State approves new wolf and coyote trapping regulations to limit conflicts with grizzlies

https://assets.scrippsdigital.com/cms/video/player.html?video=https://content.uplynk.com/7d390219922c45b69ac9bb60e90c78c7.m3u8&mp4=https://x-default-stgec.uplynk.com/ause/slices/7d3/b1fb2806e11149eb913b74193acbda23/7d390219922c45b69ac9bb60e90c78c7/7d390219922c45b69ac9bb60e90c78c7_e.mp4&autoplay=false&purl=/news/state-approves-new-wolf-and-coyote-trapping-regulations-to-limit-conflicts-with-grizzlies&ads.iu=/6088/ssp.ktvh/news/state-approves-new-wolf-and-coyote-trapping-regulations-to-limit-conflicts-with-grizzlies&ads.proxy=1&poster=https://x-default-stgec.uplynk.com/ause/slices/7d3/b1fb2806e11149eb913b74193acbda23/7d390219922c45b69ac9bb60e90c78c7/poster_307319fb7d274443bf4b290a7d06c460.jpg&title=New%20MT%20wolf%20and%20coyote%20trapping%20regs%20aim%20to%20limit%20conflicts%20with%20grizzlies&kw=Allie%20Kaiser%20%2CCoyote%20trapping%20%2CDustin%20Temple%2CGrizzly%20bear%20capture%20%2CGrizzly%20bears%20%2CKC%20York%2CKTVH%2CKarli%20Johnson%2CMTN%20News%2CMontana%20Farm%20Bureau%20Federation&contplay=*recent&mute=0&tags=Homepage%20Showcase%2CNews%2CHelena%20News%2CMontana%20News%2CNeighborhood%20News&section=News&cust_params=temp%3D%26weather%3D&host=ktvh.com&s=ktvh&env=production

Coyote

By: Allie Kaiser

Posted 5:12 PM, Nov 12, 2024

and last updated 8:47 AM, Nov 13, 2024

HELENA — The Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission passed regulations for recreational coyote and wolf trapping in an attempt to reduce the amount of incidental grizzly bear trappings.

FWP Commission meeting

“This would be designed to prevent any further incidents of grizzly bear by-catch while preserving the ability of trappers to continue to support the livestock industry by working with producers both on private land and any allotments they might have,” said Dustin Temple, the Director of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 



During the commission meeting on Tuesday, the regulations were passed and will impact western Montana, the Rocky Mountain Front, and areas of Montana near Yellowstone National Park.

In this area, wolf and coyote trapping would start later on January 1st and end sooner on February 15th.

Impacted area

Temple said, “A lot of coyote trapping occurs outside of the particular time frame when we believe bears to be asleep, so we want to make sure that we’ve got a way to mitigate the potential impact of recreational trapping on grizzly bears, so we can continue to show Montanans, the rest of the country and particularly that fish and wildlife services is ready, willing, and able to manage grizzly bears.”

Trappers doing livestock protection must fill out and sign a declaration saying they have the producer’s permission to trap on their land.

Regulations poster

The new rules also contain regulations that would take effect if a grizzly is found to be caught or injured in a foothold trap or snare in grizzly bear country.


Temple said, “One of the state’s responsibilities that it needs to fulfill in order to return that bear to state management is we have to show that we have a regulatory structure in place that will protect bears [and] continue to make sure they’re healthy.”



The regulations saw opposition from environmental groups like Trap Free Montana 

and ranchers who expressed concerns about having their information on declarations.

Attendees

“Trap and snare modifications will only apply after a grizzly is known trapped, but since we have no required trap check, other than two limited exceptions, the grizzly could be trapped a week or more,” said KC York, president of Trap Free Montana. 



A Montana Farm Bureau Federation representative, Karli Johnson, said, “Trapping is a controversial topic that merits public discourse, but these conversations should not be on the doorsteps of ranchers that are engaging in legal and responsible activities to protect their livestock.” 



It is important to note that these regulations cover the 2024 trapping season.

You can find more information about the trapping regulations here.

West-central Montana hunter success down at midpoint


by NBC Montana StaffTue, November 12th 2024 at 3:20 PM

UserWay icon for accessibility widget
Hunters at west-central check stations experienced a slow couple of weekends in comparison to the beginning of the season, according to Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Photo: NBC Montana

Hunters at west-central check stations experienced a slow couple of weekends in comparison to the beginning of the season, according to Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. Photo: NBC Montana

Comment bubble

chevron right arrow icon

MISSOULA, Mont. — Hunters at west-central check stations experienced a slow couple of weekends in comparison to the beginning of the season, according to Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

Despite the slow weekends harvest totals are still up from last year.

At check stations near Anaconda, Bonner and Darby there were 5,212 hunter stops in the first two weekends of the season, up from 5,014 last year.

In the same period hunters checked 196 elk up from 165 last year, 68 mule deer compared to 57 last year and 168 white-tailed deer compared to 172 in 2023.

Officials remind the public to stop at check stations regardless of if you harvested animals and the general big game season ends on Dec. 1.

Promoted Links

Empty heading

These Barefoot Shoes are Leaving Neuropathy Experts BaffledBarefoot Vitality

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks sent out the following:

At the midpoint of big game general hunting season, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks hunter check stations near Anaconda, Bonner and Darby all reported relatively quiet weekends, compared to the start of the season, but harvest totals remain up compared to last year.

Collectively, west-central Montana’s three FWP wildlife check stations saw 5,212 hunter stops during the first two weekends of the season, compared to 5,014 during the same period last year. Those hunters checked 196 elk, compared to 165 last year. They also reported 68 mule deer, compared to 57 in 2023 and 168 white-tailed deer, compared to 172.

Although deer harvest was slower during the third weekend, the deer rut picked up, and a handful of big mule deer and white-tailed deer bucks were harvested in all parts of the region. Mule deer harvest is up or on par with last year at all stations, and white-tailed deer harvest is down just slightly at the check station near Bonner, but on track with last season region-wide.

All stations are tracking on or above last season in elk harvest, with the biggest bump at the Bonner station of 38 elk, compared to 20 at the 2023 season midpoint.

Although wildlife check stations sample a relatively small portion of the overall effort and harvest, they capture important trends and biological information, and by stopping to report a harvest or an experience, hunters are helping with wildlife management in Montana. FWP reminds hunters they must stop at all wildlife check stations that they pass, even if they have not harvested any animals.

For more hunting season reminders and to track hunter success, stay tuned to the FWP weekly check station reports for west-central Montana. The general big game season runs through Sunday, Dec. 1.

Teen with bird flu in Canada hospitalized in critical condition

The teenager, who was previously healthy, had no farm exposure but had been exposed to dogs, cats and reptiles.

Avian influenza A viruses do not usually infect humans, however, several instances of human infections and outbreaks have been reported since 1997.

Health officials in British Columbia are still identifying the exact strain, but assume the case is H5N1.Smith Collection / Gado / Getty Images

Nov. 13, 2024, 6:14 AM PST / Source: Reuters

By Reuters

A teenager is in critical condition in a British Columbia children’s hospital, sick with Canada’s first presumptive human case of avian influenza.

“This was a healthy teenager prior to this, so no underlying conditions,” said provincial health officer Bonnie Henry in a news conference on Tuesday.

“It just reminds us that in young people this is a virus that can progress and cause quite severe illness and the deterioration that I mentioned was quite rapid.”

British Columbia health officials said on Saturday the province had detected Canada’s first human case of H5 bird flu in a teenager.

Henry said the province is still identifying the exact strain, but assumes the case is H5N1.

The World Health Organization says H5N1’s risk to humans is low because there is no evidence of human transmission, but the virus has been found in an increasing number of animals including cattle in the United States.

Henry would not disclose the teen’s gender or age but said they had first developed symptoms on Nov. 2 and were tested on Nov. 8, when they were admitted to hospital. Symptoms included conjunctivitis, fever and coughing.

As of Tuesday they were hospitalized with acute respiratory distress syndrome, she said.

Recommended

Health newsE. coli cases rise to 104 in outbreak linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders

Health newsNot just for weight loss: Wegovy may help curb alcohol addiction

The teen had no farm exposure but had been exposed to dogs, cats and reptiles, Henry said. No infection source had been identified. “That is absolutely an ongoing investigation.”

Bird flu has infected nearly 450 dairy farms in 15 U.S. states since March, and the CDC has identified 46 human cases of bird flu since April.

In Canada, British Columbia has identified at least 26 affected premises across the province, Henry said Tuesday, and numerous wild birds have tested positive.

Canada has had no cases reported in dairy cattle and no evidence of bird flu in samples of milk.

“H5N1 has historically been able to cause critical and fatal illness,” although cases involving this subtype have tended to be mild, Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease expert at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, wrote in an email, adding that it will be necessary to confirm it is indeed H5N1 and what subtype.

Trapping plan for Indiana bobcats, once listed as endangered, moving forward for 2025

Karl Schneider

Indianapolis Star

1:01

1:01

The state’s natural resource managers will hold a public hearing Thursday in southern Indiana on the upcoming bobcat trapping set to start next year despite concerns from many Hoosiers.

The Natural Resources Commission will meet Thursday in Butlerville to discuss rules for the proposed new season and hear from Hoosiers about the plans to allow bobcat trapping next year.

Advocates for the trapping season say bobcats need to be controlled so they don’t kill pets and livestock. Senator Scott Baldwin, R-Noblesville, who brought forward the legislation earlier this year that established a bobcat trapping season, said in January the growing population of the state’s only wild cat is a detriment to smaller wildlife species. Baldwin did not immediately respond to IndyStar for this article.

Following the passing of the legislation, which was signed into law by Gov. Eric Holcomb, Indiana’s DNR has proposed opening bobcat trapping to 40 counties in the southern portion of the state and set a statewide harvest cap at 250 cats.

The proposed season rules would allow licensed Hoosier trappers to take one bobcat per season and sell the hide.

If the Natural Resources Commission approves the proposed rules, the new season will begin in the fall of 2025.

Lack of study worries advocates

Samantha Chapman, Indiana state director for the Humane Society of the United States, is rallying support against the bobcat season.

“We’ve said from the very beginning that we just don’t know how many bobcats are in the state,” Chapman said. “It’s really important to have that information before determining a quota.”

The state used a population model developed by Purdue University “that incorporates the basic aspects of bobcat life history and simulates bobcat population dynamics in Indiana,” DNR spokesperson Marty Benson wrote in an email to IndyStar.

Get the Daily Briefing newsletter in your inbox.

Start your day with the morning’s top news

Delivery: DailyYour Email

“We are progressing with the rule following statutory requirements,” Benson wrote. “No separate study is required by the NRC or statute.”

Indiana also relies on bobcat reports Hoosier hunters send through the yearly Archer’s Index. This volunteer reporting relies on bow hunters reporting how long they spent hunting and what wildlife they saw in the field.

Chapman said she believes an increase in bobcat sightings across Indiana can be chalked up to the growing number of cameras set up along game trails.

Bobcats, once nearly gone from the state, have been recovering since first placed on Indiana’s endangered species list in 1969. The state removed them from the list in 2005 after reported roadkill and other mortalities increased in the early 2000s, according to a former furbearer biologist for DNR.

Indiana has about 4,000 Hoosiers holding trapping licenses, and state officials estimate half of them would apply for a bobcat permit.

The bobcat is Indiana's only native wild cat.

A state analysis of the proposed rules says a bobcat season would provide furbearers with more pelts to sell, allow taxidermists to take on more work and give trapping equipment vendors additional revenue. Bobcat pelts typically sell for around $100, according to the analysis.

While trappers have been supportive of the rule, Chapman said Hoosiers largely disagree.

“This is different than hunting a deer,” Chapman said. “You’re really leaving an animal stuck and suffering in a really uncomfortable position for up to a day which is incredibly inhumane. Then it is just being sold, usually in foreign markets outside of the state of Indiana.”

Hoosiers can speak at the public hearing

The Natural Resources Commission is holding its public meeting Thursday at 5 p.m. at the Purdue Southeast Agricultural Center in Butlerville.

Hoosiers can attend the meeting in person to provide comments, or join the meeting online at in.gov/nrc/rules/rulemaking-docket.

5 Ways Life Would Change If Global Temperatures Increase By 3C

HuffPost UKFollow

75.9K Followers

Story by Kate Nicholson

 • 12h • 3 min read

sorbetto via Getty Images© Provided by HuffPost UK

The United Nations warned last month that the Earth is on track to heat up between 2.6C and 3.1C by the end of the century unless we act.

That’s an increase on the UN’s concerns from last year, when the organisation predicted global temperatures could increase by anything between 2.5C and 2.9C, when compared to the climate we experienced in the pre-industrial era.

The world is already 1.4C hotter than it was before the Industrial Revolution – and gas emissions are only rising.

The 2024 annual Emissions Gap Report, released ahead of the annual UN climate summit COP29, said urgent intervention is needed from global governments.

The UN environment chief, Inger Andersen said: “If nations do not implement current commitments then show a massive increase in ambition in the new pledges, followed by rapid delivery, the Paris Agreement target of holding global warming to 1.5C will be dead within a few years and 2C will take its place in the intensive care unit.”

Similarly, the UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres said last year: “Present trends are racing our planet down a dead-end 3C temperature rise. The emissions gap is more like an emissions canyon.”

The 2015 Paris Agreement saw countries around the world agree to try and limit global warming to 1.5C by cutting carbon emissions.Related video: Could Global Warming Start A New Ice Age? 🧊 (Atlas Pro)

about:blank

This summer I’ll be heading to Europe for about a

Loaded: 2.31%Play

Current Time 0:01

/

Duration 12:58Quality SettingsCaptionsFullscreen

Atlas Pro

Could Global Warming Start A New Ice Age? 🧊Unmute

0

View on Watch

However, the UN has now warned there is just a 14% chance we will be able to stay below the 1.5C threshold, as global greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise year-on-year.

And at 3C, the world will have passed several key catastrophic points – and the change will be irreversible.

So, what would life look like?

1. Droughts

According to carbon accounting firm Greenly, just 3% of the world’s water is drinkable or can be used for crops right now – and global warming would put pressure on that food supply.

This would not only damage the way we live, but will seriously impact local wildlife if they don’t have enough water to survive on.

2. Natural disasters

The world already saw a staggering number of natural disasters in 2023 and 2024 – including floods, earthquakes, hurricane, tornadoes and wildfires – but this will only get worse as global warming ramps up.

That will cause mass, sudden displacement too, as communities in areas vulnerable to extreme weather become inhabitable.

3. Heat

Areas already known for high temperatures will struggle as heatwaves last longer and get more intense – posing yet a serious risk to health.

4. Sea levels

Greenly claims nearly 12% of the entire global population will be impacted by rising sea levels, because there are so many people who live in coastal areas. It warned some cities could even be entirely under water by the end of the 21st Century.

It may worsen natural disasters too, by triggering further hurricanes and typhoons, while also potentially contaminating our water supply by interfering with irrigation systems.Travel Oregon This Fall

Travel OregonTravel Oregon This Fall

Ad

5. Displacement

As the countryside becomes more uninhabitable, cities are likely to become more built up – even though they usually worsen the climate crisis because of industrialisation. That will affect indigenous communities around the world, and worsen overpopulated areas.

The global south is already disproportionately impacted by the climate crisis, particularly any developing countries which do not necessarily have the finances to combat the impact of the climate crisis.

Related…