Three million years ago, our ancestors were vegetarian, study finds

The Brighterside of NewsFollow

13.3K Followers

Story by Rebecca Shavit

 • 1mo • 

New isotope analysis of Australopithecus tooth enamel uncovers a plant-based diet, challenging long-held views on meat’s role in human evolution. (CREDIT: CC BY-SA 4.0)

New isotope analysis of Australopithecus tooth enamel uncovers a plant-based diet, challenging long-held views on meat’s role in human evolution. (CREDIT: CC BY-SA 4.0)© The Brighter Side of News

The evolution of human diets remains a captivating mystery, often tied to the consumption of animal resources. High-quality animal products such as meat, bone marrow, and eggs provide nutrients essential for brain development and overall health. However, the role of animal foods in shaping human evolution is complex and far from resolved.

Early ancestors like Australopithecus, who lived roughly 3.5 million years ago in southern Africa, mostly relied on plant-based diets.

Recent research, published in Science, analyzed nitrogen isotope ratios in the fossilized tooth enamel of seven Australopithecus individuals. These results show little to no evidence of regular meat consumption, challenging long-standing hypotheses about early hominin diets.

The Role of Diet in Evolution

Animal products are nutritionally dense and easier to digest than raw plant foods. They contain essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals crucial for brain and body development.One of the teeth from seven Australopithecus individuals that got drilled so a small amount of tooth enamel could be analyzed for evidence of meat consumption. (CREDIT: Tina Lüdecke)

One of the teeth from seven Australopithecus individuals that got drilled so a small amount of tooth enamel could be analyzed for evidence of meat consumption. (CREDIT: Tina Lüdecke)© The Brighter Side of News

The shift to consuming animal resources has been linked to the growth of brain size, increased stature, and reduced gut size in early humans. However, evidence suggests that Australopithecus did not partake in habitual meat consumption.

Australopithecus individuals lived in diverse environments, practiced bipedal locomotion, and possessed humanlike hand proportions.Related video: How Primitive Man Turns Acorns into Good Food (Chad Zuber)

about:blank

Chad Zuber

How Primitive Man Turns Acorns into Good Food

More videos

Fossil evidence, including 3.4-million-year-old cut marks on bones, hints at occasional use of tools for foraging. Yet, their diets remained predominantly plant-based, with minimal reliance on animal products. This contrasts with later hominins like Homo erectus and Neanderthals, who regularly consumed meat.

To uncover dietary habits, researchers used advanced techniques to measure nitrogen isotope ratios in fossilized tooth enamel from Australopithecus individuals. Tooth enamel, the hardest tissue in mammals, preserves dietary signatures for millions of years.

Related Stories

1.5 million-year-old footprints from two different co-existing human species found in Kenya

Early Homo Sapiens lived together with Neanderthals 45,000 years ago

8.7 million year-old fossil rewrites the story of human evolution

Nitrogen isotopes reveal an organism’s trophic level within a food web. Herbivores have higher nitrogen isotope ratios than plants, while carnivores have even higher ratios than herbivores.

Lead researcher Tina Lüdecke and her team analyzed enamel from specimens found in South Africa’s Sterkfontein Caves. The results showed consistently low nitrogen isotope ratios, similar to herbivores. These findings indicate that Australopithecus predominantly consumed plants.

“Tooth enamel is remarkable in its ability to preserve isotopic fingerprints for millions of years,” explains Lüdecke, who leads the “Hominin Meat Consumption” research group at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry. By comparing isotopic data with that of contemporary animals, the team confirmed the plant-based nature of the Australopithecus diet.

Minimal Meat Consumption

While evidence suggests occasional consumption of animal protein from eggs or insects, Australopithecus likely did not hunt large mammals. This contrasts with later hominins like Neanderthals, whose diets included significant proportions of meat.One of the teeth from seven Australopithecus individuals that got drilled so a small amount of tooth enamel could be analyzed for evidence of meat consumption. (CREDIT: Tina Lüdecke)

One of the teeth from seven Australopithecus individuals that got drilled so a small amount of tooth enamel could be analyzed for evidence of meat consumption. (CREDIT: Tina Lüdecke)© The Brighter Side of News

Advancements in isotopic analysis allowed researchers to extend dietary studies to fossils millions of years old. Alfredo Martínez-García’s lab at the Max Planck Institute developed the novel techniques used in this study.

“This method offers exciting opportunities to explore when meat consumption began and its role in evolutionary milestones such as brain growth,” says Martínez-García.

The Sterkfontein Caves, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, have been a focal point for hominin studies since Robert Broom’s discoveries in 1936. Professor Dominic Stratford, Director of Research at Sterkfontein, emphasizes the importance of this new work. “This study represents a major step in understanding the diets and evolutionary trajectory of early hominins,” he states.

Future research aims to analyze fossilized tooth enamel from other sites across Africa and Southeast Asia. By comparing data across species and time periods, scientists hope to identify the evolutionary transition to meat consumption and its impact on human development.Tina Lüdecke searching for suitable sampled teeth in the hominin vault of the Evolutionary Studies Institute at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. (CREDIT: Rani Bakkour, TU Munich)

Tina Lüdecke searching for suitable sampled teeth in the hominin vault of the Evolutionary Studies Institute at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. (CREDIT: Rani Bakkour, TU Munich)© The Brighter Side of News

“Our findings challenge previous assumptions and open new avenues for understanding human evolution,” Lüdecke concludes. The groundbreaking use of isotopic analysis provides fresh perspectives on early hominin diets and evolutionary history.

Note: Materials provided above by The Brighter Side of News. Content may be edited for style and length.

Chicago Fur Ban Fails In City Council After Black Caucus Backlash

Alderpeople rejected Ald. Ray Lopez’s proposal to ban the sale of new fur products by a 19-26 vote. Local fur shop owners said the ban would have forced them to close or leave the city.

by Quinn MyersMarch 12, 2025Updated March 13, 2025

Credibility:

  • Original Reporting
  • On the Ground
  • Sources Cited
Gerard Brown, Island Furs owner, speaks at a press conference opposing the proposed ban on sale of new fur before a City Council meeting on March 12, 2025. Credit: Colin Boyle/Block Club Chicago

CITY HALL — A proposed ban on the sale of new fur products within Chicago city limits was voted down by the City Council.

Introduced by Southwest Side Ald. Ray Lopez (15th), the ordinance had garnered both fierce support and opposition among City Council members and members of the public, some of whom spoke out on the issue before Wednesday’s full City Council meeting.

The ordinance passed through the council’s license committee last week, and with 23 co-sponsors appeared to have a good chance of winning final approval. But in recent days the council’s Black Caucus was joined by numerous other aldermen in opposing the measure, including some who had initially backed it.

The fur ban ultimately failed to win approval by a 19-26 vote.

Alderpeople voted down a proposed ban on the sale of new fur products by a 19-26 vote on March 12, 2025. Credit: Provided

Proponents of the ordinance said that it would fight animal cruelty, citing inhumane tactics like electrocution used to extract fur for coats and other products.

“There is no humane way to produce a fur product. From birth to death, it is a painful experience for these beautiful wild animals,” Jodie Wiederkehr, executive director of the Chicago Alliance for Animals, told Block Club this week.

RELATED: Should Chicago Ban Fur? Proposal Puts Animal Rights Activists And Small Businesses At Odds

If passed, the measure would have made it illegal to “sell, offer for sale, trade or otherwise distribute for monetary or non-monetary consideration a fur product in the city.” Exemptions were included for used fur products or furs used for religious reasons or cultural and spiritual purposes by Native American tribes.

But critics characterized the law as government overreach, and said it would cause the six furriers that are currently open in Chicago to likely close. That includes Gerard Brown, who owns Island Furs at 1827 W. 103rd St. in Beverly — one of only a handful of Black-owned fur shops in the entire country.

“This would put me out of business, and that’s wrong. This is my livelihood,” Brown told Block Club.

The ban would have made Chicago the 17th U.S. city to enact a prohibition on fur and the first in Illinois, according to the Fur Free Alliance. Many of the 16 municipalities with such a law are located in California, which also passed the ban at the state level.

Ald. Raymond Lopez (15th) and Ald. Matthew O’Shea (19th) talk during a City Council meeting on Dec. 2, 2024. Credit: Colin Boyle/Block Club Chicago

Far Southwest Side Ald. Matt O’Shea (19th), whose ward includes Island Furs as well as Andriana Furs, 2201 W. 95th St. in Beverly, emerged as one of the most vocal Council critics of the fur ban.

He was one of three aldermen to vote against the proposal at last week’s committee hearing, and joined Brown, Ald. Stephanie Coleman (16th) and others at a press conference Wednesday to oppose the ordinance.

“Are we going to ban leather next? Are we going to ban beef? Are we going to put Ronald McDonald out of a job?” O’Shea said. “This is about personal choice. As elected officials, our job is to do whatever we can to protect our citizens, to improve our schools, to attract business. It’s not to tell people ‘you should be able to buy this and you shouldn’t be able to buy that.’”

O’Shea later sang a few words from the famous Andriana Furs theme song on the Council floor while giving an impassioned speech against the ban.

Also rising to speak in opposition to the measure, Coleman said any anti-fur efforts should be legislated on a state level, not in Chicago where there are no licensed fur farms. The proposed ban also ignores the cultural significance of fur products in the Black community, she said.

“For Black women, furs are about embracing elegance in the world that has not been kind to us,” said Coleman, who is the current chair of the council’s Black Caucus. “It is about our pride and strength and ability to access a luxury item.”

Near the end of the brief formal debate on the ordinance, Lopez said the goal of his proposed ban, which would not go into effect until a year after its passage, was a way to “help a business that is on the decline prepare for the 21st century.”

“The facts state quite clearly that natural fur is on the decline,” Lopez said, citing data showing fur production has gone down steadily in recent years.

“Change is hard, but we also need to show…our children, to Chicagoans, that this body can also stand for having compassion and empathy in how we deal with all things alive, moving forward” he added.

No other alderpeople spoke in favor of the ban, but numerous Chicagoans did show up at City Hall to support it on Wednesday.

That included Pilsen resident Samuel Mosley, who was handing out flyers about the cruelty of the fur trade on LaSalle Street before the meeting. He said the city can “walk and chew gum at the same time” by combatting pressing issues like public safety while also moving to ban new fur products.

“Fur is some of the most grotesque, awful animal cruelty that exists,” Mosley said. “The footage from repeated undercover investigations show that there is no humane fur, and the best way to combat it here, where there are no fur farms in the city, is…to ban retailers from selling new fur.”

Mayor Brandon Johnson was neutral on the issue, staffers said on Wednesday.

Tim Moran contributed.

Animals succeed in solving major problem where scientists had failed: ‘It’s just incredible’

The mystery was solved when researchers heard loud chewing noises.

by Zachary EhrmannMarch 13, 2025

The mystery was solved when researchers heard loud chewing noises.

Photo Credit: Depositphotos.com

California’s sea otters have become surprising environmental champions by tackling a destructive invasive species wreaking havoc in Elkhorn Slough. These adorable marine mammals have naturally solved a problem scientists have struggled with for years, according to CBS.

For decades, invasive European green crabs have threatened Monterey County’s delicate Elkhorn Slough ecosystem. These unwanted visitors arrived in the late 1980s, likely as stowaways on boats, and quickly began outcompeting native species and disrupting the entire habitat.

“Green crabs wreak havoc on native ecosystems. So once green crabs showed up on the U.S. West Coast, it was a major concern,” Rikke Jeppesen, a scientist for the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, told CBS San Francisco.

Scientists had set countless traps to control the invaders, but the crabs always returned in overwhelming numbers. Then something unexpected happened: The crabs began disappearing without explanation. 

The mystery was solved, the CBS report said, when researchers heard loud chewing noises near their traps. 

The culprits? Sea otters with great appetites for invasive crustaceans.

Watch now: Giant snails invading New York City?

Giant snails invading New York City?

0 seconds of 41 secondsVolume 0%

00:35

00:42

00:42

Around 100 sea otters now call Elkhorn Slough home, devouring tens of thousands of green crabs annually. Their natural predation has accomplished what humans couldn’t achieve despite investing millions of dollars to root out the invasive crabs. 

This remarkable, natural ecological service benefits local communities by preserving the ecosystem while saving taxpayer money on expensive control programs.

Volunteer Ron Eby also pointed out how the recovering otter population boosts the local economy as well: “The income here is several million dollars a week, so it’s just incredible.”

Should we be actively working to kill invasive species? Absolutely 💯 It depends on the species 🤔 I don’t know 🤷 No — leave nature alone 🙅Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.

The total California sea otter population currently stands around 3,000, according to the CBS report — still far below previous numbers, which once reached tens of thousands along the coast. Nevertheless, their success story in Elkhorn Slough demonstrates how restoring predator populations can provide natural solutions to environmental problems.

TCD Picks » Quince Spotlight

💡These best-sellers from Quince deliver affordable, sustainable luxury for all

This popular cashmere sweater just got an upgrade

Starting at $50

Sleep serenely on these luxury sheets at 50% off retail

Starting at $99

You’ll love the pockets on this European linen dress

Starting at $60

This cotton blazer’s price is even smarter than its look

Starting at $80

“Never before have I done anything that anyone cared that much about,” Jeppesen said of the notable discovery. The otters’ unexpected role shows that sometimes the best environmental solutions come from within nature itself.

There could be a similar challenge in your own area that needs this kind of attention. While not everyone is able to get as hands-on, there are a number of ways to take action in your community and help the environment — from volunteering to donating to signing petitions that represent the interests you believe in.