He gave his cats raw milk because he thought it was healthier. He says it tragically backfired

Image

1 of 2 |  

This photo provided by Joseph Journell of San Bernardino, Calif. shows two of his cats, Alexander, background, and Tuxsie, right, who died from bird flu after they drank raw cow’s milk. Cleo, center, did not drink the milk and remained healthy. (Joseph Journell via AP)Read More

Image

2 of 2 |  

This photo provided by Joseph Journell of San Bernardino, Calif. shows two of his cats drinking raw cow’s milk in November 2024 before the milk was recalled in December 2024 for containing H5N1 bird flu virus. Big Boy, left, was hospitalized, but survived. Alexander, right, died. (Joseph Journell via AP)Read More

https://apnews.com/article/raw-milk-california-cats-bird-flu-c3f6201216efb2a7e98ca143329a631a

By  JONEL ALECCIAUpdated 5:06 AM PST, January 12, 2025Share

A California man whose two cats died after drinking raw milk recalled for bird flu risk says he meant to keep his beloved pets healthy, but his efforts tragically backfired.

“It’s horrible when you realize that you’re the one that actually gave them the milk that killed them,” said Joseph Journell, 56, of San Bernardino.

Journell lost his 14-year-old tabby, Alexander, and Tuxsie, a 4-year-old tuxedo cat, in late November. A third cat, 4-year-old Big Boy, was hospitalized for a week before tests showed the animal was infected with the H5N1 bird flu virus.

The cats drank unpasteurized milk from lots recalled by Raw Farm, of Fresno, whose dairy products were pulled from California store shelves in December after health officials found the virus in milk for sale, he said. The animals’ deaths were confirmed by state and county health officials. The cats were kept indoors, with no access to potentially infected birds, and ate conventional, not raw, pet food, the owner said.

Advertisement

Journell said he had been drinking Raw Farm milk himself for several months because he heard it had “better immunity and healing properties” than pasteurized milk. He thought it might be able to help Alexander, who had been losing weight.

Related Stories

Cats can get bird flu from raw food. Here's how to protect them

Cats can get bird flu from raw food. Here’s how to protect them

USDA orders nationwide testing of milk for bird flu

USDA orders nationwide testing of milk for bird flu

Raw milk recall in California expands after more bird flu virus detected

Raw milk recall in California expands after more bird flu virus detected

“I was trying to make him healthier and make him live longer,” Journell said.

Instead, Alexander died on Thanksgiving Day. Tuxsie followed two days later.

Big Boy was hospitalized and treated with antiviral medications, Journell said. The veterinary team collected urine samples from the cat, which were confirmed positive for H5N1 at labs run by the U.S. Agriculture Department and Cornell University, records show.

Big Boy returned home blind and without the use of his back legs, though he is recovering, Journell said. A fourth cat, Cleo, didn’t drink the milk and remained healthy.

Journell has demanded that Raw Farm owner Mark McAfee compensate him for the more than $12,000 he spent treating the cats, according Seattle food safety lawyer Ilana Korchia, who is representing him.

Advertisement

In an interview, McAfee disputed that the virus was capable of sickening the animals days after it was bottled and sold, citing preliminary research.

But Richard Webby, an influenza expert at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, said flu virus survival likely varies widely in different lots of milk. Experts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention previously confirmed that cats that drank raw milk from infected cows developed neurological disease and died.

“I think the poor cats are the best indicator!” Webby wrote in an email.

Nearly a dozen cats in California have died since early December after consuming raw milk or raw pet food contaminated with bird flu, health officials have said.

The infections have followed a massive outbreak of the bird flu virus in dairy cows, which has affected in more than 900 U.S. dairy herds in 16 states. About 80% of those herds are in California.

Federal and state health officials have warned people not to drink raw milk because of the potential for infection with bird flu and a host of other germs. Officials also have cautioned pet owners to avoid feeding unpasteurized milk and raw meat diets to their animals.

Advertisement

“Cats should not be fed any products from affected farms if those products have not been thoroughly cooked or pasteurized to kill the virus,” the FDA warned last month.

After the cats got sick, Journell said he fell ill himself and sought care at a Kaiser Permanente hospital in Fontana, Calif. He said he wasn’t checked for bird flu, despite his known exposure to the virus, because medical staff didn’t have tests available to detect it.

A Kaiser spokesperson declined to comment on Journell’s case specifically, but said the hospital system is following CDC guidelines for screening for bird flu.

Journell has recovered physically but said he’s still suffering from the “mental anguish” of losing his pets. Despite the ordeal, he said he still thinks raw milk offers some health benefits.

Nevertheless, he won’t be drinking it any time soon.

“Not right now,” he said. “And not in the foreseeable future.”

Exploring Kansas Outdoors: How to survive an unsuccessful deer season

Posted Jan 12, 2025 6:01 AM

Steve Gilliland. Courtesy photo 
Steve Gilliland. Courtesy photo 

By STEVE GILLILAND

As I left our deer blind this morning ahead of the approaching winter storm, the windows of my pickup were already icing over, and my driveway was so slick already, I nearly feel on my butt when I stepped out of the truck at home. That should have answered the nagging question “Did I stay long enough in the blind?” Yet here I sit, a little guy on my shoulder whispering in my ear “What a loser; you should have stayed loooonger!”

This has been a different and exasperating deer season for many hunters in my area.

Several local hunters have come away without harvesting deer, as the deer just don’t appear to be here. The moon was full or bright for much of the regular firearms season, raising the excuse that the deer were simply moving at night. That coupled with the unseasonably mild weather, makes that theory more than plausible.

But an avid deer hunter nearby told me he has seen fewer pictures on his cameras this year than any year he can remember. The three years of drought that has plagued our state might also be a factor, as drought affects fawn survival and forces deer to drink from stagnant water holes which foster diseases like Blue Tongue.

Around here, it always seems the nearer the river, the more deer there are.

ADVERTISING

With that in mind, I was given the chance to hunt from a friend’s raised blind close to the river. He had gotten a buck there opening morning, but for the next several days, I saw a total of two small bucks. The owner even sat with me one morning this week during antlerless season as a second set of eyes, and we saw nothing.

The farmer just across the fence had counted 17 in the field well after dark one night as he worked in the field, again, lending credence to the theory that the deer were moving at night. But this morning ahead of the storm, a 13-year-old girl got her first deer from that blind, which happened to be the only deer they saw.

Volumes have been written instructing deer hunters how to have a successful deer season, but try as I might, I can’t find anything consoling those of us who failed to harvest a deer this year, or instructing us how to cope for the next twelve months.

So, besides giving you the names of the local psychiatrists and advising you to just go out and buy half a hog, I’ll try to offer some advice as coming from a deer hunter who’s been down that “empty freezer” road more than once.

First and foremost, you know how I feel about the term “unsuccessful” as it relates to any hunting trip or outdoor adventure. I live by the cliché that a bad day in the woods is still better than a good day at work or most other places for that matter.

I have to remind myself that watching the owl silently land in the tree in front of our blind, or hearing the wailing howls of coyotes help make the morning anything but “unsuccessful.”

Failure to harvest a deer doesn’t necessarily mean you did something wrong. If you missed an easy shot or spooked the deer by being seen, smelled or heard, yes, that was your mistake. But things beyond our control affect deer harvests also.

So, here’s my advice to all deer hunters who didn’t connect this year.

First, figure out how to correct mistakes that might have cost you your venison. This can include spending time at the range if you missed an easy shot.

Secondly, get permission to hunt more property. One cannot have too many places to hunt deer; it’s like having too much money! The more ground you can hunt, the better the odds of finding deer under any circumstance.

Last, and certainly not least, spend time in the field or woods with your binoculars. I grew up hunting Ohio whitetails with a group of guys that included a couple seasoned deer hunters. When deer season ended, it became a tradition to ask each other “Well, are you eating venison or bologna?” Pre-season scouting can often mean the difference between venison and bologna for the next twelve months.

Now that I’ve finished this week’s contribution, please excuse me while I get to work on recipes for my new cookbook, 101 Ways to Cook Bologna…

Continue to Explore Kansas Outdoors.

Don’t stuff sandhill crane hunt down throat of Wisconsin. It will only divide us | Opinion

Committee recommended the legislature direct the DNR “to authorize sandhill crane hunting in Wisconsin.” This bypasses the normal decision-making by the Natural Resources Board.

Tim Eisele, Dave Clausen and Mark Martin

Special to Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

0:23

/

0:29

When the new legislature meets it should take recommendations of the Legislative Council’s Study Committee on sandhill cranes with a grain of salt.

The committee was established with the strong influence of the Wisconsin Waterfowl Association which is trying to stuff a proposal to hunt sandhill cranes down the throats of Wisconsinites.

The study committee included the association’s vice president, plus representatives of the corn and potato growers’ associations. It would have been a miracle if they did not favor a hunting season on sandhill cranes.

Committee stacked testimony and findings in favor of hunt

The committee took selected testimony from Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Executive Director Bruce Ross and put it in the form of a Summary of Findings, which not everyone on the committee supported. In addition, the committee:

•Failed to heed the comments of past DNR waterfowl ecologist Kent Van Horn who in August said that a hunting season in the fall is no guarantee it would help crop depredations in the spring. Van Horn also made it clear the decision to open a hunting season on cranes is a social decision.

•Heard from invited speakers only, and did not invite hunters against the season to express their views.

•Based their recommendation on the Constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to hunt, fish and trap in Wisconsin. That amendment does not guarantee open seasons on all species in the state.

Opinion:Wisconsin has stable and growing sandhill crane population. A hunt shouldn’t cause rancor.

Opinion:Sandhill crane hunting season isn’t a fit for Wisconsin. It would further divide us.

•Overlooked that the DNR has not recommended opening a sandhill crane hunting season in Wisconsin.

The committee passed a recommendation for the legislature directing the DNR “to authorize sandhill crane hunting in Wisconsin.” This bypasses the normal decision-making by the Natural Resources Board (NRB) to open a season. 

Setting seasons by the legislature is bad precedent, which later can’t easily be changed and it (intentionally) bypasses the established system of opening hunting and fishing seasons by the NRB. The NRB is where biological and sociological justifications come together and where any decision should be made.

If they had any legitimate intent to do what was right for Wisconsin, they would have recognized that the current crop damage law is flawed.  It pays crop damage fees for species that are hunted, theoretically justifying a hunt if farmers are to get reimbursed.

Wildlife belongs to everyone and that law needs to be amended so that damages are funded with GPR funds so everyone can pay for damage to crops.

Sandhill crane season will only further divide hunters and nonhunters

The question, whether a sandhill crane season should be opened is part biological, but the real question is sociological: why?

Why isn’t a sandhill crane season appropriate for Wisconsin?  The answer is evident to many who read Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac: “The trumpet in the orchestra of evolution,” as Leopold described the call of Sandhill cranes, are special to Wisconsinites.

Opinion:‘Wisconsin Guarantee’ only assures that high school students fixate on grades

Letters to the Editor:I’ll take squawking over gunshots. Keep sandhill cranes off the kill list

Many surveys show that most citizens do not support a season. A season will only further divide hunters and non-hunters, when the opposite is needed. Hunting seasons differ from state to state. Look no further than Nebraska which has thousands of sandhill cranes and does not hunt cranes.

 Not every state hunts every species, and Wisconsin does not need, and surveys show that a majority of citizens do not want, a hunting season on sandhill cranes.

Let’s bring hunters and non-hunters together so that both carry their fair share of funding for natural resources management, not further divide them.

Tim Eisele is a hunter and freelance outdoor writer/photographer. He has twice been the Conservation Communicator of the Year from the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation and he is a member of the Wisconsin Waterfowl Association. Dave Clausen is a life-long hunter, retired veterinarian and former Chair of the Wisconsin Natural Resources Board. Mark Martin is a hunter, member of Wisconsin Waterfowl Association, and wetland owner with nesting sandhill cranes.  He was inducted into the Wisconsin Conservation Hall of Fame in 2023.

Actress Spills Hollywood Trick For Slim Body: “We All Do It”Here’s what Hollywood star Maggie Q does to achieve a balanced, healthy digestive system, all-day natural energy, reduced bloating and improved skin glow.Experts In Getting Slimmer|

Ad

Top Doctor: If You Eat Eggs Every Day, This Is What HappensThis Doctor has decided to release a short video to the public.Supplements and Wellness Resources|

Ad

Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later One Teaspoon Every Night Burns Body Fat Like Never Before, You Will Fit In Your Pants Again!Health Benefits|

Ad

Why Every Trainer Needs BlazePod in 2025BlazePod is changing the way athletes train. Boost performance with smart reaction lights that improve speed, focus, and coordination. Make 2025 your strongest year yet!BlazePod|

AdShop Now

Cardiologists: Add This 1 Thing To Your Coffee To Turn On Fat Burning ModeDiscover how a simple purple peel trick helps reduce stubborn belly fat effectively!Health Wellness Journal|

Ad

Washington Drivers With No DUIs Getting Paid on SundayWho Normally Has The Cheapest Car Insurance?FinanceAdvisors|

Ad

Top Cardiologists: Slim Down By Mixing This Into Your CoffeeHealth Wellness Journal|

AdWatch Now

7 Wealth Tips Once Your Portfolio Reaches $1 MillionFisher Investments|

AdLearn More

The best walking shoes are suitable for men to wear all day.Bestbestones|

AdShop Now

Flight Attendant Reveals How To Fly Business Class For The Price of EconomyCoupon Code Finder|

Ad

Deal of the Day

The Mary Poppins Bag Got An Upgrade: Save 39% On The Fit + Fresh All The Things BagUSA TODAY NETWORK

Save $50 On A Smart Device That Basically Brushes Your Child’s Teeth For ThemUSA TODAY NETWORK

Recommendations are independently chosen by our editors. Purchases you make through our links may earn us a commission.

Recommended

Outgoing Packers president/CEO Mark Murphy always valued team alumnisports

New Small Electric Car For Seniors – The Price May Surprise YouFavoriteSearches | Search Ads|

Ad

Doctors: Sleep Apnea Treatment Without CPAP (It’s Genius)Papmd|

Ad

More Local Stories

What started the wildfires raging across the Los Angeles area?news

All the celebrities who lost homes in LA firesentertainment

Charlie Berens gets kicked out of Milwaukee’s Central Standard in hilarious new video skitentertainment

Jocelyn Wildenstein, socialite dubbed ‘Catwoman’ dead at 84: Reportsentertainment

The Secret Trick That’s Slashing Fuel Consumption NationwideShopOptrimo|

AdClick Here

This Happens to Your Body When You Drink Almond Milk Every DayExperts In Getting Slim|

AdLearn More

Smart CPAP Users Swear By This For Mouth Leaks & Dry MouthPapmd|

Ad

7 Ways to Retire Comfortably With $1 MillionFisher Investments|

AdLearn More

More Local Stories

Teen killed in Waukesha crash remembered as ‘light to all who knew her’communities

Missing surfer likely dead in shark attack; man’s surfboard recoverednews

Donald Trump comments twice on death of former President Jimmy Carternews

MyPillow to pay DHL nearly $778,000 for lawsuit over unpaid billsmoney

More Stories

Trump discusses viral exchange with Obama at Jimmy Carter’s funeralnews

Why not use ocean water to fight LA fires? It’s not that simple.news

I received so many compliments while wearing this sweater.Made in USA|

Sponsored Links

Surveys indicate there’s scant waterfowl habitat

Today at 3:16 a.m.

by Bryan Hendricks

Follow

ADVERTISEMENT

Recent waterfowl aerial surveys conducted in Arkansas and Mississippi illustrate how little duck habitat exists in those two states.

Bracketed between the Mississippi Flyway and the eastern edge of the Central Flyway, Arkansas has more diverse habitat than Mississippi and more potential for restoring or creating new habitat. The Arkansas River Valley has significant potential. Unfortunately, wing dams and revetments have turned backwaters and marshes into scrub land. It is detrimental to waterfowl and especially to fisheries.

The Mississippi Flyway is our bread and butter. Its role as the winter repository for ducks, particularly mallards, made Arkansas the duck hunting capital of the world. We still are the hunting capital of the world for what few ducks remain, with increasingly high numbers of hunters concentrated into the same amount of habitat.

The Mississippi Alluvial Plain (Delta) once contained about 25 million acres of prime waterfowl habitat, mostly in the form of forested wetlands that extended from southeastern Missouri to southern Louisiana. That acreage has been reduced to about 300,000.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Delta comprises roughly one-third of Arkansas’ land mass, but only a small percentage contains prime waterfowl habitat. The map that the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission included with its most recent aerial survey shows about 153,000 mallards concentrated in about 30 areas from Missouri to Louisiana. Only eight areas have high concentrations. A mere 153,000 mallards were distributed across about 10 million acres, but only in the fraction of those 10 million acres that had water.

At the start of 2025, rainfall has put a lot more water on the landscape, but the weather north of Arkansas has not been cold enough to push many new ducks into the state.

From this we posit three scenarios.

One, a relatively small number of ducks is now sparsely distributed across a greater amount of acreage.

Two, a relatively small number of ducks remain concentrated in different areas as they bounce around to exploit fresh food sources.

ADVERTISEMENT

Three — the theory supported by my observers in southeast Arkansas — is that rain and thunderstorms pushed the ducks “out of the country” to more hospitable climates. I don’t know where that would be. It rained all over the country last weekend.

The key datum, however, is that a limited amount of prime waterfowl habitat is available in America’s most important waterfowl wintering area.

Mississippi’s portion of the Delta is less than half of Arkansas’s portion, about 4.5 million acres. The Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks conducted its last aerial waterfowl survey Dec. 10-13. It estimated 302,000 ducks in its entire portion of the Delta. Only 49,533 were mallards. That’s 57% less than the long-term average for the survey period. Only four areas had high distributions of ducks, “high” being described as more than 115 ducks per square mile.

Most of Mississippi’s Delta contained what was generously described as “medium” concentrations of ducks, with a range of 12-115 per square mile. About 20 areas had fewer than 12 ducks per square mile.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unlike Arkansas, the duck hunting culture in western Mississippi appears to have waned to irrelevance. Lamar Boyd of Beaver Dam Lake Hunting Services recently told us very few residents of Tunica County hunt ducks. Boyd makes this assessment from a credible perch. He guides at Beaver Dam Lake, one of the America’s most famous duck hunting locations. Most of his clients are non-residents. People his age and younger in Tunica County don’t hunt ducks. They hunt deer. The small amount of duck habitat is leased and not accessible to local people. Deer are everywhere, and they are accessible.

Boyd said he believes the lack of local interest bodes poorly for duck hunting and duck conservation. If there’s no demand for duck habitat, then there is no compelling reason to supply duck habitat.

On the other hand, low supply of a commodity increases the value of the supply. This, in turn, increases the value of the remaining amount of duck habitat. That creates a potential growth market in which there is value in creating new duck habitat.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eventually winter precipitation will return to the prairies and refresh breeding habitat. Ducks will prosper. If we want them to keep coming, it would behoove us to beckon them with more habitat and food.