Published Thu, Aug 5 2021 3:52 PM EDTCory Stieg@CORYSTIEGShareWASHINGTON, DC – JULY 20: Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, arrives to testify before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee at the Dirksen Senate Office Building on July 20, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images)Pool | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Dr. Anthony Fauci has a sobering prediction: “Things are going to get worse.”
The White House chief medical advisor made those remarks amid rising Covid cases nationwide, due largely to the virus’s newly dominant and more transmissible delta variant, during an interview with ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday. Though it’s tough to imagine a situation more dire than the country’s current surge, “we’re looking to some pain and suffering in the future because we’re seeing the cases go up,” Fauci said.https://25d11482c429ca9bf185a95aef4b5016.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html?n=0
The Covid pandemic brought tourism to a near-halt in Alaska last year. What will happen to the majestic humpback whale when cruise ships and visitors return in August?
Christine Gabriele sat at her desk at the Glacier Bay National Park headquarters in Gustavus, Alaska, and turned up the volume on her computer.
The sound of gurgling and bubbling water enveloped the room. The lull was occasionally punctuated by the hollow roar of a male harbour seal, seeking to impress potential mates.
Gabriele’s computer is at the end of a five-mile underwater cable that stretches into the frigid waters of the bay, a national preserve teeming with fish, birds, sea otters, dolphins, lovelorn seals and the area’s feature attraction – several hundred humpback whales, who migrate to Alaska from the waters around Hawaii during summer months.
What has been notable for the past 18 months was what she hadn’t heard nearly as much of – ships.
The Covid-19 pandemic brought all of that to a sudden halt. In 2019, more than 1.3 million people visited Alaska on cruise ships. In 2020, there were 48 – not even enough to fill a New York City subway car.
Overall marine traffic in Glacier Bay declined roughly 40%.
It takes about a dozen minutes of listening to the soothing hydrophone audio on a Thursday morning in late May to hear traces of human activity – in this case, the high-pitched whine of a small boat’s propeller.
According to research by Gabriele and Cornell University Professor Michelle Fournet, the level of manmade sound in Glacier Bay last year dropped sharply from 2018 levels, particularly at the lower frequencies generated by the massive cruise ship engines. Peak sound levels were down nearly half.
All this afforded researchers an unprecedented opportunity to study whale behaviour in the kind of quiet environment that hasn’t existed in the area for more than century.
By analysing hydrophone data, and taking a small park service boat into Glacier Bay three times a week to photograph and identify whales, Gabriele has already noted changes.
She compared whale activity in pre-pandemic times to human behaviour in a crowded bar. They talk louder, they stay closer together, and they keep the conversation simple.
Now, the humpbacks seem to be spreading out across larger swathes of the bay. Whales can hear each other over about 2.3km (1.4 miles), compared with pre-pandemic distances closer to 200m (650ft). That has allowed mothers to leave their calves to play while they swim out to feed. Some have been observed taking naps. And whale songs – the ghostly whoops and pops by which the creatures communicate – have become more varied.
image captionPre-pandemic, whales stayed close together
Out in the middle of Glacier Bay on a park service boat, it was easy to see why the area is such a tourist attraction. The jade-green water is surrounded on three sides by sheer cliffs, glacier-fed waterfalls and snow-capped peaks. The humpback whales themselves are majestic. They spray mist with an audible rush as they surface to breathe, then display their enormous triangular tails – each as unique as a fingerprint – before returning to the depths.
If visitors are lucky, they can witness a breach – a whale leaping out of the water in a remarkable display of cetacean acrobatics, before crashing back into the water. Only then is the creature’s remarkable size truly appreciable.
All this can be viewed from smaller whale boats or the luxurious cruise ships, where passengers dine on lavish meals as their floating hotels ply the deep waters of the bay right up to the edge of massive glaciers.
Gabriele acknowledged that the Covid lull in tourism was only temporary. She said she hoped her research – and long-standing efforts to regulate the ship traffic in Glacier Bay – will allow a balance to be struck between the environment and the human desire to witness, and be inspired by, nature’s grandeur.
If the whales were enjoying the relative calm and quiet, they were not the only ones.
“It used to be that you could just step outside your door and you were in quiet in nature,” said Karla Hart. But the tourism industry has put an end to that idyll.
Hart lives in Juneau, the state capital and de facto capital of the Alaskan cruise ship industry, about 50 miles from Glacier Bay as the seaplane flies.
During a typical tourist season – when cruise ships pull into port and disembark tens of thousands of passengers – sightseeing helicopters crossing over her house make conversations in her own home difficult. The lockdowns, she said, gave people a taste of what Juneau could be like.
“The giant pause that we had because of the pandemic really gave an opportunity for people to rethink what we have and what we need and want,” she said.
With tourism activity suspended in 2020, Hart and a few friends thought it would be a good time to gather signatures for ballot measures that would limit the days, times and sizes of cruise ships that could stop in Juneau when the pandemic subsides. That would mean quieter times in Juneau and in the whale-inhabited waters that surround it.
They called their effort “Cruise Control”.
image captionThere are around 70 craft in Juneau, and at peak operations they can carry as many as 100 passengers each
Hart’s efforts provoked a quick and forceful response from Juneau’s business community, which depends heavily on the money that tourist-laden cruise ships bring to the town.
Posters with the slogan “Protect Juneau’s Future”, urging residents not to sign the petitions, popped up in stores. They were plastered on walls and tucked in pizza delivery boxes. Employees at local shops were told by their managers that the proposals threatened their jobs, said Hart, and warned not to support them.
The business owners saw it differently – particularly given the timing of the effort, when shops and restaurants were shutting because of a lack of tourist dollars.
“These are people that should be supporting us, trying to lift us out of the hardest 15 months of my entire life,” said Laura Martinson, who owns Caribou Crossings, a gift shop across from Juneau’s cruise ship terminal. “Everyone should have a fair shot of being successful in their community, not just the people that have already done it and are retired and a little bit inconvenienced by the rest of us.”
In the end, Hart’s petition drive failed – she wouldn’t disclose by how many signatures she came up short – leaving Martinson and the rest of the Juneau business community hopeful that the return of the cruise ships will be their financial lifeline.
If the benefits – and hidden costs – of the cruise ship industry have been a source of contention and concern in Juneau, there has been rare unanimity on the other side of America.
At the US Capitol, Democrats and Republicans brokered a deal in May to allow foreign-flagged cruise ships to travel directly from Seattle to Alaska without a previously required stop in Canada, whose ports have been closed because of Covid restrictions.
When President Joe Biden signed the Alaska Tourism Restoration Act at a closed White House ceremony, Press Secretary Jen Psaki heralded it as an example of the “critical bipartisan work” Congress can do.
“The legislation is a positive in our view because it helps reinvigorate an industry that accounts for a great number of jobs in Alaska – jobs that have been on hold for the past year plus,” she said.
The move was one of the few bipartisan accomplishments of the early months of the Biden administration
Speaking to the BBC in Anchorage, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan dismissed concerns from environmentalist groups about the cruise industry.
“They want this state to turn into a giant national park.” the Republican said. “We are always trying to balance environmental safeguards with the opportunity to grow our economy and employ our citizens – and it’s a balance we’re quite good at.”
With the legal hurdles out of the way, the major cruise ship lines have just started returning to Southeast Alaska for a shortened 2021 schedule. The first Royal Caribbean liner, the 2,580-passenger Serenade of the Sea, arrived in July. Holland America, Celebrity, Princess, Norwegian and Carnival are all scheduled for the weeks ahead – totalling tens of thousands of arriving tourists for the month of August.
Martinson, the Juneau gift shop owner, was planning how many balloons to put out for cruise visitors. For other businesses, the abbreviated tourist season may not be enough.
Holly Johnson owns a seaplane company that flies cruise visitors from downtown Juneau to a lodge near a massive glacier field. On a normal summer, she runs nine flights of 50 people each day. This year, she decided insurance costs and the risks of weather cancellations were too great to operate on an abbreviated schedule.
She says she’ll be back next year – but the shutdown will haunt her until then.
“Our economy was gone, our business that supports a year’s worth of employees and revenues was gone,” she said. “It was unimaginable.”
The whale watching boats will make a faster return. There are currently around 70 craft in Juneau, and at peak operations they can carry as many as 100 passengers each, with 10 to 15 boats gathering around a whale or whale group at any one time.
Although vessels are restricted from approaching to within 100 yards of the whales, the sheer number on the water means the humpbacks sometimes get closer. And additional, voluntary restrictions are just that – voluntary.
image captionPearson has been looking into the health of whales in Juneau
“It’s the classic tragedy of the commons,” says Heidi Pearson, a professor of marine biology at the University of Alaska Southeast, a few miles from Juneau. “I don’t want to deny anyone the chance to see a humpback whale, but I think it needs to be done carefully and sustainably.”
Pearson is conducting her own research into the health of whales around Juneau before, during and after the Covid-19 cruise pause. She is sampling and analysing the amount of the stress-induced chemical cortisol in their blood.
She plans to report her whale-stress findings in December, when they could serve as another data point to accompany Gabriele’s research into the Alaska marine sound environment. It has the potential of providing tangible evidence on the impact tourism has on whales – and, perhaps, a warning of the threat human activity may have on some of the largest mammals in the world.
“Tourism is important to Juneau’s economy, and we love to share this place with others,” she said. But, “it’s not good for anyone – the whales or the whale watching companies or the conservationists – if the whales feel too much pressure and they leave”.
By Frederik Pleitgen, Claudia Otto and Ramin Mostaghim, CNN Updated 1:32 PM EDT, Thu August 05, 2021
Tehran, Iran(CNN)Ebrahim Raisiwas inaugurated asIran’s next presidenton Thursday, signaling the start of a new harder-line era that could herald major shifts in the Islamic Republic’s policies at home and abroad.
After eight years of Hassan Rouhani’s moderate administration, Iran now turns to Raisi, an ultra-conservative judiciary chief whose views are fully in line with the thinking of the country’s powerful clergy andSupreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the final say on all major matters of state.
Raisi’s inauguration comes at a pivotal time, with Iran currently in indirect negotiations with the United States over how to revive the 2015 nuclear agreement. Raisi will also face the task of reviving his country’s economy, which has been battered in recent years by the previous US administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign…
The killing of red wolf 11768f was the beginning of the bad times for this country’s most critically endangered canid. It was mid-2015, and 11768F was a six-year-old matriarch with a mate and a large family. She’d already given birth several times before, and the evidence suggests she may have been caring for more newborns in the wet coastal forests that flourish near North Carolina’s Outer Banks. She and her family were supposed to be safe, thanks to the strong protections of the Endangered Species Act, which makes it a crime to harm or harass listed animals like red wolves. But then, in a foreshadowing of events to follow, the federal government issued her death warrant: It gave…
A heat wave in 2020 revealed a new source of methane emissions from the Arctic that could be “much more dangerous” than previously believed, according to a new German study.
The study, conducted by three geologists, found that a heat wave observed in 2020 unveiled a source of methane emissions “potentially in much higher amounts” from rock formations thawing in the Arctic permafrost.
According to The Washington Post, scientists have long been concerned about “the methane bomb,” a potentially disastrous amount of methane released from thawing wetlands in Siberia’s permafrost. The methane released from the wetlands is “microbial” and stems from the decay of soil and organic matter.
The methane emissions from the rock formations, however, come from thawing limestone that releases gases from below the permafrost that are “much more dangerous” than what was previously believed.
Permafrost typically traps methane, but as global temperatures rise, the permafrost melts and more of these trapped gases are released into the atmosphere.
Nikolaus Froitzheim, one of the scientists who conducted the study and a professor at the Institute of Geosciences at Germany’s University of Bonn, explained that he and two colleagues observed two “conspicuous elongated areas” of limestone in the Taymyr Peninsula around northern Siberia.
“We would have expected elevated methane in areas with wetlands,” Froitzheim said. “But these were not over wetlands but on limestone outcrops. There is very little soil in these. It was really a surprising signal from hard rock, not wetlands.”
Currently, the largest sources of methane that aren’t trapped in permafrost come from agriculture and leaks from hydraulic fracturing, according to the paper. But the revelation of a new source of methane is troubling —Froitzheim pointed out that it is unknown how much methane is to be expected from the limestone formations.
“The question is: how much will come, and we don’t really know,” Froitzheim said.
A heat wave in 2020 revealed a new source of methane emissions from the Arctic that could be “much more dangerous” than previously believed, according to a new German study.
The study, conducted by three geologists, found thata heat wave observed in 2020 unveiled a source of methane emissions“potentially in much higher amounts” from rock formations thawing in the Arctic permafrost.
According toThe Washington Post, scientistshave long been concerned about“the methane bomb,” a potentially disastrous amount of methane released from thawing wetlands in Siberia’s permafrost. The methane released from the wetlands is “microbial” and stems from the decay of soil and organic matter.
The methane emissions from the rock formations, however, come from thawing limestone that releases gases from below the permafrost that are “much more dangerous” than what was previously believed.
The new, highly-contagious Delta variant — spread with the ease of chickenpox — is causing COVID-19 cases to skyrocket across the globe as health officials respond with alarm. “The war has changed,” said a recent internal U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document.
Globally, numerous infectious diseases are being transmitted between wildlife, livestock and humans at escalating rates, including outbreaks of COVID-19, Ebola, dengue, HIV and others, as the threat of new emergent zoonotic diseases grows ever greater. The cost is huge in lives lost and ruined economies.
The driver: human activities, particularly intrusion into wild landscapes and eating and trading wild animals. Bringing people, domestic and wild animals into unnatural proximity exposes all to pathogens for which they lack immunity. International travel and a booming global wildlife trade quickly spread viruses.
Experts say that a “One Health” approach is urgently needed to prevent future pandemics — simultaneously addressing human, animal and ecosystem health, protecting humanity and nature, and incorporating disease risk into decision-making.
In early 2020, as a novel coronavirus swept the globe, a little-known word entered dinner table conversation. COVID-19 was “zoonotic”: a disease that originated in animals, then evolved, breached the Darwinian divide, and jumped to humans. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global pandemic.
Now, with another wave surging worldwide — and more than 600,000 new cases being diagnosed daily — a new fear-evoking word has entered the lexicon: “variant.”
“The war has changed,” according to an internal document from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The new highly contagious Delta variant has evolved to spread with the ease of chickenpox and causes more serious disease.https://www.youtube.com/embed/kQwd6seYg9Y
Now, infections near 200 million globally, with a staggering death toll: more than 4.2 million lives lost. Experts say the true numbers are far higher: A new study estimates deaths in India at 10 times the official figure. The pandemic has also sparked a global recession, thrusting more than 95 million people into extreme poverty. With this new Delta variant, and the very likely possibility of more variants to come, the crisis is far from over.
As the world reels, experts are raising a bright red warning flag: This is not just a once-in-a-century event. “Pandemics are [happening] more like once every 10 years right now,” said zoologist Peter Daszak, president of the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance in New York City. Meanwhile, there is little discussion on why the COVID-19 pandemic happened or the urgent action needed to prevent the next global disease outbreak, he said.
This graphic illustration, created at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), reveals ultrastructural morphology exhibited by coronaviruses. Note the spikes that adorn the outer surface of the virus, which continue evolving to bypass disease defenses of human hosts. Image courtesy of CDC.
Emerging zoonotic disease
Viruses need a host organism to replicate and then spread into new hosts, so survival requires that they constantly evolve to evade a species’ immune system. That evolution has allowed viruses to move back and forth between animals and humans for millennia.
Today, up to 75% of all new infectious human diseases are zoonotic, and most originate in the tropics.
There’s a vast pool of unknown viruses out there, Daszak said, possibly more than 1.6 million. Of those, 600,000 to 800,000 could potentially infect humans. “Most of the risky viruses we see out there come from mammals; a few come from birds,” he added.
Some are carried by intermediate hosts or by parasites, particularly mosquitoes and ticks. Many are fatal. They generally have no cure.
The lifecycle of Ixodes scapularis ticks that spread Lyme disease. Image courtesy of CDC.
Modern examples are numerous: The AIDS crisis, caused by the human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, originated in Central Africa, where it crossed to people from primates, possibly in the late 1800s, and was probably contracted when a person consumed infected chimp meat. One of the deadliest, Ebola hemorrhagic fever, first appeared in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo. It kills about half of its victims. It, too, is thought to be transmitted via the butchering and eating of infected chimps, and possibly fruit bats and infected forest antelope. In 1998, the Nipah virus jumped from flying foxes to pigs to humans on a Malaysian farm carved into the rainforest. In 2009, the H1N1 swine flu appeared in Mexico, a hybrid of bird and pig viruses.
Few people around the globe who contract West Nile virus via a mosquito bite ever connect it to birds living near the source of the Nile River in Uganda. Mosquitoes transmit multiple diseases, including yellow fever, Zika virus and dengue. Ticks transmit Lyme and other bacterial and viral diseases. The list goes on.
Spillover
The rate of spillover — diseases moving between species — has surged in tandem with rapidly escalating human impacts on the planet. COVID-19 is just one of about 500 new zoonotic diseases detected since the 1950s.
For decades, epidemiologists, conservationists, veterinarians and public health experts have issued dire warnings regarding spillover: Aggressive encroachment into intact ecosystems and altering the planet’s natural systems is creating dangerous health risks.
These incursions have brought people, their domestic animals and wildlife into unnatural proximity. In close contact, they swap germs, pathogens that can then mutate and jump into new, vulnerable hosts that lack immunity to them. Diseases can pass in any direction between wildlife, livestock and people — and back again.
Scientists are still debating the source of COVID-19, whether it came from wildlife sold for food at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China; was somehow transmitted through horseshoe bats, a reservoir species; or accidentally escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology biotech lab, which studies coronaviruses. Most scientists lean toward a wildlife spillover, but regardless of its origin, this pandemic was human-caused.
“It was preventable; it was not a surprise, and it was predicted,” said Steve Osofsky, director of the Cornell Wildlife Health Center in Ithaca, New York.
Two coronavirus outbreaks preceded COVID-19: The 2003 SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), which likely moved from bats to people by way of civets sold in Chinese wildlife markets, and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome), which appeared in Saudi Arabia in 2012, carried by dromedary camels. There are seven known coronaviruses that infect people.
Veterinarian Hasan Alkaf, takes samples from a camel during the first reported Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) case in Haramout, Yemen in April 2014. The investigation was led by Yemen FETP medical residents. Image courtesy of Awadh Mohammed Ba Saleh/CDC.
A human-created crisis
There are really only a few ways we invite pathogens into humanity’s living room, Osofsky said: by eating the body parts of wild animals; by capturing and mixing wild species together in markets; and by razing tropical forests and destroying what’s left of wild nature — which he said we’re doing “at a dizzying pace.” A recent study published in the journal Science noted that “the tree of life is being pruned by human activities at an unprecedented rate.”
Biodiversity has been called the immune system of the planet; its devastation puts us at great risk. Growing research shows that when we disrupt natural systems, zoonotic disease threats rise exponentially. While some species disappear, others proliferate unchecked, including rodents and many known to carry pathogens that infect humans.
It’s really a numbers game. “When we erode biodiversity, we favor species that are more likely to be zoonotic hosts,” said Rick Ostfeld, a disease ecologist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook, New York. “The next pandemic disease is far more likely to come from a rat than a rhino. We inadvertently make life golden for the rats of the world by replacing native habitat with strip malls, mega-dams and soybean fields,” he explained.
Osofsky added this caveat: “It’s important not to let fear of diseases create a backlash against wild creatures. We need wildlife and wild places.” Healthy ecosystems guard us against the next pandemic.
A pangolin stares out from the cage it was locked in by illegal traffickers as an Indonesian law enforcer looks on. The pangolin is the most heavily traded mammal in the illegal wildlife trade. It may have been part of the pathway by which COVID-19 achieved spillover. Image by Paul Hilton for WCS.A Malayan porcupine in a wildlife farm in Dong Nai province, Vietnam. The vast global legal and illegal trade in wildlife makes it very challenging to determine where the next pandemic may originate and flow from. Image courtesy of WCS Vietnam.
Zoonotic disease source: Altered landscapes
Numerous studies show that human-altered landscapes are red-flag zoonotic risk zones. Deforestation increases disease outbreaks. These most frequently occur in tropical countries where primary forest is opened up for plantations and ranches, often to produce commodities at industrial scale: beef, soy, and palm oil. Mining, logging and urban sprawl also clear huge tracts. While outbreaks can occur anywhere, human incursion affects all living things, disrupting deeply interwoven, interconnected natural systems that have evolved in synchrony over millions of years.
Incursion into pristine West African forest offers a vivid example of the pandemic domino effect. First, logging roads opened forests to bushmeat hunters. Then villages appeared, and with them came larger roads, with more forest felled for farms. That brought thousands of people into close contact with bats and other animals believed to harbor Ebola virus. There have been about 32 Ebola outbreaks since 1976.
“Those sectors never had to — and certainly never did — consider health consequences,” said Christian Walzer, a veterinarian and executive director for health at the Wildlife Conservation Society.
Dr. Alain Ondzie leading educational outreach on Ebola at a village in northern Republic of Congo. Education is vital to preventing spillover. Image courtesy of Sarah Olson/WCS.The National Public Health Laboratory in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo, tests carcass samples for the presence of Ebola virus. Image courtesy of Eeva Kuisma/WCS.
Livestock and other domestic animals living in close proximity to wildlife also serve as intermediary hosts for spillover into humans. For example, in Malaysia, farms carved into the forest brought fruit bats into villages, drawn there by planted mango trees. Once there, Nipah virus moved from bats to pigs to people.
While attention is frequently given to livestock health, those concerns are mostly geared towards “farm-to-fork” food safety issues — not spillover, said Waltzer. It’s important to note that disease can flow in either direction: Domestic animals can also infect wildlife.
Zoonotic disease pathway: Wildlife trade
The massive global wild animal trade has ignited numerous disease outbreaks. Each year, hundreds of millions of animals are shipped worldwide, legally and illegally, live, dead and in parts. It’s an extremely lucrative business driven by consumer demand for traditional medicines, bushmeat, trophies, exotic pets, food, clothing and home décor.
Trafficking and wildlife markets are “dangerous breeding grounds for the next pandemic,” said Chris Shepherd, executive director of Monitor, a nonprofit focusing on the wildlife trade.
In African, South American and Asian markets, wild species are jammed together, cheek by jowl, in filthy, cramped cages where feces, urine and blood mix, and where humans shop. Wildlife is often kept beside domestic animals. Many of these animals are weak, in poor health after traumatic capture and transport, and all are exposed to a plethora of new pathogens.
A live animal market was the likely source of the H5N1 bird flu outbreak in Asia, allowing the spread of avian flu from wild birds to chickens and turkeys to people.
Despite the current pandemic and its likely zoonotic origin, commercial trade in wild animals hasn’t significantly slowed, Shepherd said, or even been addressed.
COVID-19, SARS and other outbreaks originated in China, the world’s largest consumer of both legally imported and illegally trafficked wildlife.
For decades, China has also farmed wild animals for consumption. In 2020, the government shut down wildlife markets and facilities that raised wild species for food, but allowed loopholes for animals grown for “ornamental use,” including fur, or ingredients in traditional Chinese medicine — loopholes that still allow disease transmission.
The global legal trade in wildlife dwarfs the illegal trade, valued at about $19 billion per year by the U.N. But pathogens don’t care if they’re carried by a specimen that has been legally or illegally traded, Shepherd said. In November, Denmark culled 17 million minks after animals on fur farms contracted COVID-19 from people. Minks in Wisconsin also became infected.
Zoonotic disease pathway: Bushmeat
Bushmeat is another key route of infection, said Walzer. Spillover into humans often happens through hunting, butchering, consumption and transport of wild meat, which offer ideal conduits for the spread of pathogens, he said.
Most bushmeat today comes from West and Central Africa. The U.N. estimates that at least 5 million tons of bushmeat are hunted in the Congo Basin alone each year, including apes, monkeys, rats, bats and other potential disease carriers. But bushmeat also flows out of forests across Africa, Asia and Latin America. The logging and oil industries have greatly facilitated the commercial bushmeat trade, building roads that provide hunters entry into previously inaccessible areas. Local people also use these roads, hunting to earn needed cash.
Markets in small villages and large cities sell wild meat to very different clientele. Millions of Indigenous peoples and rural communities rely on bushmeat to survive, but most of the demand comes from urban dwellers. In cities, wild meat is a luxury, high-priced item, often bought as a way to connect with ancestral traditions or to flaunt wealth. Consumers span the globe, with thousands of tons smuggled into Europeeach year. All of that meat represents potential disease vectors.
Carcass sampling of a deceased great ape. Image courtesy of WCS/Congo.
We have met the enemy, and it is us
In the U.S., the COVID-19 pandemic sparked anti-Asian racism and attacks against Chinese-Americans. But “We need to stop trying to blame a country, a behavior, or a specific group of people,” said Daszak. “We have to recognize that we all have a role in this, and until we do, we’re going to continue to suffer in the ‘Age of Pandemics.’”
Every country on Earth trades in wild animals and wildlife products — legally and illegally — and buys imported soy, palm oil, beef, wood or other forest-destroying products. Few people realize, for example, that the U.S. is the second-largest consumer of illegal wildlife.
Our pigs, chickens, cattle, dogs and other domestic animals can all carry diseases. Fur-trimmed ski jackets bought by Europeans and Americans often come from raccoon dog farms in China — potential vectors for the next zoonotic disease.
Meanwhile, as climate change warms the planet, dengue fever, Zika, yellow fever and other vector-borne diseases are spreading into new territory. They’re spread by mosquitoes, ticks, fleas, freshwater snails and other vectors. The Asian tiger mosquito is particularly efficient, spreading debilitating diseases to humans and domestic animals including horses and dogs.
An Aedes albopictus, or Asian tiger mosquito, obtains her blood meal through the skin of her host. It’s known to transmit the dengue and chikungunya viruses. Image courtesy of Pablo Cabrera/CDC.
The WHO calls the global surge in dengue cases “alarming.” In 1970, the virus was present in just nine countries, but is now endemic in some 100 nations. From 2000 to 2019, cases skyrocketed from 505,000 to 5.2 million. Simply put, a warmer world harbors more mosquitos and other insects that are looking for someone to bite, carrying viruses looking for new hosts.
Once an outbreak begins, it’s very difficult to contain. The current pandemic has shown how quickly we can spread a new virus. In our globalized world, international travel and trade can infect far-flung corners of the planet before carriers even show symptoms. Since it emerged in December 2019, COVID-19 has been reported in 222 countries and territories.
‘One Health’ becomes a movement
Almost two decades ago, the alarming spread of HIV, West Nile, bird flu, SARS and other diseases birthed the “One Health” movement. It was based on the premise that human health, animal health and ecosystem health are inextricably linked. Veterinarians, including Osofsky, were key architects: unlike physicians, they were accustomed to thinking about the interface between animal and human health.
In 2004, health experts from the U.N., WHO, and governments worldwide gathered in New York City with physicians and vets for a “One World One Health” symposium organized by the Wildlife Conservation Society.
During that meeting, Osofsky and colleagues presented what became The Manhattan Principles, 12 recommendations focused on enhancing our respect for the natural world while preventing zoonotic disease and other consequences of poor environmental stewardship. They noted that infectious diseases threaten people, food supplies, economies and “the critically needed biodiversity that supports the living infrastructure of our world.”
The summit amplified a clarion call for new research into how human activities are rapidly transforming Earth’s natural systems, and for interventions that could create a healthier planet.
The goal, Osofsky said, is to better inform public policy regarding land and ocean use, public health, and the environment that supports us all.
The Manhattan Principles, updated in 2019, helped mainstream the One Health concept: the WHO, U.S. CDC, and many other institutions now say they incorporate a “One Health” approach.
The cost: Both human and wild
In a “normal” year, without a global pandemic, there are more than 1 billion zoonotic disease cases, killing roughly a million people. The 1998 Nipah outbreak cost $500 million; the 2003 SARS outbreak cost some $40 billion. Lost global economic output caused by COVID-19 is an order of magnitude larger: A U.S. Congressional report projects the cost at $28 trillion.
Prevention will not only save lives; it will save money. With a comparatively small investment — about $140 million per year over 10 years — researchers could identify 85% of the world’s viruses, according to a joint U.N.-WHO report. Placing genetic sequences for those viruses in the hands of vaccine makers could help protect against future pandemics.
The tremendous value of such an approach is underlined by the current crisis. Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology and coronavirus vaccines were in development before COVID-19 hit. “We are lucky right now,” Daszak said of this coincidental head start. “But as we waited for a vaccine … millions of people died. Luck is not a strategy, and luck is not a way out of the pandemic era.”
The emphasis remains on surveillance, preparedness, stronger health care systems and better vaccines, all of which are crucial. But ignoring prevention — failing to address high-risk development and human behaviors that enable disease transmission — comes at a very high price, said Ostfeld, with great loss of life and livelihoods and wrecked economies. “We are not incorporating the enormous cost to human health in our cost-benefit analyses of development projects. It is completely ignored.” What’s needed, he said, is to incorporate disease risk into government and health policies up front.
Osofsky calls this a critical juncture in the history of human civilization. “Whether you’re talking about climate change, loss of biodiversity or emerging disease,” he said, “all are symptoms of humanity’s lack of regard for nature.”
Preventing the next pandemic will require global cooperation, Osofsky concludes. It requires bringing together experts from across the societal spectrum — finance ministers, trade organizations, medical doctors, veterinarians, epidemiologists, zoologists, public health, agriculture and environment professionals, as well as business leaders, Indigenous peoples, and others — to identify and mitigate high-risk activities in high-risk areas.
“It’s time to redefine our relationships with wild nature and our fellow species,” Osofsky said.
Citations:
Carroll, D., Watson, B., Togami, E., Daszak, P., Mazet, J. A., Chrisman, C. J., … Tomori, O. (2018). Building a global atlas of zoonotic viruses. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(4), 292-294. doi:10.2471/blt.17.205005
Epstein, J. H., Field, H. E., Luby, S., Pulliam, J. R., & Daszak, P. (2006). Nipah virus: Impact, origins, and causes of emergence. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 8(1), 59-65. doi:10.1007/s11908-006-0036-2
Gibbs, A. J., Armstrong, J. S., & Downie, J. C. (2009). From where did the 2009 ‘swine-origin’ influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge? Virology Journal, 6(1). doi:10.1186/1743-422x-6-207
Verma, R., Khanna, P., & Chawla, S. (2013). Yellow fever vaccine: An effective vaccine for travelers. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 10(1), 126-128. doi:10.4161/hv.26549
Jánová, E. (2019). Emerging and threatening vector-borne zoonoses in the world and in Europe: A brief update. Pathogens and Global Health, 113(2), 49-57. doi:10.1080/20477724.2019.1598127
Maxmen, A., & Mallapaty, S. (2021). The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: What scientists do and don’t know. Nature, 594(7863), 313-315. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01529-3
Mizumoto, K., Kagaya, K., & Chowell, G. (2020). Effect of a wet market on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission dynamics in China, 2019–2020. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 97, 96-101. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.091
Lau, S. K., Woo, P. C., Li, K. S., Huang, Y., Tsoi, H., Wong, B. H., … Yuen, K. (2005). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-like virus in Chinese horseshoe bats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(39), 14040-14045. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506735102
Guynup, S., Shepherd, C. R., & Shepherd, L. (2020). The true costs of wildlife trafficking. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 21(1), 28-37. doi:10.1353/gia.2020.0023
Killerby, M. E., Biggs, H. M., Midgley, C. M., Gerber, S. I., & Watson, J. T. (2020). Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus transmission. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26(2), 191-198. doi:10.3201/eid2602.190697
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., De Souza Dias, B. F., … Yach, D. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386(10007), 1973-2028. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60901-1
Scheffers, B. R., Oliveira, B. F., Lamb, I., & Edwards, D. P. (2019). Global wildlife trade across the tree of life. Science, 366(6461), 71-76. doi:10.1126/science.aav5327
Keesing, F., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2021). Impacts of biodiversity and biodiversity loss on zoonotic diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17), e2023540118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023540118
Gibb, R., Redding, D. W., Chin, K. Q., Donnelly, C. A., Blackburn, T. M., Newbold, T., & Jones, K. E. (2020). Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems. Nature, 584(7821), 398-402. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2562-8
Morand, S., & Lajaunie, C. (2021). Outbreaks of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases are associated with changes in forest cover and oil palm expansion at global scale. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.661063
Liu, Q., Cao, L., & Zhu, X. (2014). Major emerging and re-emerging zoonoses in China: A matter of global health and socioeconomic development for 1.3 billion. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 25, 65-72. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2014.04.003
Desbordes, R. (2021). Spatial dynamics of major infectious diseases outbreaks: A global empirical assessment. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 93, 102493. doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102493
Myers, S. S., Gaffikin, L., Golden, C. D., Ostfeld, R. S., Redford, K. H., Ricketts, T. H., … Osofsky, S. A. (2013). Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(47), 18753-18760. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218656110
Gruetzmacher, K., Karesh, W. B., Amuasi, J. H., Arshad, A., Farlow, A., Gabrysch, S., … Walzer, C. (2021). The Berlin principles on one health – Bridging global health and conservation. Science of The Total Environment, 764, 142919. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142919
Wadman, M. (2021). The overlooked superpower of mRNA vaccines. Science, 373(6554), 479-479. doi:10.1126/science.373.6554.479
Osofsky, S. A., & Pongsiri, M. J. (2018). Operationalising planetary health as a game-changing paradigm: Health impact assessments are key. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2(2), e54-e55. doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30183-3
Banner image: The carcass sampling method uses knowledge and experience gained from previous disease outbreaks. Samplers work in pairs and wear personal protective equipment. Image courtesy of Sebastien Assoignons/WCS.
FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.
The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife on Tuesday, Aug. 3, authorized the lethal removal of one wolf from the OR30 wolves in the Mount Emily Unit, according to a press release.Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife/Contributed Photo, File
MEACHAM — The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife on Tuesday, Aug. 3, authorized the lethal removal of one wolf from the OR30 wolves in the Mount Emily Unit, according to a press release.
The decision comes after ODFW confirmed three depredations in a two-month period in the wolves’ known area of activity, the release said. The state authorized lethal action and will provide a kill permit to a livestock producer who requested the option after the depredations were confirmed.
The permit allows the producer or their agent to kill one wolf on 4,000 acres…