Speciesism up Next?

From the chapter “Homo sapiens, Pinnacle of Evolution?” of Richard Leakey’s 1995 classic, the Sixth Extinction—Patterns of Life and the Future of Humankind:

Homo sapiens was soon to represent the ultimate product of evolution and to be separate from the rest of nature in some important sense, with the gradation of increasing superiority through the geographical races, from Australian to European.

For instance, Alfred Russel Wallace, the co-inventor of the theory of natural selection, believed that evolution had been working “for untold millions of years…slowly developing forms of life and beauty to culminate in man.”

382304_10150410245381489_1896442457_nIn 1933, Robert Broom stated the following: “Much of evolution looks as though it had been planned to result in man, and in other animals and plants to make the world a suitable place for him to dwell in.” Broom clearly saw humans as special and separate, and the rest of the natural world ours to exploit as we please. Broom’s was not an isolated opinion; it accurately portrayed the contemporary thinking. Anthropologists of the time were in awe of the human brain and saw it as lord of all. Human progress through pre-history, according to the prominent British anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith, had been “a glorious exodus leading to the domination of earth, sea and sky.”

Examples of what by today’s standards we would condemn as blatant racism were legion in scholarly writings of the early decades of the century, which placed in an evolutionary framework what had been seen as the product of creation in earlier times. One citation will suffice by way of illustration. In his Essays on the Evolution of Man, the imminent British anatomist Sir Grafton Elliot Smith wrote the following in 1923:

“The most primitive race now living is undoubtedly the Australian, which represents the survival with comparatively slight modification of perhaps the primitive type of the species. Next in order comes the Negro Race, which is much later and in many respects more highly specialized, but sharing with it the black pigmentation of the skin, which is really and early primitive characteristic of the Human Family of Primitive Man shares with the Gorilla and Chimpanzee. After the Negro separated from the main stem of the family, the amount of pigmentation underwent a sudden and very marked reduction and the next group that became segregated and underwent its own distinctive specialization was the Mongrel Race…”

Overt racism of this kind disappeared from text by mid-century, with curious effect. Viewed as more primitive than white Caucasians, the “inferior races” formed something of a bridge between the ultimate expression of Homo sapiens and the rest of the animal world. When all races were regarded as equal, the bridge disappeared, and a gap opened up, making modern humans even more separate from the world of nature.

______________________

[In other words, speciesism became even more entrenched. The question now is, how many more centuries will the animals have to wait before examples of overt speciesism disappear from the texts and ultimately from people’s minds?]

A Disgraceful Era In Our Treatment Of Chimps Ended Today

https://www.thedodo.com/hope-arrives-for-chimpanzees-1348050214.html?xrs=RebelMouse_fb

After decades of being forced to endure pain and suffering in the name of science and entertainment, hope has finally arrived for our closest primate cousins.

As of Monday, September 14, all chimpanzees are now protected as “endangered species” — bringing an end to the most shameful era of normalized exploitation and abuse against these animals.

Wikimedia

Under an earlier ruling from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, effective as of today, it is now against the law to harm, harass, kill or cause injury to chimps, both in captivity and in the wild. The significance of this classification is beyond measure for hundreds of chimps used in biomedical research across the United States, who from this moment forward, have been given reprieve from their lives of misery. Research labs were given the opportunity to apply for exceptions, but none chose to do so.

Prior to this ruling, the U.S. was the only developed country where chimps were still used as laboratory test animals, subjected to painful procedures and denied the most basic semblance of a normal life. Now, many, if not all of these animals will be sent into retirement at sanctuaries.

Additionally, chimps held captive as props for entertainment or sold in the exotic wildlife trade finally have relief as well. Under the new distinction, it is now “illegal to sell chimpanzees in the interstate pet trade or to engage in commercial transport of the animals across state lines,” as the Humane Society notes. Permits are now required for anyone wishing to deviate from the new protections, but will only be issued if it will benefit the survival of the species.

The closing of this shameful chapter couldn’t have come soon enough — especially for those who know the true nature of chimpanzees better than most:

“This decision gives me hope that we truly have begun to understand that our attitudes toward treatment of our closest living relatives must change,” said noted primatologist Jane Goodall. “I congratulate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for this very important decision.”

Petition: Abolish hunting and trapping nationwide

11745736_133221767014660_4760726275278076498_n

Costa Rica has made hunting illegal. We need to do the same. They will also eventually free all animals from their zoos into safe habitats. While out hiking I came across a mother moose caught in a trap – terrified and yelling with pain. Her baby was right beside her – confused and in shock. All animals have emotions. (just take a look at any pet dog). They have emotions like we have because they have souls just like we do. They want to be treated with love and respect just like us. They want their freedom just like we want ours. They have a nervous system just like we do enabling them to feel pain and sorrow and happiness also. Animals are here to experience life and develop their souls just as we are. We now have the capability to feed ourselves without eating animals. And more and more studies are showing the health benefits of a plant based diet. Ex-President Bill Clinton has switched to a vegan diet. When we look at animals as objects of consumption we lose. Our soul is diminished because we lose the ability to have compassion and love for other life forms. If we are at peace with nature and it’s wildlife we expand our consciousness and awareness and are more at peace with ourselves! I ask President Obama to make this huge step forward and leave this as a memorial to his term in office. Let this be a “Trigger of Conscience” that the President has recently been talking about.

Letter to
President Barack Obama

Government Documents Reveal That Killing Cormorants Won’t Help Columbia River Salmon

August 12, 2015

Contact: Bob Sallinger, Audubon Society of Portland, (503) 380-9728 or bsallinger@audubonportland.org
Dan Rohlf, Earthrise Law Center, (503) 484-3943 or rohlf@lclark.edu
Collette Adkins, Center for Biological Diversity, (651) 955-3821 or cadkins@biologicaldiversity.org
Michael Harris, Friends of Animals, michaelharris@friendsofanimals.org
Megan Backus, Animal Legal Defense Fund, (707) 795-2533, x 1010 or mbackus@aldf.org
Sharnelle Fee, Wildlife Center of the North Coast, (503) 338-0331 or director@coastwildlife.org

Government Documents Reveal That Killing Cormorants Won’t Help Columbia River Salmon

Despite Findings, Federal Agency Authorized Killing More Than 10,000 Cormorants

PORTLAND, Ore.— Conservation groups today called for an investigation after agency documents, released last week under court order, showed that killing double-crested cormorants will not benefit salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River Basin. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s own biologists found that fish not eaten by cormorants would be eaten by other predators, but nevertheless authorized the killing of more than 10,000 double-crested cormorants and destruction of more than 26,000 cormorant nests on East Sand Island near the mouth of the Columbia.

Double-crested cormorant
Photo courtesy Flickr/Mark Dumont. This photo is available for media use.

“Dead set on killing cormorants, the Service ignored its own science,” said Collette Adkins, an attorney and biologist at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The agency’s own analysis makes clear that its cormorant-killing program is doing nothing to help endangered fish. My heart aches for all the birds that have needlessly suffered and died. The killing needs to stop now.”

Scientists with the Fish and Wildlife Service concluded in a 2014 report that salmon and steelhead mortality due to cormorant predation is “completely compensatory.” This means that fish eaten by the birds would have died anyway of other causes — primarily consumed by fish and other predators — making it worthless to kill cormorants to increase salmon and steelhead runs.

The report states that “efforts to reduce predation by double-crested cormorants are expected to result in no changes or benefits to these fish populations in terms of increasing adult returns or abundance.” In contrast, the report concludes that “efforts to reduce mortality during passage through the hydro system are expected to result in increased productivity and abundance of steelhead.”

“The Service’s analysis confirms what we’ve argued for years,” said Bob Sallinger, Audubon Society of Portland conservation director. “The federal agencies responsible for recovering endangered fish should take steps to save salmon and steelhead by improving federal dam operations rather than making native birds the scapegoats for human-caused declines in Columbia Basin salmon runs. This is a senseless slaughter and the government knew it and chose to conceal this information during the public process.”

This spring several conservation groups filed a lawsuit against the Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services to stop the slaughter of thousands of double-crested cormorants in the Columbia River basin. The lawsuit asserts that the federal agencies are scapegoating the native birds for salmon declines when the real threat is mismanagement of the federal hydropower system. Through this litigation the court ordered the Service to release documents related to whether its cormorant-killing program will actually increase returns of adult fish, which led to last week’s release of the federal scientists’ analysis.

In today’s letter conservation groups called on Dan Ashe, the Fish and Wildlife Service director, to investigate why this information was not disclosed during the public process that led to the decision to kill cormorants on East Sand Island. The groups also demanded that the Service withdraw permits allowing the Army Corps to kill cormorants on East Sand Island, given the documented lack of scientific justification. So far this year, the federal agencies have killed more than 100 adult birds and destroyed thousands of nests, with more killings planned.

Photo of 7-year-old son killing his ‘first lion’ yanked from Twitter

11828676_1647257555515456_404765920658395105_n
https://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/photo-of-7-year-old-son-killing-his-first-lion-yanked-from-twitter-by-proud-dad-after-activists-shame-him/
“An Indiana man who formerly tweeted under the name @Safarihunter77
had shut down his account after animal rights activists discovered
photos he took of his two young sons with lions they had shot and
killed, reports theDaily Record.”

Cecil the lion’s killer ‘captured’: Walter Palmer pictured for the first time since Zimbabwe hunt

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11806856/walter-palmer-cecil-the-lion-killer-first-pictures.html

Exclusive: The Telegraph obtains first images of Walter Palmer in Minnesota since beloved lion was killed

Facebook
2K
Twitter
295
Pinterest
3
LinkedIn
0
Share
2K
Email

Walter Palmer, the man responsible for killing Cecil the lion

Walter Palmer, the dentist responsible for killing Cecil the lion Photo: Richard Beetham/The Telegraph/Splash News

These are the first images of Walter Palmer, the American dentist, back in his home town after it was revealed by The Telegraph last month that he was responsible for the death of Cecil the lion.

Pictured for the first since the hunt in Minnesota, Mr Palmer has been in hiding since the worldwide furore surrounding the death of the beloved lion in one of Zimbabwe’s national parks.

His return to normal life coincided with a letter announcing that the dental practice he owns was reopening – but without the embattled hunter.

“Today, River Bluff Dental employees and dentists are beginning to serve our loyal patients,” the firm said in a letter dated Monday. “Dr Palmer is not on site.”

The dental practice website was still offline, but the news was announced on a Twitter account claiming to belong to the practice.

The account, which was started after the news of Cecil’s killing was announced, has been used to rally support for the practice since The Telegraph named Dr Palmer as the man responsible for the animal’s death on July 28.

“A smile takes but a moment, but the memories of it last forever. Happy #WorldLionDay!” they tweeted on August 10, with a photo of two lions bearing their teeth.

“Don’t understand why people are so angry. What’s done is done. The practice WILL be open again! Promise!!!”

Last week they tweeted: “The practice is still closed even though people care less and less about #CecilTheLion day after day. Fickle people.”

Mr Palmer is believed to have paid £35,000 to shoot and kill the 13-year-old lion with a bow and arrow. The animal was wearing a radio collar because he was part of an academic study by Oxford University.

Walter Palmer the man responsible for killing Cecil the lionWalter Palmer, the dentist responsible for killing Cecil the lion  Photo: Richard Beetham/The Telegraph/Splash News

The animal was shot on July 1 in Hwange National Park. There have been calls for Mr Palmer to be extradited to face charges in Zimbabwe – something highly unlikely to happen.

Walter Palmer, the dentist responsible for killing Cecil the lionWalter Palmer, the dentist responsible for killing Cecil the lion  Photo: Richard Beetham/The Telegraph/Splash News

The professional hunter who accompanied the American, Theo Bronkhorst, is facing charges of carrying out an illegal hunt.

Last week, Robert Mugabe, the Zimbabwean president, blamed his own people for allowing Cecil to be killed by the dentist, telling them they “failed to protect” a national resource from foreign “vandals”.

More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11806856/walter-palmer-cecil-the-lion-killer-first-pictures.html

Yellowstone: a Dangerous Place—for Bears

Text and Wildlife Photography©Jim Robertson

Text and Wildlife Photography©Jim Robertson

Much has been speculated since the Yellowstone employee was recently found partially consumed by a bear and her two cubs. For example, it can’t be known for certain that the popular bear nicknamed “Blaze” was the one who caused his death—teeth and claws do not leave fingerprints. Likewise, the bear’s motive for killing can’t be known for sure either. Sometimes humans just die easily. According to a recent article in the Washington Post, entitled, “Forget bears: Here’s what really kills people at national parks,” folks are far more likely to die of drowning, car accident, a fall, suicide, pre-existing condition, heat or cold exposure than by wildlife (which is last on the list in descending order).

But the motive for killing the bear was pretty clear: an eye for an eye. This was an act of revenge. You don’t kill a human in this park and get away with it—especially if you yourself are not human. What will the paying park patrons think? After all, the park was created “for the people.” Never mind that grizzly bears are threatened with extinction in the lower 48; are losing habitat daily to anthropogenic climate change and those roughly 700 in Yellowstone have nowhere else to go. The parks are their last semi-safe refuges from savage, heavily armed humans who call for their deaths at every turn. Humans throughout the world kill (and sometimes eat) bears by the tens of thousands on a regular basis.

And never mind that humans, at 7.3 billion and counting, have practically no other1451324_650954518277931_1616731734_n natural predators. Or that by the end of the century when we reach our projected 11 Billion, the Earth’s few remaining lions, tigers and grizzly bears, etc., will either be things of the past adorning someone’s walls or floors, or be locked up as zoo relics. Their lives in the wild will be so over-managed as to be non-existent.

Justice is swift in Yellowstone, especially against the wildlife, whose destruction is pawned-off as euthanasia; or if they leave the park, “harvest.” Get ready for grizzly bear “harvest” to become commonplace unless we stop the plan to delist them from their Threatened status. After all, they’re just another “big game” animal, and the growing number of people need more and more trophy hunting opportunities for the future.

If Blaze’s killing was anything more than simple revenge, it was another statement to the world that humans are top dogs and the laws of Nature (somehow, by virtue of human arrogance) do not apply to us. Don’t mess with us humans or we’ll have you euthanized, you lowly wild ursine, feline, canine, piscine, etc.

Ever since the fatal attack on the park employee, Yellowstone has posted signs all over warning about dangerous bears, but what they really need are signs warning the bears to behave themselves or we’ll trap and euthanize you and maybe take away your Threatened status protections. Then the end result will be a lot more than an eye for an eye!

DSC_0281

Murder in Yellowstone: grizzly family is sacrificed for fear of litigation

Doug’s Blog

Rants from a renegade naturalist

Murder in Yellowstone: grizzly family is sacrificed for fear of litigation

News from Yellowstone: please see Terry Tempest William’s post on my Home page, “Don’t kill this grizzly bear.”

The news is that Yellowstone Park officials will kill this mother bear, as they said they would from the beginning. Despite all your pleas for logic, fairness and humane treatment of this grizzly family, a mother and two cubs of the year, they will be killed.

A friend of mine, along with other insiders who work in Yellowstone park, actively lobbied and talked to Kerry Gunther and other YNP officials. To their credit, these public servants at least listened to alternatives to the destruction of this bear family and, although they were inflexible about euthanizing the mother grizzly, they considered placing the two cubs in a zoo-like setting, In particular the Yellowstone Discovery Center in West Yellowstone. This private educational center did it’s best towards accommodating the entire bear family. This discussion included taking in the two cubs and at least considering raising fund to acquire a larger area to suite the older female grizzly who has lived a wild bear life for 20 years. I think this kind of discussion commendable on all sides. And it wouldn’t have taken place without all your letters, calls and pleas to spare the grizzy family’s lives.

The effort failed for two reasons:

First, Yellowstone National Park decided, privately for unstated and unexplained matters of “public safety,” to kill this, and presumably any bear, who is implicated in a human fatality. This is wrong, based on no science and against the NPS Organic Act mission, which is celebrating it’s 100th anniversary in 2016. This incident was a purely defensive, natural response of a mother bear protecting her cubs. This particular female grizzly had a long and tolerant history towards human visitors, however rude and clumsy. My friend:

“It looks like the bear involved was a very familiar, older bear nicknamed, Blaze who had two COY this year. She has been viewed, photographed and filmed by thousands of people over the years with never a shred of aggression even while people chased her and her cubs to get a better shot. Apparently traps have been set and the decision to kill her has already been made.”

The mauling was a human-induced event. The hiker, however experienced, did everything wrong: he got too close to a sleeping mother grizzly, then he ran and tried to fight back. Doing these three things–stumbling in too close to an unaware mother bear, running and fighting back–are about the only way you can get get killed by a mother grizzly.

The park service of old use to treat these defensive attacks, fatal or not, as the natural responses they indeed are. No more. Since the fatal mauling of a Michigan man in 2010, they have hardened their response and changed their policy–if they have a policy other than what’s seems safest to preclude litigation at the time it’s happening. And they never discussed with or even disclosed to the public–concerned taxpayer how they arrived at this policy. Fear of litigation is what made them condemn the natural, defensive-acting mother bear to death. That cash, the litigation slush funds, doesn’t come out of their pockets; it’s our dough. YNP could at least discuss that issue with us.

The second reason is a single bureaucrat has decided to kill the cubs. This proclamation was made after YNP officials, apparently in all good faith, considered sending them to a zoo-like facility. That decency by YNP was overruled: the cubs must be killed. My friend:

“So we got all the way to the alter on adopting these cubs and Chris Servheen said no. If these cubs are euthanized after we offered to take them and privately raise the money…”

Chris Servheen is known as the “Grizzly Czar” and is the boss of the FWS Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee; his chief and perhaps single agenda is to formally “Delist” the Yellowstone, which means to strip the grizzly of all its protections under the ESA and turn “management” over to the states of WY, MT and ID who have promised to immediately issue “Trophy Grizzly Bear Hunt” permits. This removal of ESA protections, as I have argued in my own “Don’t Delist” articles, will irretrievably push the Yellowstone grizzly down the road to regional extinction within years. The boiled-down logic is when mortality (deaths) greatly exceed grizzly births, extinction is usually unavoidable in a species like the griz with exceedingly low reproductive capacities.

So that, my friends, is pretty much the story: the undeserved killing of the mother grizzly and her blood is on the hands of Yellowstone National Park officials. The slaughter of the innocent cubs lies on those of the Griz Czar Chris Sevheen. These people owe you an open explanation for their decisions. They also need to share the data and forensics they used to make their unethical and illogical calls on our innocent bears. Please demand they do.

For the wild, Doug Peacock

http://www.dougpeacock.net/blog/categories/listings/murder-in-yellowstone-grizzly-family-is-sacrificed-for-fear-of-litigation.html

 Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson,  All Rights Reserved

Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson, All Rights Reserved