily Mail reports, a variety of experts believe that sending astronauts on Mars missions will result in further deaths. This includes Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, according to Space.com. “I think the first journeys to Mars are going to be really very dangerous. The risk of fatality will be high; there’s just no way around it,” said Musk. “It would be, basically, ‘Are you prepared to die?’ If that’s OK, then, you know, you’re a candidate for going.”

According to SciTechDaily, both SpaceX and NASA are actively working toward sending astronauts to Mars to eventually colonize the planet. Since humanity’s successfully landed on our nearby Moon, space agencies have been looking to Mars — the next closest astrological body with the potential necessary for humanity to make the effort to investigate (via European Space Agency). 

Space agencies on Earth have been attempting to reach Mars with unmanned craft for decades. We’ve succeeded in reaching Mars a few times in the relatively recent past — even with probes and remote-controlled rovers aplenty. We’ve also failed quite a few times — even before we had human astronauts involved. As Popular Mechanics highlights, of the 47 missions to Mars to date, 28 have failed.

The Dangers Of Radiation

© Provided by SlashGearWhy Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

Apart from the obvious dangers of sitting atop a massive rocket even before leaving Earth, the journey outside our atmosphere has plenty of potential for failure and loss of human life. According to SpaceX, the trip to Mars with a human-piloted mission is expected to take around six months. This half-year of space travel will in itself be dangerous due to the significant amount of radiation that’ll penetrate the spacecraft during the trip. 

As the European Space Agency (ESA) highlights, astronauts could receive a dose of radiation up to 700 times higher than they would experience under the protection of Earth’s atmosphere and magnetic field. After a single day in space, the human body receives as much radiation as it would an entire year here on Earth, according to the ESA. 

The ESA has been studying ways to protect astronauts from space radiation by using particle accelerators to bombard different types of materials with lithium. These tested materials may someday provide shielding for ships making extended trips through space. 

Mars Colonization — The Impossible Dream?

© Provided by SlashGearWhy Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

Even after astronauts reach Mars, radiation shielding will be a necessary measure for long-term human health. As Phys.Org reminds us, unlike Earth, Mars does not have a protective magnetosphere and only a thin atmosphere as a result. During its 2001 mission, NASA’s Mars Odyssey spacecraft detected radiation levels that would expose astronauts on Mars to 8,000 millirads (8 rads) of radiation per year. While not immediately fatal, prolonged human exposure to these levels of radiation could result in sickness, DNA damage, cancer, and potential death.

So while Mars might be the most Earth-like planet in our solar system, it is still extremely inhospitable to not only human life, but just about any life that we know of. Consequently, it is not difficult to understand why Neil deGrasse Tyson doubts the idea that humanity would ever establish a long-term colony on Mars, saying in a Futurism interview, “I’m skeptical that you’ll find legions of people that will go there and want to stay.” 

Going to Mars on a single short visit is one thing. Staying on Mars long-term is a completely different proposition. Neil deGrasse Tyson leans strongly towards the view that sending astronauts to live on Mars and potentially colonize it is not only foolhardy but quite probably impossible.

Tyson Versus Musk

In an interview with Futurism’s Jolene Creighton, Neil deGrasse Tyson said rather than colonizing Mars, we should aim for “just an outpost.” Tyson went on to describe the highly unlikely possibility that humanity would be able to develop the necessary “entire infrastructure in which you live that mimics Earth.” 

“We’d rather stay where it is warm and comfortable,” said Tyson. While Tyson is not optimistic about humans establishing a large footprint on Mars, his position stands in sharp contrast to Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX. Despite his assertions about early explorers needing to prepare for the worst, Musk continues to dare to dream that we might reach Mars soon and is getting the SpaceX Starship ready for the journey. 

According to NPR, Musk is targeting 2029 as the timeframe for landing the first humans on Mars with cargo missions sent in advance to give astronauts the resources and materials they will need to set up an initial base. No doubt, we will all be watching in awe as this unfolds and wonder who will ultimately be right about the future Mars holds for human civilization: Neil deGrasse Tyson or Elon Musk?

Before we consider going to Mars, it’s worth remembering just how dangerous spaceflight can be. To date, 14 astronauts and four cosmonauts have been killed during spaceflight. An additional 13 (astronauts or cosmonauts) have been killed during training or testing for spaceflight. Technically speaking, only three of these deaths occurred outside Earth’s atmosphere, beyond the Kármán line, in what’s generally accepted as “in space.” 

© Provided by SlashGearWhy Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

$19.99 Triumph Flowers – 20% Off Sitewide Discount

Ad

Adhttp://www.fromyouflowers.com

As the Daily Mail reports, a variety of experts believe that sending astronauts on Mars missions will result in further deaths. This includes Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, according to Space.com. “I think the first journeys to Mars are going to be really very dangerous. The risk of fatality will be high; there’s just no way around it,” said Musk. “It would be, basically, ‘Are you prepared to die?’ If that’s OK, then, you know, you’re a candidate for going.”

According to SciTechDaily, both SpaceX and NASA are actively working toward sending astronauts to Mars to eventually colonize the planet. Since humanity’s successfully landed on our nearby Moon, space agencies have been looking to Mars — the next closest astrological body with the potential necessary for humanity to make the effort to investigate (via European Space Agency). 

Space agencies on Earth have been attempting to reach Mars with unmanned craft for decades. We’ve succeeded in reaching Mars a few times in the relatively recent past — even with probes and remote-controlled rovers aplenty. We’ve also failed quite a few times — even before we had human astronauts involved. As Popular Mechanics highlights, of the 47 missions to Mars to date, 28 have failed.

The Dangers Of Radiation

© Provided by SlashGearWhy Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

Apart from the obvious dangers of sitting atop a massive rocket even before leaving Earth, the journey outside our atmosphere has plenty of potential for failure and loss of human life. According to SpaceX, the trip to Mars with a human-piloted mission is expected to take around six months. This half-year of space travel will in itself be dangerous due to the significant amount of radiation that’ll penetrate the spacecraft during the trip. 

As the European Space Agency (ESA) highlights, astronauts could receive a dose of radiation up to 700 times higher than they would experience under the protection of Earth’s atmosphere and magnetic field. After a single day in space, the human body receives as much radiation as it would an entire year here on Earth, according to the ESA. 

The ESA has been studying ways to protect astronauts from space radiation by using particle accelerators to bombard different types of materials with lithium. These tested materials may someday provide shielding for ships making extended trips through space. 

Mars Colonization — The Impossible Dream?

© Provided by SlashGearWhy Humans Will Never Go To Mars, According To Neil deGrasse Tyson

Even after astronauts reach Mars, radiation shielding will be a necessary measure for long-term human health. As Phys.Org reminds us, unlike Earth, Mars does not have a protective magnetosphere and only a thin atmosphere as a result. During its 2001 mission, NASA’s Mars Odyssey spacecraft detected radiation levels that would expose astronauts on Mars to 8,000 millirads (8 rads) of radiation per year. While not immediately fatal, prolonged human exposure to these levels of radiation could result in sickness, DNA damage, cancer, and potential death.

So while Mars might be the most Earth-like planet in our solar system, it is still extremely inhospitable to not only human life, but just about any life that we know of. Consequently, it is not difficult to understand why Neil deGrasse Tyson doubts the idea that humanity would ever establish a long-term colony on Mars, saying in a Futurism interview, “I’m skeptical that you’ll find legions of people that will go there and want to stay.” 

Going to Mars on a single short visit is one thing. Staying on Mars long-term is a completely different proposition. Neil deGrasse Tyson leans strongly towards the view that sending astronauts to live on Mars and potentially colonize it is not only foolhardy but quite probably impossible.

Tyson Versus Musk

In an interview with Futurism’s Jolene Creighton, Neil deGrasse Tyson said rather than colonizing Mars, we should aim for “just an outpost.” Tyson went on to describe the highly unlikely possibility that humanity would be able to develop the necessary “entire infrastructure in which you live that mimics Earth.” 

“We’d rather stay where it is warm and comfortable,” said Tyson. While Tyson is not optimistic about humans establishing a large footprint on Mars, his position stands in sharp contrast to Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX. Despite his assertions about early explorers needing to prepare for the worst, Musk continues to dare to dream that we might reach Mars soon and is getting the SpaceX Starship ready for the journey. 

According to NPR, Musk is targeting 2029 as the timeframe for landing the first humans on Mars with cargo missions sent in advance to give astronauts the resources and materials they will need to set up an initial base. No doubt, we will all be watching in awe as this unfolds and wonder who will ultimately be right about the future Mars holds for human civilization: Neil deGrasse Tyson or Elon Musk?

UK government urged not to drop fur import ban, as new undercover video reveals shocking brutality of fur trapping in the United States

Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

Humane Society International / United Kingdom


BornFreeUSA/HSI/HSUS

LONDON—Amidst concerns that the UK government could be considering abandoning a ban on cruel fur imports, a shocking new undercover investigation exposing the cruelty of animal trapping in the United States, including for the fur trade, has been released by animal welfare and conservation non-profit, Born Free USA, in collaboration with Humane Society International.

An undercover investigator accompanied three trappers out in the field in the U.S. state of Iowa in November/December 2021, to witness how animals are trapped and killed for fur and recreation. Prior to that he had attended the National Trappers Association Convention in July and a state-sponsored “Trappers Education Course” in November. The investigation’s findings are harrowing and reveal the inherent cruelty of trapping.

Video and audio evidence captured includes:

  • Trapped raccoons being bludgeoned with a baseball bat causing protracted death.
  • A trapper standing on the neck of…

View original post 1,086 more words

Village of Elm Grove will not trap coyotes, opting to create educational program

Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

By:CBS 58 Newsroom

Posted:Mar 21, 2022 8:47 PM CDT

ELM GROVE, Wis. (CBS 58) — Elm Grove officials announced they will not be trapping coyotes.

Instead, they’ll create a program to teach people how to live with them.

Some of their recommendations include keeping trash out of your yard and making noise when you see one.

CBS 58 spoke with a woman earlier this monthwhose dog was attacked by a coyote.

While she’s not happy with Monday night’s decision, she says her dog is getting better.

View original post