Exposing the Big Game

Forget Hunters' Feeble Rationalizations and Trust Your Gut Feelings: Making Sport of Killing Is Not Healthy Human Behavior

Exposing the Big Game

Same Backyard Buck Shot With Arrow Again This Year!!

Many of you may remember this event and photo from last year:

IMG_1185

Now it’s happened again–same place, same deer, same psychotic bloodsport. Here’s the new account and photo from the same woman who reported this last year…

“If anyone ever tells me again that the poachers “make the law abiding hunters look bad” I’m going to punch them in the face and then shoot them with an arrow. All hunting is evil. Poachers have killed 3 deer here (illegally on our property) this year. One hunter literally tried to kill me a couple of weeks ago with his truck. Last year, we had a buck (named “Buck”) suffer with an arrow in his back for two months before it came out and he miraculously healed. I wish I could have healed like he did. Buck showed up today WITH ANOTHER FUCKING ARROW in his hind end. I’m going to have a stroke. I was chasing these f#ckers since Thursday as they’ve been lurking around our property. I can’t believe Buck was shot again. I literally can’t take this. Not one more day.”

10170838_412268015587115_39692154425774576_n

And if you need to know more about why bowhunting is sick and twisted bloodsport that should be banned, watch, A Veterinarian’s Perspective on Bowhunting:

PETA to Predators, fans: Stop throwing catfish on ice

http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nhl/predators/2014/11/26/predators-peta-catfish/19557479/

PETA wants Predators fans to stop throwing catfish onto the ice after goals.

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals sent a letter to the Predators on Wednesday and offered to ship 1,000 plastic fish in exchange for prohibiting the practice.

While the practice of throwing a catfish is not a routine after every goal at Predators at Bridgestone Arena, a catfish was thrown out after Ryan Ellis’ goal during the second period in Tuesday night’s 4-3 shootout win over Los Angeles.

The tradition goes back more than a decade as a Music City response to Detroit’s octopus.

Related: The Predators at Thanksgiving: 5 reasons to be thankful

Should the Predators ban fans throwing catfish on the ice after goals?
Yes
No

<a href=”http://polldaddy.com/poll/8479972/”>Should the Predators ban fans throwing catfish on the ice after goals?</a>

Having trouble seeing the poll? Click here.

Below is a copy of the letter sent to Predators chairman Thomas Cigarran and general manager David Poile:

November 26, 2014

Thomas G. Cigarron

Chair and Governor

Nashville Predators

David Poile

President of Hockey Operations and General Manager

Nashville Predators


Dear Messrs Cigarron and Poile:

I’m writing on behalf of PETA and our more than 3 million members and supporters—including thousands across Tennessee, with many sports fans among them—in response to reports that a catfish was thrown onto the ice during your game yesterday, November 25, against the Los Angeles Kings, and that catfish have been thrown onto the ice at other games in the past. We encourage you to prohibit fans from throwing fish—dead or alive—onto the ice in the future and have a proposition that would help make this a win-win situation for both animals and Predators fans.


Whether you want to think about it or not, fish are sentient beings, capable of feeling fear and pain. It’s no more acceptable to harm them than it is to harm any other living beings. Please, won’t you prohibit fans from engaging in such insensitive acts?


We’d be happy to send you 1,000 plastic fish that you could distribute to guests at Bridgestone Arena. Fans could use them in a harmless, fun way to celebrate their team’s success without making light of cruelty to animals. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Colleen O’Brien
Senior Director of Communications
PETA

Victory! Woodland Park Zoo is Closing its Elephant Exhibit

Victory! Woodland Park Zoo is Closing its Elephant Exhibit

In a victory for captive elephants, Seattle’s Woodland Park Zoo announced this week that it will finally be closing its controversial elephant exhibit. Now advocates for the zoo’s two remaining residents remain concerned about plans to relocate them to another zoo instead of a sanctuary.

The zoo has faced serious criticism for its elephant program over the years, with elephant advocates, and organizations including In Defense of Animals (IDA) and Friends of Woodland Park Zoo Elephants, arguing that the elephants there all suffer from both physical and psychological problems as a result of captivity and being kept in an inappropriate climate in an outdated enclosure that’s too small for them. Last year, the zoo appeared on IDA’s list of the Ten Worst Zoos for Elephants for the seventh time.

Despite the ongoing issues and a scathing investigation by the Seattle Times, the zoo continued to defend its program and announced a misguided plan last year to modify the facility, which was built in 1989, and add yet more elephants – one of two options which were presented by an Elephant Task Force.

Scrutiny and criticism only heightened this summer after the death of Watoto, the zoo’s only African elephant who had been on display there for more than four decades.

Her tragic death left behind two Asian elephants – Bamboo, 47, and Chai, 35 – whose advocates renewed calls to have them moved to a sanctuary.

Those calls were followed by even more trouble this fall when the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cited the facility for violations of the Animal Welfare Act that concern housing for locking Bamboo and Chai outside with no access to shelter and using a system that left them isolated from each other.

Thankfully the zoo has changed its tune with its announcement and recognized that its plan to expand was, in the words of the zoo’s President and CEO Dr. Deborah Jensen, “not realistic in the foreseeable future.”

While many people, including Mayor Ed Murray and City Council Member Sally Bagshaw, are applauding the long overdue move to close the exhibit, Bamboo and Chai’s advocates have raised concerns that the zoo will stubbornly squander the chance to do the right thing by moving them to another zoo, which will not do anything to improve their lives or welfare.

The zoo hasn’t chosen where the two will go yet, but it did say in a statement that they would both be moved to another zoo sometime next year that is accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

While the zoo is insisting that the elephants come first, it still says that sanctuaries don’t share its mission of education and conservation and that elephants need to be on display to get the public to care.

But it’s not Bamboo or Chai’s job to make us care about wildlife or conservation, or to ensure we have a population of captive elephants in zoos. It is their job to be elephants and after all this time confined in Seattle for the public to see, the least the zoo could do is recognize that and allow them to go to an environment where they can live out their days doing whatever they want.

“They have earned the right to retire to a warm, sunny location where they can be on elephant time and do elephant things,” said Lisa Kane, a member of Friends of Woodland Park Zoo Elephants told the Seattle Times.

The organization, which plans to urge local officials to intervene, added in a statement:

The Mayor and City Council have the authority to approve or disapprove the disposition of the animals in the zoo. We are asking that they use their authority to require that Bamboo and Chai go to a facility accredited by the Global Federation of Sanctuaries like PAWS―anything less goes against science and their constituents’ values.

 TAKE ACTION!

Please sign and share the petition urging Seattle officials to step in and do the right thing for Bamboo and Chai by ensuring they’re moved to a sanctuary where they can live out their days in peace.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/victory-woodland-park-zoo-is-closing-its-elephant-exhibit.html#ixzz3Joqnld00

Ex-Wildlife Services worker set for animal cruelty trial

…Russell Files, 44, was arrested Jan. 8, 2013, after police found his neighbor’s dog caught in a trap Files said he set it to keep the animal out of his yard, authorities said.

But a Maricopa County Superior Court judge granted the state’s request to dismiss without prejudice the case against Russell Files.

That prompted the Animal Defense League of Arizona to request the USDA to investigate Files….
Read more: http://www.kpho.com/story/23591817/ex-wildlife-services-worker-set-for-animal-cruelty-trial#ixzz3JM44IUWS

http://www.kpho.com/story/23591817/ex-wildlife-services-worker-set-for-animal-cruelty-trial

 

Wolves: Hunting Affects Stress, Reproduction, and Sociality

Harassed wolves show elevated levels of stress and reproductive hormones

Talk About Double Standards

Predictably, ever since I posted about Jaylen Ray Fryberg, the teenager who went on a shooting rampage at a Washington State High School, killing a female student and wounding four others before killing himself, I’ve been getting comments stating that since the school shooter was a native, he was entitled to hunt for food (as though he came from an exceptionally poor household–which he did not). The fact that went completely over their heads was that having been taught to kill an animal like an elk at an early age made it easier for him to shoot his fellow humans. It was as though, to them, he was a saint, even though the news is now telling us he lured his victims to the lunchroom before shooting them.

“…On Friday, after texting five friends to invite them to lunch, he pulled out a handgun in the cafeteria and started shooting. The victims were Zoe R. Galasso, 14, who died at the scene; Gia Soriano, 14, who died at a hospital Sunday night; Shaylee Chuckulnaskit, 14, who remains in critical condition; and his two cousins, Nate Hatch, 14, and Andrew Fryberg, 15.

Andrew Fryberg also remained in critical condition. Hatch, who was shot in the jaw, is the only victim who has shown improvement. He was upgraded to satisfactory condition Monday in intensive care at Harborview Medical Center…”

If a non-native person murdered with such premeditation, people would be demanding to know what was wrong with him to behave that savagely. Or, he would just be considered evil (as perhaps he should).

I decided not to give the would-be commenters special treatment by approving their pro-hunting statements. Natives no longer live in the stone age or use primitive weapons, so why should they remain in the dark ages as far as their treatment of non-human animals? 

Talk about double standards.

4pzd1

Everything Wrong With Teen Hunter Kendall Jones’ New Hunting Show

 

By Melissa Cronin

The YouTube series, titled “Game On,” features Jones and a friend setting out on hunting trips together. The first episode, a poorly-made jaunt to Lake Charles, La. for a crocodile hunt, begins with the line, from Jones’ friend Taylor Altom: “I want to shoot a gator in the face.” The pair travel through the swamp in search of alligators for a weekend with the help of a local hunter.

WARNING: Disturbing Images

  • (Kendall Jones/YouTube)The episode, which can be seen at this link, ends with Jones shooting an alligator who was caught on a baited hook in the head as her guide holds it up about six inches away from her. She’s careful to thank her Remington, a nod to the show’s sponsor.

  • (Kendall Jones/YouTube)The American alligator was taken off the U.S. Fish and Wildlife’s Endangered Species List in 1987, and is actually faring pretty well. But hunting methods like baited hooks have been criticized before as inhumane ways of killing the animals. During alligator hunts, a short wooden peg is usually attached to a line, baited with beef or roadkill and then thrown into the water or tied to a branch to lure the alligator. Because take isn’t allowed after sunset, it’s possible that alligators will have to spend the entire night on a line before they’re shot with a gun or bow and arrow.

    When Jones was attacked for hunting big game in Africa, a petition started by a Cape Town native calling on her to be banned from hunting in African states gained over 150,000 signatures. Another petition asked Facebook to remove her grisly hunting photos — which they eventually ended up doing. No word yet on whether YouTube will do the same thing.

    Wildlife Tourist Attractions to Avoid

    Wish You Weren’t Here:  Wildlife Tourist Attractions to Avoid

    Huffington Post UK
    Neil D’Cruze2 days ago

    2014-10-08-Elephant_WorldAnimalProtection.jpg © Provided by Huffington Post 2014-10-08-Elephant_WorldAnimalProtection.jpg

    Last Saturday people all over the world celebrated World Animal Day, a time for remembering and paying tribute to animals, the vital role that they play in our day to day lives, and the people who care and respect for them.

    World Animal Protection chose this as the ideal day to launch its new long term campaign about Wildlife in entertainment. The sad reality is that people’s passion for wild animals causes untold hidden suffering to the animals involved every single day, all over the world.

    More often than not, tourists are entirely unaware of the cruelty that goes on behind the scenes. So to help you to be a responsible, wild animal friendly tourist, here is a list of some of the cruellest types of attractions, to be avoided at all costs:

    1. Riding Elephants

    Elephant calves are taken from their mothers at an early age and both physical and psychological pain is typically used to ‘break their spirit’. Elephants have been known to develop post-traumatic stress disorders, similar to the condition seen in humans as a result.

    2. Walking with Lions

    Attractions offering the opportunity to ‘walk with lions’ require a continual stream of cubs in order to operate. When they are too large to ‘safely’ walk with tourists their future is placed in jeopardy…

    More: http://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/wish-you-werent-here-wildlife-tourist-attractions-to-avoid/ar-BB8l23g

    Gap Brand Drops Fur After Customers Threaten Boycott

    https://www.thedodo.com/fur-piperlime-gap-boycott-741787373.html

    Just days after the retail giant Gap, Inc. was targeted for selling fur items in one of its upscale franchise chains, the company has vowed to stop selling fur at the store. Spokesperson Debbie Mesloh issued this statement regarding its brand Piperlime:

    Your opinions and views matter to us. That is why, effective immediately, Piperlime will no longer sell real fur products, whether they are made by our company or not. This is an expansion beyond our existing policy of prohibiting real fur in our branded products. We are committed to the ethical sourcing of our products, which includes the humane treatment of animals. We are also committed to our customers and welcome your feedback.

    The move comes in response to a Change.org petition that gained over 50,000 signatures. The petition urged Gap, which has previously touted its decision not to sell fur or angora in its stores, to uphold the same standard for its franchise brands. As of last week, Piperlime, a chain launched in 2006, wasn’t meeting those standards. When customers threatened to boycott, the tables were turned.

    Brands’ decisions not to sell fur and angora reflect a growing shift away from the fur industry, which is widely known for its many inhumane methods. One 2011 survey from the RSPCA found that 95 percent of people reported that they would not wear real fur, while 93 percent wanted clothing to be clearly labelled as real or fake fur.

    Despite this trend, fur has been making a comeback in recent years on fashion runways, thanks in large part to a powerful lobbying push from the fur industry. But not everyone’s buying into it. Many designers are joining the anti-fur bandwagon, including names like Stella McCartney, Tommy Hilfiger, John Bartlett, and Calvin Klein. See this page for more animal-friendly designers.

    File

    The Horrors of Vietnam’s Meat Trade

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/dogs-kept-cramped-cages-slaughtered-4369456#ixzz3F2Bei22u

    Oct 02, 2014 22:30
    by Nelufar Hedayat
    Reporter Nelufar Hedayat looks at the terrible conditions dogs are forced to live in just to keep the black market in dog meat supplied

    A shocking new TV documentary will reveal how hundreds pet dogs are being stolen every day in Vietnam for the lucrative dog meat trade. Unreported World shows disturbing evidence of how dogs are stolen, force-fed, kept in cramped cages and slaughtered for meals. Here, reporter Nelufar Hedayat exclusively reveals the horrors she witnessed.
    The smell of dog and filth permeated the whole room along with frantic, high-pitched barking from the hundreds of dogs crammed into the large metal caged room.
    Inside, line upon line of smaller crates were already packed with dogs who seemed to be vomiting rice onto the wet floor.
    Grabbing one dog by the throat, the four men dragged it to a contraption at the back of the room, where one of them attached a tube to small buckets full of rice. He then pushed the other end of the pipe down the dog’s throat as the fourth man pulled down hard on a pump, forcing rice into the dog’s stomach.
    The terrified local Vietnamese mutt screamed in pain, defecting and urinating as it was forced out and caged again, only to vomit the rice he’d just been force fed.
    I watched horrified as this then happened again and again and again, presumably something happening to the hundreds of dogs here.
    To call it a house of horrors would be no overstatement. But this is the reality of the dog meat industry in Vietnam, where thousands of dogs are force-fed to increase their weight, and therefore their market value when they are sold on.
    Chau Doan
    Trapped: Dogs
    Breathtaking, after what I’d just seen, I asked the owner if the dogs feel pain when they are force-fed like that. His off-hand reply was “no-not at all, no pain”.
    On the flight to Vietnam to investigate the dog meat trade in the country, I had prepared myself mentally. I knew what I was about to see would be brutal, difficult and shocking. But what I found was beyond even what I had imagined.
    Almost certainly some of the dogs being force-fed in that room will have once been people’s pets.
    The insatiable appetite for eating dog in Vietnam has sparked a huge black market in it and has provided a huge payday for thieves who steal thousands of dogs to sell on and meet the demands of the lucrative market.
    Traditionally, dogs were trucked over in their hundred of thousands from Thailand where they would go without food and water for days on end till they reached Vietnam.
    In the last six months the Soi Dog Foundation has worked hard with the Thai government to stop these criminals and bring an end to the dog meat silk road.
    But the lack of dogs coming into the country has meant that criminal gangs have taken hold of the trade and need to find dogs from elsewhere.
    In Hanoi, I spoke to two thieves fresh from a night’s work stealing dogs in a local village. They told me business is booming and gangs like his now prey on villages in Vietnam, stealing pets and guard-dogs by the hundreds.
    “In the seven years I’ve been working, I’ve stolen round 3,000 dogs, big and small” one of them tells me.
    Pets, strays or family guard dogs – they didn’t care because they had no-one to answer to and lots of money to make in the multi-million dollar industry.
    But those whose animals have been stolen certainly care.
    One man, Dang, who lives in the town of Nghe Ann, keeps his dog in a cage to prevent it being stolen and told me: “Along this road, all the failies living on both sides have lost dogs.”
    Chau Doan
    Sold: Dog trade
    Almost 300 have been stolen over the last few months.
    But it is a drop in the ocean of the dog meat trade overall.
    It’s eaten in a host of countries including Thailand, South Korea, Philippines and China among others for a variety of reasons, from purging yourself of bad luck to increasing male sexual prowess.
    It’s estimated that millions of dogs a year are raised, farmed and stolen to meet the ever-growing demand.
    Every day or so I would I would see trucks in Hanoi with cages upon cages of deathly silent dogs all staring at passers by without so much as a bark.
    They would be sold to slaughter houses or restaurants, kept for a few days and then killed in front of one and other by the roadside in the markets of Hanoi.
    At one of the marketss the street is lined with holding pens, each with up to 500 dogs inside. The will be weighed to assess their value before being packed into incredibly cramped crates.
    Chau Doan
    For sale: Dogs as food
    At busy times, the holding houses on this street process around 2,000 dogs in a single day.
    The lust for dog meat grows as the Vietnamese become increasingly better off. The country has been transformed from one on the brink of starvation 30 years ago, to a place on the up and up by rapid economic changes.
    People now have more money to spend on food, going out and partying and dog meat fits perfectly into that culture.

    Any celebration and especially the end of the lunar month calls for a trip to the many dog meat only restaurants there. But do these people know where the meat they feast on comes from?
    “We don’t know but we don’t care” one group of young teenage diners told me. “We only care about how it tastes and we love it” he said as his pals nod in agreement.
    But in Vietnam, dog theft is not a crime, all you get charged with, if at all, for stealing dogs is a fine of up to $100 (about one night’s work for thieves).
    But that’s rare as dog thieves operate in the dead of night and are notorious for being armed with home-made stun guns, swards and machetes to stop any pet owner from fighting them off. They’ve viciously attacked and even killed people who have fought back.
    Video loading
    But the tension is getting to much to bear and now some villages across the country are fighting back. Numerous mob killings of dog thieves have made national headlines.
    In one such village, N-hi Trung, in the centre of Vietnam, 68 people confessed to the killing of two dog thieves who they say stole over 300 dogs from them that year alone.
    “We are not scared of them” one pregnant villager who took part told me. “We won’t beat them to death, just break their arms and legs.”
    It felt surreal, just bizarre, to think people were being killed for someone else’s dog meat dinner.
    But more than anything, what was the most upsetting was the scale and truly inhumane way the dogs that had been caught were treated.
    You don’t have to be an animal rights campaigner to see blatant cruelty at almost every turn and some of the killing and brutality I saw will stay with me for ever.
    Chau Doan
    Horror: Caged dogs
    There are no health and safety or hygiene regulations for the killing of dogs and at a slaughterhouse I watched as a dog was grabbed from a pit and rendered unconcsious with two blows to the head before its throat is slit.
    And I cannot forget the terrible scenes of those dogs being force-fed at one of the largest dog-trading market villages in the north of the country Son Dong Village.
    In a single day seven tonnes of live dogs would be packed into massive metal crates piled high on top of one and other and shipped to Hanoi City alone for the restaurants and slaughter houses.
    From what my team and I saw, the whole situation seems to be coming to a climax in Vietnam.
    I’m not against people who eat meat, far from it, and our Unreported World film isn’t about that. What we have uncovered is a world of lawlessness when it comes to dog meat in Vietnam.
    A government with a don’t ask don’t tell policy; middle-men and thieves who do unspeakable things to the dogs for better profit margins and the dog meat lovers who rarely question where the meat they were eating came from.
    Whether the answer is regulating it, like pork or beef here in the UK, or banning it outright – as it currently stands people and dogs are suffering pointlessly as a result of the dog meat trade in Vietnam.
    My hope is that after watching this film, people, campaigners and even the Vietnamese government are moved to end the cruelty in the dog eat trade. It simply isn’t right for things to continue as they are.
    * Unreported World: Vietnam’s Dog Snatchers is on Channel 4 tonight(FRI) at
    7.30pm.

    304224_10150323421256188_1151389461_n