Wisconsin Adds Crossbows to Their Quiver

Now the only question that remains is, what cruel kill method is NOT allowed in Wisconsin?

I can think of only a few offhand:

-Grenade launcher
-Flame thrower
-Nerve gas
-Chemical weapons

Hell, why doesn’t the state DNR just nuke itself every fall (starting with this one) and be done with it? That should take care of their deer, rabbit, squirrel, duck, geese, sandhill crane and wolf “problems” once and for all.

__________________

Assembly unanimously passes crossbow hunting bill

By Paul A. Smith of the Journal Sentinel

Nov. 9, 2013

In an era of deep political divisions, Wisconsin legislators can agree on at least one thing: increased crossbow hunting opportunities.

On Oct. 27, the Assembly unanimously passed an amended version of AB 194.

The bill would create a crossbow hunting license and a crossbow hunting season. Hunters of all legal ages could purchase the license.

Under current state law, only hunters with physical disabilities and those age 65 and over are allowed to hunt deer with crossbows.

The crossbow hunting season would run concurrent with the archery deer season.

The amended version creates a three-year trial period during which the Department of Natural Resources will monitor harvest rates by crossbow hunters. The Senate approved the bill in September.

The Assembly vote was 91 ayes, 0 no.

The bill now awaits the signature of Gov. Scott Walker. If the governor signs it as expected, the crossbow hunting season will take effect in September 2014.

Wolf season update: As of Friday, hunters and trappers had registered 201 wolves in the 2013-’14 Wisconsin wolf season, according to the DNR.

Harvest quotas were filled in five of the six wolf management zones.

Trappers have taken 82% of the wolves; the balance have been killed by hunters with firearms.

Zone 3 in north central and northwestern Wisconsin remains open. Nineteen wolves had been registered in Zone 3 as of Friday morning; the quota is 71.

The zone will be open to wolf hunting and trapping until the quota is filled or Feb. 28, whichever comes first.

Given the fast pace of wolf kills since the season opened Oct. 15, the season could be over before the Wisconsin gun deer hunt begins Nov. 23, as well as before wolf hunters could begin using dogs Dec. 2.

The DNR had sold 1,837 resident and 11 nonresident wolf hunting and trapping licenses as of Friday. It authorized the sale of 2,510 licenses through a lottery.

State wildlife managers set a kill goal of 251 wolves for the season.

Hunters and trappers are responsible to know the status of zone closures. Information is available at dnr.wi.gov and by phone at (888) 936-7463 .

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/sports/outdoors/assembly-unanimously-passes-crossbow-hunting-bill-b99137922z1-231303281.html#ixzz2kGrLqn3p
Follow us: @NewsHub on Twitter

90641_Varminter

SHARK calls for firing of Wisconsin state employees in armed raid that killed “Giggles” the baby deer

g1_zps0baf318dba1969

New video released from the raid showing scared fawn
just minutes before she was captured
Watch SHARK’s new video HERE  
Watch WISN 12’s coverage of the story HERE
This is a frame of the video the DNR took right before they captured and then killed Giggles.
SHARK has received a trove of internal documents from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) regarding their July 15, 2013 armed raid on the Society of St. Francis animal shelter in Kenosha County, WI. This raid was to capture and kill a baby fawn that had been dropped off at the shelter, and who had been named “Giggles” by the shelter staff.
The DNR internal documents reveal the following:
• Though the DNR claimed in a public statement that “None of our staff take joy in these situations,” emails show that personnel were excited and looking forward to the raid. They even expressed that joy with  “smiley faced” emoticons in their email.
• The DNR violated their own plan by killing Giggles before her origin could be discovered. Instead of asking the shelter owner where Giggles came from, the DNR simply killed the fawn outright.
• The DNR charged taxpayers for snacks and potato chips for their wardens who assisted with the raid.
• Giggles was killed by having a metal bolt shot through her head.
Left: The DNR’s own records show how excited and happy they were that they were going to capture and kill a baby deer. Right: The DNR actually charged taxpayers for snacks and potato chips for the wardens, because apparently if you work for the DNR, killing a fawn makes you hungry.
The armed raid by DNR was government at its very worst. These people abused their power, they wasted taxpayer money, and they took pleasure in an outrageous raid on an animal shelter all so they could capture and kill a fawn.
The DNR claimed that Giggles was “euthanized,” but by their own admission they killed her using a bolt gun.
A bolt gun is a slaughterhouse weapon. It is brutal and ugly and the DNR’s own record shows that this defenseless, 20 pound animal died after a state employee drove a steel bolt through her head. For that reason, and everything we’ve expressed, we are calling on Governor Scott Walker to immediately fire all those who are responsible for this disaster. 
Take Action!
Please politely contact Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and ask him to fire all of those who planned and participated in this raid, especially those who took such joy in it.
govgeneral@wisconsin.gov
(608) 266-1212

Wisconsin’s Wolf Kill Tally Now 181

In Wisconsin, more wolves have been killed in 16 days than during the entire 2012 hunting and trapping season.

Yes, you read that correctly.

In just over two weeks, hunters and trappers in Wisconsin have killed off more than 181 wolves. This represents a horrible and disturbing trend of accelerated anti-wolf attitudes and killing.

How did this happen?

Reports suggest that the state Wolf Advisory Committee is now overrun by livestock and hunting and trapping interests – and the deck is now completely stacked against wolves.

We have to stop this before it’s too late. Please take action today and demand that balance be restored to the Wisconsin Wolf Advisory Committee!

This committee makes recommendations on quotas, policies and even population goals. But several scientific experts have been removed from the committee, and livestock and hunting and trapping interests have been added on in their place!

No outside scientists are on the committee, and only one pro-wolf group is represented. There are, however, seven livestock, hunting and trapping groups represented!

Demand that the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources stop this blatant anti-wolf bias!

We’ve come so far in our efforts to restore wolves to their historic range in the Great Lakes region. But with anti-wolf forces more aggressive than ever, we’re at a crossroads…

copyrighted Hayden wolf in lodgepoles

Local officials face deadline over enacting rifle hunting restrictions

[You can expect a lot more hunting accidents when this season starts up…]

Towns and villages in 18 counties across eastern and western

Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson

Wildlife Photography ©Jim Robertson

Wisconsin have  only a few weeks to decide if there are public safety reasons to prohibit rifle  hunting for deer.

Local governments are scrambling to get the issue on meeting agendas before  the Nov. 23 start of the annual nine-day deer gun season.

The state Department of Natural Resources declared in late September rifles  will be allowed statewide for the traditional deer gun hunt and the December  antlerless deer hunt, except where municipalities enact local restrictions.

Most counties in southern and central Wisconsin in the past were designated  as shotgun-only for deer hunting, primarily in response to a public perception  that shotguns were safer for hunting in open farm fields.

While shotgun slugs are not as accurate or powerful as rifle bullets over  long distances, the DNR says a study of hunting accidents shows a switch to  rifle hunting did not boost the number of injuries and other incidents.

DNR officials in the past few years could not confirm any safety advantages  to hunting deer with shotguns rather than rifles so the change was made,  according to Conservation Warden Todd Schaller, chief of the DNR’s recreational  enforcement section.

The department set off the dash for a local decision by announcing the end of shotgun-only counties for deer hunting in Wisconsin  as of Nov. 1.

The decision followed votes in favor of the change at Conservation Congress  spring meetings in 2011 and 2013, said Matt O’Brien, a DNR administrative warden  in Madison.

And the number of counties prohibiting rifle hunting for deer had steadily  declined before this year.

As of January 2013, the DNR listed 19 counties with shotgun-only zones for  deer hunting. In one, Milwaukee County, all communities had enacted separate  regulations to prohibit rifle hunting in any season.

The other 53 counties permitted rifle hunting for deer before the recent rule  change.

Any new local regulation of rifle hunting should balance public safety issues  with the state’s responsibility to regulate hunting and manage wildlife  populations, Schaller and O’Brien said.

One complication for hunters is that the DNR’s declaration came after the  2013 deer regulations were printed, so a state map in the pamphlet still shows  the 19 counties as shotgun-only zones.

One other complication: the DNR will not track local ordinances and provide a  central database. It is the hunter’s responsibility to determine if there are  municipal restrictions on rifle use.

Patchwork of rules

The Village of Germantown in Washington County last week enacted a year-round  ban on rifle hunting with an exception for low-powered .22-caliber and  .17-caliber models using rimfire cartridges.

“It was a difficult decision, but it came down to topography and density of  population,” Police Chief Peter Hoell said.

Large flat fields of corn and soybeans north of Freistadt Road are his  primary concern. High-powered rifle bullets could carry long distances across  those fields, which are sandwiched between rural homes, subdivisions and  crossroad hamlets, he said.

When the dust settles in a few weeks in the other 18 counties, the result  likely will be a checkerboard quilt of ordinances with some municipalities  imposing year-round prohibitions on rifle hunting, others restricting rifles  only in the deer season, and the remainder taking no action.

But maneuvering through dozens of differing local regulations would be at  odds with one of the main reasons for eliminating the shotgun-only counties, DNR  officials said.

The change was intended to simplify hunting rules so that hunters would not  need to check the deer regulation pamphlet, and switch weapons, each time they  crossed a county line, according to O’Brien.

The checkerboard design is a work in progress:

From Germantown, a group of hunters walking north across Pioneer Road into  the Town of Jackson will need to call ahead for information on rifle use.

Town staff and board members are studying the issue but no meeting has been  scheduled.

Hunters walking south from Germantown into Menomonee Falls will have to put  away their rifles and check where they can discharge a shotgun.

The village in Waukesha County had established a prohibition on rifle hunting  several years ago and requires a municipal permit for hunting with shotguns or  bows. Shotgun hunting is only allowed on designated properties that are 5 acres  or larger.

West of Germantown, the Richfield Village Board is planning a special meeting  Nov. 7 to discuss the need for restricting rifle use, Village Administrator Josh  Schoemann said.

Hunters entering Richfield from Germantown should call ahead to determine  which firearms are allowed.

Rifles are welcome for deer hunting in the Town of Cedarburg in Ozaukee  County, a former shotgun-only county. The Town Board in October decided not to  impose restrictions on rifle hunting.

The town posted a link on its website to a Pennsylvania study of the need for rifle hunting  restrictions. The study concluded shotguns with rifled barrels could pose a  greater public safety risk than rifles on level terrain, and there was a greater  risk of ricochet with shotgun slugs than rifle bullets.

The Waukesha Town Board will discuss the issue of rifle hunting at its Nov.  14 meeting, Town Chairman John Marek said.

One additional consideration for local officials is that the old shotgun-only regulation applied only to deer seasons. There was a flip side of the rule: use of rifles for legal hunting of coyote, fox and bear during open seasons was permitted unless local restrictions were established.

In Mequon, the city had designated zones of 10 acres or more generally west  of the Milwaukee River for hunting. Rifle hunting is prohibited throughout  Mequon under an existing ordinance.

The Town of Addison in Washington County decided to re-establish a  shotgun-only deer hunting zone within its town boundaries.

On Oct. 17, the Town Board adopted an ordinance prohibiting use of rifles in  any gun deer hunting season. The board cited population density in enacting the  limited restriction.

Even so, hunters can use rifles in other open seasons.

The Town of Hartford in Washington County took no action. The Hartford Town  Board on Thursday could not reach consensus on either a year-round prohibition  on rifles or a rifle ban only during the deer gun season.

On a 2-1 vote, the board decided to step back and monitor complaints in the  upcoming season.

“There’s not a lot of open area left in this town,” Clerk Marvin Justman  said. There are 22 rural subdivisions crisscrossing the municipality with the  historic St. Lawrence hamlet on the north.

Enforcement difficult

Shotgun-only deer hunting regulations will be difficult to enforce and vulnerable to challenge now that  the DNR has decided there is no safety advantage in hunting with shotguns, the  Wisconsin Towns Association advises local governments.

Adding to the challenge: Conservation wardens do not have the authority to  enforce local regulations.

This is one situation where the DNR recommends town officials either go big —  impose year-round rifle hunting restrictions for public safety reasons — or do  nothing.

A deer season-only restriction on rifles would be viewed by the department as  a hunting regulation, rather than a public safety rule, and municipalities do  not have authority to regulate wildlife hunting seasons, O’Brien said.

Why would a community restrict rifle use only during a deer gun season? he  asked.

“If there is a public safety risk in hunting deer with rifles, then the risk  exists 365 days a year” in hunting other wildlife with rifles, O’Brien said.

For that reason, the DNR has distributed its preferred model town ordinance  with a year-round ban on rifle hunting.

“Although the department does not feel any local ordinances are required, and  in fact emphasizes minimal local regulation, certain localities may not share  this position,” O’Brien said in discussing the need for a model ordinance.

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/local-officials-face-deadline-over-enacting-rifle-hunting-restrictions-b99125880z1-229644941.html#ixzz2j8w5IEhw Follow us: @NewsHub on Twitter

A convergence of bucks – Milwaukee basketball and hunting

[Well now, isn’t that special.]

By Paul A. Smith of the Journal Sentinel

Oct. 23, 2013 
Licensed hunters and anglers can receive discounts on Milwaukee Bucks tickets  as part of a program offered by the NBA franchise and the Department of Natural Resources.

People who buy tickets under the “DNR Nights” program will receive a free blaze orange winter  hat featuring the Milwaukee Bucks emblem.

The discount is available to holders of Wisconsin hunting and fishing  licenses. The offer is good for tickets to the following games at BMO  Harris Bradley Center:

Saturday, Nov. 2, 7:30 p.m. vs. Toronto (opening night)

Wednesday, Nov. 6, 7 p.m., vs. Cleveland

Saturday, Nov. 9, 7:30 p.m., vs. Dallas

Saturday, Nov. 16, 7:30 p.m., vs. Oklahoma City

Wednesday, Nov. 20, 7 p.m., vs. Portland

Saturday, Nov. 23, 7:30 p.m., vs. Charlotte

The promotion offers a ticket and blaze orange Bucks hat for $18 in the upper  bowl and $35 in the lower bowl. The prices represent a discount of up to 40%,  according to the agency.

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/228967181.html#ixzz2j1gnV1bF Follow us: @NewsHub on Twitter

Big Game Hunter Pays $13,500 to Kill Mountain Lion

[He won’t just donate the money without the chance to killsnrsslion something, of course.]

From Mountain Lion Foundation: Big Game Hunter Pays $13,500 to Participate in Nebraska’s First Ever Exclusive Lion Hunt

Spouting the standard propaganda about hunters being the biggest conservationists, Tom Ferry, of Ponca, Nebraska, paid $13,500 to become the winning bidder of one of the first two mountain lion permits issued by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission.

Mr. Ferry, a Big Game Hunter, has killed animals for sport in Africa, Canada, New Zealand, Russia, and across the United States. He has approximately 150 trophy mounts commemorating his exploits at his home including those of mountain lions killed in Arizona and Utah.

“I just thought it would be nice to hunt mountain lions in Nebraska during the state’s first season,” Ferry said.

Ferry will be one of only two people permitted to hunt cougars during Nebraska’s first lion hunting season (January 1st through February 14th) in the Pine Ridge Hunting Unit. Last week, 15-year-old Holden Bruce of Franklin, Nebraska, was selected in a drawing for the other permit. Both hunters will be allowed to hunt with dogs.

The auction, held Wednesday night at a special Nebraska Big Game Society function, reflected the small participant turnout experienced in last week’s statewide lion hunting lottery with only 70 bidders.

Before the auction, Nebraska Game and Parks Director, Jim Douglas, also presented former State Senator LeRoy Louden, who shepherded Nebraska’s lion hunting bill through the Legislature, with an honorary mountain lion hunting permit so he can accompany the remaining 99 lottery winners when they commence their hunt during Nebraska’s second lion hunting season (February 15th through March 31st).

Game and Parks officials say the objective for allowing mountain lion hunting is to provide hunters opportunities while allowing a slight to moderate reduction in mountain lion population.

Mr. Ferry seemed to sum up the Department’s draconian position towards Nebraska’s wildlife. “They have a saying in Africa,” he said. “And it’s true here, too: If it doesn’t pay, it doesn’t stay.”

110 Wolves Have Been Killed After Day 8 Of Hunting Season

http://news.wpr.org/post/110-wolves-have-been-killed-after-day-8-hunting-season

By

The Department of Natural Resources says that as of Wednesday morning, 110 wolves have been killed in the wolf hunting and trapping season.

The season just started last week. Last year, 117 wolves were killed during the entire two month season. DNR official Tom Hauge says the faster pace of this year’s harvest remains a bit of a mystery.

“We really don’t have any good ideas as to why that is,” says Hauge. “But the trappers are out in large numbers this year and are having some good success.”

Most of the 110 wolves killed this year, were first caught in traps. Two people concerned about the possibility of using dogs to hunt wolves testified before the DNR Board today. Dogs are banned from the wolf hunt until December 2.

A wolf-hunting zone in far northeastern Wisconsin closed earlier this afternoon.

Hunters “Become the Hunted,” Squeal

Wis. Hunters Apparently Shot at by ‘Animal Lover’

Updated at: 10/23/2013  By: Beth McDonough, KSTP

Hunters looking for ducks, find trouble. The harrowing hunting story happened in Barron County in Western Wisconsin.

Two men were shot at, numerous times, while hunting legally in Cameron. The man who opened fire, is only facing minor charges.

Both sides are telling their stories to Eyewitness News.

It’s the heart of duck hunting season. On Sunday, a marsh looked like it does, perfect, for outdoorsman, “we knew it was going to be a great day, it started out good.”

Yet within minutes of shooting two mallards, the hunters became the hunted.

A stranger lurking in the nearby woods, got mouthy, “he went off on a rant about how we shouldn’t be here, we should be in Afghanistan if we were gonna shooting something,” says Levi Johnston.

Then, that stranger, Van Hawkinson, got a gun, “for a moment there, I got angry and was hurt, I jumped in the vehicle took a .410 with me, what’s that gonna do? I shot out at the corn field up in the air, I had my weapon like so.”

We asked duck hunter David Reichenberger if he felt targeted, “oh absolutely, if he had a .22 or any other lethal weapon he could’ve killed us.”

Reichenberger and Johnston were in a canoe. No way to escape. The shots were close enough to scare them. And that’s the point, “I’m an animal lover and bird lover. I don’t like to see things die, especially for the sport of killing,” says Hawkinson.

Although the hunters were on private land, they had permission from the owner to be there. Authorities arrested and charged the 64-year-old with dangerous use of a weapon and disorderly conduct, which are misdemeanors and considered minor crimes by the law.

We asked Hawkinson if he was sorry, “yes, why? Because I went to jail for it.” He was there for one night, then he was free on $1,000 bond.

“That’s it?” That’s what David Reichenberger and Levi Johnston want to know, “he got nothing for basically trying to kill us, how is it you can shoot somebody and the next day get out of jail?”

monty-python-image-3

Wisconsin is Too Open to Hunting With Dogs

[First, I have a couple of pet peeves to air: 1) I’m getting real tired of all the articles these days that start out as a question when the author and readers clearly know the answer. Like this one: “Is the state too open to hunting with dogs?” This isn’t a question, it’s a statement! Why not just come right out and say, “The State is Too Open to Hunting With Dogs.” We all know it is, so I took the liberty in change the title to reflect the answer.

2) Another thing that gets extremely old are articles that start out something like, So and So, an expert on animal behavior, is not against hunting and even raises lamb for food…” as though So and So’s concessions to cruelty make them more credible. Okay, that’s all I have to say; enjoy the article.]

Bill Lueders: Is state too open to hunting with dogs? copyrighted Hayden wolf in lodgepoles

October 18, 2013 12:30 am  •  By Bill Lueders

Patricia McConnell, an expert on animal behavior, is not against hunting and even raises lamb for food. But the University of Wisconsin-Madison zoologist and author is appalled by what she regards as blatant cruelty to animals sanctioned and abetted by the state.

“I’m sure most people don’t know this goes on in Wisconsin,” McConnell says. “I think most people would be horrified.”

McConnell is referring to the use of dogs to hunt other animals, like bear, with often deadly consequences. Joe Bodewes, a Minocqua-based veterinarian, described the damage to dogs by bear in a recent letter to the Wisconsin State Journal.

“Broken and crushed legs, sliced-open abdomens and punctured lungs,” he wrote. “Dogs lying mangled and dying on the surgery table — all in the pursuit of sport.”

Bodewes, in an interview, says his small clinic treats about a dozen dogs a year mauled by bears while hunting. Usually two to four die. Recent cases include a dog whose jaw “was snapped off below the eyes” and one whose back muscles were “ripped loose from its spine.” Both survived.

Now Wisconsin is about to become the only state to let dogs be used in wolf hunts. A judge’s injunction blocking the use of dogs in last year’s inaugural hunt has been lifted; the case is now before a state appeals court. This year’s hunt, with a kill goal of 275 wolves, began Tuesday. Dogs can be used beginning Dec. 2.

McConnell and others warn of inevitable violent clashes. And with good reason.

According to the state Department of Natural Resources, wolves have killed 23 hounds so far this year, tying a 2006 record. All were being used to hunt or pursue bear, says DNR wildlife damage specialist Brad Koele.

Their owners can receive up to $2,500 per animal from the state. Many have already applied.

“People who choose to put their dogs at extreme risk of horrific injury are compensated,” McConnell says. “Some of these dogs die painful deaths, in a blood sport that it some cases is no better than organized dog fights.”

A recent study found that Wisconsin has a higher dog casualty rate than Michigan, which also allows their use in bear hunts. The lead author, a Michigan Tech wildlife ecologist, speculated that Wisconsin’s compensation program creates “an incentive for abuse” — that is, hunters who deliberately put their dogs at great risk.

Since 1985, a DNR tally shows, the state has spent $441,651 to reimburse hunters for hounds killed by wolves, usually while hunting or pursuing bear. Until last year these payments, and more than

$1 million paid for wolf depredations of other animals, came in part from the state’s Endangered Resources Fund.

Now these payments come from application and license fees paid by prospective wolf hunters. Last year, Koele confirms, none of these fees went for wolf population monitoring or hunt management costs.

McConnell and Bodewes trace the state’s policies back to small but politically powerful advocacy groups. These prominently include the Wisconsin Bear Hunters Association, the state chapter of Safari Club International and United Sportsmen of Wisconsin.

These three groups collectively spent nearly $400,000 since 2004 lobbying state officials, including their support for the wolf hunt law. Group officials did not respond to interview requests.

Former Republican state Rep. Scott Suder, the wolf hunt bill’s lead Assembly sponsor, helped United Sportsmen snare a $500,000 state grant, which Gov. Scott Walker yanked after concerns were raised about the group’s fitness and honesty. Suder ending up leaving a lucrative state appointment to become a lobbyist.

The owners of dogs killed by wolves while hunting wolves are not eligible for compensation. While McConnell is glad state funds won’t go to this purpose, she notes that hunters have “no motivation to report” dogs killed or injured.

A DNR official says the agency may try to gather information about dog casualties in its post-hunting-season questionnaire.

Bill Lueders is the Money and Politics Project director at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism.

Wisconsin on record pace for number of bear-hunting dogs killed this year

There’s a-near crisis situation going on in the cheese and crackers state, Wisconsin. It seems their hound hunters are losing dogs to wolves. Too bad for the dogs, but then again the only time they’re allowed out of their pen is to chase down and tree black bears so their “masters” can stumble up and shoot the terrified ursine.

Apparently the taxpayers are expected to foot the bill if a one of the hound hunters’ frantic dogs has a lethal run-in with a wolf. As the article below informs us, the Wisconsin Department of Natural “Resources” has a compensation program wherein hounders are paid $250.000 for their losses, if they choose to take up the barbaric sport. Of course, “it is possible, however, that because of the potential for compensation a hunter might be more likely to

photo Jim Robertson

photo Jim Robertson

put a dog at risk.”

According to Wisconsin newspapers:

This has been a deadly year for bear-hunting hounds.

According to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’
<http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/wildlifehabitat/wolf/dogdeps.html#table&gt; dog
depredation report, 23 hounds have been killed by wolves while being used to
hunt bears or being trained to hunt bears since June 3, tying the record 23
killed in 2006, according to Brad Koele, DNR wildlife damage specialist.
Three pet dogs have also been killed.

Only six dogs were killed last year, but Koele says that was an aberration –
at least 20 were killed in each of the four years before that. Black bear
hunters in Wisconsin can use dogs until Oct. 1 and can hunt without dogs
until Oct. 8.

“It’s not that this year is abnormally high, it’s that last year was
abnormally low,” says Koele. “I don’t have an answer for why.”

The owners of the dogs can claim up to $2,500 from the state, though Koele
says not all of them receive or ask for the full amount.

“Not all claims are maximum payments,” he says.

Livestock, hunting dogs and pets are all eligible for compensation.

The death toll could be higher. Last year Republicans passed a bill
establishing a wolf hunt in the state, but a provision in the bill allowing
hunters to use dogs is tied up in court. However, dogs used to hunt wolves
would not be eligible for compensation.

According to a <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613910&gt; study earlier
this year from Michigan Tech, Wisconsin DNR data show that payouts for wolf
attacks on hounds “costs the state more than it has spent for wolf attacks
on any other category of domesticated animal, including calves, missing
calves or cattle.”

(Here’s a
<http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/wildlifehabitat/wolf/documents/wolfdamagepayments.p df> table showing the compensation paid out in Wisconsin since 1985, when
the program started.)

The Michigan Tech study found that the rate of wolf attacks on bear-hunting
hounds in Wisconsin is two to seven times higher than in Michigan.

Researchers at the college, who teamed up with Michigan DNR researchers for
the study, have a couple of ideas as to why.
<http://www.mtu.edu/news/stories/2013/april/story88261.html&gt; This bulletin
from Michigan Tech says the research team found that bear baiting season
starts earlier in Wisconsin and lasts longer.

“The longer you bait, the more opportunity you provide for wolves to
discover and potentially defend bear-bait sites,” said Joseph Bump, a
Michigan Tech wildlife ecologist, in the bulletin. “Most hunters release
their dogs at bait sites, and the longer the bait has been around, the more
likely hunting dogs are to encounter territorial wolves who have found and
are possibly defending the bait. So it appears that baiting is an important
factor.”

There’s another factor: Michigan doesn’t pay dog owners for their dead dogs.

“Compensation can have multiple effects,” Bump says. “It is a reporting
incentive, but it also creates an incentive for abuse. The net effect of
compensation is far from clear, and it is an important factor to study
further.”

Koele says providing an incentive for reporting attacks is important for
tracking efforts by the state. Wisconsin contracts with USDA Wildlife
Services to do a site investigation to verify that the depredation was
caused by wolves, he says.

“We don’t just pay based on what a hunter tells us,” he says. “There’s
actually an investigation to make sure we’re justly paying them.”

He says it is possible, however, that because of the potential for
compensation a hunter might be more likely to put a dog at risk.

“There could be that abuse occurring out there,” he says. “We really
wouldn’t know.”