Large birds can boost forest carbon storage — if deforestation doesn’t interfere
Reply
‘A momentous day for nature’: EU approves first-of-its-kind law that could bring back biodiversity
Angela Symons
Mon, June 17, 2024 at 3:49 a.m. PDT·5 min read
After months of deliberations, the EU’s Nature Restoration Law has finally been approved.
The first-of-its-kind regulation aims to restore Europe’s damaged ecosystems and boost biodiversity.
“There is no time for a break in protecting our environment,” says Alain Maron, environment minister for the Brussels region. “Today, the Council of the EU is choosing to restore nature in Europe, thereby protecting its biodiversity and the living environment of European citizens.”
Environmental organisations have celebrated the law’s passing, with The Nature Conservancy’s Noor Yafai calling it “a momentous day for nature” that will deliver “a vital boost to efforts to implement international climate and biodiversity targets”.
Here’s everything you need to know about the ruling and how it could help Europe meet its climate goals.
What is the Nature Restoration Law?
The Nature Restoration Law aims to restore at least 20 per cent of the EU’s land and sea areas by 2030, and all degraded ecosystems by 2050.
It is the first comprehensive, continent-wide law of its kind.
The law sets binding targets and obligations for EU member states to rehabilitate their natural habitats – 80 per cent of which are currently in poor condition.
It focuses especially on those with the most potential to capture and store carbon.
This includes restoring wetlands, rivers, forests, grasslands, urban and marine ecosystems – and the species they host.
Its goals are to increase biodiversity, as well as harnessing the power of nature to clean our water and air, pollinate crops and improve food security, and prevent and reduce the impact of natural disasters like floods.
As part of the EU Biodiversity Strategy, it is hoped the Nature Restoration Law will help Europe meet the Paris Agreement pledge to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
- Rare wild horses back on Kazakhstan’s Golden Steppe after being saved from extinction
- ‘Really dangerous’: Why activists are so worried by Switzerland’s rejection of climate case ruling
Why has the Nature Restoration Law faced setbacks?
The Nature Restoration Law was first proposed by the European Commission back in June 2022.
Towards the end of that year, it received a boost at the COP15 UN Biodiversity Conference in Montreal, Canada, when countries agreed to ‘30×30’ – a pledge to restore 30 per cent of the world’s degraded ecosystems by 2030.
But last year, backlash from conservative parties in Europe – including the European People’s Party (EPP) – stopped the proposal in its tracks.
They claimed the bill would threaten the livelihoods of European farmers, decrease food production, disrupt supply chains and push up food prices for consumers.
It has since been the subject of fierce debate and infighting, with the European Commission, left-wing groups, climate scientists and commercial players arguing that the law is essential to the long-term viability of European industry, and some conservatives breaking away from the EPP’s stance to vote in favour of the law last July.
A provisional agreement was reached in November but it soon faced further opposition as farmer protests swept across Europe at the start of this year.
Why were farmers protesting against the Nature Restoration Law?
Farmers say the EU’s environmental regulations are putting added strain on an industry already badly impacted by climate change.
They point to contradictory regulations that at once require farmers to reduce their environmental impact while increasing food production.
With fuel subsidies being removed and emissions regulations ramped up, farmers have complained of a lack of support in the green transition.
It became a major issue in the lead up to the EU election, contributing to the rise of the right.
What will the approved Nature Restoration Law mean for Europe?
In a vote held among EU environment ministers today, Finland, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden rejected the law, while Belgium abstained.
But Austria, which had been internally divided, flipped at the last minute in favour, allowing the minimum threshold for it to pass.
Under the new law, EU member states will prioritise restoration of Natura 2000 protected areas, which cover Europe’s most valuable and threatened species and habitats.
Those deemed in poor condition under the new regulation will need to be restored by at least 30 per cent by 2030, 60 per cent by 2040 and 90 per cent by 2050.
They must also make efforts to prevent deterioration of areas already improved by restoration measures and those that host important land and marine habitats such as peatlands and coral beds.
The law includes specific measures to restore Europe’s declining pollinator populations, and protect certain species of butterflies and birds.
As well as helping to plant at least three billion new trees by 2030, EU countries must make sure there is no net loss on urban green spaces and tree canopy cover.
This is a defining moment in the fight to restore Europe’s endangered forests.
“This is a defining moment in the fight to restore Europe’s endangered forests… which are being assailed from different directions – including logging, demand for bioenergy, wildfires and pests,” says Siim Kuresoo, European Forest Campaigner at forests and rights NGO, Fern. “This law provides the vital structure to direct desperately needed resources and energy to restoring nature across Europe.”
Additionally, human-made barriers will be removed from rivers to improve water connectivity, with a goal of restoring 25,000 km of rivers to free-flowing conditions by the end of the decade.
It also has the potential to “unlock significant investment in nature and biodiversity”, both public and private, says Yafai of The Nature Conservancy.
Now the regulation has been green-lit, it will be published in the EU’s Official Journal and enter into force, becoming directly applicable in all member states.
Its impacts will be reviewed by the Commission in 2033.
Cocaine Trafficking Threatens Rare Tropical Birds in Central America
1 day ago
By Trinity Sparke
Image Credit :skapuka/Shutterstock
Help keep One Green Planet free and independent! Together we can ensure our platform remains a hub for empowering ideas committed to fighting for a sustainable, healthy, and compassionate world. Please support us in keeping our mission strong.Pay
Cocaine trafficking is endangering rare tropical birds as traffickers push into remote forests to avoid detection, a study in Nature Sustainability reveals. Two-thirds of key bird habitats in Central America are at risk from “narco-driven” deforestation. For four decades, U.S. drug policy has failed to curb illegal networks, pushing traffickers deeper into forests. Here, they build infrastructure for drug shipments and establish cattle pastures to launder money and control territories. Lead author Amanda Rodewald from Cornell Lab of Ornithology highlights the severe impact on both vulnerable human and non-human populations, particularly Indigenous communities.
Millions of hectares of tropical forests have been destroyed by narco-trafficking, forcing Indigenous people to either cooperate or flee. Co-author Nicholas Magliocca from the University of Alabama stresses that resistance often leads to violence and land dispossession.
For the first time, researchers have quantified the impact on bird populations. They found 67 migratory bird species, including endangered golden-cheeked warblers, at increased risk. Remote sensing shows that 15-30% of annual deforestation in Nicaragua, Honduras, and Guatemala is due to cocaine trafficking.
You May Like
Step into Spring With a Guided Adventure in OregonTravel OregonLearn More
The largest remaining forests in Central America, the “five great forests,” are experiencing rising cocaine trafficking. Traffickers use these forests for cattle ranching to launder money. Magliocca argues that U.S. drug policy has failed, as cocaine trafficking has expanded globally. The study suggests that creating jobs, clarifying land tenure, and improving forest protection can help tackle the problem. Empowering Indigenous groups to control their territories can protect against narco-trafficking and other environmental crimes.
Speak Up Tee By Tiny Rescue: Animal Collection
Being publicly-funded gives us a greater chance to continue providing you with high-quality content.Click here to Support Us
Related Content:
- Pablo Escobar’s “Cocaine” Hippos Are Being Sterilized
- Pablo Escobar’s Cocaine Hippos Are Facing Slaughter
- Cocaine Cat: Wild Cat in Cincinnati Found with Cocaine in its System
- Greyhounds Used for Racing Test Positive for Cocaine – Let’s End This Cruel Industry Once and For All!
Easy Ways to Help the Planet:
- Eat Less Meat: Download Food Monster, the largest plant-based Recipe app on the App Store, to help reduce your environmental footprint, save animals and get healthy. You can also buy a hard or soft copy of our favorite vegan cookbooks.
- Adopt-a-Pet: Visit WildWatchers, a watchdog platform specifically designed for animal, earth, and wildlife warriors to actively give back, rescue, and protect animals and the planet.
- Reduce Your Fast Fashion Footprint: Take initiative by standing up against fast fashion Pollution and supporting sustainable and circular brands like Tiny Rescue that raise awareness around important issues through recycled zero-waste clothing designed to be returned and remade over and over again.
- Support Independent Media: Being publicly funded gives us a greater chance to continue providing you with high-quality content. Please consider supporting us by donating!
- Sign a Petition: Your voice matters! Help turn petitions into victories by signing the latest list of must-sign petitions to help people, animals, and the planet.
- Stay Informed: Keep up with the latest news and important stories involving animals, the environment, sustainable living, food, health, and human interest topics by subscribing to our newsletter!
- Do What You Can: Reduce waste, plant trees, eat local, travel responsibly, reuse stuff, say no to single-use plastics, recycle, vote smart, switch to cold water laundry, divest from fossil fuels, save water, shop wisely, Donate if you can, grow your food, volunteer, conserve energy, compost, and don’t forget about the microplastics and microbeads lurking in common household and personal care products!
Share this:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
Read More https://www.onegreenplanet.org/animals/cocaine-trafficking-threatens-rare-tropical-birds-in-central-america/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR310_gxBEc-HE1mT67Y3FadTwTuYdZhuL6onY9M8bmPbPGniqJR_ydOYiQ_aem_Kn9SB4dHo776OsbNsZqpug
IFAW statement on new Netflix movie ‘Under Paris’
June 13, 2024
“Sharks play a critical role in keeping oceans healthy, balancing the food chain and ensuring species diversity. Only on your movie screen will they swim through the Seine or the River Thames in London and eat people as if they’re gobbling down potato chips with ketchup squirted all over.
Back in the 70s, the movie Jaws did sharks no favour. We’re still doing damage control giving their reputation a complete makeover by recognising their amazing contribution to a healthy planet. Now we’re up against another movie piggybacking on this less than favourable image of the species, having sharks behave like a menacing predator, while in reality we are the ones hunting them to extinction.
It seems ‘Under Paris’ could be intended to show the shark as a victim of humankind and raise awareness about ocean pollution, loss of habitat and shark conservation. Yet it still emphasizes the eternal stereotype of radical activists and sharks as the villain in the story. Nature and wildlife conservation organisations like IFAW, however, base their campaigns on scientific reports and approaches aiming for both people and animals to thrive.
It’s time to set the record straight: Sharks keep our marine ecosystems healthy, and this makes our planet more climate change resilient. They capture carbon, not dead humans – with climate change being the real horror here. The movie also portrays the mutated shark who has adapted to climate change, and people being too busy with their lives to pay attention to looming disaster. If we don’t take urgent action, we may find Paris and other places like London, Amsterdam or Berlin actually under water in the future.
If you’re still not convinced after watching ‘Under Paris’ and you’re looking for more evidence – click here for more info on how sharks benefit our planet and help combat climate change.”
– Barbara Slee, senior program manager International Policy at IFAW
Scientists try to solve bird flu mystery: Why there’s so much virus in Michigan wastewater
Avian flu spread in cows not being tracked, posing greater risk of human transmission
Mark Lyons, a senior USDA animal health official, said federal officials are “still working closely to understand the breadth” of the bird flu outbreak in the nation’s dairy herds.
Former government health officials with experience with the Covid-19 pandemic say they want a better understanding of how rapidly the virus is spreading in dairy cows. | Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images
By DAVID LIM and MEREDITH LEE HILL
06/17/2024 05:00 AM EDT
Reliance on individual dairy farmers to help track the spread of avian flu is leaving the federal government without the data necessary to understand — and slow — the virus’ spread in the U.S.
The biggest challenge for the federal response, agriculture and public health officials told POLITICO, is that the more the virus spreads among dairy cows, the more opportunity it has to mutate and become easier to jump to additional humans. The number of documented infected dairy herds in recent weeks has risen rapidly — and several other states have confirmed initial infections in cows.
But many dairy farmers are declining to test their cows, leaving the nation vulnerable to a situation in which federal officials won’t have adequate warning if the virus evolves and poses a greater risk of infection to people.
“The longer this is prevalent in animal farms and livestock operations across the state, the greater the opportunity is for future mutations in animals or human risks in different ways going forward,” said Tim Boring, who heads the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development in Michigan, a state with two confirmed human cases to date as it deals with a major bird flu outbreak among poultry and now dairy herds.
The federal response is largely focusing on voluntary efforts by farmers to help track and contain the outbreak. But many farms still have not signed up for USDA efforts to boost surveillance and testing for the virus. To date, 94 herds across 12 states have tested positive for bird flu, but the testing has covered a mere fraction of the nation’s nine million dairy cattle. Only about 45 exposed and symptomatic humans have been tested for avian flu, CDC Principal Deputy Director Nirav Shah said in a Thursday briefing with reporters.
Mark Lyons, a senior USDA animal health official, said federal officials are “still working closely to understand the breadth” of the bird flu outbreak in the nation’s dairy herds.
While the risk to the public remains low, the CDC is focusing on preventing cases in populations at higher risk of infection. Given the extent of spread among dairy cows, additional human cases in farmers and dairy workers “would not be surprising,” according to CDC spokesperson Rosa Norman.
“Continued comprehensive surveillance in wild birds, poultry, mammals and people worldwide are critical to determine the public health risk, along with ongoing preparedness efforts,” the spokesperson said. “We are taking a number of measures to keep up testing and sequencing of influenza viruses over the summer to help increase surveillance.”
Jerome Adams, former surgeon general under President Donald Trump, said more testing is needed to understand how widespread avian influenza is — a threat he described as rapidly growing and potentially catastrophic despite the limited human infections detected to date. But farmers and workers must be reassured that they will not face legal penalties by allowing government officials onto farms and there should be financial incentives to participate in testing, he added.
“We failed — through two administrations — to develop and implement an effective surveillance strategy with Covid, and we are repeating the same mistakes with [this virus],” Adams said. “Farmers are reticent to test for many reasons. Fear of financial harm is a major factor.”
Since April, more than 15,000 animal samples have been tested, with more than 4,300 under a federal order requiring dairy cow testing before animals are moved across state lines, according to USDA data.
Deborah Birx, former Trump administration coronavirus response coordinator, said it is essential to know whether the baseline incidence of infections among dairy cows and humans is changing so the government can prepare a response.
“It’s not about pointing fingers, it’s not about whether their workers are documented, it’s about knowing where we are and how much this is spreading in humans, and how much is spreading in cows,” Birx said. Allowing voluntary anonymous testing and taking steps to allay fears that farms could be shut down is critical to get that buy-in, she added.
A new effort by the CDC aims to ensure that clinical laboratories send samples from people with suspected novel influenza infections like avian flu to state health laboratories for further testing. The guidelines call for the CDC to be alerted of specimens that test positive for such viruses or if unsubtyped results are obtained.
MOST READ
- New Polling Shows the Real Fallout From the Trump Conviction
- ‘Wildly inappropriate’: Trump ally blasts German chancellor for Biden praise
- Biden unloads on Trump in ad: ‘A convicted criminal who’s only out for himself’
- Freedom Caucus member takes unprecedented step backing chair’s challenger
- Nikki Haley says her father has died
“We have indicated to states that the threshold for testing somebody is exceedingly low if they do happen to detect somebody who has been exposed and who would like to be tested,” Shah told reporters. “We’re open to doing that, very much so.”
HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra urged state leaders at the Western Governors’ Association Annual Meeting to help increase monitoring for avian influenza.
“That includes reaching out to dairy farmers in your states to confirm they are taking steps to protect workers — and encouraging those farms to test their cows or their milk so we know quickly if a herd is positive,” Becerra said earlier this week according to prepared remarks.
Although federal funds have been allocated, no farms have enrolled in voluntary on-site milk testing, according to the USDA. Fewer than a dozen farms have applied for separate financial aid in exchange for boosting biosecurity measures to help contain the virus. Meanwhile, federal rulemaking is delaying the rollout of compensation for farmers who have lost or had to kill cows because of the disease.
That’s a problem because the scope of financial support for dairy farmers to date has been “peanuts,” according to Michael Mina, chief science officer at telehealth company eMed and a mass-testing advocate during the Covid-19 pandemic. With the virus spread across many herds across the country, strengthening sequencing efforts to understand if a mutation that warrants aggressive action toward a particular farm is critical.
“We actually did have a period of time where there was a possibility to contain this had we taken very aggressive fast action,” Mina said. “Those days are done. It’s big and you can’t just squash it.”
Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said that even if every cow in the U.S. is tested daily, it does not guarantee that a mutation won’t occur that starts a new pandemic.
“What I would like to know is in terms of transmission issues, is how many of these current farms that are turning up positive can trace back cattle movement to the original outbreak farms,” Osterholm said. “If that can’t happen, it greatly complicates how you try to stop ongoing transmission in dairy cattle.”
Michigan, which is dealing with a major bird flu outbreak among poultry and now dairy herds, is undertaking an “aggressive” response effort, Boring said. There have been no confirmed avian flu fatalities in the U.S.
In recent days, Wyoming, Minnesota and Iowa have announced their first confirmed avian influenza cases in dairy herds, underscoring many agriculture officials’ fears that the virus is present in wide swaths of the country but just hasn’t yet been detected.
Shah deferred to USDA when asked how much dairy cow surveillance testing the CDC believes is necessary on a call with reporters on Thursday. State agriculture officials and some farmers pushed back on an early CDC effort to deploy federal public health officials on farms across the country to better track and contain the virus.
So far, 11 farms have enrolled in financial support programs the USDA announced May 10 to help bolster biosecurity measures to contain the virus, according to USDA spokesperson Allan Rodriguez. No farms have enrolled in a separate voluntary testing pilot program to monitor virus levels in milk in dairy herds, though there’s been interest in the effort and the USDA “expects the number of participating producers to increase in the weeks ahead.” The department is talking with at least 20 states about participation in the pilot program.
“USDA continues to ramp up outreach and leverage every tool available to raise awareness of these new resources,” Rodriguez added.
Dr. Jamie Jonker, the chief science officer at the National Milk Producers Federation, said that “any widespread disruption to an industry is going to encounter a wide variety of responses and questions.”
“Only three months into H5N1 in dairy cows, testing is identifying affected farms, and dairy farmers are taking action in response,” Jonker said. “With USDA programs in effect for just over one month, farmers are working with USDA to make them effective, even as details of those programs are still being worked out,” he added, noting dairy farmers are doing what they can both to understand the H5N1 situation and work effectively to address it.
Boring said Michigan state officials are working to head off a potentially devastating blow to the dairy industry and to try to keep the virus from spreading to more humans. While the U.S. has responded to bird flu outbreaks in the poultry industry for decades, the outbreak among dairy cows is a new and vastly different challenge. Boring acknowledged state officials are still flying somewhat blind in their response after the virus was first detected in dairy cows in Texas in late March.
“It’s a tough situation. There’s a lot that we still don’t know. We’re learning more every day,” Boring said.
“So oftentimes, we’re working with a bit of incomplete information,” he added.
Boring said he believes several Michigan farms have reached out to the USDA for more information about the financial aid the department announced last month as a way to contain the virus, but he didn’t know whether any farmers have applied for the USDA money.
Producers in his state are chiefly watching the USDA’s expected rollout of specific emergency assistance funding for livestock losses in the coming weeks. Agriculture officials in blue and red states are pressing the USDA to make that move as generous as possible to offset the growing economic toll of the virus, while working to contain the spread.
But that effort is “continuing to go through the [federal rulemaking process],” according to USDA, signaling that a full rollout could take months. It’s also unclear how many infected cows in the U.S. are dying from bird flu or being killed due to a drop in milk production.
Boring confirmed “there have been instances of cow fatalities associated with this” in Michigan, but he didn’t know how many infected cows have been killed, or culled, in his state.
He suggested culling is still used in “rare instances” for infected cows that contract other diseases and wasn’t aware of any mass culling.
“We’re concerned about the spread of this into other populations, whether it’s swine, or whether it’s directly to humans,” Boring said.
Still, public health experts like Osterholm who have been monitoring avian influenza for decades caution that no one knows what the future holds.
“I’ve been dealing with this virus since 2003 and on multiple occasions, thought, well, this is it, it’s going to go, and then it didn’t,” Osterholm said. “That doesn’t mean it won’t go now, but it also means be careful, because, in fact, what we’re seeing happen may not be indicative that we’re going to see a major antigenic change in the virus.”
Exposing the Big Game 