Rise, Kill & Barf

1889026_10203173734877994_3915256344431734818_o

Gee, I wish that terrible Ted Nugent had written the forward to my book–NOT! I’m sure Ted wrote (in Crayon, no doubt) a fitting lead-in to the book of drivel pictured above.

Sub-headed A Theology of Hunting from Genesis to Revelation, the author makes claims such as: “If a person looked to Scripture and paid particular attention to the passages within the Bible that address the topic of hunting, then they’d walk away thinking not only is hunting animals tolerated but it is endorsed by God. And that’s exactly what this little book is about: proving that God, from Genesis to Revelation, is extremely cool with hunters and hunting. I’ll go out on a biblical limb and claim right off the bat that you cannot show me, through the balance of the Bible, that the God of the Scripture is against the responsible killing and the grilling of the animals He created.”

If you haven’t yet urped up your fill and you want to read more hate-speak from this sadist, feast your eyes on this bull crap: http://news360.com/article/239678297

Meanwhile, for some truly enlightening and uplifting reading: http://www.earth-books.net/books/exposing-the-big-game

front-cover-low-res6

the use of hounds, traps, and bear baiting. Some animal rights groups claim that these methods are inhumane, unsporting, and unsustainable. Earlier this year the advocacy group Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting submitted nearly 80,000 signatures to put the issue of banning the three hunting methods on the November ballot. The organization notes that Maine is the only state in the nation to allow all three harvest methods.”

Look, doe-eyed Disney movie lover: the most effective way to keep bears away from your kids and grand-kids, your dogs, your plate of doughnuts on your outside deck and your refrigerator is to make them fear you – and the chief way to get that message across is to hunt, shoot and eat them.  Always legally of course.

Oh, and by the way, as I point out in my new book, Rise, Kill And Eat: A Theology of Hunting From Genesis to Revelation, animals are supposed to fear us according to this book called the bible.  Check it out …

“Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, ‘Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth. The fear and dread of you will fall on all the beasts of the earth, and on all the birds in the sky, on every creature that moves along the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; they are given into your hands. Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything.’” Gen.9:1-3
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/05/kill-bears-author-says-shooting-bears-will-solve-bearhuman-conflicts-gods-will/#rVxL4LgMepT5rbey.99

Killing Makes Them Feel Better

I received the following comment from a Facebook friend today:

“Hey Jim. Just finished your book. When reading the chapter about the mind of the hunter, I recalled something I witnessed back in 2006 when I worked for my state’s Dept. of Natural Resources. It was bowhunting season for deer, and a bunch of camo-clad yahoos were gathered in the parking lot early in the morning in the park where I worked. One of them said to the others, ‘I need to kill something. Me and my old lady had a fight.’

“So this ignorant A-Hole went out in search of a deer to kill because he was angry at his wife. Just proves exactly why these psychos hunt, and it sure doesn’t have anything to do with conservation, or loving the animals they kill, or any other lame excuse they come up with. They are sick and twisted people, and need to be called out on their BS at every turn.”

This goes a long way to explain why most hunters like to kill innocent animals. It’s typical serial killer motivation: a transference of victimhood; a self-esteem thing. Simply put, killing makes them feel better.

Photo Copyright Jim Robertson

Photo Copyright Jim Robertson

 

People In Hawaii are Killing Cats For Sport

http://news360.com/article/239475774

The Huffington Post

Are People In Hawaii Killing Cats For Sport?

 05/16/2014

While one Hawaiian island is being overrun by thousands of mice, another is seeing a disturbing trend of cat disappearances and murders.

In the past two months, according to Basil Scott, president of the Kauai Community Cat Project, more than 50 cats on Kauai have either been killed or have disappeared.

“We’ve had some shootings, poisonings, (and) one intentional running over,” Scott told The Garden Island. “There’s five places where we are very certain, or fairly certain, that people are killing cats. And some of it is crazy.”

The organization has received several reports of “sport type” cat shootings late at night and in public areas. People “have seen dead and dying cats,” according to a statement. “This is not only a violation of animal cruelty laws but is also prosecutable under firearms and public safety laws.”

According to Scott, a security guard witnessed one of the shootings, which involved several men shining a spotlight on a cat from a car before firing at it.

“We’re talking about guys who have been drinking, who have loaded firearms in the car, which is illegal,” Scott said.

The Kauai Police Department told The Garden Island paper that it had no knowledge of the alleged crimes, but the Humane Society is offering up to $5,000 for information leading to an arrest.

Is Sport Hunting a Sin?

Excerpted From:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ambassador-muhamed-sacirbey/is-sport-hunting-a-sin_b_5338891.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false

“Hunting for Sport is a Sin”

In a search for some consistency in ritual and purpose, I consulted with an Islamic scholar on hunting. I directly asked whether hunting for sport is forbidden. His answer was an unequivocal “yes.” Taking of any animal life unless for food or protection is not sanctioned. Hunting has evolved along with man as manner of feeding one’s family or society. However, this is no longer part of human necessity, regardless of whether we view hunting as a more noble activity in the past. The more complex issue may be whether hunters who consume their prey are sanctioned in the killing. However, I would suggest that we should not evade the difficult question whether such hunt is motivated by the need for food or desire for some notion of sport. Taking of any life should not be a pleasure, and it particularly should not be taught as such to our children.

A similar view of hunting appears to have originated in Christianity, at least originally.

A young Belgian nobleman, Hubert, in the seventh century was enjoying roebuck hunting when the roebuck suddenly turned towards him. A light appeared from the horns in which the centre emerged into a cross. The hunter heard the voice of Christ speaking to him through the roebuck, ‘Hubert, why are you hunting me?’ After this phenomenon, the nobleman became a bishop and gave up hunting. The Church declared him a saint on the 3rd of November. In many parts of Europe this day is celebrated as St. Hubert Day which opens hunting season because Hubert, contrary to any logic, was accepted by hunters as their patron saint. The fact is that in early Christianity the believers were forbidden from hunting and keeping hunting dogs and falcons. Later on, these rules applied to only the priests.

This story was relayed by an animal rights activist from Serbia, Stevan Zivkov Andricin.

Canned Hunt:

2014-05-16-5379172_orig.jpg

Some Hunters Are Atheists Too

It’s interesting that two totally different people can follow completely divergent paths to10172782_486237174810952_1604406170771652512_n reach the same conclusion.  Lately I’ve been posting about hunters whose sense of self-entitlement was rooted in Christian beliefs. For instance, the Bonus Fallacy in Top Ten Retorts to Hunter Fallacies is, “God put Animals here for us to use.”

But today I received a comment from a hunter troll boasting that she’s an atheist. Like all other comments from hunters trying to justify their pastimes, it was not approved. Once you feed a troll, you can never get rid of them. But since she brought up the inarguable fact that not all killers use religion to justify their actions, I’m posting it here for your perusal:

“I’m an atheist and I love hunting. So it isn’t silly god reasons. Hunting regulations and conservation maintain the populations and of course meat isn’t sustainable for the world’s population, but thankfully we have goofy vegetarians. But yeah, I just love killing them and eating them. They are so delicious and tasty. For me, it’s that wonderful reminder that human beings are primitive and inferior, and I have no delusions about our meaningless existence. I can has retort, now?”

No, sorry, I’m fresh out of retorts. You’ll have to troll somewhere else for an argument to that one.

 

 

 

Controversial wild turkey hunting method gain popularity

http://ravallirepublic.com/lifestyles/recreation/article_6207a604-d7e3-11e3-bfa1-001a4bcf887a.html

 

2014-05-09T19:35:00Z Decoy dilemma: Video clips help controversial wild turkey hunting method gain popularityRICH LANDERS – The Spokesman-Review Ravalli Republic

For perspective, Native Americans camouflaged themselves with the horns and skins of buffalo to stalk bison. The tactic’s effectiveness was all that was important for Indians hunting to survive.

But modern sportsmen have more to consider.

A decoy company’s video hyping the “scoot & shoot” technique – or “fanning” as some call it – is getting a lot of play on the Internet. Some hunters apparently find no problems with sneaking and hiding behind the fanned-out tail of a realistic gobbler decoy, at least on private land.

The Mojo Outdoors video clips show hunters rising from behind a gobbler decoy’s fanned tail and shooting running toms, sometimes as close as 10 feet or less.

Ethical hunters strive to be undetected so a steady, clean shot can be made at a standing gobbler’s head from a distance optimum for shot placement.

But the video brazenly shows hunters missing turkeys at ranges so close their shot pattern spreads only about 3 inches.

In several cases, the hunters rise from the decoy, spooking the incoming gobblers at close range and then taking running shots, with poor results. Multiple shots are fired and in some cases the fleeing or flying birds must be killed with body shots.

An ethical hunter rarely has to worry about a pellet in the turkey breast he serves at the table. Not so in these cases.

The link for the Mojo Outdoors scoot & shoot decoy video was sent to five people experts in the field of turkey hunting and hunter safety. Following is a summary of their reactions.

• Steve Hall, executive director of the International Hunter Education Association, said a hunter in the field must look at shooting from the offensive perspective – be sure of your target – as well as the defensive.

“Our stance has always been don’t wear anything resembling animals that are being hunted, especially on public land.”

He cites examples of Texas hunters shooting a man in dark clothing after mistaking him for a hog, and the 19-year-old Kansas hunter who was hiding in a goose decoy when he was shot by a drive-by shooter.

Missouri was a leading state in compiling data on causes for turkey hunting accidents, said Hall, who’s been analyzing hunter accident stats for more than three decades. By pointing out dangerous practices – such as wearing red, white or blue colors and sneaking up to the sound of calling turkeys – hunter safety educators have dramatically reduced turkey hunting accidents in the past decade.

“The safe practices we teach are usually borne from empirical data,” Hall said. “In the case of turkey fanning, I must say we haven’t collected any, yet.

“Do I have evidence against it? No. Would I promote it or do it myself? Heck no.”

• Jimmy Parman of Newman Lake, voted Washington’s hunter safety educator of the year in 2013, said he hasn’t directly addressed fanning tactics.

“It never occurred to me that anyone would be dumb enough to do this,” he said. “I’ll be talking about this with my students from now on.”

Defending the tactic as OK in a “safety zone” of private land doesn’t hold water, Parman said:

“Every landowner will tell you he’s dealt with trespassers and poachers.”

• Dave Murphy, veteran Spokane turkey hunter and former Primos pro-staffer, said, “This is new to turkey hunting and I really don’t think those who made up the safety recommendations ever saw this coming.

“What if someone breaking the law was to shoot a rifle, say 200 yards away, at that fan? Do you really want your face right behind it?

“I don’t like the idea at all!” said Murphy, who’s promoted safe use of gobbler decoys and calls. “I have not and will not encourage anyone to do it.

“Put your back to a tree and put your decoy out in front of you. In that way you can hopefully see anyone sneaking in on your decoy and the tree protects your back.”

• Leonard Wolf, local sportsman who hunts mostly on private land, is less judgmental.

“As a seasoned and experienced turkey hunter who regularly takes out novice hunters and spends over 20 days annually in search of long beards, mostly for others as an unpaid guide, I would compare these Mojo products to automobiles and drivers,” he said. “A souped-up sports car in the hands of a skilled driver on an appropriate course could be safe while it would be dangerous on public streets or in the hands of an amateur, he said.

“I would never suggest (scoot &shoot) be used by novice hunters and NEVER on public land!” he said.

“I can see where these decoys might appeal to an inexperienced hunter, and if that were to occur and these decoys were used incorrectly under the wrong conditions, I see no evidence of guilt on the part of the manufacturer, nor would I place any blame on them.”

He points out that beneath the photo of a scoot-n-shoot gobbler decoy with a fully fanned tail and engorged red head, the Mojo Outdoors webpage warns that the product should be used “only in very controlled hunting areas.”

• Tom Hughes, National Wild Turkey Federation assistant vice president and wildlife biologist who’s helped prepare the organization’s safety materials, condemns fanning.

“I consider it an extreme form of stalking turkeys, and we’ve already affirmed that stalking turkeys is unsafe and a bad idea.”

After years of studying data, Hughes said the NWTF had a “strong belief that the traditional method of sitting in place and calling a turkey, moving as needed to new locations, is safer and more successful than sneaking methods.”

His last word on scoot-n-shoot: “I can’t really think of a better way to assure that someone’s going to get shot while turkey hunting.”

 

Please Don’t Feed the Trolls

If there’s one thing trolls can’t stand, it’s being ignored. Every few days someone trolls this anti-hunting site and tries to infest it with their pro-killing comments.

But the old adage that there are two sides to every coin doesn’t carry any weight here. Oh sure, a killer has the right to rationalize murder all he wants, but it doesn’t mean anyone has to listen to him.

Today’s troll wanted to argue the alleged merits of the shooting (or, in their words, “bagging”) of the “world record” grizzly bear. I’m sorry, but nothing anyone can say can justify that crime; commenting here to argue otherwise is just a waste of everyone’s time.

As I’ve said many times before, pro-hunters should read the About page so they won’t get frustrated when their comments go unheard. The fact is, sport hunting disgusts us and nothing any troll could ever come up with could change that.

64445_616484885064145_471220926_n

Alaska hunter bags world record grizzly bear

May 06, 2014

Larry Fitzgerald and some pals were moose hunting near Fairbanks, Alaska, when they came across fresh bear tracks in the snow. Three hours later, the auto body man had taken down the grizzly that left the prints, an enormous bruin that stood nearly 9 feet tall and earned Fitzgerald a place in the record books.

Although Fitzgerald shot the bear last September, Boone and Crockett, which certifies hunting records, has only now determined the grizzly, with a skull measuring 27 and 6/16ths inches, is the biggest ever taken down by a hunter, and the second largest grizzly ever documented. Only a grizzly skull found by an Alaska taxidermist in 1976 was bigger than that of the bear Fitzgerald bagged.

 “I’m not really a trophy hunter, or anything,” Fitzgerald, 35, told FoxNews.com. “But I guess it is kind of cool.”

Fitzgerald brought down the bear from 20 yards, with one shot to the neck from his Sako 300 rifle. He said he knew from the tracks he was on the trail of a massive grizzly, but only learned this week that he held a world record.

“We knew it was big,” he said. “It was a rush.”

Bears are scored based on skull length and width measurements, and Missouloa, Mont.-based Boone and Crockett trophy data is generally recognized as the standard. Conservationists use the data to monitor habitat, sustainable harvest objectives and adherence to fair-chase hunting rules.

Richard Hale, chairman of the Boone and Crockett Club’s Records of North American Big Game committee, said it was unusual that such a massive grizzly would be taken near a a city.

“One would think that a relatively accessible area, with liberal bear-hunting regulations to keep populations in line with available habitat and food, would be the last place to find one of the largest grizzly bears on record,” said Hale.

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game instituted grizzly hunting regulations to help balance and control the bears’ preying on moose. Although baiting is allowed under the regulations, Fitzgerald stalked his trophy.

Grizzlies are currently federally protected in the Lower 48 states under the Endangered Species Act, but thriving populations have prompted regulators to consider de-listing them, said Hale.

Petition for Elephants

Sign for Elephants

We the People…

  • Refuse to allow the elephant species to disappear…
  • Refuse to allow poached elephants’ tusks to fund terrorism…
  • Refuse to allow the deaths of rangers as they defend elephants…
  • Refuse to allow the bloody ivory trade to continue in the United States of America.

Sign the Petition

Pass the Word!

<!–


–>

#signforelephants

The Elephant Crisis &
How You Can Help

100 elephants per day are slaughtered in Africa for their tusks. We must end the ivory trade, or it will be the end of elephants. This May, it is vital that elephants receive 100,000 signatures across America to the White House.

We petition the president to:

Unequivocally ban the ivory commerce to save elephants from extinction

 

#signforelephants

How to Sign the Petition

They don’t make it easy but it’s really this simple:

  1. Create an Account with We the People
  2. Check your email for the confirmation message
  3. Follow the confirmation link to activate your account

Ok, that’s sorted.

NOW I’m Ready to Sign!

<!–

–>

The Crisis

On average, 100 elephants per day are being slaughtered in Africa so their tusks, also known as ivory, can be sold. At this rate a species that has walked the earth for millions of years will be made extinct. Poaching is being conducted in mass by sophisticated criminal syndicates that often slaughter an entire herd with machine guns. The tusks eventually end up being traded illegally in the #1 market, Asia, and the #2 market, the United States. The U.S. Department of State has also identified elephant poaching as a national security risk, as ivory is used to fund acts of terrorism such as the 2013 Westgate Mall terrorist attack in Nairobi, Kenya.

Photo by Billy Dodson

It is essential to eliminate the demand for ivory. Though many people may think ivory is illegal to trade today in the U.S., that is not the entire story. There are loopholes in the law that allow “old” or “antique” ivory to be bought and sold. The problem is, it is very difficult and expensive to tell old ivory from new ivory and thus the domestic and export ivory trades continue. These are the loopholes that are wiping out the elephant right here at home.

On Feb. 11 the president launched a new National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking which eliminated the commercial ivory import trade. However ivory continues to be smuggled into the U.S. and we need to go further. We must stop all commercial ivory sales including the domestic and export trades.

Americans Petition for Elephants

Photo by Billy Dodson

The petition urges the United States president to TOTALLY BAN the ivory trade, with only very narrow noncommercial carve-outs for museums and other cultural institutions. This immediate and historic measure for another species is required to save the elephants from extinction. It is important to know that elephants were relatively safe just 7 years ago. But at the end of the last decade the global ban was “temporarily” lifted. Today the high price of ivory is wiping elephants out faster than they can reproduce. An elephant is killed every 15 minutes.

This petition is different than many you may have come across. This one is built on the backbone of the First Amendment established in the U.S. Constitution to petition our government for change. Upon 100,000 people – like you and me – signing this petition at http://petitions.whitehouse.gov the administration must respond.

We have only one month to achieve this goal between May 1 and May 30. As the poaching crisis is urgent we ask you to please sign now.

Sign the Petition

<!–

–>

Sign

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The First Amendment, United States Constitution

“The right to petition your government is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. We the People provides a new way to petition the Obama Administration to take action on a range of important issues facing our country. We created We the People because we want to hear from you. If a petition gets enough support, White House staff will review it, ensure it’s sent to the appropriate policy experts, and issue an official response.”

The White House

A small elephant with large ears and budding tusks standing in a field of tall grass
Photo by Mike Paredes

Beginning May 1 people across the nation are invited to Sign for Elephants. The petition may only be signed online as a requirement of the Administration.

It takes under five minutes to:

  1. Create an Account with We the People
  2. Check your email for the confirmation message
  3. Follow the confirmation link to activate your account
  4. Sign the petition
  5. Share with friends and family!

NOTE: A key step to Sign for Elephants is activating your account by clicking on a link sent to your email address from the White House which redirects you to the petition page. Once this is done, you can sign the petition.

http://elephantsusa.org/

Sign the Petition