Exposing the Big Game

Forget Hunters' Feeble Rationalizations and Trust Your Gut Feelings: Making Sport of Killing Is Not Healthy Human Behavior

Exposing the Big Game

Old ammunition found in bears

http://svalbardposten.no/english/old-ammunition-found-in-bears/19.8555

Two polar bears killed last summer were both shot with a shotgun earlier.

Tekst:
Line Nagell Ylvisåker

Publisert:
26.05.2017

Se bildet større

Old ammunition was discovered in a two-year-old bear killed by a Russian researcher at Forelandet. The researcher was fined 15,000 kroner. FOTO: The Governor of Svalbard, Facsimile: Svalbardposten

A female polar bear was shot last June at Austfjordnes. An autopsy revealed shotgun ammunition in her body. Two months later another female bear was shot by Russian researchers at Forlandet. It also had been hit by such ammunition.

“There was ammunition that was encapsulated in the fat and the meat of the bears,” said Knut Fossum, environmental director for The Governor of Svalbard. “It was obvious that this had not happened when they were killed. Our interpretation of it is both of the bears were previously shot with pellets.”

Fossum said he believes it was done to scare the bears.

“We take a serious view of the findings and remind people that it is associated with criminal liability to harm polar bears,” he said.

Many shotgun pellets
The governor did not receive any reports of shotguns being used against polar bears despite a requirement people do so.

“Whether it’s customary or some perception that pellets are good for intimidation, it’s not right,” Fossum said. “It’s not a legal intimidation method or something we in any way accept.”

He said he does not know specifically how much ammunition was in the bears.

“But there were obviously many shotgun pellets in both,” he said.

Shotguns are short-range weapons and pellets spread out widely. Pellets were found in several places in both bears.

“Based on the amount of pellets they can’t have been shot at a very long range,” Fossum said.

Inflammation found
Fossum said he isn’t aware of any previous incidents where polar bears were found with shotgun ammunition in them.

Is he concerned there may be more bears that have been hit?

“It’s only speculation, but when we have two cases in a short period of time there is reason to remind people that this is neither lawful nor desirable to scare bears with pellets,” he said.

Pellets were found in connections between skin and muscle tissue in both bears.

“In several places inflammation was found around where the pellets had entered,” Fossum said.

Were the bears in pain?

“It is hard to say,” Fossum said. “It is also difficult to say whether the behavior of the bears was characterized by the fact that they were previously shot. But it is clear that the chance of inflicting serious injuries upon the bears with shotgun ammunition is quite large. That can go beyond the survival of the bear and affect the safety of others who encounter it.”

Pain and irritation

Torill Mørk, a veterinarian at the Veterinary Institute in Tromsø, was not present when the autopsy on the bears occurred. But speaking generally, she said she does not believe the shotgun pellets in the bears greatly affected them since they only went through the skin.

“But there will be pain and irritation,” she said. “It will probably hurt for a while, but how bad I cannot answer.”

If the pellets penetrated deeper, or hit an eye or joint, they might do more harm.

“Usually there will probably not be that much damage to such a big and powerful animal, but it depends on how they are hit,” Mørk said. “We had a case here with a reindeer that was killed with an air rifle. There the bullet had entered between two ribs and into the chest cavity.”

The veterinarian said the ammunition was in the bears for a long time, but can’t offer a specific duration.

“It could be anything from weeks to months,” she said.

How to intimidate bears

The governor recommends using a signal pistol to scare bears and a rifle for protection in life-threatening situations.

“A rifle is considered the most effective and safe instrument for self-defense against bears,” Fossum said.

Action Alert: Yupik, Polar Bear in Mexico – emails needed to USFWS & Mexican Governor & Mexican Green Party (Secretary of Environment)

Zoocheck

2 hrs · Toronto · 

Morelia Zoo and Governor Sabotaging Yupik’s Future

It is with heavy hearts that we share the sad news that last night Friday 23nd of February, just days before a massive multi-year effort was about to be finalized, the Parque Zoologico Benito Juarez (Morelia Zoo) and the Governor of Michoacán, Silvano Aureoles, abruptly breached the legal agreement with Zoocheck and the Yorkshire Wildlife Park to relocate Yupik, the Morelia Zoo’s solitary polar bear, to the United Kingdom.

Yupik has been at the Morelia Zoo for more than 25 years, confined in a grossly inadequate, outdated enclosure and locked away in a tiny off-exhibit area for the majority of each day. For years, Yupik has also been suffering from deteriorating health and serious dental issues.

When Zoocheck’s world renowned team of bear veterinarians and specialist Mexican veterinarians conducted a full medical examination of Yupik in 2017, they discovered that she had been left for years with painful broken teeth and exposed nerves, a result of abnormal stereotyped bar biting behavior. Her muscle mass was poor due to lack of exercise and she had lost her natural layer of blubber due to her unnatural diet and the extreme heat she has been forced to live in.

Zoocheck’s expert team conducted surgery to address Yupik’s dental issues, finally freeing her from the immense suffering and pain her broken teeth had caused. If not for Zoocheck’s intervention, she would still be suffering today as the zoo had no intention of correcting the problem. However, her other medical issues will persist if Yupik is left in Mexico.

The Morelia Zoo’s veterinarians had also misdiagnosed Yupik with a heart condition that she did not have, which the zoo used to bolster their claim that it would be dangerous to move her. This false diagnosis was dismissed by the veterinary cardiologist that Zoocheck provided who examined Yupik’s heart with specialized cardiology equipment, finding no evidence of any heart disease.

Yupik has been suffering for many years and her only hope for a substantially improved life was relocation to a more appropriate and professional facility elsewhere. The Morelia Zoo and Governor are now squandering an opportunity to improve Yupik’s life, for no apparent reason. Yupik is the only Arctic animal in the Morelia Zoo and she will not be replaced once she dies. The legal agreement included a statement wherein the zoo committed to focusing on native species animals.

Operating in good faith, the Yorkshire Wildlife Park spent $400,000 thousand dollars (aprox. over 7 million pesos) preparing for Yupik’s arrival, her new habitat was set to be completed next week. Yorkshire is an accredited member of the British and Irish Association of Zoos and Aquariums (BIAZA) and the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Their award-winning facility with its expanded space, natural grassy terrain and a natural deep lake, and the opportunity for Yupik to interact with other polar bears, would have made her life immeasurably better. Yorkshire is a collaborator in the polar bear research non-profit Polar Bears International and the Species Survival Comission from IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), with whom Yorkshire has developed critical research initiatives to conserve polar bears and study their adaptation to threats from climate change.

The research project that was submitted to SEMARNAT (Mexico’s Environment Ministry) in order to comply with the Mexican wildlife regulations was authored by researchers from the University of Lincoln and the University of Edinburgh, authors of hundreds of peer-reviewed articles, book chapters and conference lectures. The research project as well as the assesment of the adaptation and acclimatisation of Yupik into her new home and more appropriate climate at Yorkshire Wildlife Park would have provided much needed data that could have been used to increase knowledge about the behavior and conservation of polar bears and their adaptation to climate change. This research was supported and encouraged by the AZA (Association of Zoos and Aquariums) Polar Bear SSP, the BIAZA, researchers at the Institute for Animal Welfare and Dr. Ian Sterling, one of the world’s most renowned polar bear researchers with 40 years of experience studying polar bears. Dr. Stirling said:

“I can say it is clear, from the delineation of the objectives of the overall project, that moving this bear from Mexico to the UK will provide the potential for some significant research on several aspects of polar bear ecology to be undertaken. The studies identified have the potential to contribute positively to the conservation of polar bears in the longer term. It is equally clear that there will be no scientific or conservation benefits to be gained by retaining this bear in Mexico, in conditions which may often be detrimental to her health.”

In 25 years, the Morelia Zoo has not conducted any scientific studies or produced any scientific publications that will benefit the conservation of polar bears, nor has any other Zoo in Mexico that has housed polar bears (now deceased) ever wanted to do a research project. And now, given this great opportunity for an international collaboration with reknowned scientists, the Morelia Zoo decided to dismiss it.

Zoocheck spent in excess of $50,000 and a great deal of time during the past year to facilitate Yupik’s move to her new home where she could enjoy whatever time she had left. Arranging medical assessments, sending a polar bear crate to Morelia, facilitating her training for transport, making flight and other travel arrangements, applying for permits, and all of the other aspects inherent in a complex move of this kind were handled by Zoocheck. Yupik’s relocation was literally just days away, until the Morelia Zoo and the Governor backed out of the agreement last night and sabotaged Yupik’s future.

Mexican celebrity, Eugenio Derbez stepped up to help Yupik by urging Mexican authorities to approve and expedite her export when it seemed things were moving too slowly. For doing that, he has been attacked viciously by members of the Mexican zoo community. Mr. Derbez is a hero for speaking out on behalf of Yupik and for trying to give her a better life.

Yupik was sent to the Morelia Zoo in 1992 on permanent loan under a Letter of Authorization from the United States. The authorization was contingent on the Morelia Zoo meeting certain conditions, including providing care that meets or exceeds US standards for polar bears. The Morelia Zoo has not satisfied these standards, so now we are calling on the United States to exercise their authority to recall Yupik so she can be transferred to the Yorkshire Wildlife Park. She should not be left to suffer the remainder of her life in the substandard conditions of Morelia Zoo. Yupik’s last hope is for her home country to take action to give her the quality of live she deserves, so she can receive professional care, improved conditions and a better life.

Yupik is the most famous animal at the Morelia Zoo but it is important to remember that many other animals also endure poor conditions. We sincerely hope the people of Mexico will stand up for Yupik and the other animals at the zoo and demand that their conditions be dramatically improved or that they be sent elsewhere. We will continue to do everything possible to support that goal.

Zoocheck is grateful to the Yorkshire Wildlife Park for opening up their hearts, their facility and for committing the funds necessary to give Yupik a better life. They are an example that other zoos should follow.

Thank you to Eugenio Derbez for his thoughtfulness, generosity and willingness to get involved. He is a true Mexican hero for animals and his efforts should be applauded, not attacked.

Our sincere thanks also go to the various veterinary professionals, trainers and other experts who volunteered their services. They have improved Yupik’s life, alleviated some of her pain and gave her hope.

And of course, Zoocheck would like to thank the thousands of concerned activists and citizens of Mexico, Canada and elsewhere around the world who also spoke out on behalf of Yupik. If she could understand, we have no doubt she would be grateful.

We urge everyone to contact US Fish and Wildlife, the legal “owner” of the bear asking them to take immediate action to repatriate Yupik so she can go to Yorkshire. Contact US Fish and Wildlife at https://www.fws.gov/duspit/contactus.htm

Also please email the Governor of Michoacan and urge him to allow Yupik’s transfer to the Yorkshire Wildlife Park: silvanoaureoles@michoacan.gob.mx

Justices deny review of case challenging polar bear habitat

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a challenge to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to designate 187,000 square miles of Alaska’s coast and waters a critical habitat for the threatened polar bear.

Oil and gas trade associations, several Alaska Native corporations and villages, and the state of Alaska claimed the habitat designation was unjustifiably large. They also claimed the designation would do nothing to help conserve the polar bear.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case leaves in place a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling upholding the designation.

The court gave no explanation for its decision not to hear the cases.

Polar bear shot by wildlife officers after being deemed public safety risk

Polar bear shot by wildlife officers near Catalina after being deemed public
safety risk

By Geoff Bartlett,
CBC News
Posted: Apr 10, 2017

.. Newfoundland and Labrador’s Department of
Fisheries and Land Resources says its officers shot and killed a polar on
the Bonavista Peninsula this weekend as a last resort.

The animal was being tracked near the shoreline of Catalina throughout the
day Saturday, after first being spotted earlier in the morning.

The department said officers immediately started following its polar bear
control management policy, which outlines the steps for containing a polar
bear in a community.

The policy puts a priority on capturing the polar bear alive if possible,
and suggests killing the animal only if it is deemed a public safety risk.

Last course of action

According to the department, conservation officers had originally planned to
use a helicopter and tranquillizers to capture the bear alive, but the
helicopter was unable to fly all day due to foggy and windy weather
conditions.

As they continued to monitor the bear, the animal gradually moved closer to
shore. Officers also set up a baited live trap, and used sirens and noise
repellant to try to scare the bear back out on the sea ice.

After those techniques failed – and the bear continued to move towards
nearby homes and people – officers determined the bear was a public safety
risk and decided to go with the lethal option.

“This decision is the very last course of action to take after all other
options are exhausted and only taken when public safety is immediately at
risk,” the department wrote in a statement.

Reaction

CBC received several complaints from people upset that the bear was shot.
There was also some debate on social media as to whether the decision to
kill the animal was justified.

Burin bear

Meanwhile, the Department of Fisheries and Land Resources also had to deal
with a report of polar bear sighting on the Burin Peninsula this weekend.

Officers were able to tranquillize the bear in the Parker’s Cove area Sunday
evening, before successfully capturing and relocating it, according to the
department.

Amid some public outrage, conservation officers say killing a polar bear on
the Bonavista Peninsula this weekend was a last resort.

Deaths of Dogs – and Why It’s Not Cute

by Barry Kent MacKay
02 Dec 2016 12:26 PM PST

Polar Bear and Dog <http://www.bornfreeusa.org/images/blogs/canadianblog/polarbeardog_sm.jpg> © David de Meulles / YouTube

Finally, the same internet that has continually shown a video that has utterly charmed millions (but sickened me) has exposed the truth… although, I suspect that many will miss that and go on mindlessly grinning at the original images.

I’ll explain all of that in a moment. First, let me say that, as someone increasingly concerned about the fates of wild and domestic animals—working with dedicated professional colleagues sharing the value I put on all life, human and animal—I can never understand why people seem to think an animal’s “worth” is relative to how much he or she acts like humans, or unlike how the animal’s own nature dictates.

Polar bears are predatory. So, when videos emerged on the internet some time ago showing a bear seeming to play with a sled dog, I immediately wrote to a polar bear biologist. The expert told me that he knew all about it, including how many dogs have been killed by being left chained outside, helpless, in a region that is well-visited by polar bears.

“We’ve tried to tell that to people for years,” I was told.

The video does not show that part of the story.

The bear, overwhelmingly powerful, is in no hurry to make a kill. The animal first examines the unsuspecting dog, and that is the part the video shows: sniffing and petting only. It’s been viewed more than four million times. What the viewers don’t see is that the bear then chose another dog, possibly one of those on short leashes in the background, and killed and ate that one.

It’s intolerable enough to leave dogs tied up overnight without shelter as a roadside attraction at the Mile 5 Sanctuary near Churchill, Manitoba. But, feeding polar bears to attract them to the site makes it worse.

The owner of the property, Mike Ladoon, explained what happened by <http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/polar-bear-dog-video-churchill-manitoba-1.3855128> telling CBC news, “That was the only day we didn’t feed the [expletive] bears, the only night we didn’t put anything out.”

But, it’s not just the dogs. Churchill is a community full of men, women, and children trying to live within the range of the bears. By acclimatizing the bears to human activity and teaching them that humans provide food, the risk of an attack by a bear on a human increases—and so does the chance that the bear, having no fear, will be shot.

It’s a delicate balance between living with the huge predators, benefiting from the presence of the bears as a tourist attraction (as thousands of people go there to see them), and protecting life, limb, and property of the people.

Charges have been laid against Ladoon, both for interfering with the bears and for his treatment of the dogs. Let’s hope the word gets out to those still smiling at the misleading video, not understanding how wrong it all is.
10615414_311553309030149_2346944286901096966_n

Urge Hillary Clinton to remove Salazar from her transition team

Voters for Environmental Protection and Wildlife Conservation
 see: Change.org

Salazar is a bad choice for wildlife and the environment
Hillary Clinton has picked former Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar to head her transition team preparing for her Presidency if she wins. The transition team is a small group of advisors responsible for setting the groundwork for important decisions, which includes selecting executive branch appointments. As the former head of the Interior Department, Salazar is sure to have a great deal of influence on the selection of the next Secretary of the Interior and other positions with wildlife and environmental responsibilities. Therefore, the people making these decisions would be very likely to have positions, opinions, and loyalties similar to those of Salazar himself.

This is very bad news for wildlife and the environment. Salazar’s actions and statements reveal a strong bias against wildlife and protection of natural resources and in favor of such groups as ranchers and oil executives. For example, during his tenure at Interior, and since then, he:

– delisted vulnerable wolves from the endangered species list early in his tenure

– later delisted wolves in Wyoming where wolves are treated as vermin

– refused endangered species protection to polar bears whose habitat is threatened

– consistently sided with the interests of ranchers vs wildlife on public land issues

– accelerated rates of cruel roundups of horses and sale to known slaughterers

– rejected reasonable humane solutions to wildlife problems in favor of cruel and lethal methods

– developed vast areas of public wildlife habitats for energy production, including gas and oil

– defended the safety of fracking for oil and gas and joined industry in opposing the anti-fracking initiatives in Colorado

– promoted the XL pipeline

TAKE ACTION NOW

FIRST: Sign the petition and circulate it to as many people as you can.

THEN:  strengthen the message:

1. Call Hillary’s campaign office at 646-854-1432, and urge her to remove Salazar from her transition team. Phone calls have major impact.

2. Go to Hillary’s Contact Us form https://www.hillaryclinton.com/forms/contact-us/ and copy our petition letter at the link below and paste it into the Message section, or just write a brief message urging Hillary to remove Salazar from her transition team, and send her a direct message.

THANK YOU!

Voters for Environmental Protection and Wildlife Conservation

Sad Polar Bear Kept In Tiny Enclosure In Chinese Mall For Selfies

Sad Polar Bear Kept In Tiny Enclosure In Chinese Mall For Selfies,
Animal Rights Group Campaigns To Shut It Down
http://www.inquisitr.com/3324681/sad-polar-bear-kept-in-tiny-enclosure-in-chinese-mall-for-selfies-animal-rights-group-campaigns-to-shut-it-down/
“Animals Asia, an animal rights group headquartered in Hong Kong, is
campaigning to shut down an exhibit in a Chinese mall where a polar
bear is kept in a tiny enclosure for locals and tourists to gawk at
and take selfies with.”

Animal rights group has big beef with NZ live cattle exports
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/beef/82299399/animal-rights-group-has-big-beef-with-nz-live-cattle-exports
“WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT: SAFE will fight any plans to export live
animals and believes that this trade will damage New Zealand’s
reputation as a responsible exporter.

Animal rights group filing appeal
http://www.thecalifornian.com/story/news/my-safety/2016/07/19/animal-rights-group-filing-appeal/87321186/
“An animal rights group alleging that the California Salinas Rodeo
underreports animal injuries plans to file an appeal in a lawsuit
against the rodeo that was dismissed earlier this year.
“Showing Animals Respect and Kindness, also known as SHARK, sued the
California Salinas Rodeo in 2014, and last months, Monterey County
Superior Court Judge Susan Matcham dismissed the suit in court.”

Beaufort Sea polar bears are spending more time ashore. And it may be a wise move.

http://www.adn.com/arctic/2016/06/12/beaufort-sea-polar-bears-are-spending-more-time-ashore-and-it-may-be-a-wise-move/

by    June 12

 

A polar bear walks along the beach in Kaktovik, Alaska, at sunset on Sept. 7, 2012.

As Arctic sea ice dwindles, polar bears are spending more time on land. Now a long-term study tracks the dramatic change in behavior over the recent warming in the Beaufort Sea off northern Alaska and northwestern Canada.

Polar bears in the beleaguered southern Beaufort Sea population are now three times as likely to come ashore in summer and fall as they were in the mid-1980s, according to the study, by scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and two universities. The bears that come ashore are also staying there much longer than bears did in the past, according to the study.

The big changes, the study found, have happened over the past decade and a half — corresponding to big reductions in summer and fall sea ice.

“That’s where we found a turning point in the data series. Prior to 2000, there really was no trend,” said Todd Atwood, a USGS wildlife biologist and the study’s lead author.

Since the late 1990s, the open-water season in the southern Beaufort Sea has expanded by 36 days on average, and polar bears have responded in kind, said the study, published online in the journal PLOS ONE. Since that time, the study said, the polar bears that swim to shore are spending 31 more days a year there.

Before then, the polar bears that went ashore in the late summer and fall tended to make brief exploratory forays, not the extended stays that are happening now, Atwood said.

The study uses data from movements of 228 adult female polar bears that, over the period from 1986 to 2014, were fitted with 389 radio collars. Only adult females can wear the tracking collars; males’ necks are too wide to allow collars to stay in place.

The study also uses data from aerial surveys conducted from 2010 to 2013. Those surveys tracked all polar bears — male and female, adult and subadult.

The newly open Beaufort Sea water, a trend continuing this year, is forcing polar bears in summer and fall to make a choice — swim north to the receding edge of the pack ice, or swim south to land, Atwood said.

The bears that come ashore still make up only a minority of the population, but they may be making the better choice, Atwood said. They seem to be making a beeline for piles of meat- and blubber-laden bones left after local Inupiat hunters butcher bowhead whales on the beaches, according to scientists’ data.

More: http://www.adn.com/arctic/2016/06/12/beaufort-sea-polar-bears-are-spending-more-time-ashore-and-it-may-be-a-wise-move/

Senate Committee Passes Anti-Wildlife Package with Poison Pills, Strips Wolves of Federal Protections

http://www.humanesociety.org/news/press_releases/2016/01/senate-committee-passes.html?credit=web_id93480558

The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works today added several poison pill provisions to the so-called Bipartisan Sportsmen’s Act, S. 659, which already threatened the interests of wildlife, conservation and public lands, but now is an even more extreme measure.

Among other harmful provisions, the bill now strips wolves of their federal protections in four states under the Endangered Species Act, subverting the judicial process and subjecting hundreds of wolves to hostile state practices such as baiting, hound hunting, and painful steel-jawed leghold traps. It also blocks federal wildlife officials from making decisions about cruel and inhumane predator control practices on Alaska’s national wildlife refuges.

In response to the EPW vote, Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States said: “This was already an awful bill, but now it’s an appalling one — undermining the federal courts and removing federal protections for endangered wolves, denying proper oversight of toxic lead in the environment, blocking carefully considered rulemaking to protect animals on national wildlife refuges, among other destructive provisions.  This bill is a grab bag of miscellaneous items that the trophy hunting lobby cannot secure in free standing bills, and Congress should give it a quick, clean kill shot.”

A few of the harmful provisions included in S. 659 are as follows:

Wolves

Just last month, Congress rejected a rider to the end-of-year spending bill that would have removed Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves in the Great Lakes states and Wyoming. Today, the committee adopted by voice vote an amendment by Senator Barrasso, R-WY, to accomplish the same. This proposal would both subvert judicial processes and undermine the ESA, one of our nation’s bedrock environmental laws. When wolves were delisted in 2012, 20 percent of the Wisconsin population was wiped out in three hunting seasons, including 17 entire family units. In a three year period, more than 1,500 wolves were killed in the Great Lakes states alone. It is clear that federal oversight is necessary to provide adequate protections for gray wolves as required by the ESA.copyrighted wolf in water

AK Predator Control

An amendment proposed by Senator Dan Sullivan, R-AK, and adopted on a straight party-line vote would prohibit the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from issuing a rule and going through a public process on cruel predator control methods like the trapping and baiting of wolves and bears in Alaska’s national wildlife refuges.

Lead

The bill contains troubling provisions that relate to the use of lead ammunition, at a time when non-toxic ammunition is available to all hunters, and is less harmful to wild animals, land, and human health. The committee rejected a common sense amendment by Senator Barbara Boxer, D-CA, that would have narrowed the exemption for sport fishing equipment from the Toxic Controlled Substances Act to focus on lead content. Senator Boxer’s amendment would have required periodic reports by the Environmental Protection Agency on the health impacts of lead in fishing equipment.

Polar Bears

A provision of the bill would roll back the Marine Mammal Protection Act and provide a sweetheart deal to help 41 wealthy polar bear trophy hunters import the heads of rare polar bears they shot in Canada. The animals were not shot for their meat, but just for trophies and bragging rights. It’s the latest in a series of these import allowances for polar bear hunters, and it encourages trophy hunters to kill rare species around the world and then wait for a congressional waiver to bring back their trophies. The committee today rejected an amendment by Sen. Boxer that offered a sensible middle ground on this issue, and would have allowed the import of 41 questionable polar bear trophies, while making absolutely clear that the one-time carve-out is not intended to set a precedent.

Petition: Stop the legal slaughter of Polar Bears by trophy hunters

1975210_217349905127731_192938778_n

https://www.change.org/petitions/the-canadian-government-stop-the-legal-slaughter-of-polar-bears-by-trophy-hunters

Animal First! (www.animalfirst.org)

Petition by

Animal First! (www.animalfirst.org)

Polar Bears are some of the most majestic and beautiful animals in the world. The global population estimate is between 20 000 and 22 000. This classifies the Polar Bear as ‘threatened.’ Polar Bears are threatened by pollution High levels of chemicals and PCBs. Another threat is global warming. Without ice Polar Bears are unable to reach their prey.

But the most immediate threat is hunting. Over 1000 polar bears are hunted annually! This prevents the Polar Bear population from increasing to a healthier number. Canada is the only nation in the world that allows Polar Bear hunting by non-natives and non-citizens. (Polar Bears also live in Alaska, Russia, Greenland, & Norway) Canada sells polar bear hunting licenses to trophy hunters. The main problem with this is that 60% of Polar Bears reside in Canada.

The Canadian government are paying hunters for Polar Bear hides! The government pre-pays hunters for the hides of bears shot in this subsistence hunt, and then sells the hides at auction for up to $11,000 (which also goes to the hunter), it blurs the line between a subsistence hunt and a commercial hunt.

Polar Bears are protected under national law and international treaty, so Canada’s Polar Bears can only be harvested by Inuit hunters for subsistence, OR by trophy hunters guided by Inuit.

The major threat for Polar Bears in Canada is the commercial hunt. Canada is the ONLY nation in the world that allows Polar Bear hunting by non-natives and non-citizens trophy hunters. Why? The answer is easy: MONEY! Pure greed for profit! Canada charges 750 Canadian dollars per Bear!

Allowing hunting by non-natives and non-citizens and selling hunting licenses to trophy hunters creates a bloody business where radical hunters sell hunting tours to Canada and kill Polar Bears. The hunt of one male Polar Bear is offered for 35.000 $ and as we know there are enough rich people who book these tours to get their trophy! There is also an increase in polar bear skin sales!

By booking one of these horrifying tours, the trophy hunters are allowed to go to 5 or 6 day hunting trips in which they chase polar bears with several dogs and after a long chase, when the Polar Bear is exhausted from running, he stops to finally try to make the dogs that are surrounding him go away, at which point the hunter gets closer and shoots several arrows (!!!) until he is finally dead. This means pure torture for the Polar Bear. Cruelty on animals can not be worse than this.

Tell the Canadian government to stop the legal slaughter of one of the highest endangered species in the world. We are horrified and shocked that you sell the life of one of the most majestic and beautiful animals in the world to hunting tour operators like:

http://polarbearhunting.net/ or http://52safari.com/

The irresponsible killing of this threatened species for pure trophy hunting as well as commercial trade in polar bear products must be stopped — now! Before it’s too late!

We need a lot of signatures to put pressure on the Canadian Government! So please share this petition to as many people as possible.

To:
Environment Canada
THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT
Ministry of Agriculture
Environment Canada Inquiry Centre
Environment Canada National Office
Species at Risk Public Registry
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Minister of the Environment, Peter Kent
Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada

Dear [Decision Maker],

Dear Stephen Harper,

I have learned that Canada is the only nation in the world that still allows Polar Bears to be killed by trophy hunters and for the commercial trade in their skins. Canada sells Polar Bear hunting licenses to non-natives and non-citizens trophy hunters. That creates a bloody business where radical hunters sell hunting tours to Canada and kill Polar…

Read More and sign the petition: https://www.change.org/petitions/the-canadian-government-stop-the-legal-slaughter-of-polar-bears-by-trophy-hunters