Kansas wildlife officials to meet in Topeka, vote on hunting season changes.
Reply
Daily MailFollow
458.5K Followers
Story by Will Stewart and Miriam Kuepper
• 4h • 3 min read
A Russian cruise missile flew over NATO territory for 39 seconds overnight triggering a major alert amid fears over an escalation of the war in Ukraine.
Allied war planes scrambled to ‘ensure the security’ of Polish airspace after the incursion at 4.23am local time. ![]()
StuffAnswered6.5% High Yield CD. Find The Highest CD Interest Rates
The Polish armed forces confirmed the incident in a statement on X, saying: ‘There was a violation of Polish airspace by one of the cruise missiles launched overnight by long-range aviation of the Russian Federation.
‘The object entered Polish space near the town of Oserdow (Lublin Voivodeship) and stayed there for 39 seconds. During the entire flight, it was observed by military radar systems.’
The military said the missile travelled about 1.2miles into Polish territory and that Polish and allied aircraft had been activated, but that the airspace over Poland was now safe.
Meanwhile Ukraine subjected Russian-annexed Sevastopol in Crimea to one of the heaviest bombardments of the 25-month war (pictured above: Sevastopol under missile attack) © Provided by Daily Mail
An explosion of a missile is seen in the sky over Kyiv during a Russian missile strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, on March 24© Provided by Daily Mail
The Polish armed forces said in a statement: ‘The object entered Polish space near the town of Oserdow (Lublin Voivodeship) and stayed there for 39 seconds. During the entire flight, it was observed by military radar systems’© Provided by Daily Mail
There were huge explosions in the city believed to be from Storm Shadow missiles, the kind supplied to Ukraine by the UK© Provided by Daily Mail
Police officers inspect a part of a Russian Kh-55 cruise missile, intercepted during a missile strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in a park in Kyiv, on March 24© Provided by Daily Mail
The potentially dangerous violation by Vladimir Putin‘s forces came during a Russian strike on the Lviv region of Ukraine.
1 / 12
Firebrand Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has launched a bid to oust Speaker Mike Johnson by filing a motion to vacate in fury over the $1.2 trillion spending bill. Conservatives in the House GOP were fighting mad that Johnson released the package to keep the government funded in the middle of the night and gave them one day to read on it before a vote. With the House GOP’s razor-thin majority, only two Republicans would need to support a motion to vacate for it to pass if all Democrats voted for it, like they did last time. But some have signaled they might vote to save Johnson, particularly if he agrees to put Ukraine aid on the floor.©CNN / EPA
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Jacek Siewiera, said he talked with the head of the Ministry of National Defence, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz. ‘The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces was immediately informed,’ he said.
The Polish Armed Forces claim that the Russian missile entered the country’s airspace to a depth of one and a quarter miles.
Related video: Russia-Ukraine War: Russian forces pound Ukraine’s major power facilities (WION)
We use every day to convince the necessity and most
Loaded: 100.00%Play
Current Time 0:56
/
Duration 1:59Quality SettingsCaptionsFullscreen
WION
Russia-Ukraine War: Russian forces pound Ukraine’s major power facilitiesUnmute
0
More videos
Russia deployed at least 29 Kh-101 and Kh-555 missiles in the overnight strikes, as well as 28 Shahed strike drones into Ukraine.
Of these, 18 missiles and 25 drones were shot down, said Air Force Commander General Mykola Oleshchuk.
Russia is believed to have hit infrastructure in Stryi, Lviv region after cruise missiles were launched form 14 Tu-95MS strategic bombers.
Meanwhile Ukraine subjected Russian-annexed Sevastopol in Crimea to one of the heaviest bombardments of the 25-month war.
There were huge explosions in the city believed to be from Storm Shadow missiles, the kind supplied to Ukraine by the UK.
There were reports that the communications centre of the Russian Black Sea Fleet was hit. A 65-year-old man died and four people were wounded in the strikes, said reports.
However it is not known if there were more casualties at the targeted communications centre.
Sevastopol governor Mikhail Razvozhaev reported a ‘massive’ attack by Ukraine.
Russian air defences claimed to have shot down more than 10 missiles and numerous drones.
Police officers inspect a part of a Russian Kh-55 cruise missile, intercepted during a missile strike, earlier today© Provided by Daily Mail
There were reports that the communications centre of the Russian Black Sea Fleet was hit (pictured: black smoke over Sevastopol following the Ukrainian missile attack)© Provided by Daily Mail
An explosion of a missile is seen in the sky over Kyiv during a Russian missile strike on March 24© Provided by Daily Mail
A police officer inspects a part of a Russian Kh-55 cruise missile, intercepted during a missile strike, in a park in Kyiv on March 24© Provided by Daily Mail
The OSINTtechnical project said the Ukrainians had struck a fleet facility, and a spectacular video showed the moment of the hit.
‘At least three Ukrainian Storm Shadow cruise missiles… hit a major communication node of the Russian Black Sea Fleet,’ they reported.
Telegram channel Crimean Wind said: ‘The hit of the missiles was at the main special communication node of the Russian Black Sea Fleet on Mykola Muzika Street.’![]()
StuffAnswered6.5% High Yield CD. Find The Highest CD Interest Rates
Ukrainian outlet Pravda reported: ‘Three Storm Shadow cruise missiles hit a building in the centre of Sevastopol at once.’
The commander of the Ukrainian Air Force thanked ‘the pilots and sailors for their successful combat work.’
Further explosions were later heard in the city and other locations in Crimea. An oil depot in the village of Gvardeisky was hit.
Scientists measured canine brain waves to shed light on language learning.
BY LAUREN LEFFER | PUBLISHED MAR 22, 2024 11:00 AM EDT

SHARE
When a dog follows a command or fetches a ball, it’s hard to know what’s really going on inside its canine cranium. Do dogs understand and respond to tone of voice, the syllables of words, accompanying hand motions and body language, or just the situational context? Behavioral studies have offered some clues, but new research brings additional evidence that our favorite furry friends really do grasp the meaning behind words.
Dogs show a pattern of neural activity that seems to indicate they can differentiate between words for different objects, and are even surprised when presented with words and objects that don’t match up, according to a study published March 22 in the journal Current Biology. A team of neuroscientists and animal behavior researchers used non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) testing to measure the electrical pulses inside 27 pet dogs’ brains during an experiment involving the dogs’ owners and some well-loved toys. They found an electrical impulse pattern similar to a known signal in humans. The findings shed light on canine noggins and also add to our knowledge of the origins of complex language.
“We were interested in whether dogs understand words the way humans do.”
“It’s wonderful to have studies like this,” says Ellen Lau, a neuroscientist studying linguistics at the University of Maryland who was not involved in the new research. Applying EEG to dogs, instead of the more invasive techniques that are often used to study animal brains, allows for more direct comparisons between humans and non-humans, she explains. “If we want to understand what’s common across humans and animals, we need to have more of this kind of data.”

00:00
02:23
Read More
https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.629.1_en.html#goog_892967630
https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.629.1_en.html#goog_892967631
https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.629.1_en.html#goog_892967632
https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.629.1_en.html#goog_892967633
Among animals, family pups are unique for how much exposure they get to human language. “You can probe a lot of interesting questions about language experience with dogs, because they’re some of the only animals that live in our houses and pay attention to us,” says Amritha Mallikarjun, a neuroscientist researching canine cognition at the University of Pennsylvania who was not involved in the new research.
The study scientists set out to test if dogs grasp the relationship between words and their corresponding objects. “We were interested in whether dogs understand words the way humans do,” says Lilla Magyari, co-lead author and a cognitive neuroscientist and psychologist at the University of Stavanger in Norway. Some standout dogs are able to demonstrate their vocabulary through behavioral tests, but not all dogs are as abiding, capable, or well-behaved. The scientists wanted to know if even dogs that don’t display exceptional abilities still have some language sense.
The bigger the surprise, the bigger the signal.
People have internal references for what words mean, or the ability to “picture” an object inside their minds’ eye from memory. However, it’s unclear if any other animals share this capacity to imagine something that’s not there from an associated sound. To explore this question, Magyari and her colleagues adapted a cognitive test previously used in studies of infants. The assessment compares EEG readings from a subject told a word or phrase, and then either shown a corresponding object or an object that doesn’t match the description.

In humans, even those too young to speak, an observable effect called the N400 appears on EEG read-outs when people encounter language and other stimuli. It’s a characteristic signal that peaks around 400 milliseconds after a stimulus is presented, and gets larger when objects or images and words don’t match up. The bigger the surprise, the bigger the signal. Many scientists interpret the effect as evidence of understanding and proof of an internal reference for a word’s definition, even in non-verbal subjects.
In order to make the test canine friendly, Magyari and her co-researchers made some careful adjustments, controlling for the dogs’ comfort, potential variability in voice, and other movements or communication signals between dogs and owners that might influence results.
“I think this study is beautiful,” Lau says–noting the thorough and well-considered design. “I think they really did everything you need to be doing in animal cognition work.”
The dogs, all healthy companion animals, were recruited via social media and were selected based on an owner’s assessment that their pet understood at least three object words. After a period of acclimating to the lab, owners and dogs were separated by an electronic window that could quickly toggle between transparent and opaque. The scientists attached electrodes to the dogs’ heads at key points. Over multiple trials, the pets were played recordings of their owners’ voices calling their attention to one of five familiar objects (e.g. ‘Fido, look, the ball’), while being shown their owners’ faces through the window. Then, after a brief period of opaque blankness, the window would reveal the owner holding up one of the objects–either a match to the previously played phrase, or a mismatch. Meanwhile, the EEG recorded the electronic pulses going on inside their brains.
Out of the 27 dogs that started the experiment, 18 were included in the final analyses. Nine were excluded, mostly because they wouldn’t sit still enough to yield clean EEG data. But even accounting for the challenges of wiggley animal subjects, the scientists still found clear patterns in their results.