It’s time to dust off the shotgun and hunt some grouse
Reply
Virginia board approves ‘last resort’ fee increases for hunting, fishing, trapping licenses
Portugal Turns to Hunting to Control Wild Boar
Portugal Turns to Hunting to Control Wild Boar
Portugal is pursuing a strategy to reduce wild boar numbers through hunting and extraordinary density adjustments, but the widely reported figure of almost 300,000 animals does not come from a current count: it is an estimate based on data collected in 2021 and subject to a wide margin of variation.
Most read
A drone to get wild boar out of the woods [+]
Thirsty and dehydrated roe deer: one enters a car [+]
Alarm Over Roe Deer Fawn Deaths in Bavaria [+]
Beretta 694 Black DLC: What the New [+]
Wolf Following Dog Walkers Tests Germany’s [+]
|
|
Areport published by Le Chasseur Français has once again drawn attention to the spread of wild boar in Portugal and the use of hunting to reduce its impact. The French publication cites around 300,000 animals in mainland Portugal, as well as agricultural damage, accidents and incursions into urban and tourist areas.
The official documents reviewed confirm the approximate scale of the figure, although they also require it to be qualified. A health declaration by Portugal’s Directorate-General for Food and Veterinary Affairs gives a central estimate of 277,385 wild boar, with a range of 163,157 to 391,612. The data used were collected between January and December 2021 by the University of Aveiro as part of the Wild Boar Strategic and Action Plan promoted by the ICNF.
An Estimate, Not a 2026 Census
The Portuguese documentation itself warns that the figures represent an estimate of abundance by hunting area, not a density calculated per unit of land. The range was obtained by applying an average coefficient of variation of 0.41 to the local estimates. Presenting the 300,000 animals as an exact and current snapshot of the population may therefore be misleading.
The Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests explains that the plan was developed by the University of Aveiro’s CESAM between September 2020 and December 2022. Its objectives included determining the size of the population, assessing the animals’ condition and analysing the habitat and factors associated with damage. The agency considers that this information should be used to design sustainable management and mitigate damage to agriculture and forestry, as well as health risks.
Official sources do describe a population whose development requires intervention. The technical recommendations include concentrating hunting effort at the start of the season, favouring collective methods over individual ones when a greater population-level effect is sought, and directing part of the cull towards females and subadult animals. These are proposals contained in the plan, not new obligations approved in August 2026.
Extraordinary Density Adjustments and Health Surveillance
The most specific measure identified for 2026 is Notice No. 1/2026, signed on 19 February. The decision allowed hunting-area owners and managers to use the RUBUS system to request extraordinary density adjustments through driven hunts between 1 and 15 March. Each application had to be assessed individually and could be authorised only if it did not compromise the site’s conservation values.
The ICNF justified these measures on the grounds of preventing African swine fever, damage to agricultural crops and forests, and road accidents. It also noted that weather conditions had prevented many scheduled driven hunts from taking place. The document therefore confirms a temporary increase in control efforts, but does not in itself demonstrate that new national regulations were adopted this August.
Health surveillance completes the strategy. The DGAV states that the last outbreak of African swine fever recorded in Portugal occurred on 15 November 1999. The disease does not affect people, but it can cause high mortality among swine and serious economic consequences. Portugal requires suspected cases to be reported and allows wild boar found dead to be reported through the ANIMAS application.
UP hunters want equal representation at state level
Default Mono Sans Mono Serif Sans Serif Comic Fancy Small CapsDefault X-Small Small Medium Large X-Large XX-LargeDefault Outline Dark Outline Light Outline Dark Bold Outline Light Bold Shadow Dark Shadow Light Shadow Dark Bold Shadow Light BoldDefault Black Silver Gray White Maroon Red Purple Fuchsia Green Lime Olive Yellow Navy Blue Teal Aqua OrangeDefault 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%Default Black Silver Gray White Maroon Red Purple Fuchsia Green Lime Olive Yellow Navy Blue Teal Aqua OrangeDefault 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%The Michigan Department of Natural Resources recently published the deer hunting regulations for 2026.
Published: Aug. 21, 2026 at 2:37 PM PDT
BIG BAY, Mich. (WLUC) – The Michigan Department of Natural Resources recently published the deer hunting regulations for 2026.
The changes affecting the Upper Peninsula most are the rescinding of management units 351 and 352, along with the elimination of the extended late antlerless deer season and January archery season. Muzzle loading season has also been shortened to three days starting Dec. 4.
Changes to tag limits and season lengths are a direct result of this year’s harsh winter, which has led to a decline in deer populations. However, hunters in the Upper Peninsula say that statewide changes might not be properly representing the U.P.
The Natural Resources Commission that puts state regulations into place is made up of seven members, with only one of those members representing the U.P.
That representative is Dave Nyburg whose term ends on Dec. 31.
“We could have nobody on the commission after December 31st, so one of the things that they can do is have two people on the commission at all times,” said Bryan Reynolds, president of U.P. Whitetails of Marquette County.
Because Upper Peninsula winters are so different from those downstate, Big Bay Sportsman’s Club President Mark Bevins says deer populations and hunters face different challenges.
“I think there are folks in Lansing who think one-shoe-fits all. We have to manage differently, because the populations are different, because of the environment,” said Bevins.
Reynolds proposes that one way to get the Upper Peninsula the proper focus it deserves is to divide state NRCs into three units.
“We would have unit one which would be U.P., unit two would be the northern lower, and unit three would be the southern lower, and they should all be managed separately from the other ones,” said Reynolds.
The importance of managing and conserving deer populations is to preserve the ability to hunt for future generations.
Read more about this year’s changes here.
