ANLC responds to Michela Vittoria Brambilla after the accusations about hunting

The honorable continues to define hunters as primitive beings stuck at the dawn of civilization.

 di Simone Ricci

 25 September 2025

in Hunting Associations

Reading time: 2 minutes of reading

A A

 0

Brambilla

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterSend WhatsApp

Grotesque attempts

Punctual and timely as always, the passionate animal rights activist immediately showed off her prose steeped in ideology and fanaticism and like a vulture she pounced on the first tragic episode that has struck our age-old activity, which she defines as “an absurd, cruel and dangerous practice.” In her speech, the Hon. Brambilla He continues by stating that hunting: “Is an activity that in 2025 could perhaps still make sense, as a means of subsistence, for the very few peoples remaining in the Stone Age” and that, “Despite the grotesque attempts to present shotguns as ‘guardians of nature,’ hunting is and remains a ‘legal’ attack on our biodiversity, which is everyone’s heritage.”

Attack on biodiversity

The kind lady, therefore, continues to portray us as primitive beings stuck at the dawn of civilization, forgetting that modern hunting, developed over centuries of history, culture, and art, is clearly the true and only tool for wise and scientific management of wildlife. We would like to point out to the lady that the true “legal” attack on our biodiversity is precisely the lack of serious management of a wildlife heritage that is now out of control. Anyone with a shred of honesty cannot ignore the abnormal and intolerable populations of coypu, cormorants, wild boars, wolves, sacred ibises, crows, parakeets, deer, fallow deer, starlings, crabs, shrimp, catfish, etc., etc. which have now invaded the countryside and cities, causing dozens of deaths in road accidents, destroying crops, decimating herds and wiping out from our countryside and from our seas, lakes and rivers millions and millions of small birds, mammals and fish, destroying at the root and irreparably our enviable biodiversity.

A profoundly different culture

Yes, of course, we won’t go for a walk carrying a tender, carefully washed and scented pink piglet on a leash or in our arms (but what will its final fate be when it reaches and exceeds 200 kg in weight?), nor will we waste time cuddling donkeys, ducks, and rabbits. We certainly belong to a culture profoundly different from theirs (which perhaps isn’t a millennia-old culture like ours, but merely a fad), and we reclaim its authenticity and profound naturalness. Not only that, but we are proud to fully experience nature, free from the hypocrisy of those who eat meat and fish plucked from supermarket shelves and refrigerated counters and then accuse us of being bloodthirsty and dangerous criminals.

A ridiculous video

We therefore reject the lady’s gratuitous accusations, demanding that in Italy, as in all civilized countries in Europe and the world, hunters be respected as upright “Serie A” citizens, and that their activity not be ignobly and gratuitously criminalized. Especially when the accusations come from people who only love nature on television and in magazines, and who, as has happened recently, pitifully “like” a ridiculous video, shamelessly generated by artificial intelligence, showing a wolf saving a baby chamois from falling into a ravine and then returning it to its mother, who thanks it with an affectionate and grateful pat of her hooves! Well, if these 200.000 fools are our fiercest enemies, we are truly proud to be different from them. Profoundly different (Paolo Sparvoli, president of ANLC).

Why armed herdsmen are the wrong way

The demand for armed herdsmen sounds like a quick solution to the wolf conflict. But it poses more problems than opportunities.

September 25, 2025, 9:34 a.m., IG Wild editorial team at Wild

Why armed herdsmen are the wrong way

The use of firearms in the steep, confusing terrain of the Alps is risky.

Herders are primarily livestock keepers, not trained gamekeepers or police officers. A weapon increases the risk of misfires, accidents, and misunderstandings – for humans, dogs, and wildlife alike.

Experience from France shows that defensive culling barely reduces the number of wolf attacks. Wolves are adaptable, and individual culling won’t solve the underlying problem. Only a well-combined herd protection program consisting of herding, dogs, fences, and adapted grazing management remains truly effective.

Allowing herders to use weapons themselves undermines the wolf’s protected status. The wolf is a protected species under international law. A de facto “right to shoot” weakens this protection and could destroy trust in government regulation.

Armed herders send a dangerous signal: Instead of resolving conflicts through prevention, planning, and coordination, they rely on confrontation. This promotes polarization and can further exacerbate the social conflict surrounding wolves.

The call for weapons is an expression of frustration, but not a sustainable approach. Livestock protection, prevention, professional gamekeepers, and fair compensation are more sensible in the long run, safer—and also compatible with species conservation .

It must be considered that the wolf is now widespread in parts of the cantons of Valais and Graubünden, as well as in the western Vaud Jura. In this situation, wolf populations regulate themselves through their territoriality: where one pack exists, no new one will settle. According to scientific research, a flattening of population growth can be expected there even without regulation.

The Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC) plans to present a report by 2025 to clarify the legal and practical conditions under which armed herders would be possible. The report will focus on issues of training, liability, monitoring, and animal welfare .

Added value:

Wisconsin DNR provides updates on CWD testing ahead of hunting season

Default Mono Sans Mono Serif Sans Serif Comic Fancy Small CapsDefault X-Small Small Medium Large X-Large XX-LargeDefault Outline Dark Outline Light Outline Dark Bold Outline Light Bold Shadow Dark Shadow Light Shadow Dark Bold Shadow Light BoldDefault Black Silver Gray White Maroon Red Purple Fuchsia Green Lime Olive Yellow Navy Blue Teal Aqua OrangeDefault 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%Default Black Silver Gray White Maroon Red Purple Fuchsia Green Lime Olive Yellow Navy Blue Teal Aqua OrangeDefault 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%

By Marisa Ornat

Published: Sep. 23, 2025 at 11:58 AM PDT

MADISON, Wis. (Northern News Now) – Wisconsin DNR officials held a meeting Tuesday, discussing how you can help limit CWD in the state.

CWD, or chronic wasting disease, is a fatal disease that attacks a deer’s nervous system.

The Wisconsin DNR started monitoring the state’s white-tailed deer population in 1999.

DNR leaders say they’re focusing on the priority sampling areas this year, which are highlighted in orange:

DNR CWD Sampling Needs for 2025
DNR CWD Sampling Needs for 2025(WI DNR)

They say testing for CWD is the best way to prevent the spread.

“We are a state that does a lot of testing, and we want to have that resource available to our hunters and also be able to have that information to give us good data on what’s occurring in our state,” said Erin Larson, WI DNR Herd Health Specialist.

Hunters who are interested in testing their deer can use a self-service kiosk or head to a DNR sample site.

The nearest location can be found using the DNR’s CWD Sample and Disposal Locations map.

Wisconsin’s archery and crossbow deer hunting season is currently ongoing.

The firearm hunt begins on Nov. 22.