Business June 17, 2021 Protestors call for action on factory farm fires. Photo: Alfons Spoler via Wikimedia Commons Animal rights organisations have again renewed their call for better fire safety on factory farms after two fires this month led to the death of thousands of animals. On Tuesday, 220 calves died in a fire in a factory farm in Elspeet, and last week, 4,600 pigs were killed in a fire in Nederweert in Limburg. ‘We have been saying for years that the measures taken are far too minimal,’ Animal Rights spokeswoman Kristel Grond told Nu.nl. ‘We can talk about fire alarms and sprinklers, but they are just quick fixes. The only real solution is the end of the livestock industry, and closing mega barns is the first step.’ Animal rights lobby group Wakker Dier, which campaigns against cheap meat, says farmers are reluctant to spend on safety because they want to supply meat to supermarkets at bargain prices. ‘The sad thing is that farm minister Carola Schouten is going along with this,’ spokesman Kenny Oostrik said. ‘She says some measures should be taken, but that they are too expensive.’ Wakker Dier says the law needs to be tightened up to force farmers to comply with better safety standards. In particular farmers should be required to install flame resistant walls, fire hydrants and fire alarms, the lobby group says. Eight fires So far this year there have been eight reported barn fires in the Netherlands according to the Wakker Dier monitor. In 2018, the government said it would not force farmers to take further measures to prevent fires breaking out because of the cost of the investment. The current measures do not include compulsory lightning conductors and sprinkler systems. In March, the Dutch safety board OVV said that the Dutch government is not doing enough to reduce the number of barn fires, and that the government considers the death of 130,000 chickens to be an ‘acceptable risk’.

Read more at DutchNews.nl: https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2021/06/more-animals-die-in-factory-farm-fires-as-campaigners-call-for-action/

https://www.thejournal.ie/kerry-boar-hunt-for-escaped-wild-hog-5469509-Jun2021/

The boar was part of a herd of seven which was roaming the countryside near Castleisland.

Thu 12:58 PM 33,896 Views  53 Comments Share110 Tweet Email2

Image: Shutterstock/WildMedia

WILDLIFE RANGERS ARE continuing their search of a mountainous area in Kerry for a wild boar who escaped a cull.

The hunt has prompted one wildlife campaigner to call for the on-the-run hog to be spared.  

In recent days the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) had been in the Mount Eagle, Cordal area of Castleisland hunting the illegal herd.

As boars are an invasive species in Ireland wildlife experts were notified by a local farmer when he spotted them on his land. The herd was cornered in a field and then euthanised.

One of the feral pigs bolted from his impending demise and is now on the loose in the countryside.

A spokesperson for the NPWS said that people should report any sightings and not to approach the dangerous animal.

“The National Parks and Wildlife Service are responsible for the implementation and enforcement of both European and National Nature Conservation legislation.

“It is currently an offence under both, to introduce without a current licence certain species into the wild which may have serious implications for our native flora and fauna. Such releases are not only illegal, but they also pose a very serious threat to the disease free status of the national herd.

“On Tuesday 15 June NPWS Regional staff were made aware of the presence of approximately seven animals fitting the description of Feral pigs / Wild boar by a concerned land owner in the Castleisland area.

“NPWS staff attended the scene to assess the validity of the sighting and to ascertain the best course of action to pursue. NPWS are indebted to the concerned landowner for reporting the sighting as soon as they did,” he said.#OPEN JOURNALISM No news is bad news Support The Journal 

Your contributions will help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to youSUPPORT US NOW

The spokesperson said that NPWS has a policy to remove “alien species” out of the area to preserve the “native flora and fauna”.

“In this instance six of the reported animals were dispatched on Tuesday evening. There was apparently a seventh animal present earlier in the day and any sightings of an animal fitting the description should be reported to the National Parks and Wildlife Service in Killarney National Park on 064 6635215.

“The NPWS and the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage liaises with the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine when the species in question may pose a threat to agriculture or livestock,” he added.

Animal rights Campaigner John Carmody called on the NPWS not to kill the animal.

“The National Parks and Wildlife Service must call off their plans to lethally kill this lone wild boar who is the only family member remaining out of seven that were spotted and killed recently. “Killing wildlife continues to be the only lazy solution to apparent problematic wildlife and it must stop. Animal lovers across Kerry and around Ireland join calls to humanly trap the animal and work with wildlife advocates to either place the animal in a sanctuary or work towards relocating him or her to the UK where some wild boar are still roaming,” he said.

https://www.all-creatures.org/environment/environment-why-animal-justice.html?fbclid=IwAR3UUMbRyQq6uQCPP0J7vzOD6Z9be7otmAWIV9QfFz2oOU9JX3rRBxQsU2c

An Environment Article from All-Creatures.org

FROM Philip Murphy, OpenDemocracy.net
June 2021

A vegan diet is probably the single biggest way to reduce your impact on planet Earth, as well as preventing the suffering of animals.

Philip Murphy is the Co-Founder of Animal Rebellion NYC and Continental Liaison, Turtle Island (North America)

“I refuse to be sidelined and overlooked as a weak-minded sentimentalist. I am vegan for justice. I am vegan as a rejection of violence. I am vegan because what we are doing as a species is wrong. I am vegan with my heart and my soul, but also with my mind, my intellect and my intelligence.”
– Linda Clark, There’s An Elephant In the Room

The environmental movement Extinction Rebellion (XR) burst into public consciousness on 31 October 2018 with a “Declaration of Rebellion” against the UK government, delivered in Parliament Square in London. Responding to the “climate emergency” and advancing behind a narrative calling for systems-level change through nonviolent direct action, XR grew into a global movement that catalyzed worldwide mass civil disobedience demonstrations in April and October of 2019.

The April actions were widely regarded to have been successful; the October actions less so, as acknowledged by Extinction Rebellion national spokesperson Rupert Read in a speech to the Sheffield XR group in December. In his talk Read shared a thoughtful and considered analysis of these actions, and in doing so articulated his belief that XR’s demands and associated values and principles can and must be actualized from “necessity, not ideology.”

In January 2020 Read and his co-authors Marc Lopatin and Skeena Rathor published a pamphlet entitled “Rushing The Emergency, Rushing The Rebellion?,” which represents a significant philosophical reorientation of the movement. The pamphlet calls for “a new story and vision [that] is human-centric, as opposed to environmental…[and] is nearer-term (as opposed to far-flung) as evidenced by the vulnerability of civilisation to locked-in unpredictable and extreme weather.”

Efforts to address this vulnerability are to be grounded in an approach to inequality that is broadly conceived; this new story is “above all, a story about how Mother Nature is making us all one.” But who exactly is included in this unity, and what about the rights of non-human animals in the way the climate emergency is framed and addressed?

“Rebel Alliance” member organization Animal Rebellion was birthed in the interval between the April and October Rebellions by a group of vegan animal justice advocates who were inspired by the impact of XR on the public consciousness. Incorporating the demands, core principles and values of XR and affirming an anti-speciesist stance, Animal Rebellion asserts that “we cannot end the climate emergency without first ending the animal emergency,” and calls for the adoption of a plant-based food system as a foundational means to mitigate climate change. ‘Speciesism’ simply means prejudice or discrimination that is based on species membership, rooted in the idea of human superiority.

In the words of Animal Rebellion member Alex Lockwood, “We are not here to replace calls for individuals to go vegan. Our intention was to add to the individual programmes and campaigns that urge, help and support people to go vegan…programmes that are bottom-up processes enacted one person at a time. We want to add to these with a new, top-down mass movement demand focused on the government for immediate system change.” Since its public launch at The Official Animal Rights March in London in August 2019, Animal Rebellion has grown to include over 60 local groups in 12 countries including the US, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and Germany.

While it can be said that Animal Rebellion has drawn inspiration from XR, it is equally true that it came into being as a response to the latter’s shortcomings with regard to the consideration it affords to nonhuman sentient beings. Virtually from XR’s launch, the movement had engendered sharp criticism from the global animal justice community regarding its failure to address the profound environmental impacts of so-called ‘animal agriculture’ and the deleterious impact of the active subjugation of non-human sentient beings for the purpose of turning them into commodities such as food. This criticism included powerful pieces by the noted abolitionist animal rights scholar and activist Gary Francione here and here.

These critiques are well-founded: the negative environmental impacts of raising animals for food make this one of the leading causes of ecosystem degradation, if not the leading cause. These impacts include increased emissions of greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide, deforestation, biodiversity loss (including species extinction), and air and water pollution (including ocean acidification). In the words of Oxford University’s Joseph Poore, the lead researcher on one of the largest metanalyses of the environmental impacts of food production:

“A vegan diet is probably the single biggest way to reduce your impact on planet Earth, not just greenhouse gases, but global acidification, eutrophication, land use and water use. It is far bigger than cutting down on your flights or buying an electric car.”

Substantively animal-generated emissions of methane and nitrous oxide have much more potent near-term impacts as greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide. Moreover, owing to what’s known as the “aerosol masking effect” associated with carbon dioxide emissions – whereby particulates in CO2 reflect a portion of the sun’s rays away from the Earth’s surface and thereby mask their actual warming effects – removing substantive quantities of CO2 in advance of reducing or eliminating methane and nitrous oxide from the atmosphere will serve to increase global average temperatures rapidly.

All this is scientifically true and should be politically compelling, but the genius of Animal Rebellion is as much philosophical and ethical as technical. The movement aims to illuminate the standing of all sentient beings as members of a moral community, and the profoundly damaging impacts associated with remaining ignorant of this fact. As Animal Rebellion’s ‘first value’ states:

“We are an anti-speciesist movement that has a shared vision of change – creating a world that protects beings of all species for generations to come…We are inspired not only by human action but also animal resistance and we believe in co-creating a world with individuals from all species for a just and secure future.”

This stance affirms the landmark 2012 Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, which states that “Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuro-anatomical, neuro-chemical, and neuro-physiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviors. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness.”

In his book Animal Oppression and Human Violence: Domesecration, Capitalism, and Global Conflict, the American sociologist David Nibert points to the domestication of animals (renamed “domesecration”) and the associated and unrelenting drive to secure the land and resources necessary to maintain populations of these animals, as being foundational to the development of the acquisitive, violent and expansionist mindset that has informed the creation of an unfettered, ‘grow or die,’ corporate capitalism – which in turn drives the planetary ecocide that has been called the “First Extermination Event” (in contrast to the commonly used term “Sixth Extinction”). As Nibert writes:

“Prejudice against other animals arises from socially promulgated beliefs that reflect a speciesist ideology, created to legitimate economic exploitation or elimination of a competitor. Oppressive practices have deep roots in economic and political arrangements. Therefore, for injustices to be addressed effectively, it is not enough to try to change socially acquired prejudice or to focus only on moral change. The structure of the oppressive system itself must be challenged and changed.”

A more skillful approach to addressing the climate and ecological emergency as affirmed by Read and his co-authors would necessitate that the new story and vision they advocate be centered not merely on human beings, but rather on all beings who demonstrate a unified psychological presence and who are, in the words of the moral philosopher and animal rights activist Tom Regan, the “subject of a life.” It is to all sentient beings that equality must be afforded, with the shared right to be treated with respect honored universally. Mother Nature is indeed “making us all one,” and that unitary domain must therefore include all beings who have the capacity to suffer.

By virtue of its uncompromising anti-speciesist stance and the actions that follow from it, Animal Rebellion can be identified as a progenitor of this new story and its attendant vision. Consequently, it is Animal Rebellion that can lay claim to being the climate justice movement to which all other such movements can and should aspire.