Police hunt suspect who shot and killed 2-year-old sea lion lying on California beach

Police are offering a reward of up to $20,000 for information about the suspect.

ByJon Haworth ABCNews logo

Thursday, October 10, 2024 10:01AM

Sea lion fatally shot on Orange County beach

about:blank

A California sea lion was fatally shot on Bolsa Chica State Beach in Orange County, and a reward is now being offered to find the person responsible.

Federal officials are hunting for a suspect who they say shot and killed a 2-year-old sea lion while it was lying on a California beach, authorities said.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Law Enforcement is now offering a reward of up to $20,000 after the incident — which took place at Bolsa Chica State Beach in Orange County, California, on Aug. 7 — when the male California sea lion was found injured but alive between lifeguard stations 22 and 23 with a “fresh gunshot wound in its back,” according to a statement from the NOAA released on Wednesday.

“The Pacific Marine Mammal Center in Orange County rescued the male sea lion, but it died from its injuries the following day,” NOAA officials said.

Law enforcement is now actively seeking information on the person who shot the animal and any other details surrounding its shooting.

“The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the harassment, hunting, capturing, or killing of sea lions and other marine mammals,” officials said. “However, the law allows for non-lethal methods to deter marine mammals from damaging private property, including fishing gear and catch, if it does not injure or kill an animal.”

Like all marine mammals, the California sea lion is protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act which has helped their population to continue increasing since at least 1975, after protections were put in place under the MMPA.

“California sea lions are easy to view in the wild, but this puts them at higher risk of human-related injuries and death. Feeding or trying to feed them is harmful and illegal, because it changes their natural behaviors and makes them less wary of people and vessels,” the NOAA said. “They learn to associate humans with an easy meal and change their natural hunting practices-for example, they take bait catch directly off fishing gear. Sometimes they fall victim to retaliation (such as shooting) by frustrated boaters and fishermen.”

Anyone with information about the sea lion shooting should call NOAA’s 24/7 enforcement hotline at (800) 853-1964.

Carbon removal no solution if world overshoots warming target, scientists say

https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/carbon-removal-no-solution-if-world-overshoots-warming-target-scientists-say/ar-AA1rYeSN?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=ENTPSP&cvid=da65ea348fb448f7bf11af0668db399f&ei=21

Reuters

Follow

898.4K Followers

Story by David Stanway

 • 35m • 2 min read

FILE PHOTO: Smog is seen in this general view of the Upper Silesian Industrial Region from Bedzin, near Katowice, Poland, December 5, 2018. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo

FILE PHOTO: Smog is seen in this general view of the Upper Silesian Industrial Region from Bedzin, near Katowice, Poland, December 5, 2018. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/File Photo© Thomson Reuters

By David Stanway

SINGAPORE (Reuters) – Even greater efforts to strip carbon dioxide from the atmosphere will fail to avert climate change catastrophe as rising global temperatures threaten to cross a key threshold of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit), scientists said on Wednesday.Kizik Women's Athens - Lilac 5.5 / Standard | Kizik Hands-Free Shoes | Step In Shoes | Slip On Shoes

Kizik StoreKizik Women’s Athens – Lilac 5.5 / Standard | Kizik Hands-Free Shoes | Step In Shoes | Slip On Shoes

Ad

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has said carbon dioxide removal (CDR) could help slow warming by reducing greenhouse gas already accumulated in the atmosphere, and even temperatures, especially if 1.5 C is exceeded.

However, even if removing carbon dioxide works, it can do nothing to mitigate other aspects of climate change, from sea level rises to changes in ocean circulation, scientists said in research published in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

“Even if you’ve brought temperatures back down again, the world we will be looking at will not be the same,” said Carl-Friedrich Schleussner of Austria’s International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, one of the paper’s authors.

The research showed cutting temperatures from their peak could also prove harder than anticipated even if CDR is scaled up, particularly as melting permafrost and shrinking peatlands release methane and drive further warming.Related video: The world’s first farm of mechanical CO2 absorbing trees (Innovative Techs)

about:blank

Loaded: 3.99%Play

Current Time 0:00

/

Duration 5:00Quality SettingsCaptionsFullscreen

Innovative Techs

The world’s first farm of mechanical CO2 absorbing treesUnmute

0

View on Watch

CDR refers to a range of techniques that extract and store away CO2 already in the atmosphere, including natural solutions such as forests and ocean algae, as well as new technologies that filter carbon dioxide from the air.

Existing CDR capacity takes about 2 billion metric tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere every year, but that figure must rise to about 7 billion to 9 billion tons to meet the world’s climate goals, a separate research report said in June.

Yet there are limits to how much new forest can be planted and how much CO2 can be permanently sequestered, while current technologies are expensive, said Joeri Rogelj of Imperial College London, another co-author of the paper in Nature.

“If we are starting to use land exclusively for carbon management, this can strongly conflict with the other important roles of land, be it biodiversity (or) food production,” he told a briefing.The Hyundai Palisade SUV Costs Next To Nothing (Take A Look)

VyagerThe Hyundai Palisade SUV Costs Next To Nothing (Take A Look)

Ad

Even the most optimistic emissions reduction scenario in the IPCC’s latest assessment report, published last year, factored in the possibility of a small overshoot of 0.1 C.

Reversing that would require the removal of about 220 billion tons of CO2, while an overshoot of 0.5 C – also consistent with the IPCC’s best-case scenario – would need more than a trillion tons removed, Rogelj said.

“The risks the world exposes itself to (from) an overshoot are much larger than acknowledged,” he said.

“Only through ambitious emissions reductions in the near term can we effectively reduce the risks from climate change.”

Reuters

Follow

898.4K Followers

How Denver Could Become the First City to Ban Slaughterhouses

Activists got a slaughterhouse moratorium on Denver’s ballot — but what are its chances?

Advocate Aidan Kankyoku
Featured: Aidan Kankyoku, Pro-Animal Future. Credit: Paul Miller

Mon October 7th, 2024

Solutions • Food • Food Systems

Words by Grace Hussain

– Share on Facebook– Share on LinkedIn– Share on Whatsapp– Share on X– Copy

– Republish

7 min read

The largest lamb slaughterhouse in the country is located in the Globeville neighborhood of Denver, Colorado. Each year, up to 500,000 young sheep are carted into the facility, and leave as packaged meat. Now, Denver is poised to be the first city in the nation to ban slaughterhouses like this one. Thanks to a campaign spearheaded by Pro Animal Future — a nonprofit organization with tactics backed by research — voters will decide this November whether to allow the facility to continue operations.

Its success or failure could have broad implications for the animal rights movement. While it’s certainly not the first time that animal advocates have sought to leverage ballot initiatives — there’s currently also an initiative to ban factory farms from Sonoma County, California — the Denver campaign could serve as a blueprint for future campaigns in cities across the country.

Pro Animal Future was started to test out the research generated by their sister organization, Pax Fauna. That research suggested that animal rights activists could garner success by shifting the framing of their work to ask for people’s votes instead of personal dietary change — a finding that let to this and another ballot initiative in Denver.

“We had a lot of people sign these petitions, including the slaughterhouse petition, while eating animals,”  Aidan Kankyoku, who worked on the research and is now spearheading the campaign, tells Sentient.

Though the fate of the slaughterhouse still hangs in the balance, even getting the question on the ballot was an uphill climb. Kankyoku embarked on it in hopes of testing the findings of Pax Fauna’s research. So far, those findings are holding up, which may have far-reaching implications for animal welfare groups.

Why Ballot Measures May Be More Effective Than Advocating for Dietary Change

In 2023, Pax Fauna published research, which found that calling meat out as unsustainable or cruel is not very effective for the average consumer — in part because it ignores the large role of corporations and policymakers, and relies too heavily on changing personal choice. Instead, focusing on collective action and civic duty — via voting, for example — appears to be more effective.

Those findings were based upon a series of focus groups, surveys and interviews with over 200 participants, all of whom eat meat. After writing up and publishing their findings, their next steps were clear: the new grassroots framework they had designed needed to be tested. For that testing, they chose Denver.

“This is where we have the most progressive and liberal voters who are going to take the first step and set this precedent to say ‘no’ to slaughterhouses,” says Kankyoku. In November of last year, the team dropped off 10,488 signatures supporting a ballot initiative to ban slaughterhouses from the city — well above the 8,940 needed to get on the ballot. Pro Animal Future ran a fur ban initiative alongside the slaughterhouse ban, which received 11,708 signatures and will also be appearing on ballots in November. Each of those signatures represents a conversation with a campaigner.

A Focus on Deep Canvassing

One of those campaigners is volunteer Alaina Sigler, who runs the nonprofit The Night Sky Garden. “These very meaningful conversations are going to be one of the most important tactics for us to continue to focus on,” Sigler says, referencing the deep canvassing technique at the center of the campaign. Deep canvassing relies on having sincere conversations with voters, and offers space for people to express their concerns without judgment. Though the tactic is great for helping people understand an issue, it is time intensive. “It’ll be anywhere from three to 12 voters in an hour, if you’re walking up to groups,” says Kankyoku.

In addition to these conversations, volunteers have been hosting postcard writing parties in collaboration with other local organizations, including nearby Luvin Arms Animal Sanctuary. While most of those writing parties are dominated by people already involved with the campaign, Pro-Animal Future works hard to ensure a welcoming environment for everyone — whether they eat meat or not.

“If you have friends, family members…and they’re not vegan, we actively are asking folks to bring them to the social events,” Sigler, who has organized several such parties, says.

From Sigler’s perspective, the campaign is cause for “immense hope for these initiatives, after not seeing much change occur locally for animals.” A longtime grassroots activist, Sigler has years of experience as an organizer for Direct Action Everywhere, standing vigil outside slaughterhouses and canvassing.

She and other volunteers have also been active in another facet of the campaign: flyering the city. “We do have this kind of guerrilla marketing component of the campaign as well,” says Kankyoku. In addition to the flyers, volunteers hand out stickers, chalk art and messages around the city and are working with businesses to host events.

Pro Animal Future signs hanging in a window. They say "Denver's last slaughterhouse kills over 1000 baby lambs every day" and "Raising animals for meat is the leading cause of deforestation"
Campaign signage in a downtown Denver shop. Credit: Grace Hussain

The Economic and Political Implications of Banning Slaughterhouses

In addition to being home to the nation’s largest lamb slaughterhouse, Colorado also plays host to Colorado State University (CSU). CSU is home to AgNext, (an agricultural research institute that has come under fire for its connections to animal agriculture), as well as Regional Economic Development Institute (REDI), a research center focused on economic development.

In April of this year, REDI released a policy brief arguing that eliminating the slaughterhouse could result in a maximum loss of 629 jobs and over $861 million. Kanyuko says he doesn’t believe those numbers are feasible, given that the facility has 160 employees and generates roughly $250 million in revenue annually. “It’s just obvious propaganda, if you’re going to dig into it a little bit,” he says, but “they’re using the letterhead of this respected university.”

The processes put into the report are standard within economics, says Dawn Thilmany, PhD, who led the team that put together the REDI brief. Analysis was based upon government data run through an economics software program that calculates likely ripple effects.

The analysis outlines three possible scenarios, based upon how much of the lamb industry exits the state of Colorado. Should the initiative pass, Thilmany is concerned that the most drastic of those is the most likely to take place. “It’s [likely to be] really hard to get investors to build processing capacity in other parts of [Colorado] because they’re afraid the ban is going to get wider than Denver County,” she says.

From her perspective working with small producers, the Denver slaughterhouse is unique in that it allows producers to get back their animals following slaughter — a rarity within the industry. For producers who sell meat locally, getting their animals back is essential.“Anyone who’s selling local[ly], that’s what they have to do,” she says. “For lamb, I think they’re about the only one who can do that, even in the region.”

Even if the report’s worst-case economic scenario does come to pass, points out Kankyoku, the projected impact of shutting down the slaughterhouse represents only a small fraction of the state’s overall economy. In the third quarter of 2023, Colorado’s real Gross Domestic Product — a measure of economic activity — was $529.1 billion.

What Comes Next

“What’s so exciting about the ballot initiative approach is that we’d much rather be talking to voters than to a few city council members,” says Kankyoku. Focusing on voters also means that even a loss is a win, in Kankyoku’s eyes. “If we focus all our attention on engaging with the public and connecting with local businesses and building a really strong community around this objective, [even] if the measure doesn’t pass, we can still feel very confident that all of that work is setting us up to do better next time, whether it’s the same policy or a different policy for the next campaign.”

Pro Animal Future’s partner organization, Pax Fauna, is already gearing up to launch similar campaigns in cities across the country — starting with Portland.

Even with the growing popularity of ballot initiatives as a means of activism, advocates are restricted to the cities and states that allow them. But with roughly three quarters of cities allowing some form of citizen-supported legislation making, the opportunities for animal advocates are numerous.

This story is part of a series called How Food Justice is Made: Stories and Solutions, in which Sentient dives into four different communities, and the unique ways they’re combatting slaughterhouses.

Mama grizzly bear chases hunter up a tree in Montana, later killed by wildlife officials

By Kerry Breen

Updated on: October 8, 2024 / 9:44 AM EDT / CBS News

grizzly bear was shot and later killed after chasing a hunter up a tree in Montana, authorities said.

The animal, a mother bear with two cubs, charged the unidentified man while he was hunting by the Hidden Lakes in Gallatin County, Montana, the sheriff’s office said in a news release. He shot the bear with a pistol before climbing a tree, but the wounded bear remained in the area. 

County dispatchers received a 911 call from the hunter at 2:08 p.m. on Saturday. The man waited in the tree until a Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks helicopter arrived on the scene. 

When the Fish, Wildlife and Parks personnel arrived, they “dispatched the wounded grizzly,”  the sheriff’s office said, and rescued the hunter. He was not injured, and was transported out of the area on the helicopter. The Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office assembled a search and rescue team, but it was not needed to find the man. 

img-1294-1024x768.jpg
A Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks helicopter meets a search and rescue team after rescuing a hunter.Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office

The Hidden Lakes are a series of eight lakes on the west side of the Gallatin Range, a part of the Rocky Mountains. The area is home to grizzly bears and wolves. Gallatin County Sheriff Dan Springer said that the incident should serve as a reminder for hunters to be aware of their surroundings, to carry bear spray, avoid signs of bears, and hunt in groups and carry a communication device to call for help if necessary. 

symbol

00:02

02:00

Read More

Grizzly bears are considered a threatened species by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. There are fewer than 2,000 verified grizzly bears in the continental United States, with most living in “recovery zones” that have been established to help the population recover. Another 30,000 grizzly bears are estimated to live in Alaska, with 3,000 living in Katmai National Park, the home of “Fat Bear Week.” 

Multiple bear attacks have been reported in Montana in recent months. In late September, a man was attacked by a bear and injured, then walked over a mile to reach a rescue helicopter. In mid-August, a three-year-old girl was attacked by a black bear while she was in a tent at a private campground just north of Yellowstone National Park. A bear believed to be involved was captured and euthanized hours after the incident. 

In July, a man shot and killed a grizzly bear after it charged him while he was picking berries. Another grizzly bear was killed by Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks officials that same day after it broke into a home.