by: Ben Breen

Posted: Aug 4, 2025 / 10:35 PM EDT

Updated: Aug 4, 2025 / 10:35 PM EDT

SHARE https://www.mychamplainvalley.com/news/local-news/plan-released-to-protect-rutland-county-hunting-trapping-wildlife/

MONTPELIER, Vt. (ABC22/FOX44) – Vermont officials want to make sure that two wildlife areas near Castleton are kept up for hunters and anglers in the generations to come.

Vermont’s Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) on Monday announced a plan for the next 20 years to manage the Birdseye and Blueberry Hill Wildlife Managment Areas (WMAs), an area totaling 4,725 acres in the towns of Castleton, Ira, and Poultney.Vermont reminds new hunters to take basic education courses

Birdseye WMA contains thousands of acres of forest as well as Birdseye Mountain, a known nesting site for peregrine falcons, while the smaller Blueberry Hill WMA is home to white-tailed deer in the winter.

In public comments from meetings in 2017 and 2021 about the plan, some concerns are echoed again and again. One member of the public said they learned to hunt in the area with their family, and many comments reflect the desire to preserve the area for hunting. “Less grouse and deer at this property than in the past,” reads one comment.

Up Next – William Byron on his NASCAR Cup win at Iowa Speedway

Other comments mention access for bikes, horses, and hiking, and birdwatchers talk about their experiences seeing warblers and falcons. Some comments are long, with suggestions for forest and wildlife management. Others are much shorter: “Keep it wild”; “Beautiful place”; or even just “It makes me happy.”Fish & Wildlife reminds the public to leave fawns alone

The finished plan includes requirements to keep at least 3% of the area as young forest. With its thinner trees and less deep shade, young forest is important for animals including moose, wild turkeys, foxes, and white-tailed deer; meanwhile, a full 25% of the area will be allowed to mature into old forest, with trees often older than 150 years old and fallen trees on the ground. Old forests are home to martens and barred owls while also serving to store carbon from the atmosphere.

Commissioner of Forest, Parks and Recreation Danielle Fitzko said the plan is a reflection of the philosophy of Vermont Conservation Design. “Sustainable forest management,” she said, “through both active tools like well-planned timber harvests and passive strategies that allow nature to shape the forest over time, will guide how we care for these lands.”

“I asked them, ‘Would you sue me for having pterodactyls?’ Because I have as many pterodactyls as I have feral Russian boars”

By Dac Collins

Published Jul 30, 2025 6:05 PM EDT

Sign up for the Outdoor Life Newsletter

Get the hottest outdoor news—plus a free month of onX Hunt Elite.Email addressSign Up

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Around four years after it took place, details are still emerging around the wild pig sting operation that was led by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, and which targeted several hunting properties on the Upper Peninsula, including one owned by Ted Nugent. Although the famous rocker and outspoken hunter has since been cleared by a judge of any wrongdoing, Nugent is still raising a ruckus about the agency’s policies and what he says is government overreach.

In late June, Nugent spoke in front of a Michigan House committee on alleged abuses by the DNR. (Skip to 4:30 to see Nugent speaking.) During his fiery testimony, which touched on everything from mourning doves to chronic wasting disease, he accused the agency of abusing its power and promoting “anti-nature and anti-science” regulations that harm the state’s hunters, anglers, and trappers. A pair of wildlife commissioners have called his testimony “appalling” and “unfair.”

0:10

At the heart of Nugent’s indignation was the 2021 sting operation that entangled him and three other landowners in a legal battle with the DNR. That operation initially targeted six high-fence hunting properties on the U.P. that were alleged to hold Russian boar or Russian boar hybrids, which are labeled an invasive species and are prohibited in Michigan. One of the properties was Nugent’s Sunrize Acres in Jackson County.

The DNR officers involved in the probe booked hog hunts at Sunrize and the other properties under false names. In one case, the officers told the owner they wanted to pay in cash so their wives wouldn’t find out, according to The Detroit News.

The sting remained a secret; the landowners didn’t know about the DNR’s operation until 2023, when four of them, including Nugent, were sued by the agency for allegedly keeping Russian boars. (A fifth location named in the original lawsuit was later dropped.) The DNR argued in court that it had used genetic testing to make its determinations. 

Read Next: Game Wardens Can Surveil Private Land with Trail Cams. But That’s Now Being Challenged in Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court

Nugent had already been cleared of any wrongdoing before his testimony. In May 2024, Ingham County Judge Richard Garcia ruled that the pigs on Nugent’s ranch and a second high-fence property were not actually Russian boars or hybrids, even though they looked a lot like them. (This was by design. Many breeders who sell hogs to hunting operations try to breed for the same physical characteristics as Russian boar hybrids, also known as “razorbacks.”)

“I asked them, ‘Would you sue me for having pterodactyls?” Nugent said in his testimony. “Because I have as many pterodactyls as I have feral Russian boars. And after tens of thousands of wasted, hard-earned dollars, some judge finally went, ‘Well, they’re not feral and they’re not Russian, and some of them are females!’”

As part of his May 2024 ruling, however, Judge Garcia determined that the two other hunting properties implicated in the DNR’s lawsuit, Freedom Ranch and Superior Wildlife, were in possession of Russian boars or hybrids. Garcia did not rely on the DNR’s genetic testing and focused on the hogs’ physical characteristics instead, according to additional reporting from The Detroit News. He noted in his ruling that the pigs from the two properties “could have been used by the DNR on its website as a prime example of a Russian boar or Russian boar hybrid.” 

Garcia originally gave the properties 60 days to comply with the DNR and exterminate all the Russian boars and hybrids they had in their possession. This led to further litigation, and the pigs were never removed.

Read Next: Texas Officials Kill Off Deer Breeder’s Entire Herd, Ending Yearslong Legal War Over CWD Management

On Tuesday, however, Garcia gave the two property owners an ultimatum. He said they could either kill all the Russian boars and hybrids within a year, or else the DNR would be allowed to enter the high-fence operations to remove them. He allowed the owners to allow paying customers to cull the animals, so they could at least get some of their investment back.

Garcia said Tuesday that the 12-month window should give the two hunting operations enough time to manage their own hogs “before we start rolling through there with helicopters and high powered rifles.”