In Agreement With a Hunter, This One Time…To a Point

Here’s my letter to the Daily Astorian in response to their article, “Bowhunting and Elk.”

When they printed it, the newspaper simply titled the letter, “In Agreement.” But a more fitting title would have been: “In Agreement With a Hunter, This One Time…To a Point.”


Dear Editor,

Although I don’t usually find myself in agreement with hunters on much of anything, I had to concur with the rifle hunter who stated last week that bowhunting’s 50 percent crippling rate is a calamity and absurdly unfair to elk (“Bowhunting and elk,” The Daily Astorian, Aug. 23). For every elk the average bowhunter kills, at least one escapes with an arrow painfully stuck in them.

However, I was disappointed that the rifle hunter’s main concern was for his chosen sport, not for the elk themselves. His final line, “It’s high time to care about elk seasons,” should have read, “It’s high time to care about elk.”

Jim Robertson

elk-000-home17300

16-year-old killed in hunting rifle accident

http://www.kptv.com/story/23301778/16-year-old-killed-in-hunting-rifle-accident-in-home

16-year-old killed in hunting rifle accident in home
Posted: Aug 30, 2013
By FOX 12 Staff – email

DRAIN, OR (KPTV) –
A 16-year-old boy was killed when a friend handed him a hunting rifle inside a home and a shot was accidentally fired.

Douglas County deputies said it happened at 10:45 p.m. Thursday on Hayhurst Road in Drain.

Investigators said the victim was spending the night at his 15-year-old friend’s house. The boys were in the bedroom together when they decided to handle the rifle belonging to the younger boy.

The 15-year-old was handing the rifle to his friend when it accidentally discharged, according to investigators. The 16-year-old boy was shot and died at the scene.

The Douglas County Deputy Medical Examiner’s Office determined the shooting to be accidental. Both boys live in the Drain area and attend school there.

Deputies are not releasing their names at this time.

90823_Pred_ATACS

Lone Wolf OR7

copyrighted Hayden wolf walking

http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/7690

Lone Wolf

A forsaken predator reappears

By Joe Donnelly

Published in the September/October 2013 issue of Orion magazine

Here’s an excerpt from the article…

Except for a few stubborn holdouts, the era of man seems just about done in Plumas County. It’s an eerie, forgotten landscape, and there’s a certain poetic justice in OR7’s arrival. Bounty hunters killed OR7’s last remaining California cousin near here in 1924, back when wolves were considered to be an enemy of manifest destiny. OR7, though, doesn’t seem to have revenge in mind. He has yet to take sheep or cow from the descendants of those who shot, trapped, poisoned, and burned his kind to extinction in the West.

But this hasn’t stopped some locals from greeting his arrival as if the devil himself were paying a visit. As soon as his epic trek signaled a wolf with Golden State aspirations, the hysteria began. To calm local fears of pending doom, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife conducted public meetings featuring wildlife officials, celebrity wolf experts, government resources managers, and a highly agitated public—all awaiting the imminent arrival of a solitary, thirty-month-old Canis lupus.

After one meeting, Marcia Armstrong, a supervisor for Siskiyou County, where OR7 dallied briefly before moving on, told the Los Angeles Times that she would like to see all encroaching wolves “shot on sight.” Adding to the tinder were ranchers warning that a wolf repopulation would be “catastrophic.” Other folks spread rumors of conspiratorial wolf smuggling by federal agencies, and of a government out to trample rights and make it harder to log, mine, and dam the rural West.

Bowhunting and elk–Unfair to Who?

This columnist–a rifle hunter–brings up some good points about the cruelty and waste of bowhunting, but he perceives himself the victim and only mentions the suffering of wounded elk to help make his case…

http://www.dailyastorian.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/bowhunting-and-elk/article_840e51ac-0c1a-11e3-8f0c-001a4bcf887a.html

Bowhunting and elk
Posted: Friday, August 23, 2013

DICK MATTSON
Warrenton

I have hunted elk, usually successfully, in Clatsop County for 60 years, all with a big game rifle, hopefully with one merciful shot. I write to share my experience and knowledge, as I also studied elk habits during my lifetmie, much of it during wonderful scouting trips with my brother, Jim.

The current Clatsop County archery season of 30 days was politically driven by archers to take advantage of the unwary bulls during the mating “rut” season in September. This is wrong, both by lack of biological insight, and by the great disparity to rifle bull elk hunters, who are allowed only a four-day season, or seven days for the last elk season.

House ad: Northwest Opinions website – ros in article ad

During my investigation years ago, I found that 50 percent of elk wounded by arrows get away to suffer. This was illustrated by a Bill Monroe column where he wrote of two archers’ “success” near Jewell with bow hunting a bull elk. However, both archers had wounded two other elk, which they did not look for. This is a calamity, as well as highly absurd and unfair to elk rifle hunters.

If elk rifle hunters do not care enough to do something, archers will continue to dominate. I suggest a 10 day bull elk rifle season and a 16 day archery elk season, ending by Sept. 10, allowing time for more herd bulls to escape arrows. Herd bulls are needed for a stronger, healthy elk herd.

It’s high time to care about elk seasons.

198333_531743856838438_1843100664_n

Media Bias Promotes Hunting Agenda

This is a letter I sent to the Daily Astorian, a local paper on the Oregon coast:

Dear Editor,

Cannon Beach used to be a pretty peaceful place. It was a nice romantic getaway or a great place to bring the entire clan. Haystack Rock appears on more post cards and magazine covers than any other feature on the entire Oregon coast. Most people come to Cannon Beach to enjoy quiet walks, hoping for a glimpse of some of the native wildlife. It’s not the kind of place folks expect to run into cammo-clad hunters with shotguns or compound bows stalking area’s half-tame animals.

But when the town’s parks and community services committee wanted to limit the local hunting season to only one month, the Oregon state Department of Fish and Wildlife instead set FIVE seasons there, totaling 90 days (“Hunting dates for Ecola reserve are expanded,” Aug. 5). And although the town of Cannon Beach wanted to restrict hunting to bows and arrows and shotgun slugs, the ODFW informed them that buckshot would be allowed as well.

Now any hunter who wants to can blast a 700 pound bull elk with a shotgun. What a mess that will be for some sightseeing family to come across! And how many elk or deer, who were nearly out of range at the time they were shot at, will escape with gaping, bleeding, lead-filled holes in them?

This is just another example of state game departments pushing their weight around, defying the will of the people and town councils, not to mention the will of the wildlife. Who do game regulators think they are, God? Sorry, but I hear that position has already been filled.

Jim Robertson

……..Instead of printing that, here’s the letter they chose to print…….

Dear Editor,

I am writing in response to the article The Daily Astorian regarding the debate on the upcoming hunting season in the Ecola Creek Forest Reserve (“Expanded hunting season remains in Ecola Creek Forest Reserve,” Aug. 7).

I am proud to be an avid hunter, fisherman, and outdoorsman and was very upset to read some of the comments made during the city council meeting by Cannon Beach resident Jan Seibert Wahrmund.

The topic being discussed was the hunting area that borders the non hunting area. Wahrmund’s quote was, “Hunters don’t always know where they are. They may have been drinking.”

I understand that not everyone is pro hunting, and I respect their beliefs and opinions. But this comment is ignorant and offensive. To stereotype all hunters as beer-guzzling hillbillies who get drunk and shoot at everything that moves is unfair and misinformed.

Hunters and all outdoorsman are the biggest proponents for conservation and safety. Hunters are the reason that such strict game management laws are in place. A true hunter and outdoorsman has a great deal of respect for all wildlife and everything in its surrounding area.

Hunters and hikers can and always have been able to share the forest without issues. Hunting is a tradition that has been passed down through generations, and we are very passionate about it. It is much more than just harvesting an animal. It’s about enjoying the outdoors and wildlife, and time spent with friends and family.

I hope that Wahrmund takes the time to consider how offensive and misleading her comments were before the next time she “shoots off” her stereotyping and unfair opinions at a council meeting. On behalf of all responsible hunters, please consider how your actions affect others. Thank you.

Steve Honan

….My favorite line in his letter: “Hunters and hikers can and always have been able to share the forest without issues.” Hasn’t he heard about all the hunting accidents that happen each year?

elk-000-home17300

 

 

Game Departments Must Think They’re God

Cannon Beach, nestled along the northern Oregon Coast, used to be a prettymore housepix 235 peaceful place. It’s a nice, romantic getaway or a great place to bring the entire clan. Haystack Rock, perched immediately off CB’s two mile stretch of sand, appears on more post cards and magazine covers than any other feature on the entire coast.

Folks stay there to escape the noise and manic pace of Portland or Seattle, enjoying quiet walks, hoping to catch a glimpse of some of the native wildlife. A small herd of elk lives there and can sometimes be seen taking their own cautious walks out on the beach in the early morning, foraging on the thick, leafy salal bushes in Ecola State Park or resting on the grass in city parks at the edge of town, adding to the natural character of area.

Cannon Beach is not the kind of place people expect to run into cammo-clad Elmers with shotguns or compound bows stalking the area’s half-tame animals.

But when the town’s parks and community services committee wanted to limit the local hunting season to only one month, the Oregon state Department of Fish and Wildlife told them they could not limit the hunting season and instead set five seasons there, totaling 90 days.  And although the town of Cannon Beach wanted to restrict hunting to bows and arrows and shotgun slugs, the ODFW informed them that buckshot would be allowed as well.

Yes, you read that right—now any hunter who wants to can blast a 700 pound bull elk with a shotgun. What a mess that would be for some sightseeing family to come across. And how many elk and deer, who were nearly out of range at the time they were shot at, will escape with a gaping, bleeding, lead-filled hole in them?!!

According to the almighty ODFW, hunting on the Ecola Creek Forest Reserve will be extended from one month to 92 days, beginning Aug. 24. And rather than being limited to one season from Sept. 28 through Nov. 1, five seasons will be allowed through Dec. 8!

The great and powerful ODFW have decreed that hunting dates in the reserve shall be:
• Aug. 24 through Sept. 22: bow hunting for deer and elk.
• Sept. 28 through Nov. 1: shotgun hunting for buck deer.
• Nov. 9 through Nov.12: shotgun hunting for bull elk.
• Nov. 16 through Nov. 22: shotgun hunting for bull elk.
• Nov. 23 through Dec. 8: bow hunting for deer.

This is just another example of state game departments pushing their weight around, defying the will of the people and town councils, not to mention the will of the wildlife. Who do “game” regulators think they are, God? Sorry, but I hear that position has already been filled.

Text and Wildlife Photography © Jim Robertson

Text and Wildlife Photography © Jim Robertson

Oregon panel OKs ‘last resort’ wolf-killing rule

http://www.redding.com/news/2013/jul/12/oregon-panel-oks-last-resort-wolf-killing-rule/

by JEFF BARNARD, Associated Press

Posted July 12, 2013

GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) — The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission on Friday adopted provisions of a lawsuit settlement that will make Oregon the only state in the West where killing wolves that attack livestock is a last resort.

The rules adopted by the commission amend Oregon’s Wolf Management Plan, along with statutory provisions enacted by the Legislature that will be signed by Gov. John Kitzhaber.

The rules require ranchers to show they have taken non-lethal steps, such as alarm boxes and low strings of fluttering plastic flags known as fladdery, to protect their herds before the state will send out a hunter to kill a wolf. There must also be hard evidence, such as GPS data showing a radio-collared wolf was in the area when a cow was killed, that wolves have attacked four times.

In return, ranchers get new rights to shoot wolves that they see attacking their herd, but only if those non-lethal protections are in place, and attacks have become chronic.

The settlement represents a new level of cooperation between conservation groups and ranchers, who have long fought over restoring wolves in the West, where they were wiped out by bounty hunters in the early part of the 20th century.

Ranchers downplayed the significance of the settlement.

“I don’t think it’s a whole lot different from the wolf plan already being implemented,” said Kate Teisl, executive director of the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association. “Now there’s just more documentation. Ranchers are out there doing all they can to keep their animals alive, including the non-lethal measures.”

But wolf advocates said it was that documentation of non-lethal steps that was groundbreaking.

Rob Klavins of Oregon Wild said the old plan talked about conservation of wolves being a priority, but it was so ambiguous that it was ineffective.

“It’s now up to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the livestock industry, and the conservation community to honor the agreements that we have made,” he said. “If we do so, I am optimistic we will continue to see conflicts between wolves and livestock continue to be rare, and the need to kill wolves even rarer still.”

Brett Brownscombe, natural resources adviser to the governor, said making the rules clear was important as Oregon’s wolf population continues to grow, and the Obama administration moves toward lifting federal protections for wolves in areas they have yet to repopulate.

Oregon Wild and other conservation groups had sued the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, claiming that a kill order on the Imnaha pack, the first to establish in Oregon as well as the first to attack livestock, threatened to wipe out the pack. Conservation groups claimed the actions violated the Oregon Endangered Species Act, which still protects wolves in the eastern two thirds of the state, where federal protections have been lifted.

The Imnaha pack only has one more strike against it before a kill order can be imposed, but so far, it has not been linked to an attack.

The Oregon Court of Appeals barred the state from killing wolves for more than a year before the settlement was reached between conservation groups, the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association, and the governor’s office. During that time, the number of wolves in Oregon went up, while the lethal attacks on livestock went down. In Idaho, where the Oregon packs had migrated from, the numbers of lethal livestock attacks went up, along with the numbers of wolves killed, primarily by trophy hunters and trappers.

copyrighted Hayden wolf walking

Oregon Ranchers Want to Get into the Predator-Kill Game

Oregon Ranchers Want More Authority To Kill Wolves

AP | April 16, 2013 1:04 p.m. Salem, Oregon
by:AP
Part of Series:
Ecotrope
Eastern Oregon ranchers are asking the Oregon Legislature for more authority to kill wolves that threaten their livestock.

Gray Wolf
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Gray Wolf

Ranchers told a House committee Tuesday that their existing authority to kill wolves caught in the act of killing livestock isn’t enough. Three Eastern Oregon legislators have proposed allowing ranchers to kill any gray wolf they reasonably believe has attacked or harassed their livestock.

Conservationists worry that wolf populations would dwindle.

Both sides are planning meetings to work on a compromise. The House Environment and Natural Resources Committee took no action on the bill Tuesday.

____At the same time, also from Oregon:

URGENT ALERT!

Cougar killing bills are moving to the Oregon house floor.

1. Please immediately contact your representatives and ask them to vote NO on bills that allow counties to overturn the Oregon state law prohibiting the unethical practice of setting packs of hounds on cougars to chase them up trees for easy targets by trophy hunters.

These bills set a terrible precedent by letting counties decide which state laws they chose to acknowledge.

You can find your representatives’ contact information here:
http://www.leg.state.or.us/findlegsltr/

2. Contact Governor Kitzhaber and ask him to VETO any bills that increase cougar mortality and/or overturn the ban on cougar hounding. Tell him you voted with the majority of Oregonians twice to keep unethical trophy hunting practices out of Oregon, not just out of your county.

Governor Kitzhaber
503-378-4582
http://www.oregon.gov/gov/Pages/ShareYourOpinion.aspx

For more information on cougars go to:

http://predatordefense.org/cougars.htm

copyrighted-wolf-argument-settled