Time is now to offer comments on hunting w/ hounds proposed regulations
Reply
Viewpoint: Grizzly hunting is trophy hunting
VIEWPOINT: GRIZZLY HUNTING IS TROPHY HUNTING
https://missoulacurrent.com/grizzly-hunting-trophy/
Missoula CurrentPublished: May 23, 2024An old, female grizzly was relocated to the North Fork of the Flathead drainage in 2019. (Montana FWP)
Mike Bader
A final decision on the petitions to remove the grizzly bear from the list of threatened species and the protections of the Endangered Species Act (delisting) may come in June or early July. Currently, authority over grizzly bear management is vested in the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. If the petitions are approved, management will be turned over to the states.
26.1K
Biden hosts Kenya’s William Ruto for CEO summit as part of state visit
Both Montana and Wyoming would have trophy hunts for grizzly bears. Wyoming would begin immediately and Montana in five years. But what would stop the politicians once they’ve achieved control over the bears?
Keep in mind that all grizzly bear hunting is trophy hunting. There is no subsistence hunting for bears in the lower 48. People do not eat bear meat and Montana hunting regulations do not require black bear hunters to eat the meat. To the contrary, hunters of elk, deer and other species can be fined if they waste the meat. Grizzly bear hunting is for the trophy and the thrill of shooting a grizzly bear.
Montana might use private citizens to remove bears with a history of management or habituation. This is not hunting. Since most bears with a management history are radio-collared, hunters might be directed to the bear’s location. This is not ethical or fair chase nor would it be allowed for any other animal.
The states also intend to arbitrarily limit where grizzly bears may be, even where they are in excellent habitat on public lands such as the Missouri Breaks with over one million acres of public lands and Wilderness. Hunting tags may be issued in specific areas to limit grizzly bear distribution to Wilderness and National Parks, which are not large enough to support viable populations. It’s the antithesis of wildlife habitat connectivity.
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWPs) earned a reputation as being the leading state wildlife management agency in the U.S. and has been highly trusted by the public. Unfortunately, political interference is tarnishing this reputation. The Montana Fish & Wildlife Commission used to have professional biologists as members including Chairs Dr. Gary Wolf and Dr. Bob Ream. No more. There is not a single biologist on the Commission, whose members are all appointed by the Governor.
Moreover, the legislature enacted many laws governing wildlife management that retired FWPs biologists and others have warned are extreme, unsporting and threaten stable populations of wildlife. This pervasive influence led FWPs to produce a statewide management plan for grizzly bears that reads like a trophy hunting plan. Many justifications are offered for trophy hunting grizzly bears, but few if any for not doing it.
The political override of state biologists is affecting Montana’s wildlife heritage from elk on down the line. In Wyoming the Cody Roberts wolf torture episode, which Wyoming Fish & Game sat on for five weeks, further erodes confidence in state management of carnivores and predators. Trust must be re-earned and that takes time.
If you oppose the trophy hunting of grizzly bears then you must also oppose removing the grizzly bear from the protections of the Endangered Species Act because that would immediately enable unsustainable trophy hunting. Relisting a species is almost unheard of and takes much time that the grizzly bear does not have.
There is no ordinary hunting of grizzly bears. It is trophy hunting plain and simple. Please consider contacting the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and tell them no delisting and no trophy hunting of grizzly bears. In the Search box, enter FWS-R6-ES-2022-0150, which is the docket number for this action.
Grizzly in Grand Teton attack won’t be punished
Officials say encounter was defensive; bear 399 is not a suspect ‘at this time.’
- By Billy ArnoldEnvironmental Reporter
- May 22, 2024 Updated 21 hrs ago
- https://www.jhnewsandguide.com/news/environmental/grand-teton-will-take-no-action-against-grizzly-that-attacked-visitor/article_dab34076-17c1-11ef-99b4-fff9f93b1ec1.html
- 4 min to read
Grand Teton National Park will take no action against a grizzly bear that attacked a visitor, officials say.
“We are not considering any management actions,” Chief of Staff Jeremy Barnum said. “It’s pretty clear in talking to the person who was injured and based on the site investigation that this was a surprise encounter and that the bear, likely a sow, responded defensively because she had at least one cub.”
ADVERTISING
Grizzly attacks in Grand Teton
According to Grand Teton National Park records, there have been only seven bear attacks in the park or the John D. Rockefeller Memorial Parkway since the park was founded in 1929.
August 1994 — Michael Dunn is attacked while jogging near Two Ocean Lake.
September 1997 — An unnamed visitor is attacked while hunting in the John D. Rockefeller Memorial Parkway.
March 2001 — Jim Olsen is attacked while skiing near Berry Creek.
April 2001 — Ken Bates is attacked while he is fishing in the John D. Rockefeller Memorial Parkway.
October 2001 — Conrad James Smith is attacked while hunting at School House Hill near Moran.
June 2007 — Dennis VanDenbos is attacked by Grizzly 399 while hiking the Wagon Road near Jackson Lake Lodge.
October 2011 — Timothy Hix is attacked while hunting the Snake River bottom near Blacktail Ponds Overlook.
May 2024 — An unnamed visitor is attacked near Signal Mountain Lodge. The circumstances remain uncertain.
Teton park rangers and Teton County Search and Rescue responded to the Sunday grizzly bear attack near Signal Mountain, the first grizzly attack in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem this year.
From 2012 to 2022, grizzlies have typically attacked an average of five people a year in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. But attacks in Grand Teton are rare, and the Sunday incident is the first reported in the park since 2011, when a grizzly injured a hunter participating the park’s fall elk hunt. At that time there had only been six bear attacks in Grand Teton’s history, none of them fatal, per park records.
By that account, the attack Sunday is the seventh since Teton park was founded in 1929.
The fact that park rangers have determined the bear acted “defensively” is also significant.
When it comes to bear attacks, biologists view attacks in self-defense differently than even rarer acts of predation. Grizzly or black bears that pursue or stalk humans are often killed. But bears that swipe or maul a human that surprises them are often spared that fate. That sort of response is typically deemed natural.
On Sunday the Massachusetts man was hiking through a forested area, carrying bear spray and intentionally making noise based on bear safety information Teton park had posted. When he saw a smaller bear in close proximity running away, he reached for his bear spray and was simultaneously charged by a larger bear, according to a park report on the incident provided to the News&Guide.
The victim was able to remove his bear spray from his holster but didn’t have time to let it loose because of how quickly the larger bear approached.
When the bear hit him, the man dropped, fell to the ground on his stomach and played dead, “interlacing his fingers behind his neck with the bear spray canister caught in one of his fingers,” the report says.
The bear hit the man several times and ultimately punctured the bear spray can. After that, the bears left.
The man was able to move to an area with cell coverage and call for help around 4 p.m. Sunday.
Rangers located the victim and provided emergency care. The Search and Rescue chopper airlifted him from the Signal Mountain area to a landing zone near the Potholes Turnout. From there he was transferred to an ambulance and driven to St. John’s Health.
He was discharged Monday and is expected to make a full recovery.
The News&Guide’s efforts to reach the victim were unsuccessful by press time. Officials did not release his name, citing privacy concerns.
Grand Teton biologists and law enforcement rangers investigated the incident Monday and Tuesday, and were able to talk with the victim for a second time Tuesday. After that conversation, they were able to adjust their characterization of the responsible bears from “two grizzly bears” to a sow and “at least one older cub.”
While the description of the bears involved matches the description of Grizzly 399 and the one, yearling cub she’s raising this year, Barnum said the park does not believe 399 was involved in the attack “at this time.”
“We can’t even say with 100% certainty it was a sow and a cub,” Barnum said. “We can’t rule out that it’s a mating pair or something else. We’re moving to a likely assumption without confirmation.”
The park does not know what bears were involved and may never know for certain.
Tom Mangelsen, a wildlife photographer who has documented 399 for the last decade, said 399 has been frequenting the northern part of Teton park. On Thursday, 399 and her young cub were seen at Moose Island near Leeks Marina, then showed up at Colter Bay on Friday as she ventured out to Hermitage Point.
After that, 399 wasn’t seen until Tuesday morning, when she emerged near the sewer ponds south of Colter Bay, heading north, traveling in a way indicating she came from Hermitage Point, not Signal Mountain. Hermitage Point and Signal Mountain are only 3.5 miles apart as the crow flies — close enough for a grizzly to make the trek in day. But Mangelsen and others have studied 399’s behavior for years. He doesn’t think making a trek from Hermitage point to Signal would have made any sense.
“It’s just really not her normal behavior. I’m pretty sure she isn’t the one that attacked the guy,” Mangelsen said. “It’s possible that she’s done it, but it doesn’t make sense.”
As the first reported grizzly bear attack in the Greater Yellowstone, the Sunday encounter follows a slew of high-profile incidents in 2023, including a grizzly attack that left a woman dead in West Yellowstone and a separate attack near Dubois where the victim survived. But bear biologists say attacks remain rare.
More attacks have occurred as grizzly range expands outside the core of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. However, because more grizzlies are now occupying more densely populated, or more heavily visited areas like Grand Teton National Park, researchers say attacks are down on a per capita basis. They attribute that to better education about methods to prevent bear attacks, such as avoiding hiking and running alone, making noise in the woods and avoiding moving through forested areas at dusk.
As bears have been emerging from dens, Grand Teton officials have been urging visitors to use caution. Park regulations require visitors to give bears and wolves 100 yards of space, including with their vehicles. There are wildlife closures in place to protect high-quality bear habitat, elk calving areas and carcasses on the landscape, as well as no-stopping zones in areas where bears frequently cross the road.
Closures are intended to give wildlife space, and biologists have asked that people respect them to stay safe. At the time of the attack, the Signal Mountain Road was closed to vehicles, as it always is this time of year. There were not, however, any wildlife-related closures in the area. It was legal to walk the road by foot.
Prevent human-bear conflicts
To prevent human-bear conflicts Grand Teton National Park asks visitors to do the following:
- Never leave food unattended unless it is properly secured.
- Keep a clean camp and adhere to all food storage orders. Store all attractants, including coolers, cooking gear, pet food and toiletries, inside a bear-resistant food locker (i.e., bear box) or a hard-sided vehicle with the windows rolled up.
- Properly store garbage until you can deposit it into a bear-resistant dumpster.
- Do not eat or cook in your tent, and never keep food or other scented items in your tent.
- Respect all wildlife closure areas.
- If you see a bear, give it space. Always stay at least 100 yards away. If you choose to watch or photograph the bear, use a spotting scope, binoculars or a telephoto lens. Park in designated areas, and never block travel lanes. Follow the directions of staff in places where bears are sighted.
While exploring the backcountry, visitors must:
- Be alert and aware of surroundings.
- Make noise, especially in areas with limited visibility or when sound is muffled (e.g., near streams or when it is windy).
- Carry bear spray, know how to use it, and keep it readily accessible.
- Hike in groups of three or more people.
- Do not run. Back away slowly if you encounter a bear.
China Turns Tables on US Over Russia-Ukraine War Sanctions
House Bill Would Ban Wildlife Killing Contests on Public Lands
Donald Trump Jr.’s girlfriend unveils wild conspiracy theory about Kristi Noem’s executed dog
Virginia weighs regulations on hound hunting, citing tensions with landowners
Squirrels now fair game for hunting in City of Green Bay… but only on your own property
‘There was no right vote’: Why a controversial wildlife bill died in the Vermont House
Bird flu strain H7N3 detected on Victorian farm, hundreds of thousands of chickens euthanased
/ By Jane McNaughton and Warwick Long
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 14h ago14 hours ago
abc.net.au/news/avian-influenza-bird-flu-detected-at-victorian-poultry-farm/103877560Copy link
Link copiedShare article
- In short: Avian influenza has been detected at an egg farm in Victoria, leading to hundreds of thousands of chickens being euthanased.
- Testing has revealed the strain to be H7N3, a different variant to the one that has sparked fears of a global outbreak.
- What’s next? The property is in quarantine and poultry keepers are being urged to monitor their birds carefully.
Hundreds of thousands of birds have been euthanased at a Victorian egg farm after the detection of avian influenza.
The property near Meredith, in the state’s west is in quarantine and testing has revealed that the strain of the disease is H7N3, which is the most commonly occurring variant in Australia.
Agriculture Victoria said the detection was the result of investigations of poultry deaths at the farm.
The confirmation comes amid fears of a global bird flu outbreak following the widespread detection of the H5N1 strain overseas.
Victorian Chief Veterinary Officer Graeme Cooke said avian influenza was present in Australian wild birds and “from time to time spilled over into the domestic poultry population”.
“We are putting in place all the requirements to prevent it spreading any further and removing the chance of any onwards spread,” he said.
“This area [surrounding the detection] does have a high density poultry businesses, both egg laying and meat.
“Poultry farmers, backyard flock and bird owners are urged to report any cases of unexplained bird deaths to the 24-hour Emergency Animal Disease Hotline on 1800 675 888, or to your local vet.”
Global outbreak
Avian influenza is a highly contagious virus that affects bird species and some variants can spread to other species, including humans.
There’s an animal pandemic sweeping the world. Will humans be next?
There are many types of bird flu, including the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain, which has been a cause of concern for local authorities as there is a global outbreak which has been detected in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, North America, South America and Antarctica.
Dr Cooke said all variants of bird flu were of serious concern and it was a relief that H5N1 was not detected in the outbreak near Meredith.
“In the USA and other parts of the world the H5N1 virus is causing great concern, as it has behaved unusually, as it has infected dairy cattle and some other marine mammals and so on.
“This is not the strain that we’re dealing with.”
After the news of the outbreak near Meredith was reported on Wednesday, the Victorian government announced that a human H5N1 infection had been reported in Victoria.
The case related to a child who returned from overseas in March.
The child experienced a severe infection, the government said, but made a full recovery.
The outbreak near Meredith and that infection are not related.
Bird flu was last detected in Australia in 2020, when it was found on an egg farm south of Ballarat.
This resulted in multiple outbreaks in Victoria and led to tens of thousands of farmed birds being euthanased.
Agriculture Victoria is urging all poultry and bird owners to follow biosecurity practices such keeping poultry sheds, yards, aviaries and equipment clean and restricting contact between poultry and wild birds.
Bird owners should also ensure their footwear is clean, always wash their hands before and after handling birds or eggs, and quarantine new birds before integrating them with flocks.
Consumers should not be concerned about eggs and poultry products from the supermarkets — they do not pose a risk and are safe to consume.
ABC Rural news daily
Key stories of the day for Australian primary producers, delivered each weekday afternoon.ABC Rural Weekday NewsABC Rural Weekly News
Your information is being handled in accordance with the ABC Privacy Collection Statement.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Posted 18h ago18 hours ago, updated 14h ago14 hours ago
Share
Exposing the Big Game 