Polar bear killed by another animal at Detroit Zoo


by Matthew BleicherMonday, February 8th 2021AA

Visitors to the Detroit Zoo’s new Arctic Ring of Life Exhibit get an up close and personal view of a polar bear October 16, 2001 in Royal Oak, Michigan. The new 4.2 acre, $14.9 million exhibit is the largest polar bear exhibit in the world, and contains a 70-foot long viewing tunnel that runs beneath a 300,000 gallon chilled salt water pool, and other arctic wildlife such as seals, snowy owls, and arctic fox. (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)<p>{/p}

Facebook Share Icon
Twitter Share Icon
Email Share Icon

ROYAL OAK, Mich. (WEYI) — On Monday, the Detroit Zoological Society said in a statement that a female polar bear, Anana, was killed by another polar bear.

According to the zoo, it happened during a breeding attempt. The male polar bear, Nuka, killed Anana.

“This was completely unexpected and the Detroit Zoo staff is devastated by the loss of Anana in this sudden and tragic event,” said Detroit Zoological Society Chief Life Sciences Officer Scott Carter. The zoo says the two bears lived with each other in 2020 without any issues. They had just been reintroduced last week. This was part of a nation-wide program called the “Polar Bear Species Survival Plan.” According to a statement from the Detroit Zoo, this program is “a cooperative population management and conservation program that helps ensure the sustainability of healthy captive animal populations.”

Nuka has been successful in the breeding program before. Nuka recently fathered twin cubs at the zoo.

https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/polar-bear-killed-at-detroit-zoo

GUEST POST: THE THREAT OF HIGH-PROBABILITY OCEAN ‘TIPPING POINTS’

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

23 February 202115:49

https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-the-threat-of-high-probability-ocean-tipping-points

Dr Helena Martins

DR HELENA MARTINS

23.02.2021 | 3:49pmGUEST POSTSGuest post: The threat of high-probability ocean ‘tipping points’

This guest post is by:

Dr Helena Martins, science communicator in theRossby Centreat theSwedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.

Climate change is profoundly altering our oceans and marine ecosystems. Some of these changes are happening quickly and are potentially irreversible. Many are taking place silently and unnoticed.

In recent years,tipping points– thresholds where a small change could push a system into a completely new state – have increasingly become a focus for the climate research community.

However, these are typically thought of in terms of unlikely changes with huge global ramifications – often referred to as “low probability, high impact” events. Examples include theslowdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulationand the rapiddisintegration of the West Antarctic ice sheet.

In…

View original post 1,215 more words

Covid-19 antibodies may protect against reinfection later, study suggests

Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

By Jacqueline Howard, CNN

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/24/health/covid-19-antibodies-coronavirus-reinfection-study-wellness/index.html

Updated 11:07 AM ET, Wed February 24, 2021

antibody immunity coronavirus orig_00000514

    Replay

    MUST WATCH

    US passes 500,000 Covid-19 deaths

    US passes 500,000 Covid-19 deaths

    How antibodies protect us from virusesCNN01:37/01:37Now PlayingHow antibodies protect…

    Source: CNNHow antibodies protect us from viruses01:37

    (CNN)There’s new evidence that connects testing positive for Covid-19 antibodies from a prior infection with a significantly lower risk of becoming infected again in the future.

    Covid-19 reinfection: What you need to know

      Covid-19 reinfection: What you need to know01:38A study, published in the journalJAMA Internal Medicineon Wednesday, found that people who tested positive for Covid-19 antibodies were at a decreased risk of coronavirus infection compared with those who tested negative for antibodies.”The results from the study are basically a 10-fold reduction, but I would have caveats around that. In other words, it could be an overestimate of the reduction. It could be an underestimate of the reduction,” said Dr. Douglas Lowy, principal deputy director…

      View original post 484 more words

      New bill could allow hunters to take does without permits in parts of Maine

      Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog


      https://wgme.com/news/local/new-bill-would-allow-hunters-to-take-does-without-permits-in-parts-of-maine

      by WGMEMonday, February 22nd 2021AAThe Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife says right now, there are too many deer in certain parts of the state. (WGME)https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.443.0_en.html#goog_1826362061Volume 90% The Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife says right now, there are too many deer in certain parts of the state. (WGME)

      Facebook Share Icon

      Twitter Share Icon

      Email Share Icon

      KENNEBUNK (WGME) — The Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife says right now, there are too many deer in certain parts of the state.

      As a result, the department introduced a controversial bill Monday.

      Right now, a limited number of any deer permits are given out by lottery to Maine hunters to control the doe population.

      [Maine lawmaker proposes bill to authorize ‘deer baiting’]

      If passed, this new bill would allow hunters to take does without a permit in certain areas of the state.

      “This would be another tool that we would have the option of using,” Nate Webb of Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife said. “The bill doesn’t prescribe that we must use it.”

      Webb is the Wildlife Division…

      View original post 244 more words

      Upstate NY coyote hunter talks about his passion: ‘This is the best time of year to be doing it’

      Exposing the Big Game's avatarCommittee to Abolish Sport Hunting Blog

      Updated 11:22 AM;Today 9:06 AM

      Upstate NY coyote hunting
      Josh Saville, of Scipio Center, with a full body mount of a coyote he shot.

      Facebook ShareTwitter ShareByDavid Figura | dfigura@nyup.com

      SCIPIO CENTER, N.Y. — Josh Saville said he shot his first coyote in 2007 “by chance.”

      “I got it with a bow while deer hunting,” he said. “It just became an addiction after that. I also hunt deer and waterfowl, but mainly I hunt coyotes because it’s outside my business hours and I can do it uninterrupted.”

      Saville, 39, is a taxidermist whose shop,Taxidermy by Josh Saville, is run out of his home.

      “When you deer hunt, you usually hunt in the morning and afternoon. I like to head out for coyotes after I shut down my business for the day, usually after 6:30 – 7 p.m. and stay out to about 2 a.m.” he said.https://d8c5077a9d8c36933947a25a189337a8.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

      In Saville’s opinion, January and…

      View original post 784 more words

      Million-Year-Old DNA Rewrites Mammoths’ Evolutionary Tree

      Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

      02.21.2021 09:00 AM

      The oldest DNA ever sequenced shows how the genus split off into new species.

      mammoth tusk
      PHOTOGRAPH: CPG

      ANCIENT DNA HASrevolutionized how we understand human evolution, revealing how populations moved and interacted and introducing us to relatives like the Denisovans, a “ghost lineage” that we wouldn’t realize existed if it weren’t for discovering theirDNA. But humans aren’t the only ones who have left DNA behind in their bones, and the same analyses that worked for humans can work for any other group of species.ARS TECHNICA

      This story originally appeared onArs Technica, a trusted source for technology news, tech policy analysis, reviews, and more. Ars is owned by WIRED’s parent company, Condé Nast.

      Today, the mammoths take their turn in the spotlight, helped by what appears to be the oldest DNA ever sequenced. DNA from three ancient molars, one likely to be over a million years…

      View original post 1,078 more words

      The Second COVID-19 Shot Is a Rude Reawakening for Immune Cells

      Side effects are just a sign that protection is kicking in as it should.KATHERINE J. WUFEBRUARY 2, 2021

      a hand holding a syringe
      GETTY / THE ATLANTIC

      Editor’s Note: The Atlantic is making vital coverage of the coronavirus available to all readers. Find the collection here.

      https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/02/second-vaccine-side-effects/617892/?fbclid=IwAR37htr7JdW8UChpem5zJR5e3RAT308bo3G2lbnsri_-5HFotchj5vRSCMA

      At about 2 a.m. on Thursday morning, I woke to find my husband shivering beside me. For hours, he had been tossing in bed, exhausted but unable to sleep, nursing chills, a fever, and an agonizingly sore left arm. His teeth chattered. His forehead was freckled with sweat. And as I lay next to him, cinching blanket after blanket around his arms, I felt an immense sense of relief. All this misery was a sign that the immune cells in his body had been riled up by the second shot of a COVID-19 vaccine, and were well on their way to guarding him from future disease.

      Your guide to life on a warming planet

      Discover Atlantic Planet, a new section devoted to climate change and the ways it will reshape our worldExplore

      Side effects are a natural part of the vaccination process, as my colleague Sarah Zhang has written. Not everyone will experience them. But the two COVID-19 vaccines cleared for emergency use in the United States, made by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, already have reputations for raising the hackles of the immune system: In both companies’ clinical trials, at least a third of the volunteers ended up with symptoms such as headaches and fatigue; fevers like my husband’s were less common.

      Dose No. 2 is more likely to pack a punch—in large part because the effects of the second shot build iteratively on the first. My husband, who’s a neurologist at Yale New Haven Hospital, is one of many who had a worse experience with his second shot than his first.

      The New York Times

      So Much More Than a SoupRasam is a flavorful, multifaceted Indian soup with endless variations.SPONSORED BY THE NEW YORK TIMESSee More

      RECOMMENDED READING

      The New York Times

      Finding a Meditation AppBefore you download a meditation app, be aware of how it can — and can’t — help.SPONSORED BY THE NEW YORK TIMESSee More

      But much like any other learning process, in this one repetition is key. When hit with the second injection, the immune system recognizes the onslaught, and starts to take it even more seriously. The body’s encore act, uncomfortable though it might be, is evidence that the immune system is solidifying its defenses against the virus.

      “By the second vaccine, it’s already amped up and ready to go,” Jasmine Marcelin, an infectious-disease physician at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, told me. Fortunately, side effects resolve quickly, whereas COVID-19 can bring on debilitating, months-long symptoms and has killed more than 2 million people.

      When the immune system detects a virus, it will dispatch cells and molecules to memorize its features so it can be fought off more swiftly in the future. Vaccines impart these same lessons without involving the disease-causing pathogen itself—the immunological equivalent of training wheels or water wings.

      The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines accomplish that pedagogy via a genetic molecule called mRNA that’s naturally found in human cells. Once delivered into the upper arm, the mRNA instructs the body’s own cells to produce a coronavirus protein called spike—a molecule that elicits powerful, infection-fighting antibody responses in people battling COVID-19.

      To ensure safe passage of mRNA into cells, the vaccine makers swathed the molecules in greasy bubbles called lipid nanoparticles. These strange, fatty spheres don’t resemble anything naturally present in the body, and they trip the sensors of a cavalry of fast-acting immune cells, called innate immune cells, that patrol the body for foreign matter. Once they spot the nanoparticles, these cells dispatch molecular alarms called cytokines that recruit other immune cells to the site of injection. Marshaling these reinforcements is important, but the influx of cells and molecules makes the upper arm swollen and sore. The congregating cells spew out more cytokines still, flooding the rest of the body with signals that can seed system-wide symptoms such as fever and fatigue.

      “It’s the body’s knee-jerk reaction to an infection,” or something that looks like it,  Mark Slifka, a vaccine expert and an immunologist at Oregon Health and Science University, told me. “Let’s spray the area down with antiviral cytokines, which also happen to be inflammatory.”

      The mRNA itself might also tickle a reaction out of the immune system, simply because of how unusual it looks. “All of a sudden, you have a lot of new RNA that the cell didn’t make,” says Donna Farber, an immunologist at Columbia University, who got her second shot of Moderna’s vaccine last month, with very few side effects.

      The provocative nature of mRNA might help explain why Moderna’s shot, which contains three times as much of the genetic material as Pfizer’s, was linked to more side effects in clinical trials.

      The New York Times

      The New Digital EtiquetteWith so much of life moving online during the pandemic, digital etiquette is changing.SPONSORED BY THE NEW YORK TIMESSee More

      The innate immune system acts fast. But its actions aren’t very long-lived or discerning: These cells just clobber anything that looks a little weird. Within a day or two of the injection, they start to lose steam. Cytokine production sputters; side effects start to fade. Around this time, innate immune cells start to pass the baton to another division of the immune system, called adaptive immunity, which includes sniperlike molecules and cells, such as antibodies and T cells, that will launch an attack on specific pathogens if they try to infect the body again.

      T cells and B cells, the cells that make antibodies, need several days to study the spike’s features before they can respond. But by the time the second injection rolls around, adaptive cells are raring to go, and far faster to react. Some of these cells have even been lingering at the site of injection, out of suspicion that their target would return. Stimulated anew, these sentinel cells will blast out their own cytokines, layering on an extra wave of inflammation. In some people, like my beleaguered neurologist husband, these complex reactions can manifest in fevers, aches, and prolonged exhaustion.

      My husband had side effects after his first dose too: a headache, some fatigue, a touch of dizziness—all of which I can safely blame on his innate immune system. Those same innate responses return for another round of inflammation after the second shot. But the ruckus raised after the second injection might be a double whammy: The expected innate cells might be further egged on and amplified by a less sluggish surge of adaptive cells, concentrated near where the needle goes in.

      “With the second dose, now everything is responding within that same short time period,” Marion Pepper, an immunologist at the University of Washington, told me.

      Pepper described her first shot of Pfizer’s vaccine as “a piece of cake.” The second injection saddled her with flu-like symptoms, tougher to take. But the side effects also signify that both branches of the immune system are being engaged as they should—cementing the memory of the coronavirus’s spike protein in some of the body’s most powerful cells.

      That’s a big part of why vaccine boosts are so important, Slifka said. Although the first shot stimulates both innate and adaptive immunity, the second injection reminds B and T cells that the threat of the coronavirus cannot be taken lightly, and ensures that the sharpest and strongest immune players will be used for any subsequent response.

      “They’re asking, ‘Why is this happening 21 or 28 days later? I thought we took care of this four weeks ago,’” Slifka said.

      Marcelin, the Nebraska infectious-disease physician, also experienced rougher symptoms after her second shot of Pfizer’s vaccine. By the time she went to bed that evening, she was gripped with miserable muscle aches and chills. It took a couple more days before “I felt like myself,” Marcelin recalled.https://98cff45991f1d93f5f0036e008d03516.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.htmlhttps://98cff45991f1d93f5f0036e008d03516.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

      The side effects didn’t faze her, though. She’s now about three weeks out from her second dose—past the point when the vaccine’s full protective effects are expected to kick in. “I would do it again,” she says. “It was definitely worth it.”

      People shouldn’t be perturbed by a lack of vaccine side effects either. As our bodies churn through new information, “some people’s immune systems are louder than others’,” Marcelin said. But the quiet ones are still hard at work.

      My husband’s immune system certainly fell into the diva category. The night after his second shot, he pinwheeled between cold and hot, alternately bundling himself in blankets and tossing them away. The flux seemed to bleed a bit into his emotional valence too. After snoozing on the couch for several hours, he perked up and couldn’t stop laughing at a picture of an orange cat curled up next to a box of similarly crescent-shaped croissants.

      But within 24 hours of his shot, he was feeling well enough to run (yes, run) to work and finish an 11-hour shift. In a couple of weeks, he’ll join the millions of other Americans who, thanks to a pair of injections, will be cloaked in an extra layer of armor against the coronavirus.

      As he told me Wednesday night, shivering through the cushion of two comforters: “This is a million times better than getting COVID.”

      https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/02/second-vaccine-side-effects/617892/?fbclid=IwAR37htr7JdW8UChpem5zJR5e3RAT308bo3G2lbnsri_-5HFotchj5vRSCMA

      Cloud-Making Aerosol Could Devastate Polar Sea Ice

      Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

      An overlooked but powerful driver of cloud formation could accelerate the loss of polar sea ice.

      https://www.quantamagazine.org/cloud-making-aerosol-could-devastate-polar-sea-ice-20210223/

      READ LATER

      Photograph showing cirrus clouds in a blue sky above an expanse of flat, snow-covered ice.
      Cirrus clouds float over sea ice in northwest Greenland. Melting sea ice releases iodine into the atmosphere, which can rapidly mix with other trace gases to form particles that seed the growth of new clouds, a recent study found.Bryan & Cherry Alexander / Science Source

      Max KozlovWriting Intern


      February 23, 2021


      VIEW PDF/PRINT MODEAbstractions BlogAtmospheric ScienceClimate ModelsClimate SciencePhysicsAll Topics

      To climate scientists, clouds are powerful, pillowy paradoxes: They can simultaneously reflect away the sun’s heat but also trap it in the atmosphere; they can be products of warming temperatures but can also amplify their effects. Now, while studying the atmospheric chemistry that produces clouds, researchers have uncovered an unexpectedly potent natural process that seeds their growth. They further suggest that, as the Earth continues…

      View original post 1,364 more words

      North Carolina man faces a dozen animal cruelty charges after 12 dogs seized from home

      NEWS

      by: Nexstar Media WirePosted: Feb 23, 2021 / 06:31 AM EST / Updated: Feb 23, 2021 / 06:31 AM EST

      Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s Office

      PEMBROKE, N.C. (WBTW) – A Pembroke man is facing twelve misdemeanor cruelty to animals charges after a dozen dogs were seized from a home in Robeson County.

      Deputies with the Robeson County Sheriff’s Office say Nehemiah Pate, 25, was arrested Monday. Deputies were tipped off by a community member about the living conditions and malnourishment of several dogs at Pate’s home on Ottmus Road.North Carolina woman accused of stabbing man, breathing in deputy’s face after saying she tested positive for COVID 

      The dogs were rescued and transported to local veterinarian hospitals for treatment and care. The sheriff’s office provided photos of the dogs.

      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »
      • Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »

      Courtesy: Robeson County Sheriff’s OfficeRead More »

      “There is no excuse for animal cruelty,” Sheriff Burnis Wilkins said. “Animals can’t express their feelings but when abuse is recognized, we must become their voice.” Sheriff Wilkins also called the case “horrific”.

      Anyone with information about the case or other cases of animal cruelty is asked to contact the Robeson County Sheriff’s Office at (910) 671-3170 or (910) 671-3100.

      Sea rise accelerating as climate change causes collapse of glaciers

      Exposing the Big Game's avatarThe Extinction Chronicles

      newBen Webster, Environment EditorTuesday February 23 2021, 5.00pm GMT, The Times

      The study quantifies ice loss in a little-studied Getz region of West Antarctica, where nine of the 14 glaciers studied have yet to be named
      The study quantifies ice loss in a little-studied Getz region of West Antarctica, where nine of the 14 glaciers studied have yet to be namedAHOGG

      Glaciers are flowing more quickly into the ocean in West Antarctica due to climate change, contributing to rising sea levels, a study has found.

      The most detailed study to date of ice loss in the Getz region, which is so remote that humans are thought to have never set foot in most of it, reveals 14 glaciers are thinning and the speed at which they are moving towards the sea has increased by an average of 23.8 per cent in the past 25 years.

      Satellite observations showed one glacier flowed seawards by 669 metres (almost half a mile) in 2018, 59 per cent faster than in 1994. Between 1994 and 2018, 315…

      View original post 16 more words