By JOSHUA GOODMAN and HELEN WIEFFERINGApril 15, 2022

1 of 4

FILE- A cod fish sits on ice at the Portland Fish Exchange, in Portland, Maine. A U.S. ban on seafood imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine was supposed to sap billions of dollars from Vladimir Putin’s war machine. But shortcomings in import regulations means that Russian-caught pollock, salmon and crab are likely to enter the U.S. anyway, by way of the country vital to seafood supply chains across the world: China. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty, File)

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-putin-business-miami-global-trade-e0aeaad0790e9919ef9757c343235aaa

MIAMI (AP) — A U.S. ban on seafood imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine was supposed to sap billions of dollars from Vladimir Putin’s war machine.

But shortcomings in import regulations mean that Russian-caught pollock, salmon and crab are likely to enter the U.S. anyway, by way of the country vital to seafood supply chains across the world: China.

Like the U.S. seafood industry, Russian companies rely heavily on China to process their catch. Once there, the seafood can be re-exported to the U.S. as a “product of China” because country of origin labeling isn’t required.

The result is that nearly a third of the wild-caught fish imported from China is estimated to have been caught in Russian waters, according to an International Trade Commission study of 2019 data. For pollock and sockeye salmon, the rate is even higher — 50% to 75%.

ADVERTISEMENT

“China doesn’t catch cod. They don’t catch pollock. But yet, they’re one of the largest exporters of these whitefish in the world,” said Sally Yozell, a former policy director at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who now is a senior fellow at the Stimson Center in Washington. “Having it labeled as a Chinese product is really not fair to the consumers and to restaurants.”

RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR

Mariupol teeters as Ukrainians defy surrender-or-die demandLive Update | Ukraine: Takeover of Mariupol could end talks‘This land is in blood’: A Ukraine village digs up the deadPope makes Easter plea for Ukraine peace, cites nuclear risk

___

This story was supported by funding from the Walton Family Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

___

Fishing is big business in Russia, one closely linked to the Kremlin and Putin’s projection of power at sea. The country is the one of the world’s top seafood producers and was the eighth-largest exporter to the U.S. last year, with more than $1.2 billion worth of sales, the bulk of it king crab.

But it’s unknown exactly how much manages to land in the U.S. by way of China, which sent another $1.7 billion in fish to the U.S. last year. Nor does the Biden administration’s ban require companies importing from China to find out.

Among Russia’s biggest seafood exports is Alaska pollock. A cousin of cod, Alaska pollock is the most harvested fish in the U.S., showing up in everything from imitation crabmeat to McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish. Every year, giant, floating factories in the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska with dozens of workers aboard catch 1.5 million metric tons of the fish, the equivalent of more than four times the weight of the Empire State Building.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://17c5c8a103acd1774d84c8bb792da60c.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

But the same species is also harvested in Russia in similar amounts. Even though the U.S. forbids the use of the name “Alaska pollock” if the fish wasn’t caught in U.S. waters, pollock caught by Russia and processed in China is hard to detect and fills an important gap in the U.S. market. Complicating matters further, a small share of the U.S. catch is also sent to China for processing and reimported to the U.S.

In lieu of seafood tracing, U.S. producers rely on the name recognition of Alaska pollock to signal where the fish was caught.

“Consumers can have confidence that if the name Alaska is on the box it unequivocally comes from Alaskan waters,” insisted Craig Morris, chief executive of Genuine Alaska Pollock Producers.

Even before the invasion of Ukraine, pressure had been building to prevent what Sen. Dan Sullivan, a Republican of Alaska, called “authoritarian” pollock from entering the U.S. Putin banned U.S. seafood in 2014 following American sanctions to punish him for the invasion of Crimea that year. Since then Russian exports entering the U.S. duty free have nearly quadrupled in value.

U.S. trade data analyzed by The Associated Press show that the biggest importer of Russian-caught pollock from China last year was High Liner Foods, whose shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Other big importers include Gloucester, Massachusetts-based F.W. Bryce, a subsidiary of Japanese seafood conglomerate Nissui; Miami-based Quirch Foods; and Newport, Rhode Island-based Endeavor Seafood, whose founding partner, Todd Clark, served until 2020 as chairman of the National Fisheries Institute, the industry’s main lobby group.

None of the companies responded to requests for comment about whether they would stop purchasing pollock from China or take steps to ensure it is not of Russian origin — neither of which is required by the seafood embargo.

Gavin Gibbons, a spokesman for the National Fisheries Institute, said that almost all of the group’s members are now reviewing their sourcing practices. But some fear an outright ban on third-party processed seafood could lead to job losses in the U.S. and add to inflation, already the highest in decades.

“The need to hold Russia accountable for its reprehensible actions in Ukraine is undeniable,” said Gibbons. “We support a strong and smart response that is targeted and avoids unnecessary economic collateral damage on U.S. workers.”

While overshadowed by Russia’s role as an energy powerhouse, Russia’s seafood industry has increasingly been flexing its own muscle with strong support from the Kremlin.

Two of the country’s largest seafood exporters — Vladivostok-based Russian Fishery Co. and Russian Crab — are owned by Gleb Frank, the son of Putin’s former transportation minister and head of state-owned shipbuilder Sovcomflot. Frank is also the son-in law of one of Russia’s richest men, Gennady Timchenko, who was among the first oligarchs sanctioned following the 2014 invasion of Crimea.

The 39-year-old Frank was dubbed Russia’s “Crab King” after emerging in 2019 as the biggest beneficiary of a government plan to auction fishing quotas that had traditionally been handed out based on the previous year’s catch.

With generous state loans, his companies have been at the forefront of an effort to renew Russia’s aging fleet. Last year, during a Navy Day ceremony at a St. Petersburg shipyard with Putin and 50 warships looking on, he launched an advanced supertrawler capable of hauling 60,000 tons of pollock per year.

“Today the Russian navy has everything it needs to defend our homeland, our national interests,” Putin said in a speech in front of a monument to the fleet’s founder, Peter the Great. “We can locate any enemy, whether they’re on, under or above the water. And if required, deal them an unavoidable strike.”

One of Frank’s biggest competitors, Oleg Khan, fled into exile after a criminal investigation for murder was reopened around the same time Frank busted onto the seafood scene. Later, a company connected to him had its offices in Russia’s Far East raided and assets seized over allegations of tax fraud and crab smuggling.

Last month, after Frank himself was hit with U.S. sanctions along with his wife and father-in-law again, he sold part of his ownership stakes in both seafood companies to several associates and resigned as chairman. Russian Fishery Co. did not respond to a detailed list of questions about the U.S. embargo but Russian Crab said Frank has never played a role in management of the company.

It’s not just the industry’s ties to the Kremlin that are driving concern.

For years, activists have complained about Russia’s poor record caring for the oceans. The country was ranked No. 2 out of 152 nations in a recent study of global efforts to combat illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing prepared by consulting firm Poseidon and the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. Only China scored worse.

Allegations of illegal fishing have even followed Russia to the south pole, where a Russian ship in 2020 was accused of faking its location data to fish illegally off season. A Russian observer was also found to be behind anomalous catch data from several Antarctic fishing vessels. In both cases, Russia denied any wrongdoing.

At a congressional hearing this month on the Russian seafood ban, Rep. Jared Huffman, a California Democrat, led calls for the expansion of NOAA’s Seafood Import Monitoring Program, which aims to prevent illegal seafood from entering U.S. supply chains by tracking shipments from the point of catch. Currently the program covers just 13 species, only two of which — red king crab and Atlantic cod — are fished by Russia.

“Until that happens, Russian seafood will continue to line grocery store shelves and American consumers will continue to unwittingly support Putin’s war machine,” Huffman said.

But some worry further isolation of Russia’s seafood industry could backfire and slow important reform efforts driven by demand from Western consumers to know the origins of the fish on their plates.

Peter Quinter, a former U.S. Customs Service attorney, said that the Biden administration can easily close the China loophole by requiring importers to inspect their supply chains to make sure none of their fish comes from Russia. He cited as a model recent legislation requiring retailers to obtain certification from the U.S. government that their goods were not produced using forced labor by Uyghur Muslims in China’s Xinjiang province.

“They can and should fix this,” said Quinter, who now advises seafood companies on compliance with American trade law. “The old days of being sure your fish is caught in a single place or country is no longer the case.”

Social Sharing

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Major tracking project will look at eider duck populations in Maine and parts of Atlantic Canada

Raechel Huizinga · CBC News · Posted: Apr 16, 2022 9:00 AM AT | Last Updated: 8 hours ago

21

comments

Scientists from a United States research institute are gearing up to travel to Grand Manan, N.B., at the end of this month to implant tracking devices in some eider ducks and set them free again.

The hope is that those ducks will someday shed light on why the species is declining in places like New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Maine, but increasing in others, like Newfoundland and Labrador.

It’s something that has puzzled scientists for more than a decade, and while research on the topic has been done before, it has never been done on this scale, said Dustin Meattey, director of the waterfowl program at the Biodiversity Research Institute in Maine.

Officials in Canada and the U.S. are working together on the project. Partners include the Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Maine’s Department of Fisheries and Wildlife and Acadia University.

Together, researchers will capture and tag breeding eiders throughout their range ⁠— the geographic area where a species can be found.

They started with eiders in Maine and Quebec last year. Now, they’re moving onto New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and potentially Newfoundland and Labrador, unless there is a later breeding season this year due to snow. If that’s the case, Meattey said they’ll go there next year.

While location data from the transmitters will help scientists learn more about different distribution patterns, migration routes and types of habitat, Meattey said they’re really trying to hone in on the proportion of birds that are breeding. 

Eider ducks are primarily capital breeders, meaning that prior to nesting, females must acquire all the nutrients they need to make their eggs and sit on them, which can take up to four weeks.

“They’ll very rarely leave the nest during incubation,” Meattey said.

The nesting ducks need their bodies to be strong enough to last the entire period, but if environmental conditions stop that from happening, Meattey said they might just skip the breeding season altogether.

The eiders’ primary food source is blue mussels, making areas with large blue mussel beds important, Meattey said. 

That’s the reason behind one theory about why eider ducks might be declining: they feed on blue mussels in the Gulf of Maine, which is one of the fastest warming bodies of water on the planet. Meattey said blue mussels have a narrow window of water conditions they can survive in.

“As the waters warm, that affects the distribution of blue mussels, [and] they can’t survive as well toward the southern part of their range in the warmer waters,” he said.

There are other theories about why the eider ducks might be declining, Meattey said, including the presence of green crabs, an invasive species that moves north as waters warm, which impacts blue mussel beds.

Mark Mallory, a professor and the Canada research chair in coastal wetland ecosystems at Acadia University in Wolfville, N.S., has been studying eiders for more than 20 years, including 12 years living in the Arctic.

Shortly before the pandemic, he helped write a paper about the decline of the eider duck population that brought together the expert opinions of researchers from across the species’ range.

“Virtually everyone agreed that we think that there’s some underlying sort of range-wide issues going on with the marine environment,” Mallory said, also referencing warming waters, blue mussels and green crabs.

He said there are a few reasons why researchers on both sides of the border have a keen interest in finding out why eider duck populations are decreasing.

First, Canada and the U.S. are signatories to the Migratory Bird Convention Act, an international agreement to monitor and conserve migratory bird populations.

There’s also economic interest in eider ducks, which are hunted and harvested for their feathers.

“Anytime that we’ve got humans harvesting any species … and you want to do that in a sustainable way, you have to work to figure out that if the amount that you’re taking from the population is sustainable,” he said.

Mallory said data is already starting to come in on the eiders from Maine and Quebec that were tagged last year, and more data will start arriving next year from the ducks in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. He said the data will become more reliable after three or four years.

Mallory added that the health of eider ducks is also an indication of environmental health.

He said people are generally interested in and concerned about ducks from a conservation point of view, recalling how earlier that morning, someone sent him a photo of people looking at a large flock of birds in Pubnico, N.S.

And he said if humans are responsible for the species’ decline, we have a duty to help.

“If we’re changing the environment … and we’re responsible for it, I think we’ve got some sort of moral reason that we should be trying to fix that,” said Mallory.

“Eiders may just be one signal or one symbol of what’s going on in the much broader marine and coastal environments.”