Mountain lions, guns and schools, oh my! Proposition 127, Proposition KK and Amendment 80 are a one-two-three of Colorado’s contentious ballot issues.

Trish Zornio3:05 AM MDT on Oct 21, 2024

• Share https://coloradosun.com/2024/10/21/trophy-huting-guns-schools-opinion-zornio/

With election season in full swing, last week I tackled one of the biggest issues Colorado voters face: Proposition 131. The takeaway? It’s a tough call, and many readers agreed.

But 131 is hardly the only contentious or complex issue on this year’s ballot. So this week let’s turn our attention to three more big Colorado topics: hunting, guns and schools.

Hunting of Colorado’s big cats

Proposition 127 feels complicated, but it’s not. It simply boils down to whether or not you believe the main reason hunters pay upwards of tens of thousands of dollars to specialized canine outfitters to kill Colorado’s Big Cats is for only the meat.

On a matter of common sense, I find this claim patently absurd. But even if the mountain lion meat is a delicacy, as some anti-127 proponents claim, paying outfitters outlandish fees to obtain such meat as an aside to seeking animal fur is still, by definition, trophy hunting. This is why I support 127 to end trophy hunting of Colorado’s Big Cats.

If you aren’t convinced, it’s worth addressing a few common claims by those against the measure. For starters, they claim hunters regulate lion populations, despite copious evidence Big Cats are self-regulating. They claim “ballot box biology” is unfair, an argument that not only implies voter values don’t matter, but also one that somehow gets lost for many of the very same voters when it comes to a woman’s biology — a contradiction of the highest order.

Editor’s picks

• What is the “Cyclopean Cave” — and why are these guys hauling buckets of Colorado mud to find it?
• By the numbers: Colorado’s antitrust trial to block the Kroger-Albertsons merger
• Windy Gap Reservoir nearly crashed an aquatic ecosystem. A $33 million water project is undoing the damage.

Then there are claims of economic loss, despite being a drop in the bucket of Colorado’s overall economy. Besides, highlighting how much money Colorado hunting organizations bring in to lure out-of-state hunters to kill Big Cats screams trophy hunting, not “I’m a local here to conserve wildlife.” 

Long story short, I support Proposition 127, and I hope you will, too.

Gun taxes

Proposition KK is about taxes, but it’s also about values: Should gun owners be required to contribute in the form of firearm purchase taxes to aid victims of gun violence and improve public safety as related to shootings?

The answer is fundamentally and unequivocally yes. Securing funds for gun victims and safety is one more tool in our toolbox to reduce the impact of gun violence, an issue that is top of mind for many Colorado voters due to ongoing high rates. And who better to help pay a little extra for those public services than those who insist on owning deadly weapons in the first place? I certainly can’t think of anyone. Can you? 

☀ MORE IN OPINION

Littwin: Do we really want a gang of rich guys to tell us how to do election reform in Colorado? 

3:06 AM MDT on Oct 20, 2024

Nicolais: This project offers hope to those wrongfully convicted of crimes

3:04 AM MDT on Oct 20, 2024

Carman: The world watches nervously as Election Day nears

3:02 AM MDT on Oct 20, 2024

School funding

 Amendment 80 is devious. At first glance, it sounds like an easy, happy choice for parents. It’s not. 

Coloradans are already guaranteed free public education, and Amendment 80 is a sneaky attempt to dupe voters into diverting taxpayer funds away from public schools toward private ones, including religious institutions. 

https://buy.tinypass.com/checkout/offer/show?displayMode=inline&containerSelector=%23SUNRISER_singlestep_inline&templateId=OTT34BVLKGDF&templateVariantId=OTV6YI5PR68UG&offerId=OF6KPH0OMNP9&formNameByTermId=%7B%7D&showCloseButton=false&experienceActionId=showOfferDR9QZE94WLYHB35&offerType=purchase&experienceId=EX3E6899PMOH&widget=offer&iframeId=offer-0-A7mhv&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoloradosun.com%2F2024%2F10%2F21%2Ftrophy-huting-guns-schools-opinion-zornio%2F&parentDualScreenLeft=0&parentDualScreenTop=0&parentWidth=1536&parentHeight=710&parentOuterHeight=816&aid=qlu5NxAypu&customVariables=%7B%22page_type%22%3A%22post%22%7D&browserId=lziym2mn5smw9oso&userState=anon&pianoIdUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fauth.coloradosun.com%2Fid%2F&pianoIdStage=&lang=en_US&userProvider=piano_id&userToken=&customCookies=%7B%7D&hasLoginRequiredCallback=true&initMode=context&requestUserAuthForLinkedTerm=true&initTime=10618.400000095367&logType=offerShow&width=670&_qh=7f4390d002

There are already several examples of religious charter schools in the state, as well as schools that refuse to meet basic scientific and education criteria per state guidelines. There are also already legal questions about the initiative, so do voters really think mandating taxpayer dollars for private schools is a good idea? I certainly hope not.

This means that even for those who support school choice, it is imperative to vote no on Amendment 80 to avoid the improper dispensing of public tax dollars. This is especially true for preventing public funds from going toward religious private schools with flimsy oversight.